Nuclear warheads - Why China does not need more but actually have more warheads than the Americans?

 

The Americans have been pleasantly congratulating themselves that they have many times more nuclear warheads than China and can threaten China with a nuclear holocaust. But quietly China is confident that with its 300 warheads against the USA's 7,000 warheads, China has nothing to fear. How so?

Read the 4 points listed in the above pic, especially point 2, 'US & allies missiles...re directed to return to base. This is a capability that China has developed with their ability to decode the missile command codes at super speed with the use of code cracking computers and the fastest computers in the world.

American or allies missiles, once launched, could be captured and redirected back to where they belong or to any coordinates the Chinese command them. What do these mean? American and allies missiles would become Chinese missiles, and could be flown to attack them instead of China.

Be warned Americans and allies, before you fly missiles, know where they would eventually be heading and land. Once launched, the Chinese would take control of them. Thank you very much.

Americans and their allies' missiles are as good as belong to China.

This is one of the key reasons why China is confident to take on the Americans and their allies head on in a way.  China had proven that in a conventional war.  China could bash up the Americans and their elite units, including those from their allies. During the Korean War, the top elite American unit, the Marine Corp, was decimated by the peasant soldiers of PLAV.  The 3 elite British brigades were also wiped out. The same fate also gone to the elite Turkish units and the Australian brigades, all claimed to be their best units. 

China has also neutralised the American aircraft carriers, denying them any chance of operating in the East and South China Seas.

In a nuclear war, the American homeland would be hit by American nuclear weapons from their own silos. The American submarines and destroyers would also be hit by the same nuclear missiles they launched.

Covid19 - Rational or irrational decision making

 An old Chinese saying, which I have heard from old folks many times when I was still schooling:

"Don't study books so much until the brain is filled with shits!"

The recent restrictive measures and severe discriminations against the unvaccinated - who are mainly oldies and those who cannot take the vaccines, and children under 12 years old, who have no vaccines available for them - are an obvious reflection of people who have study books so much until their brains are filled with shits and incompetence.

It shows:

1. No common sense and making decisions not based on facts but conjectures, hearsays and theories.

2. Making decisions in order to please the Western foreign powers and foreigners but discrimated against own citizens.

3. Making decisions based on the sole objective of reconnecting with other countries for national level economic gains but disregarding the small and medium size local entrepreneurs, restaurants, food courts, hawkers and coffee shops.

4. Making decisions based on the unexpert experts' advice instead of common sense, prudence and wisdom -, the qualities which the leaders seem to be devoid of. 

Queen of Hearts

Xi Jinping says peaceful reunification with Taiwan is in country’s best interests

 
President says the ‘complete reunification of the motherland must be fulfilled’ and warns that those who oppose this are doomed

President Xi Jinping said on Saturday that Beijing hoped Taiwan could be reunited peacefully with the Chinese mainland as he warned that those who opposed this would be “judged by history”.

“To achieve the reunification of the motherland by peaceful means is most in line with the overall interests of the Chinese nation, including our compatriots in Taiwan,” Xi told a meeting in Beijing commemorating the 110th anniversary of the revolution that established the first Chinese republic.

The Xinhai Revolution, which began in Wuchang, now part of modern-day Wuhan, led to the downfall of the Qing dynasty.

In his most high-profile speech on Taiwan since July 1, the Communist Party’s centenary, Xi said: “We [should] adhere to the basic policy of peaceful reunification and one country, two systems, adhere to the one-China principle and the 1992 consensus, and promote the peaceful development of cross-strait relations.”

He urged Taiwan to “stand on the right side of history jointly to create the glorious cause of the full reunification and the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation”.

Xi added that secessionists were “the biggest obstacle to the reunification of the motherland and a serious hidden risk to national rejuvenation”.

“Those who forget their ancestors, betray the motherland, or split the country are doomed. They will definitely be spurned by the people and judged by history.”

Without naming any country directly, Xi also warned of foreign interference. “The Taiwan issue is entirely China’s internal affair, and no external interference can be condoned,” he said.

“No one should underestimate the Chinese people’s determination, and strong ability to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity, The historical task of the complete reunification of the motherland must be fulfilled, and it will definitely be fulfilled,” he said. 

Anonymous

Anonymous

COVID-19 Discriminations: The Vaccinated And The Unvaccinated

 For many unvaccinated individuals who find today’s announcement troubling, here is the takeaway: I do support that our country needs to open up and declare the situation from pandemic to endemic. However, we have a government that is practicing endemic for foreigners but pandemic for its citizens, further discriminating and ostracizing the innocent unvaccinated citizens and individuals. 

This is why: 1. Unvaccinated cannot dine in hawker centres (not even alone) where hawker centres are a day to day living culture for many. What is the rationale for this policy? Close proximity with a dining partner? If this is so, it shall mean unvaccinated individuals should not be taking any public transport like MRT or public buses because they are jam packed and usually for more than half an hour for most commuters. 

2. Unvaccinated cannot enter shopping malls but stand-alone supermarkets are exempted. If the unvaccinated are seen as posing risks to the vaccinated, then such supermarkets will be a haven for the unvaccinated. Hence, in order to protect the vaccinated, should you not ban the vaccinated from visiting these stand-alone supermarkets? Why is there this need to segregate and divide the harmonious community? 

 3. You close your doors to your unvaccinated citizens (due to so many ostracizing policies removing their very basic rights to live normally) making them stay in a Pandemic situation, but you allow the foreigners quarantine free, practising Endemic. May I ask is this a fair manner in treating your own citizens? You already have a compliant 82%. 

 4. So it is said vaccines wear off after 6 months and therefore booster shots are recommended. Hence, what is the difference between a person fully vaccinated 6 months ago vs the unvaccinated/partially vaccinated? 

5. Government or rather the PM told us not to be alarmed or fear covid-19 and should treat it like a flu. Is this not hyprocritical when there remains further restrictions in the economy and community especially the F&B sector, further tightening our own market when the unvaccinated now cannot be the spenders. 

6. When the ministers and PM tell us not to fear and especially with now only the vaccinated can dine in restaurants and go to malls, why is the 2-to-a-table restriction not eased? What is the fear or concern in allowing dining back to pre pandemic days? Preach Endemic, but act Pandemic? 

 7. Telling us to respect Covid-19? Hello, would you respect your enemy / killer? I know of many who have health problems who cannot be vaccinated; I know of an unvaccinated friend who is just earning a living operating a small store in a shopping mall but with this new further tightening rule (it is not an opening up), she ended up crying because she does not know how to continue to run her store in two days’ time, where she will certainly chalk up more losses during the shop closure. Why is she not vaccinated? She is pregnant and although they say it is safe for pregnant ladies, her concerns to protect her first pregnancy is definitely valid. 

 It is an opening up in disguise back to what it seems like a 90% circuit breaker, further tightening and constricting our own market by sending our elites and wealthy out of our country spending outside our country, leaving the unaffordables to continue in this struggle and the beauty now is government no longer has to pay relief and help struggling businesses. Brilliant. Vaccination is not by choice in Singapore. Devising it mandatory but Not declaring it mandatory is for obvious reasons. The wisemen know why. Really poor Singaporeans. 

PS: And I have one more question: If I stay in a one room flat and tested Covid positive with mild or no symptoms and the direction now is not to visit any hospital but to isolate and recover at home. Obviously, I don’t want to infect my beloved family members. Can I go to either of the MTF’s ministries to look for OYK GKY or LW and seek a solution? A squatter in your bungalow will do. 

Jun Low

Foreigners controlling employment of PMETs - Donkeys interviewing horses

 Recently, I had chances to come across a few interviews conducted online with a local friend. No surprises all the hiring managers are foreigners from India, China and elsewhere. These foreign managers are located in Singapore, two of them are new citizens.

I went to browse their profiles on Linkedin, most of them are armed with unknown qualifications or low ranking universities in their country of origin and a number of them worked for local enterprises there. But when they landed in Singapore, they got good jobs at MNCs. As the interviews went on, I found they sounding superior, making a lot of reference to their past experience. ...

The debate about re-balancing foreign and local PMETs is no fluke. But these foreigners were imported and converted to new citizens and PRs. And many local PMETs are marginalised or displaced from their jobs, downgrading to low level menial jobs like Grab driver or Food. But instead of acting on the complaints, those who raised such issues on immigration, foreign work force are always dragged down the route of racism, xenophobia, against foreign investment and foreigners.

Our grads from world class institutions are being interviewed by third class institution grads, isn’t this a big joke now? And they are senior managers in Singapore. And sometime later, he was informed that he was not selected. Any surprise?

The above is part of an article posted in the TRE by a reboot, titled Third World interviews First World.

This pathetic and sorry state of affair is only made possible by the imbeciles that Singaporeans voted to power. Instead of looking after the well beings of Singaporeans that put their trust in these imbeciles, the imbeciles chose to look after the foreigners, mostly half baked cheats from funny universities, some with fake degrees and credentials.

When you put a few donkeys up there to interview the horses, the donkeys would look for donkey qualities and dismissed the qualities of the horses.  This is only normal and only donkeys would appreciate the qualities of donkeys. Period.

Donkeys would seek the company of donkeys. They understand and appreciate each other.

Below are some comments in the article in TRE. Singaporeans must remember that they voted to be in this shit.

Iskandar:
October 3, 2021 at 4:03 pm (Quote)

This is so typical of foreign manpower. Not talent. Another friend also got interviewed by a local company for manager post but interviewer is from india and he touted his experience and education as first class. Overseas hiring mgr was happy but after indian interview, ended up rejected for position. Any surprise?

xoxo:
October 3, 2021 at 5:00 pm (Quote)

Now that it is common knowledge that MANY FTs are armed with FAKE DREGEES or degrees from Low-ranked universities ,the G changes its tune and SING LOUDLY ITS NOT ABOUT DEGREES,its about *SKILL SETS*?

WTF! THEY WILL ALWAYS FIND EXCUSES TO COVER UP THEIR LAPSES ,be it FTAs,FTs,whatever.

What is SKILL SET?
Come on,years ago,when SGPOREAN TECHNICIAMS were mending lifts and escalators,but with low education,THE F GOVT brought in SO-CALLED FT-engineers to take over sgs.
We all can see how slow these FTs are in repairing or servicing lifts,escalators compared to when our own less-educated but SKILLFUL sgs were doing?!

Now,all these SGS are chronically jobless n lost their skills ,the G turns around and say SKILL SETS?

KONG LYE,KONG KER,THE G ALWAYS WIN?

xoxo:
October 3, 2021 at 5:06 pm (Quote)

Indeed,most TALENTED ANG MOHS already left Sg for Shanghai,Dubai n to their HQs in USA,EUROPE,JAPAN ,ETC.

What we are seeing now are *LEFT-OVERS* NO GOOD GOVT WANTS EXCEPT THE PAP,LOL!

SKILLS ARE ACQUIRED WITH EXPOSURE.
HOW CAN WE SAY sgs lack skills when the govt put these sgs out of jobs?
Even LKY said it takes quite a few soild years to train a scholar to be a good minister,a good perm sec.

If scholars need time n exposure,what about us?

I say FARK THE G FOR MONKEYING AROUND.
THEY OUGHT TO BE REPLACED THEMSELVES!

NotMyProblem:
October 3, 2021 at 6:47 pm (Quote)

Well, that’s what Singapore going to be, third world talent supervising first world workers! Just worry about the future of our Singaporean children!

Take an example; People who never seen a toilet supervising toilet installation! These people only knew how to use the Ganges for washing, cleaning, shitting and dispose of their deaths.

They may even wondering why our toilets are better than the place where they sleep. So can we expect them to understand what they are doing?