On what basis did the Anglos Saxon tribe claimed North America, Australia, New Zealand, Falklands and the islands in the oceans?

 

 Today the Anglo Saxon tribe is sitting on big chunks of land in Americas, Australasia and the oceans. While these thugs have the audacity to ask on what basis is China claiming the islands in the South China sea, we would also want to know what is the basis for the Anglo Saxon tribe to claim there lands. Is there any legal or legitimate basis for them to claim these lands as theirs?

The only so called basis they made their claims on when they set up to invade the world was the Doctrine of Christian Discovery, an edict from the Pope in Rome, some mighty super human or semi God. This Doctrine is based on the outrageous belief that the people of the rest of the world were sub humans and had no rights to own lands to call their own. And the Christian God had given the Christians the right to take the lands they occupied as theirs. Are these beliefs acceptable, legal, legitimate?

There was another very strong factor for the Anglo Saxon to make their claims stick. The came with guns and cannons to force the natives to give up their lands or be terminated. The natives of the world then were too primitive or less developed and less advanced in science and technology than the Anglo Saxon tribe and thus did not have the means to oppose the occupation, killings and seizure of their lands.

The occupation of the lands by the Anglo Saxon tribe was anything but illegal, by force and by a fake doctrine in the name of an imaginary God. A God that was white, a God that regarded the natives of the rest of the world as sub humans. In all counts, the Anglo Saxon tribe has no legal or legitimate rights to the lands they seized from the natives, occupied them and claimed them as their own. Period. 

When would the natives of the stolen lands bring their cases to the International Court of Justice to reclaim their land? And at the same time bring charges for genocides and murders against the Anglo Saxon tribe?

Today we are also seeing many small countries claiming islands in the South China Sea that were claimed by China historically. The basis of their claims mainly fall on UNCLOS, a new legislation sanctioned by the UN in 1982. The question, is this piece of legislation good enough to claim the islands that were historically claimed by China? Can this piece of legislation be applied retrospectively against legitimate historical claims, to overturn claims of ownership by finder's keepers on land that were unoccupied?

Perhaps the claimants of the South China Sea islands against China need to be reminded of how the Anglo Saxon tribe claimed those lands they now called theirs, eg USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Falklands, the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian Ocean islands. They may not be able to use the Doctrine of Christian Discovery as no one would accept this piece of crap. But they might want to consider if they have bigger guns and weapons than China like the Anglo Saxon tribe had against the natives of the world in those early days to make their claims stick. China would definitely not accept UNCLOS to be applied retrospectively against their claims.

The bottom line is very simple, unless the Asean claimants have legitimate and legal basis, excluding the UNCLOS, please carry a bigger gun than China. The Anglo Saxon tribes are still sitting on their stolen lands simply because they still carry a bigger gun than the natives whose land they stole and no one, not even the UN would dare to utter a single word on this. They would sit on these stolen lands for as long as the natives are unable to fight back to reclaim their lands.

In contrast, the South China Sea islands were no man's land in the first place and no natives of any sort would have the legitimate right to claim the islands from China, not UNCLOS. It is easy to make wild and audacious claims, but one needs, other than a recognisable law, is the power of a big gun, like how the Anglo Saxon did it.

China is just being polite and courteous to entertain the Asean countries by its willingness to talk with them on the claims. China could simply ignore every one of them and none of them can do nothing about it, just like the white Americans, Canadian, Australians, New Zealanders and British are doing.

Anyone dare to ask them on what basis the Anglo Saxon tribe are claiming these stolen lands?

Covid19 - vaccine against discrimination or the mark of the beast?

 It’s okay sometimes politics defies logic. Let’s move on. Get your vaccine against discrimination if need be.

The above quote is from a comment by a Politics Defies Logic in TRE. This comment shows the ridiculous nature of this pandemic, turning it into an exercise of oppression. All the logic turns out to be a farce and all the questionable illogic carted out as logic. And the daft sheep were simply be marched into the slaughter house, initially sheepishly without protest but now feeling cheated and started to whine for being misled by well trained but equally mindless sheep dogs.

For whatever reasons that were not spoken, the whole thing is looking like a get rich quick scam for the pharmaceutical companies at the expense and well being of the unthinking masses.  Looking from a bird's eye view, it is western vaccines and nothing else. It is a new order of American or western dominance in the use of vaccines in a world pandemic. Only the newly created mRNA vaccines, still in a very preliminary stage of trials that would normally take years to complete is touted as the silver bullet with unquestionable efficacy of 95% against Covid19 virus! And they swallowed it all, hook, line and sinker. No one in his right mind would want to question salesman talk and salesman promises. Worse, they were all behind this scam, telling and coercing the daft that mRNA is the vaccine to save the world.

Even today, with so many revelations that make it looking more like a farce, no more claims of 95% efficacy, and effectiveness fading away in 3 to 6 months, no one is standing up to admit that he is a sucker, cheated by the pharmaceutical companies in their wild claims based on their own trials, own data and own shit. Some gullible are starting to feel the heat, feeling being cheated and fearing what would happen to them if the contrarian narrative comes true.

Why was traditional method of producing inactivated vaccines frown upon, coerced and forbidden from use? Why the discrimination against the use of proven method vaccines that are safe but going for something that is basically untested and with manufacturers demanding exemption clauses to free them from responsibility from adverse events? Does this ring a bell that something is not right? Trust me, just drink?

Why make the use of inactivated virus vaccines unavailable or difficult to access to? Why all the discrimination against such vaccines, against people who are unavaccinated when being vaccinated did not really make much difference in terms of being infected and being spreader of the virus? Why creating so many barriers against people who are not vaccinated as if they are the spreader of the virus when the truth is just the reverse?

The mRNA vaccines is now more like a vaccine against discrimination than against the virus as it did really nothing in preventing infection and preventing transmission. The only thing that it is effective is to prevent discrimination so the once vaccinated, one can dine in restaurants, participate in big events, maybe no need to wear masks, and can be a happy go lucky super spreader of the virus.  

Is this what the vaccines are really for? Or is this part of the sinister scheme of putting a mark on the forehead by a group of evil men?

The age of American privilege is over

Successful statecraft aligns interests with circumstance. In the immediate aftermath of World War II, a generation of statesmen grasping this essential truth presided over a radical reorientation of basic U.S policy. The result was a half-century of American global primacy.

Now, however, the era of American primacy has ended. The imperative of the present moment is to adjust U.S. policy to rapidly changing circumstances. In the two decades since 9/11, members of the foreign policy establishment have sought to finesse or avoid this issue. The failure of America’s 20-year war in Afghanistan suggests that this is no longer possible.

Writing in 1948, George Kennan, director of the State Department’s Policy Planning Staff, made an essential point. “We have about 50 percent of the world’s wealth, but only 6.3 percent of its population,” he wrote. “Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity.”

With this purpose in mind, Kennan’s associates, chief among them George Marshall, Dean Acheson, James Forrestal and Paul Nitze — White males all — undertook a series of initiatives aimed at perpetuating this position of disparity. Their approach centered on devising mechanisms to project American power globally.

Among their best-known initiatives were the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan and NATO. Hardly less important was the National Security Act of 1947, which, among other things, created the CIA; NSC-68, a secret document that in 1950 committed the United States to the pursuit of permanent military superiority; and the fashioning of Strategic Air Command into an instrument of genocidal nuclear attack.

On balance, throughout the decades-long Cold War, Americans enjoyed a way of life that made the United States the envy of the world — free, democratic and prosperous. So at least most Americans themselves firmly believed.

By this time, the correlation between U.S. policy and Kennan’s position of disparity had long since begun to unravel. In 2000, the United States accounted for 32.6 percent of the world’s wealth. A mere two decades later, America’s share of global wealth had shrunk to less than 30 percent. Simultaneously, within the United States itself, the gap between the rich and the non-rich was increasing by leaps and bounds, contributing to profound domestic unrest.

“Free, democratic and prosperous” no longer suffices to describe contemporary America, even in the eyes of many Americans. The postwar formula for sustaining a position of global privilege is no longer working. Indeed, it has become irrelevant at best or counterproductive at worst.

Ever the realist, George Kennan would have unhesitatingly acknowledged that fact. For that reason, he would certainly have supported President Biden’s decision to end the war in Afghanistan.

But as a strategist, Kennan would have gone further, recognizing that the most pressing threats to American security and well-being are no longer “out there” in Central Asia or in other distant theaters but “back here.” Those threats include disease, climate chaos, environmental deterioration, porous borders, the erosion of personal privacy and, perhaps most insidiously, the unraveling of domestic comity.

The paradigm of power projection, with its emphasis on military intervention abroad, no longer provides a relevant response to these threats.

The genius of Kennan and his contemporaries was to recognize the imperative of fundamentally changing America’s approach to the world. The lesson of Afghanistan, confirmed by the astonishing display of incompetence that has accompanied the U.S. withdrawal, is that it’s past time for the present generation to do the same.

The American war in Afghanistan ends in bitter humiliation. But it should also serve as a wake-up call. The age of American privilege is gone for good.

- WP Sep 02 2021

Covid19 - Is Singapore ready for the big influx of Delta variant?

Chart from CNA

Is Singapore looking to a big explosion of cases? The chart is looking ominous,  Daily cases are up. On 2 Sep, daily cases 187 and unlinked cases now in a worrying 113 from single digit. When the door is flung open, what would the picture be like?

How safe would Singaporeans be? How effective are the vaccines in protecting the lives of Singaporeans now that ineffective prevention of infection is a foregone conclusion? The hordes in the dormitories are going to be released, assuming that the vaccines are effective in preventing them from being infected and preventing them from transmitting the virus. If these assumptions are false, then we will know how serious things will be in 2 to 3 weeks.

Are Singaporeans ready for an exponential increase in infection at a level we have not seen before and to live with the virus as a way of life? Look at the transmission rate among the bus drivers.

Are we sure this is the way to go? Don't panic, more than 80% have been vaccinated, going to be 100%. Don't scare, don't scare.

A self destructive conglomerate aka government

  This present Singapore government is a self-destructive conglomerate (like a business organisation) run by academics who have no clues on how to make a successful business deal.

As each year advances, you can see more and more flaws, mishaps and blunders appearing. When those became a trend, you know that the conglomerate is running on autopilot mode by remote controls. Why?

Because in the past, the old guards were holding their hands and walking them around, like going for a stroll in the botanic gardens. Things were so easy and rosy to them. Things worked like clockwork. All they had to do was press a button here and make a phone call there and all the running dogs and work horses would obey and ensure that nothing goes wrong.

After the old guards were gone, they
had already acquired the habit of autopilot modus operandi and continued to operate on autopilot, assuming things would be as easy and rosy. They forgot something very important.

They forgot that things and people worked like clockwork because the old guards had fought against all odds and worked very hard for the people, and earned the respect of the people. That's why people obeyed and trusted the old guards' instructions and directions. These young birdies, coming out with silver spoons in their mouths and golden plates served on their tables, without having to fight for their lives, think they can earn the respect of the people simply because they are from the privileged class, the elites, the natural aristocrats?

So, as time goes on, things started to look bad - mistakes, errors, blunders started to surface, bigger and bigger, serious and more serious....

Just look at the recent policies, starting from the birth of the highly controversial and stupid CECA agreement with India, all of them have not be thoroughly thought out and tested first before implementation. All of them have flaws that would cause long-term negative consequences affecting the people seriously. Why?

Answer: Because there are no good thinkers like Dr Goh Keng Swee who could think deeply, widely and far ahead of time. There are no good motivators like Lee Kuan Yew who could mobilize the whole country into a united front to tackle any critical life and death survival threat. None. Zilch. Why?

Answer: Because money cannot buy real talents. Money can attract many loyalists who are willing to go all out to please the Paymaster so that they can keep their jobs. That's all. That's what obscene monetary rewards have bought. Loyalists, not nationalists.

Nationalists rise out of the ashes like a Phoenix due to their passion, courage and beauty of heart and brain. They don't work for money. They work for the people, not themselves. They don't derive from spoilt brats with silver spoons and golden plates, nor with those who can be bought by money.


LIPS