Trump's assassination attempt - A few pertinent questions

 Many people would be wondering what happened, how did it happened, what really happened, who was behind this assassination? Was it a lone wolf incident or something more complicated. I have seen some of the videos presented over YouTube and have a few puzzling questions to ask.

1. The assassin was reported to have been seen crawling on a roof and the police and security officers were alerted several minutes before the shooting. Apparently no action was taken, the security officers around Trump were not alerted and no action was taken to stop him or remove him from the podium. Why?

2. The assassin now identified as Thomas Crooks, a 20 year old man. He was killed by snipers stationed at the rally to protect Trump. Could a 20 year old be as good as a sniper in firing an AR15, or similar rifle to hit Trump from more than a 100m away?

3. If he had fired 8 or 9 shots at Trump, with a thick crowd behind him, how come so few people were hit when he was that accurate? Only 1 dead and 2 wounded? The toll for 8 or 9 shots should be much higher.

4. How long would it take to fire 8 or 9 shots before being shot by the govt sniper? Looked like he was firing away happily for a while.

5. What about the wound on Trump's ear? I watched the video in slow motion. The first time Trump moved his hand to touch his ear after the shooting, and brought down his hand, his hand was clean, no blood on it. Subsequent footage shown a lot of blood on his ear after he was on the ground with the security officers for a few minutes and stood up again. If there was so much blood, why his hand was clean when he touched/covered his ear the first time?

6. Trump's ear was a fresh wound with a lot of blood. It was strange that when he stood up, and while being whisked away by the security officers, no blood was flowing except what was already painted on his ear. Should not there be blood continuing to stream down from his wounded ear?

7. Trump did not seem to be in pain. Neither did he bothered to cover his ear or anyone trying to stop more blood oozing out from his ear. Also, the blood on his face seemed to have dried up and stayed in position within such a short time, like Trump trying to show to the world the red paint, oops, blood drawn on his face...both streaks leading to his upper and lower lips.

8. Trump's ear seemed to be quite intact. Neither was the side of his head been grazed by the bullet. And, hitting any part of Trump's body would be quite serious. Hitting a teeny weeny bit of his ear was the safest place not to hurt Trump. ..and easy to paint on it.

Above are just some of the things I found quite puzzling.

What do you think?

PS. Just to add a few more points. 

1, The blood painted on the whole rim of Trump's ear with equal consistency was as fake as it could get. 

2. The Secret Service officers were not playing by the book to protect Trump by covering him and keep him out of sight. They allowed Trump to show his full face for most of the time, to showcase his face bloodied face. This is extremely dangerous in a real situation. They somehow strategically moved their heads away to give the cameras a perfect view of Trump's face. All the pics were as perfectly taken as possible to give the full impact on the screen. Great photography from Hollywood photographers.

With more video clips showing the layout of the area, my point 2 in PS was not correct and I have removed it. The shooter was on a roof on the side of the stage where Trump was. So he was shooting from Trump's right to left.

Breaking News - Assassination attempt on Donald Trump

  

Former US president Donald Trump is helped off the stage at a campaign event in Pennsylvania, Jul 13, 2024. (Photo: AP/Gene J Puskar) 

The bullet missed killing Trump, but still sliced through his right ear. Blood was oozing. And Trump survived. Now Trump is tasting the American medicine of assassination. The American terrorists had assassinated many foreign political leaders and is a clear and eminent threat to all foreign leaders in the world. This is how primitive and wild the American terrorists are, but never been condemned or labelled as terrorists by the UN or any world bodies. It is like a God damn given right for the Americans. No one shall call them terrorists or bring them to court.

It is a good thing that they are turning their guns at their own leaders now. The Americans are such lovely and peaceful people, the policemen of the world, NOT THE TERRORISTS OF THE WORLD. How many silly people and leaders still blaring this phrase?

An interesting question now would be, who is behind this? Definitely not Biden. He doesn't know what is happening. Who does not want Trump to be the next POTUS and has the power to make it happened? The shooter is dead! No one is going to know unless there is a whistle blower.

The presidential campaign in the world's number one terrorist state is getting exciting and a beautiful sight.

Tax payers money for foreigners?

Even alien economic scavengers benefit much more than our own singaporeans?
Labour policy practices,HDB policies,Covid budget allocations,etc,have benefitted “alien$” much more than many groups of sgs including singles and elderly nation builders.

This is Sgporean G,not UN!
The primary obligations are to the CITIZENS FIRST,NOT EVEN TO PRs especially long-time PRs who REJECT THE G’s multiple offers to convert to Sg Citizens.  Posted by rice in TRE.

Above is from a comment by a 'rice' posted in TRE.

The gripe of 'rice' is that Singaporean taxpayers' money are given to the PRs and non citizens, often more than to Singaporeans. I have not been monitoring these closely, but have a general idea that PRs and even foreigners were benefiting from govt handouts in some ways, especially during the Covid pandemic. This is very perplexing. Why should out govt thinks it is right and it is its duty to take our tax payers money and gave it to PRs and foreigners?

Why should foreigners and PRs that are non citizens, basically fair weather residents, be receiving our taxpayers money? There are many responsibilities and obligations that a citizen differs from a non citizen and a PR. The most painful sacrifice is National Service, and not forgetting being owners of this island. I agree with 'rice' that Singaporeans must be treated differently from foreigners and PRs especially when privileges of citizenship is concerned. It is ludicrous to think otherwise and to lump Singaporeans together with PRs as locals or residents, not just for convenience, political expediency and worse, to benefit monetarily.

How many of you think that it is right for the govt to give our taxpayers' money to foreigners and PRs freely?

Anglo-Saxons British evil imperialists used force, deception, subterfuge

 The Anglo-Saxons British evil imperialists historically always get what they want either by deception or by subterfuge underhand methods or through the might of their guns. In the case of China / India border it is both by deception, subterfuge and by force.

This evil British practice has long been inherited by its offspring the satanic Anglo-Saxon white United States.

This vile and diabolical ways of seizing what they want is the general practice of all warmongering European imperialist countries like France, Spain, Holland, Belgium, Germany, Portugal, Denmark, Sweden and Italy.

But now they are slowly forced to stop this evil practice because of the rise of China and the countries of the global south which are determined to put a stop to their evil colonisations and imperialism.

Omar Kamari Pakistan SG

India has serious domestic problems with all its minorities and external problems with all its neighbours

 Hindu dominated India does not get along well with Muslim countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh. Muslims and Sikhs in India itself are never on cordial terms with the Hindus.

And Narendra Modi is in Moscow talking about his love for Ukrainian children and his pain in seeing them killed by Russian missiles. What about the Muslim children killed by Israel in Gaza? Does this not pain his heart like the Ukrainian children? What a hypocrite!

India does not even get along well with Buddhist dominated state Myanmar and its relationship with Buddhist dominated Sri Lanka had also been strained for years. The civil war between the Tamil Tigers of India seeking to set up an independent state in Sri Lanka is a well-known instigative move by India.

India can never get on well with others and is only looking to have the cake and eat it. Where it cannot get any advantage, it will not join, just like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). India was originally part of the RCEP but opted out and is not a member. Both groupings were formed under the leadership of China, which India is not too happy about for sure. India is only happy with the CECA where they can have all the advantage at its disposal.

India had been played around by even the old man with dementia. There was the talk of building an impossible railroad across the Pacific to link to India. There were the big boasts about building the India/Middle East/Europe Corridor which inflated India's ego but is now being deflated like a balloon. The war in the Middle East killed it all. Even if that had not happened, Saudi Arabia would not have wanted such a project when it already has the BRI.

The reality of the BRI is right before the eyes of the Saudis, which they can touch, while the castle built in the air - The India/Middle East/Europe Corridor is just a figment of the imagination of a dementia patient. Believe in it at India's own peril after losing out on the BRI. It is a regret that India will find it hard to come to terms. Listen to the dementia patient and suffer the consequences, like the EU.

Anonymous