Random Thoughts, Facts And Truths :- ( 1 )

 Western Colonialism                                                                                                 _________________

Some people superficially think Western colonialism is dead or there is no more Western colonialism. How can we say Western colonialism is dead when white men still have full control of the whole continent of North America, Australia, New Zealand and large parts of South America like Argentina, Colombia, Paraguay, Uruguay and Chile. White invaders must be completely chased out of  the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Uruguay and Paraguay. They must all go back to Europe where they originated from.  Moreover the Anglo-Saxons neo-liberals are crafty enough in using neo-liberal tactics to continue to hold sway and indirect control of their ex-colonies via control of trade and commerce, financial control via World Bank, IMF and Swift, use of the Patro Dollar and insidious military bases to ensure victimised countries follow white dictates especially those of America, England and France.

The Anglo-Saxons United States wants to be a  World Hegemony.                          _____________________________________________________

So the charlatans, the hoodlums, the rogues and scoundrels, the thieves and robbers of USA rulers want to rule the world. First have they examined themselves and look in the mirror to see if they are qualified. If we take a look at every USA political leader both present and past from the president downward to senators, congressmen and members of the House of Representatives what do we see? We see green faces with protruding eyes and jutting teeth not different from frankensteins or dracula. We see robbers,buccaneers,pirates ruffians, gangsters, hoodlums, thugs and street fighters. We see see fierce looking faces with unsaturated hungry looks staring down at you with scorn and hatred. In short we see wild savage like animals not different from the hyenas and wolves, the tigers and lions, the leopards and jaguars, the crocodiles , the poisonous serpents like the cobras, black mamba and rattle snakes. How can such wild and savage people with no conscience and human compassion at all rule the world?  The Anglo-Saxons Americans can't even put their own house in order with unsolvable homeless problems, racial riots, killings and murders every day, rickety infrastructures and severe economic breakdowns and never ending political in-fighting. The people of the world and even God will never allow them to rule the world. If they try to they will only be seeking self destruction.

Palestine and the Jews .                                                                                               ___________________                                                                                            

There is no question for undoubtedly Palestine belong to the Palestinian Arabs.  The Jews have no right to be in Palestine.The Jews were planted in Palestine by the Anglo-Saxons UK and US to serve the whites geopolitical agenda. The Palestinian Arabs and nation have been living peacefully in Palestine for over 2,000 years. Since the 18th and 19th century England has been making plans with the Jews to colonize Palestine and the whole of the Arab Middle East. Their plan was to genocide all the Arabs so as to colonize all the Middle East with white people and Jews just as they had genocided the native Americans to almost extinction before taking over the whole continent of North America. The Jews biblical claim that they are just returning to their native land in Palestine is nothing but plain hogwash. So the rogues, scoundrels and villains in the Palestine and Israel conflict are the Anglo-Saxons Americans and the British. All the seas around Palestine and the whole of the Arab Middle East are awashed with vast rich oil resources. Thus the Anglo-Saxons US and UK have every intention to supplant the Arabs so as to take over the whole region for white and Jewish colonization.

  Thus to achieve everlasting peace in Palestine and the Middle East it is imperative to get rid of the Jews in Palestine and the Anglo-Saxons US and UK from all Arab terroitories in the Middle East.

Southernglory1

Friday, 17th May,2024

Singaporean was mentioned 14 times in Lawrence Wong's first speech

 In his first official speech as the Prime Minister of Singapore, Lawrence Wong mentioned the word 'Singaporean' 14 times. This is very unusual and a departure from the official norm that avoids mentioning the word Singaporean in favour of things like locals and residents. And the words 'locals and residents' were totally left out in Lawrence's speech. Is this deliberate, is he saying something without saying it, that he would really be looking after the interests of Singaporeans? Another word that he missed out completely is foreign talent.

Would this speech by Lawrence Wong set a new direction in Singapore's policies that would be more Singaporean and citizen focused? Would Parliament and reports from ministries start to use Singaporeans in their data and statistics instead of locals and residents? Great effort has been made in the drafting of this speech and the words are carefully chosen to reflect his thinking. Could this be the first indicator of a departure from the foreign talent narrative and to differentiate Singaporeans from the foreigners ie PRs, locals and residents?

The last couple of decades of unquestionable policies in favour of foreigners may come into question, or maybe I am hallucinating. Would the interests of Singaporeans now be the top priority of Lawrence Wong? In his speech he kept repeating about looking after Singaporeans, about Singaporean identity, 'to uplift all Singaporeans, not just a few', 'And a Singapore that matters to every Singaporean.' 

I am tempted to add the words, ha ha ha. Hope this is not necessary.

Singaporeans reading his speech may feel comforted, at least for the moment. What is important is the things that he will be doing to protect and uplift the interests of Singaporeans. Only time will tell. Just keep the fingers crossed that this is not just rhetoric as the Prime Minister of Singapore and Singaporeans...that he is not the Prime Minister of locals and residents. No one will be left behind! Or you die your business?

And these were the concluding paragraphs of his speech.

 

"My mission is clear: To continue defying the odds and to sustain this miracle called Singapore.

So that we can reach even greater heights. So that we can be a beacon of hope and unity for ourselves and our children.

My fellow Singaporeans, I ask you to join me and my team in our journey forward. Everyone will have a stake in our nation's progress.

Everyone will play a key role in shaping our future. Let us unite with common purpose and shared resolve.

Let us take Singapore Forward - Together."

Which is better, Chinese Socialism or American Democracy?

 Who can argue that China's Socialism is bad, when it has managed to lift more than 800 million or more Chinese people out of poverty? Which other democratic country's leader has been able to do that and on that scale? And if Xi is bad for China as a 'Dictator', compare him to any other democratic leader in the world, including the USA, who have outdone him in improving their country under their leadership?

India is the biggest democracy in the world, and India is still mired in poverty and underdevelopment. The USA's poverty situation is going from bad to worse, homelessness is getting out of hand (moving tents out of public sight is no solution), drug infestation is escalating (and they are trying to blame China as well), polarization is an internal cancer spreading like wildfire, and the whole establishment on both sides of the political divide are a big joke.

And yet the USA is trying to spread its democracy to the rest of the world. In Africa, leaders are telling the USA and the West that they can keep their democratic ideals to themselves and not try to coerce them to follow a farcical system that is failing. African leaders know that the USA and the West are still trying hard to flog the dying democratic horse, to make it great again. They are still denying the inevitable.

Anonymous

Once the USA has a foothold in a country, it will be impossible to get rid of

 The irony is that once the USA has a foothold in a country, its presence will be impossible to get rid of.

Just look at the Philippines, Japan and South Korea. Duterte tried to put pressure on the USA by threatening the removal of USA miliary bases in the country and knew that that warning has put his survival in jeopardy in the hands of the CIA. He had to stand down. The USA will keep hyping up the Chinese threat towards the Philippines, Japan and South Korea to justify prolonging their stay. Another ploy that they always use from their playbook is creating unrest using the CIA and USA funded NGOs to keep a country they eyed in turmoil, giving them added reasons to stay behind to help put down the opposition.

What happened in Hong Kong failed because Hong Kong was totally under the Chinese control, with no love lost between the USA/the West and China, and no USA military bases in Hong Kong to hinder the Hong Kong Government's crackdown. The instigators of the unrest in Hong Kong had been closely watched, identified and completely taken care of in one fell swoop. The USA and UK were left nursing their wounds over that failure. Their investments in those terrorist elements have gone to waste, like their investment in Navalny in Russia.

In another scenario that is probably what is happening in Myanmar today, the USA, using the CIA, will give support to the rebels to take down the Myanmar Government, in the hope of fermenting a regime change. Using propaganda to demonize the Myanmar Government adds another layer of subterfuge that the USA and the West are trying to sway international opinion against the Military rulers in Myanmar. And attempting to control and using ASEAN to support them.

One development we should keep an eye on is the USA/India relations which is under strain. The USA is keeping up its pressure on India to toe the line, trying to force India to have less trade dealings with Russia, especially in energy and criticizing Modi's persecution of Muslims and Sikhs in the country. India is beginning to understand the agenda of the USA. Boasting about India's ambition to be the next superpower is not a good thing. Keeping quiet and working towards that goal may be more productive. Nevertheless, nothing is certain on the surface, as India is playing Russia against USA, China against USA and the USA is still playing India against China and Russia. 

Anonymous

USA's Military Industrial Complex is now outdated

 The USA's Military Industrial Complex is now outdated in its thinking and outperformed by China, but still producing extravagantly expensive and outdated stuff like aircraft carriers, submarines and fighter jets.

Despite outspending China in defense, the USA is not moving fast enough in military innovation and strategy. Cheap drones used by the Houthis are now taking out expensive USA made missiles costing tens of millions, or thousands of times more to build as seen in the Persian Gulf.

The real determinant of results in future wars is centered on drones, unmanned aerial vehicles, hypersonic missiles, unmanned underwater drones that will pose the most threat to aircraft carriers, support ships and submarines. Those new weapons are what China has been developing over the last decade, cheaper and better, things which the USA is now starting to realize and is what they are critically short of and trying desperately to produce them in numbers.

Just far behind is the USA in drone technology can be seen in Ukraine and Israel. Both countries have discarded their USA made reaper drones for atrociously much cheaper Chinese drones made for civilian use, that can be bought off the shelves at Walmart, just by reconditioning them for military use. These drones were said to be more reliable and accurate. Just imagine how much more lethal are the military drones used by the Chinese military and you can gauge the gap that China is leaving the USA in drone technology.

The USA may be trying to move in that direction but has already lost the window of opportunity to overwhelm China in military terms. That is why there is little perceived advantage that the USA still holds over China in military terms. China is becoming a peer competitor in the military arena as well, something that was thought impossible.

Anonymous