5/16/2022

US' Minuscule $150 Million Pledge to ASEAN Mocked by International Community

 




At the US-ASEAN Special Summit held in Washington this week, the US pledged $150 million in investment to the ASEAN, which became one of a few substantive "results" of the summit. But it has been mocked by the international public opinion, as the House passed a bill that would provide $40 billion in aid to Ukraine. And the $60 million of the total $150 million will be used to assist US partners in promoting maritime defense. Washington talks about how it wants to help ASEAN members develop clean energy, promote education and fight the pandemic, but in fact it still focuses on "security" to "counter China's influence."

ASEAN was China's largest trading partner in 2020 and 2021. In 2021, China’s trade with the ASEAN countries had touched US$878.2 billion, by far outstripping the US’ trade with ASEAN ($362 billion per last available 2021 figures.)

In November 2021, China promised to provide $1.5 billion more development aid to ASEAN members in the following three years to help the countries fight the pandemic and recover their economies. That's ten times the US' $0.15 billion pledge to ASEAN.

ASEAN countries as a whole remained cautious about the summit. Cambodian Prime Minister Samdech Techo Hun Sen, made it clear that "We don't have to choose between the US and China."

In his speech in Washington, Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh stressed that "between independence and dependence, our choice is always independence … Between negotiation and confrontation, we choose negotiation. Between dialogue and conflict, we choose dialogue. And between peace and war, we choose peace. Between cooperation and competition, we choose cooperation."

On his part, Indonesian President Joko Widodo said, "Indonesia expects this special summit will produce a partnership that can contribute to peace, stability, and regional welfare." Not regional warfare!

The relationship between ASEAN and the US can hardly be described as "ideal." The ASEAN countries live by trade, but Washington’s obsessive focus is on security and coercive diplomacy, and the mismatch hinders the Indo-Pacific strategy from gaining traction.

In March, the US announced it would launch an investigation into alleged circumvention of duties for solar panels imported into the US from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam, alleging the modules of panels might come from China and it caused shockwaves to relevant industries.

Cambodia, Indonesia and Thailand are due to host three important leaders' meetings in the Southeast Asia region later this year, said to a joint statement released by the three countries in early May. The statement suggest the meetings are "for all participating countries/economies," which, in real sense, rejected the unreasonable demands of the US and the West, which piled pressure to the three countries, to isolate Russia.

ASEAN members have been through regional wars and conflicts. They deeply know how precious peace and development is. Most ASEAN members are experienced and wise to avoid becoming the pawns in the games between super powers. Biden hopes to push the Ukraine issue with the ASEAN leaders seeking a coalition with them against Moscow. But the ASEAN countries have mixed views on Ukraine. Myanmar at one end is supporting Russia, while Singapore at the opposite end instinctively embraces Washington’s sanctions against Russia. 

 Anonymous 

5/15/2022

Covid19 - Why is WHO so disturb by China's zero Covid strategy?


WORLDWIDE
PLACESCONFIRMED CASESREPORTED DEATHS
United States82,227,294998,739
India43,110,586524,157
Brazil30,617,786664,750
France28,269,887143,868
Germany25,503,878136,987
United Kingdom22,233,899177,088

On Tuesday, WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus urged China to change tack, saying the approach "will not be sustainable" in the face of new fast-spreading variants....

Abandoning zero-COVID and allowing Omicron to rip across the country could result in 1.6 million deaths, according to a paper published on Tuesday in the peer-reviewed journal Nature by researchers at Shanghai's Fudan University. CNA

It is suspicious and mischievous for WHO to question China's zero Covid strategy to the extent of wanting China to do away with it to join the lepers of the world. What is so unsustainable about China's zero Covid strategy when to date it has only 1.12m infected cases and 5,200 deaths? Compare these numbers to the USA, 82.2m infections and nearly 1m deaths, what are the data saying?  China's total infections are about the same as US total number of deaths.

By extrapolating the numbers, China has about 5 times the population of the US at 1.4b, if China would to recklessly and irresponsibly open up the country and follow what the US has been doing, China is likely to have 400m infections and 5m deaths, or anything more than the numbers of the US. Would these be acceptable? Is Tedros being irresponsible to call for the opening up of China, undo the zero Covid strategy and face the consequences of tens of millions of infections and at least a million deaths?

Has Tedros been smoking too much weed? Is he thinking or was he pushing an agenda of someone else that want to bring more deaths and infections to China? If China were to remove its zero Covid strategy and deaths and infections skyrocketed, who is going to be responsible? Is Tedros going to be responsible? Is he in a position to be responsible for the tens millions of infections and millions of deaths?

What is the motive and agenda of Tedros? Why is he so disturb and uncomfortable with China's zero Covid strategy? He is coming out sounding like an ass, totally irresponsible and unbelievable for the Head of WHO to make such a statement. Does he have any solution to avoid the huge infections and millions of death to replace the zero Covid strategy? Does it make him feel good if China were to lift the restrictions and discard the zero Covid strategy?

Who is Tedros to tell China to abandon its zero Covid strategy? Or is he unhappy that China has too few infections and too few deaths and wanting China to be like the lepers of the world, with hundreds of millions of Chinese being infected and millions dead? Is he hoping that China become the laughing stock of the world, for every country to laugh at China for having the most infections and the most deaths?

This is totally bizarre for Tedros to make such an irresponsible and thoughtless statement without offering a better solution. The Chinese govt treasures the lives of its people and would do everything to protect their people from dying unnecessarily.

Empire of Bioweapons

  From: http://thesaker.is/empire-of-bioweapon-lies/

So just when we thought we could enjoy the summer by watching Europe commit hara-kiri, it’s time to stock up on those Aperol Spritz. Get ready for a new hit series, season 1: Inside the American bioweapon racket.

'The provisional results of evidence being collected about the work of U.S. bioweapons in Ukraine are simply astonishing. These are the main takeaways.

U.S. bioweapon ideologues comprise the leadership of the Democratic Party. By linking with non-governmental biotechnology organizations, using the investment funds of the Clintons, Rockefellers, Soros and Biden, they profited from additional campaign financing – all duly concealed. In parallel, they assembled the legislative basis for financing the bioweapons program directly from the federal budget.
COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers Pfizer and Moderna, as well as Merck and Gilead – of Donald “known unknowns” fame, and affiliated with the Pentagon – were directly involved.
 

U.S. specialists tested new drugs in the Ukraine biolabs in circumvention of international safety standards. According to Kirillov, acting this way “Western companies seriously reduce the costs of research programs and gain significant competitive advantages.”
 

According to Kirillov, “along with U.S. pharmaceutical companies and Pentagon contractors, Ukrainian government agencies are involved in military biotechnology activities, whose main tasks are to conceal illegal activities, conduct field and clinical trials and provide the necessary biomaterial.”
 

The Pentagon, Kirillov pointed out, expanded its research potential not only in terms of producing biological weapons, but also gathering information on antibiotic resistance and the presence of antibodies to certain diseases among the population in specific regions. The testing ground in Ukraine was practically outside the control of the so-called “international community”.
 

These findings, amply documented, suggest a vast “legitimized” bioweapon racket reaching the highest levels of the American body politic. There’s no doubt the Russians plan to thoroughly unmask it for the benefit of world public opinion, starting with a War Crimes Tribunal to be set up this summer, most probably in Donetsk.'

 Anonymous 

PS. Why no country thinks it is important to condemn the Empire for developing and using bioweapons? It is ok for the Empire to develop and use bioweapons?

5/14/2022

The treachery of the United States against the Filippinos and its brutal occupation of the Philippines from 1898 to 1946.

    The treachery of the Anglo-Saxon Americans. They promised the Filippinos independence if they were to help the US to fight and drive out the Spanish imperialist. However, after defeating Spain in December 1898, the Americans reneged on their promise and refused to grant independence to the Filippinos. Their spurious excuse was that the Filippinos were uncivilise and were unfit for self-government for they would have anarchy and misrule.                             

The Filippinos then rose up in revolt under the great leadership of Emilio Aguinaldo. However, the rebellion was crushed with great brutality by 80,000 American troops. After crushing the rebellion the Americans carried out horrible atrocities against the Filippino civilians who also continued to resist American imperialism.

It took about four years for the American imperialist to crush the rebellion resulting in the brutal killings of over three hundred thousand Filippino resistant fighters and over three million deaths of Filippino civilians both from US genocide and from disease and famine.

The Filippinos will never forget the violent and brutal occupation of the Philippines by the evil American imperialist. The diabolical and abominable American occupation lasted from 1898 to December, 1946 after the end of the Second World War.

The American imperial occupation of the Philippines faced fierce violent resistance from patriotic and heroic Filippinos. But no matter what the American imperialist had to suppress this rebellion because it had intended to make use of the Philippines as a base for its  imperial venture further into China and other east Asia countries. Its blood thirsty desire for empire and for further imperial ventures had yet to be quenched. Thus it had to suppress the local Filippino rebellion with the utmost brutality, atrocity and violence to secure the Philippines base. Further more the Philippines is endowed with very rich abundant mineral and agriculture resources like gold, copper, nickle, rice, sugar, coffee, coconuts and tobacco which would go a long way to enrich the United States.

Below are some of the descriptions of the utmost brutalities and atrocities carried out by the invading Americans against the Filippinos in its determination to secure its diabolical imperial hold on the Philippines.

The white American invaders - their senators and generals and army officers claimed that the war against the Philippines had to be cruel and fought with the fierceness and brutalities as demanded because they were not dealing with Anglo-Saxon Americans or Europeans but with unsavoury Orientals.

The war started when the American army fired indiscriminately on the peaceful demonstrations in Manila against the American invaders. Soon the Philippine insurgents spread throughout the whole country. In the town of Caloocan the US army set fire to all the houses. Those who tried to escape from the fire were quickly mauled down by bullets. Hardly more than a few hundred of the original 20,000 inhabitants survived the genocide. The few survivors mostly women and children were badly burnt and left to die untreated. The American soldiers boasted that their fighting blood was boiling as they all wanted to kill the little brownies and that shooting brownies was more thrilling than hunting and shooting rabbits.

In addition to the indiscriminate brutality of war on the Filippinos there was an added element of racial hostility, of white superiority and hatred of the brownies as they disrespectfully referred to the Filippinos. The war was bloody and the Americans were relentless to kill and exterminate men, women, children, prisoners and captives. Also insurgents and suspects from the age of ten were rounded up and summarily killed as the American prevailing idea was that the Filippino brownies were only a little bit better than a dog.

American soldiers pumped salt water into Filippino prisoners to make them talk and after which they were shot and killed. Even Filippinos who held up their hands and peacefully surrendered were brought up to a bridge where they were shot down one by one to drop into the river below and float down as warning to other Filippinos of the fate they would face if they opposed the Americans.

An American general boasted that at least about 40 percent of the population of Luzon had been killed by the Americans  the death of which went on to justify and serve the legitimate purpose of American invasion. Yet the Secretary of War Elihu Root arrogantly and falsely claimed that the war in the Philippines was conducted by the American army  "with scrupulous regard for the rules of civilized warfare and that it was conducted with self-restraint and with humanity never surpassed."

In Manila , a marine named Littletown Waller, a major, was accused of shooting more than ten defenseless Filippinos without trial on the island of Samar. In his testimony of defense he claimed that he was ordered by General Smith to kill and burn and that General Smith told him that the more he killed and burnt the better he would be pleased and that there was no time to take prisoners for he would like to make Samar a howling wilderness. And when Waller asked General Smith to define the age limit for killing he was told " Everyone over ten."

In the province of Batangas about 120,000 inhabitants of the total population of 300, 000 were butchered by the US army while many others died of famine and disease. The Americans deprived the Filipinos of food and medicine to weaken them and deter them from further resistance.

All over the Philippines the Americans claimed to have pacified thousands of Filippinos by killing them and burying them, by destroying their crops, burnt their villages and forced their women and children out of their houses and exiled others to inhospitable terrains. Millions of other Filipinos were rounded up and incarcerated with many mercilessly tortured before they were killed. 

The American war on the Philippinos was undoubtedly to the advantage of the invaders as the Americans had overwhelming superior firepower against the meager obsolete arms that the Filippinos could muster. Around the Pasig River the American guns and cannons pounded on the Filippinos killling thousands that the dead Philippino bodies piled up like mole-hills. The scene was just plain massacre and murderous butchery.

However, inspite of overwhelming odds the insurgents persisted in their fight as they had the full support of the population who were just as determined to drive out the abominable savage Americans. They had to resort to fight a protracted guerilla warfare against the Americans. The fight against the American invaders lasted for over four years. But unfortunately American overwhelming superior firepower prevailed and the Philippines succumbed to the invaders and became a servile colony of the United States. 

The Philippinos had fought the Americans with undaunted bravery  and great fighting spirit and heroism as against the cowardly Americans who relied on their superior arms to achieve unbridled killings and murderous massacre.

Southernglory1 Aka Yang Rong Nan

Saturday, May 14th, 2022

NB: Please spare a few precious minutes and forward this article to every Philipino in Singapore and in the Philippines as well as to every friend and relative so that they can be kept aware of the evil and wicked Americans and their diabolical deeds of terrorism and never ending  abominable aggressive wars of conquest and destruction around the world for the last over 200 years.














Ukraine - Unravelling the Azovstal mystery

 To move the Pope and make him go to Moscow to see Putin required a lot of influence and power. Who on earth could do this and for what purpose? Even the UN Sec Gen had to move his fat ass to make the same trip which was in vain for whatever he was tasked to do. If not, the Pope would not have to make that trip, likely also in vain. There must be someone that is very very important trapped in the Azovstal underground fortress and getting him out is of utmost importance. Who can that person be? Hunter Biden would not be in that league. He is no heavy weight that could move mountains.

I would put on my analyst hat to try to put the pieces together to see if it makes sense from things and events that were seemingly not sensible.

Why would Blinken, Austin and Pelosi took the trouble and risk to visit a comedian in Kiev and putting their lives at stake? It might make a bit of sense for Blinken, Secretary of State for foreign affairs, to visit Zelensky when a phone call would be enough to show some moral support, to assure him that the US was behind him. Austin was the Secretary for Defence. Why was he there? He could not be there to command the Ukrainian forces to conduct a war.  Did not make any sense for him to be at Kiev either. Then Pelosi, the Speaker of the House. What was she doing in Kiev? This haughty and cocky woman would not have time for a comedian like Zelensky, and to risk flying to a war zone to see him? This is totally out of sync, out of her character.

The only reason for them to be at Kiev was to see someone very important. And this someone is definitely not Zelensky. This someone is stuck in Ukraine, unable to call them, unable to speak to them over the phone. They need to go to Kiev personally to see and talk to him. Why is this person unable to communicate with the 3 in Washington? They could not be visiting someone in prison in Kiev for sure. Very likely, this person is holed up inside the Azovstal fortress. In the deep bunker, mobile phones would not operate, let alone connect to Washington. This person could likely be reachable only by landline, like a hotline to the President of Ukraine, Zelensky. And to talk to him personally, they have to come to Zelensky's office. Period.

Could the 3 be there just to talk to Hunter Biden? Not likely. Hunter Biden would not be important enough for all three to want to talk to him in Kiev, and to talk about what? Definitely not Pelosi. If she has to make such a trip, it must be someone more senior than her, and someone she knew personally, a personal friend. Who can be that senior and a personal friend of Pelosi? Get the picture?

But very likely Hunter Biden is inside the hole. Mrs Biden visited Poland, with a common border with Ukraine. Could she sneak across unannounced for safety and security reason, to visit Zelensky's office as well, to use the hotline to talk to Hunter in the hole? There is no good official reason for the first lady of the USA to go to Poland at this time. It is likely that the mother would want to talk to her son and ask about his well being. Sensible?

What is the mystery behind all these innocent looking trips for the top few political personalities of the US, ... all with a common thread, Zelensky's office and the Azovstal fortress? The other clue to this mystery is to scour the American media for news and appearance of some top personalities that have apparently been absent from public view, not seen since 24 Feb. Other than Hunter Biden, the interest should be on ex Presidents, not even generals. The generals would not warrant the visit of Blinken, Austin and Pelosi in Kiev.

I think we could narrow down the search to only a handful of personalities that could be trapped in the Azovstal fortress. Then, what was he doing down there? Who is so free to be there. And to be trusted and welcome to be part of the syndicate? That person must be security cleared at the highest level to prevent any leaks on the existence of this notorious and sinister outfit. No one is to know what is inside there and what they were doing.

Happy guessing. The possible personalities, the really big crocodiles are limited to a very small circle now. Pelosi is the biggest link to this person.