The 'debt traps' used by the USA and the West via the
IMF and World Bank had marginalized Argentina and to a lesser extent
Indonesia among others, like Pakistan and Bangladesh. This predicament
is not lost on the rest of the world.
AIIB was set up to provide
an alternative for Asian countries to finance their infrastructure
development, hence the name 'Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank'. This
puts it in direct competition with the IMF and World Bank.
There
have been claims by certain countries that the IMF prohibit its loans
to be used for infrastructure development. I do not know if this is
true. The IMF and World Bank just wants to extend loans to poor
countries to induce a 'debt trap' that these countries find it hard to
get out of. Forced devaluation of the victim country's currency was the
modus operandi of the West to control the ever-unpayable debts.
That
the West still had a strong hold on countries in Africa, Latin America
and Middle East is not divorced from the fact that most of these poor
countries have taken loans from the IMF or World Bank and have to follow
the stringent conditions dictated by the West via the IMF and World
Bank.
In that context, the BRI also extended loans to poor
countries to build infrastructures for progress and uplift their living
conditions, which is in competition with and contrary to what the IMF
loans are generally for, which is buying weapons to fight wars created
by the USA. That is why the BRI is being demonized by the USA and the
West as 'debt traps' for poor countries. Fancy that!
Anonymous