1/28/2021
1/27/2021
White Australians celebrate Invasion Day as their National Day, just like Thanksgiving Day. What a shame!
Thousands protest ‘Invasion Day’ amid pandemic - "Decolonize! You are on stolen land"
Thousands
of Aboriginal Australians defied coronavirus rules on Tuesday to
protest the country's national day, held on the anniversary of British
colonization of the vast continent that its Indigenous population brands
"Invasion Day."
Officially recognized as Australia Day, January
26 also sees annual rallies drawing attention to the injustices faced by
Indigenous people and calling on the government to change the date of
the national holiday.
The celebration of the origins of the modern nation is a time of mourning for Indigenous Australians, who have inhabited the land for 65,000 years and view the arrival of British settlers in 1788 as the beginning of two centuries of pain and suffering.
January 26, 2021
By Anonymous
PS. The insensitive white supremacist Australians totally disregard their crimes against the aborigines, the natives of Australia, for killing them, abusing them, discriminated against them, and stealing their continent.
Australia's National Day is a Day of Shame.
Chan Chun Sing - Tracking progress of Singaporean core not meaningful?
In response to Gerald Giam’s question on tracking of Singaporean core in companies, Chan Chun Sing (CCS) replied that ‘it is not meaningful to track Singaporean core in companies’....‘Our economic schemes are meant to encourage companies to upgrade their capabilities and expand their operations in Singapore to create good jobs for Singaporeans’- Chan Chun Sing....
I will be blunt here. To me, CCS is nothing more but a book-smart idiot and a highly educated fool who is totally devoid of human ingenuity, cunningness and street-wisdom....
CCS’s answer is another hard knocking head lesson for our hardcore and often unthinking suckerporeans.
Simon Lim - in an article posted in TRE
Before we discuss on this issue, I disagree with the PAP's definition of the Singapore core, ie Singaporeans and PRs. A nation and its citizens must not simply be dumped together with foreigners in the form of PRs. PRs are not citizens but foreign citizens and must not, cannot, and should not be included as the Singaporean core. Most of them are economic migrants and fair weather migrants and would go back to their home countries when conditions are favourable there or not favourable here. They do not regard Singapore as their country or home.
Recently I posted a piece of a troublemaker wildlife hanging his full size bicycle in a moving train and no one in the train would dare to tell him off. In fact everyone in the train dared not even look at him, turned to look elsewhere. Why? Because this is not their country. Most of them are foreigners, PRs etc. Why should they bother about the incident or mess in this country that did not belong to them? It is not their business. How then should they be included in the Singaporean core, to be treated as one of us and their interest protected by the govt like Singaporeans?
Back to the question why tracking the progress of Singaporean core not meaningful or not important. I would agree that tracking the progress of PRs or so called residents is not important as they are not Singapore citizens. They are non citizens. Period. But tracking the progress of Singaporeans is definitely important.
Why is it not meaningful to track the progress of Singaporeans? What is the purpose of tracking the progress of Singaporeans? As Simon Lim put it, the PAP must not forget that it is the Singaporeans that voted for them to be the govt and they owed it to the Singaporeans to look after the interest of the Singaporeans, not the interest of foreigners like PRs. Looking after the interest of PRs could be a by the way thing, that after looking after the citizens, it is ok to take care of PRs as a collateral side interest, not the main objective of the govt. These foreigners have their own countries and govts to look after them. They don't need two govts to look after them. Why are they so special to have their own govts and Singapore govt to look after them?
It is important that the core business of the Singapore govt is to put the interest of Singaporeans as top priority over the interest of foreigners and PRs. A Singapore govt that thinks it is important for them to look after the interest of foreigners, to the same level as the interest of Singaporeans is not deserving to be the govt of Singaporeans and should not be voted to be the govt of Singaporeans.
Does this make sense? Does Singapore belong to Singaporeans or to PRs?
1/26/2021
1/25/2021
Covid 19 - Aryans being infected most
NOVEL CORONAVIRUS CASES
| PLACES | CONFIRMED CASES | REPORTED DEATHS |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25,109,148 | 418,982 |
| India | 10,654,533 | 153,339 |
| Brazil | 8,844,577 | 217,037 |
| Russia | 3,679,247 | 68,397 |
| United Kingdom | 3,647,463 | 97,939 |
| France | 3,044,358 | 72,668 |
| Spain | 2,499,560 | 55,441 |
| Italy | 2,466,813 | 85,461 |
| Turkey | 2,429,605 | 25,073 |
| Germany | 2,147,814 | 52,168 |
| Colombia | 2,002,969 | 50,982 |
| Argentina | 1,862,192 | 46,737 |
| Mexico | 1,752,347 | 149,084 |
| Poland | 1,475,445 | 35,363 |
| South Africa | 1,412,986 | 40,874 |
| Iran | 1,372,977 | 57,383 |
| Ukraine | 1,231,965 | 22,926 |
| Peru | 1,082,907 | 39,274 |
| Indonesia | 989,262 | 27,835 |
| Netherlands | 948,933 | 13,540 |
As of 8:34am Jan 25, 2021
Above from CNA
What are the common factors in the top 10 most infected countries? Ex colonial powers is one. Most of them were ex colonialists and this virus is like a punishment for their past crimes against victims of their brutal and uncivilised colonialism. But this factor alone makes India and Brazil stood out as exceptions as they were not in the same league as the European colonialists.
The other factor that is common to all of them is race, the Aryan race. Many Brazilians are also Aryans, descendant of Spanish colonialists. Indians are also Aryans though not Europeans.
Why are the Aryans most infected by this virus?
According to the Chinese Academy of Sciences, three researches, Pei Hao, Institute Pasteur of Shanghai. the Chinese Academy of Science,
Wu Zhong, National Engineering Research Centre for the Emergence Drugs,
Academy of Military Science, Xuan Li, Key Laboratory of Synthetic
Biology, CAS Centre for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, published a joint article on 21 Jan 21 in China Life Science journal, written in English, on the discovery of 4 Amino proteins that were changed in the Sars virus to create the Covid19 virus. The change in the S proteins in the Sars virus would give the impression that the victims were down with Sars, not a new virus, a deception that would have killed many more if not discovered early. The second important discovery is that it is designed specifically to kill Chinese people. Thirdly, though 4 S proteins have been changed, the infectious rate is still very high, in fact higher than Sars, and more deadly. Fourth, the Covid19 virus is man made. It would take hundreds of years for a bat virus to mutate to this state with 4 S proteins changed.
This is a scientific paper and stands to be corrected or disputed scientifically, not white lies spread by the Americans. Scientists would be studying this in detail and make their comments and observations based on science.
The fact that this virus was designed to target Chinese people, people with similar genetic stocks are the Japanese, Koreans, Mongolians, Tibetans, Vietnamese and to a great extent Thais and some northern Asean countries, might be the reason why a simple minded Trump did not act on it. Probably he believed whole sale in the intelligence briefings that it would only infect the Chinese. This lulled him to inaction and telling his believers that it would go away miraculously.
What the Americans did not bargain for, they could not believe or expect the virus to mutate to hit them and the Europeans so fast and so deadly. Now the Aryan stocks are the new victims and with more mutations like in Britain on the way. Things are going to get from bad to worse for the Aryans. This is called playing with fire and got burnt by the fire.
The above charts said it all. What you throw around would come around.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
In the eyes of Western elites, Westerners can have the privilege to eat meat while Chinese should just eat grass.
Time magazine on Friday posted an article entitled "How China could change the world by taking meat off the menu." The author draws a connection between Chinese eating meat and global environmental problems. It said: "Livestock farming produces 20 percent to 50 percent of all man-made greenhouse gases… Halving China's animal-agriculture sector could result in a 1 billion metric-ton reduction of CO2 emissions."
In 2018, the Atlantic published a piece with the headline of "China's love for meat is threatening its green movement." In 2019, the Economist released an article entitled "The planet needs China to curb its appetite for meat." It is reported in June 2020 that Pat Brown, chief executive of Impossible Foods, a company developing plant-based substitutes for meat products, even said, "Every time someone in China eats a piece of meat, a little puff of smoke goes up in the Amazon."
Chinese people's eating patterns remarkably differ from people in the West. Chinese mainly eat grain and vegetables, supplemented by meat, while for Westerners, meat has been their staple food. The proportion of meat in the diet of Westerners is much higher than that of Chinese.
The Time article states that China consumes 28 percent of the world's meat. This data has been cited by Western media outlets since 2016. Western media tend to criticize China by referring to the total amount. As China is the most populous country in the world, using a total figure as a benchmark is unfair to China. Yet based on meat consumption per capita, the West far exceeds that of China.
In terms of beef, the OECD shows in 2020 that China's consumption of 4.2 kilograms per capita lagged behind the world average at 6.4 kilos. The figure for Argentina was about nine times as much as that of China, and the US more than six times that of China. The consumption of many Western countries, including Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the UK, was also much higher than China's.
According to media report, beef production causes five times more climate-warming emissions than pork. If having less meat is essential to "change the world," it is more than fair to urge the West to reduce its beef consumption. The US consumed far more meat per capita in 2020 alone, so how can they pass the buck of Amazon destruction to China?
When interviewed by an Australian media outlet in 2010, former US president Barack Obama said, "If over a billion Chinese citizens have the same living patterns as Australians and Americans do right now, then all of us are in for a very miserable time. The planet just can't sustain it."
In the eyes of some Western elites, Westerners can have the privilege to eat meat while Chinese should just eat grass. They are reluctant to see Chinese are living an increasingly abundant life, and that the living standards of the Chinese are getting closer to the Westerners. They feel their sense of superiority including the one toward their political system challenged when they see Chinese, whose political path and values sharply differ from them, can also enjoy a better life.
January 25, 2021 12:20 pm
By Anonymous