A Reuter report came out with a new idea about the reason why Kim Jong
Nam was killed by North Korea, that he was a CIA spy. The previous
theory offered by Washington was that he was critical of the Kim Dynasty
and thus an order to assassinate him by Kim Jong Un. How plausible are
these untalented and biased western view, all with one central position,
he was killed by his half brother.
One glaring point about Kim Jong Nam was his finance. North Korea is not
a rich country and he had been living in ‘exile’ for so long outside
North Korea and supposedly living a life of a rich play boy and gambler.
This supposedly lavish decadent life style is not cheap and needed a
continuous supply of cash. Where did he get his money? Even if he was
useful to the CIA, but unlikely to be of much use as he was outside
North Korea, CIA would not and could not finance this kind of wasteful
expenditure. And if he was an outcast of North Korea, Kim Jong Un would
not be funding him. But it was obvious that he had a lot of money to
spend, meaning that North Korea was the likely source. No other country
would support the wild spending of a non entity.
The two supposedly murderers of Kim Jong Nam have been released
unconditionally. What happened, no crime committed? Know how silly Asian
leaders are, and how they would love to kiss the ass of the USA, if
they know that it was the act of North Korea, they would happily put the
two suspects to death, to be in the good book of the USA.
For them to release the suspects is likely because they knew North Korea
was innocent, and the whole allegation was fabricated. Very likely they
knew that it was the work of the Americans. Thus released everyone to
close the case.
The point is that Kim Jong Nam had a lot of money to spend…doing
nothing? I still stick to the position that he was working for North
Korea, for his half brother, to do all the money laundering to bring
hard cash for North Korea to pay for their imports. He was murdered by
the Americans just to put the blame on Kim Jong Un and to paint the
latter as a cold blooded murderer. This is the only consistent story,
kill Kim Jong Nam and blame Kim Jong Un, and smear Kim Jong Un.
What does it say when Trump called this ‘cold blooded murderer’ a nice
chap, and willing to meet with him and calling it brotherly love?
Because Trump knew that all the badmouthing and smearing of Kim Jong Un
were the works of the Americans.
Of course our resident funny, sometime crazy critic would disagree as he
totally agree and accept all the allegations made by the Americans,
that Kim Jong Un is a murderer, a womaniser, a very bad person. He
would not say any bad about Trump’s sexual exploits and groppings. The
latest smear campaign was that several of the negotiators of the Trump
Kim Summit, including Kim Jong Un’s sister, were executed only to
withdraw the allegation when they reappeared one after another.
See how talented or untalented are the western reports, how reliable or
unreliable are their so called objective and highly regarded main media,
and stupid experts that were actually generating fake news and
misinformation to manipulate the readers and published world wide in
many main media as facts, as worthy news!
Are these main media so gullible or told or paid to report it?
I hope by now everyone reading western media would treat them with high suspicion, that most of them are white lies, propaganda and mischiefs.
6/11/2019
Let’s talk massacres part II
Below are copied from wikipedia
California Genocide 1846–1873 Statewide (However the worst killings were in Round Valley) California 9,492 to 16,094. California Indians killed in over 370 massacres, California Indian population declined by 120,000 overall during the period
1837 Great Plains, smallpox epidemic 1836–1840. Missouri River through Rocky Mountains, Missouri , 17,200 to 34,400
Trail of Tears 1831–1850. Southeastern United States present day Oklahoma, 8,700 to 17,000. Deportation of Choctaw, Creek, Chickasaw, Cherokee, Seminole tribe members, black slaves, and white citizens as part of an ethnic cleansing policy made under the order of Andrew Jackson. In continuity with other Indian Removal policies the US has pursued in the past and future.
Long Walk of the Navajo, 1864–1868. Bosque Redondo, Arizona and New Mexico 3,500. Deaths of Navajo and Mescalero Apache from within the Bosque Redondo internment camp due to disease and starvation.
Comanche Campaign, 1867–1875. Statewide Texas 2,500 to 3,500.
Yavapai Wars, 1861-1875. Various areas Arizona 741 to over 5,500
The above are also white lies. Look at the first paragraph quoting 9,492 to 16,094 deaths. Then it added the Indian population declined by 120,000 over the same period? What happened, why so many disappeared? Migrated or massacred or diseased, killed by European diseases spread by the Americans? Oh, another point, the Americans would say no massacre, genocide is not massacre.
Also, with so few massacred, how could 80-100m native Americans died, disappeared, by natural death? Or they migrated to India? The Americans are not telling the whole truth about how they massacred 80-100m native Americans. Actually should search under genocide of native Americans. Massacres are just for small numbers of people murdered.
‘American Holocaust: D. Stannard (Oxford Press, 1992) – “over 100 million killed” “[Christopher] Columbus personally murdered half a million Natives”Native Americans have the highest mortality rate of any U.S. minority because of U.S. action and policy. The biggest killers though were smallpox, measles, influenza, whooping cough, diphtheria, typhus, bubonic plague, cholera, and scarlet fever. All imported by the Europeans colonists.’
See more on espressostalinist.com
What about the massacres in Korea and Vietnam, not counting in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan and many African and Arab countries? Part III
6/10/2019
Let’s talk massacres part I
Since the Americans are so happy to talk about Tiananmen Massacre as if
the Americans were angels, never commit any massacre, let’s take a look
at the Americans massacre records that they have recorded, not inclusive
of the massacres in Japan, Korea, Vietnam and the Middle East.
Here is a list of the 10 Horrific Native American Massacres in listverse.com
The first 100 years or so of the United States’ existence was filled with travesties like the Civil War and the enormous slave trade which flourished in the South. In addition, manifest destiny and the inherent racism involved with the “white man’s burden” led to a number of horrible massacres of the Native American population. Some are well-known, like the Wounded Knee Massacre, but there are other terrible examples that we shouldn’t forget.
10 Sand Creek Massacre
At Sand Creek in the Colorado territory in 1864, the Cheyenne village of around 800 was supposed to be protected territory. Chief Black Kettle had brokered a deal with a nearby US Army fort for his people’s safety, but this proved to be an outright lie.
Colonel John Chivington had decided that winning battles against local Native American tribes was the best way to become a territorial delegate to Congress. When spring 1864 proved fruitless for battle, he used a 700-volunteer militia to burn Native American villages.
On November 29, just one day after Black Kettle’s deal, the Colorado Volunteers attacked Sand Creek. Nearly all the Cheyenne men were out hunting, leaving the women, children, and elders with no one to protect them. Between 100 and 400 Native Americans were slaughtered.
Although Chivington was denounced by much of the country, he was never formally charged with anything.
9 Camp Grant Massacre
Shortly after the start of President Ulysses S. Grant’s “Peace Policy” toward Native Americans, the Camp Grant Massacre occurred in southern Arizona on April 30, 1871. The local Apache had recently agreed to live at Camp Grant via an order by Lieutenant Royal E. Whitman, who also pledged to provide the tribe with food.
Unfortunately, public opinion turned against the military in Arizona, declaring them unable to protect the territory’s citizens. A handful of Americans, some Mexicans, and some rival Native American tribesmen sneaked up on the peaceful village in the middle of the night.
Most of those killed were women and children because the men were out hunting for food. The perpetrators of the massacre had used unfounded claims of Apache depredations to justify murder. Although 104 men were charged with murder, all were acquitted at trial.
8 1860 Wiyot Massacre
In an act of genocide on a small tribe, the Wiyot Massacre took place on February 26, 1860. (Smaller attacks on the Wiyot tribe took place later that week.)
For at least 1,000 years, the tribe had lived off the northern coast of California on what is now called Indian Island. The peaceful Wiyot had just completed their annual world renewal ceremony, marking the start of their new year.
The men were out gathering supplies when a small group of white men crossed Humboldt Bay and slaughtered women, children, and the elderly. From 60 to 200 people died.
The local sheriff lied, citing revenge for cattle rustling as the reason. In reality, a local militia wished to be federally recognized as a state militia to receive money from the government. The militia leader believed that massacring local tribes would accomplish that goal, but it didn’t work.
7 Bridge Gulch Massacre
The Bridge Gulch Massacre against the Wintu tribe of northern California took place on April 23, 1852. Shortly before the attack, a man named John Anderson was killed, with his riderless mule returning to a nearby corral. Nearly 70 men set out after the perpetrators, who were reportedly members of the Wintu tribe, though they were of a different band than the ones who were brutally murdered.
Surrounding a part of the small valley known as Bridge Gulch, the men attacked early in the morning, shooting nearly every man, woman, and child they saw. Over 150 Native Americans were killed, and only two small girls survived. They were taken back to the town and “adopted” by white parents.
6 Cypress Hills Massacre
One of the driving forces behind the creation of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Cypress Hills Massacre took place in 1873 in what is now Saskatchewan. People of the First Nations had occupied the territory for thousands of years. Meanwhile, Montana fur traders had recently set up trading posts in the area, with tensions rising as the traders’ stocks began to dwindle.
Eventually, some disgruntled wolf hunters arrived, tired from tracking another Native American tribe who were supposedly horse thieves. When another horse went missing, the Assiniboine tribe was blamed.
The drunken Americans went to take one of the tribe’s horses as payment, but a handful of the Assiniboine, drunk as well, challenged them to a fight. The Americans slaughtered the Assiniboine, killing at least 20 of them.
Canadian officials tried in vain to prosecute those responsible, managing to capture three of them while they were still in Canada. But they were acquitted due to a lack of evidence.
5 Three Knolls Massacre
By 1865, the Yana tribe’s population had dwindled to fewer than 100 in northern California around Lassen Peak. After the murders of several nearby white people during a raid, hunters tracked the culprits to Three Knolls, where the Native Americans slept.
Determined to rid the area of any remaining natives, the settlers attacked, killing dozens of Native Americans. Only a handful escaped.
A Yana tribesman named Ishi was present at the massacre as a small child, and he and his family eventually hid in some nearby mountains for almost 40 years. 1n 1911, he emerged as a frail, elderly man—the last of his people—to tell his fantastical story.
4 Marias Massacre
The deadliest massacre of Native Americans in Montana’s history was a mistake. Colonel Eugene Baker had been sent by the government to “pacify” a rebellious band of the Blackfeet tribe.
Eventually, Baker’s men tracked the tribe to a village along the Marias River. On January 23, 1870, the men surrounded the village and prepared to attack.
But a scout recognized some of the painted designs on the lodges and reported to Baker that this was the wrong band. Baker replied, “That makes no difference, one band or another of them; they are all [Blackfeet] and we will attack them.”
Most of the Native American men were out hunting, so the majority of the 173 massacred were women, children, and the elderly. When Baker discovered that the survivors had smallpox, he abandoned them in the wilderness without food or shelter, increasing the death toll by 140.
3 Yontocket Massacre
The Tolowa people laid claim to territories in northwestern California and southern Oregon that were continuously encroached upon by white settlers. By 1853, a “war of extermination” had been going on for a while, with settlers forming makeshift militias and slaughtering any Native Americans they encountered.
In the fall of that year, the Tolowa and other tribes came together to pray at Yontocket, the spiritual center of their universe, and to perform the world renewal dance. Unknown to them, a group of white people, led by J.M. Peters, was slowly creeping upon the camp.
Surrounding the Tolowa, the men began firing, indiscriminately slaughtering everyone in sight. Peters, who lost no men during the massacre, reportedly said that “scarcely an Indian was left alive.” By the end of the violence, hundreds of people had been killed.
2 Clear Lake Massacre
An island in Clear Lake, California, was renamed Bloody Island after the massacre of the indigenous Pomo tribe there in 1850. Thanks to severe mistreatment, including rape and murder, at the hands of white men who had taken various members of the tribe as slaves, the Pomo people attacked, killing two men and escaping to a nearby lake.
Captain Nathaniel Lyon, a soldier in the US Cavalry, and other men set off into the woods to find the offending tribe. The men discovered the hidden camp a short time later.
After failing to successfully reach the tribe, which had taken refuge on an island in the lake, the soldiers built a handful of boats, loaded them with cannons, and attacked. From 100 to 400 Native Americans were killed.
A local newspaper originally declared the massacre to be tantamount to state-sponsored genocide but reversed course four days later, calling it a “greatly exaggerated” story.
1 Bear River Massacre
Perhaps the deadliest massacre of Native Americans in US history, the Bear River Massacre has remained in obscurity largely because it occurred during the Civil War. The Northern Shoshone called present-day southeastern Idaho home, and it was there that they were attacked.
Mormon settlers had been progressively taking more land from the Native Americans, appropriating nearly all of the arable territory. Striking back at those stealing their land, the Shoshone soon saw themselves in the crosshairs of Colonel Patrick Connor and 200 California Volunteers, who vowed to take no prisoners.
At daybreak on January 29, 1863, the soldiers attacked, brutally killing nearly 250 Native Americans. They raped any women who hadn’t been killed, used axes to crush the skulls of the wounded, and set fire to all the lodges.
The above 10 horrific massacres were lies, white lies. Not that they did not happen. These events were peanuts in the Singapore expression if you know what and how they massacred the Red Indians. Oh, they raised it to the highest level, called genocide. See part II
Here is a list of the 10 Horrific Native American Massacres in listverse.com
The first 100 years or so of the United States’ existence was filled with travesties like the Civil War and the enormous slave trade which flourished in the South. In addition, manifest destiny and the inherent racism involved with the “white man’s burden” led to a number of horrible massacres of the Native American population. Some are well-known, like the Wounded Knee Massacre, but there are other terrible examples that we shouldn’t forget.
10 Sand Creek Massacre
At Sand Creek in the Colorado territory in 1864, the Cheyenne village of around 800 was supposed to be protected territory. Chief Black Kettle had brokered a deal with a nearby US Army fort for his people’s safety, but this proved to be an outright lie.
Colonel John Chivington had decided that winning battles against local Native American tribes was the best way to become a territorial delegate to Congress. When spring 1864 proved fruitless for battle, he used a 700-volunteer militia to burn Native American villages.
On November 29, just one day after Black Kettle’s deal, the Colorado Volunteers attacked Sand Creek. Nearly all the Cheyenne men were out hunting, leaving the women, children, and elders with no one to protect them. Between 100 and 400 Native Americans were slaughtered.
Although Chivington was denounced by much of the country, he was never formally charged with anything.
9 Camp Grant Massacre
Shortly after the start of President Ulysses S. Grant’s “Peace Policy” toward Native Americans, the Camp Grant Massacre occurred in southern Arizona on April 30, 1871. The local Apache had recently agreed to live at Camp Grant via an order by Lieutenant Royal E. Whitman, who also pledged to provide the tribe with food.
Unfortunately, public opinion turned against the military in Arizona, declaring them unable to protect the territory’s citizens. A handful of Americans, some Mexicans, and some rival Native American tribesmen sneaked up on the peaceful village in the middle of the night.
Most of those killed were women and children because the men were out hunting for food. The perpetrators of the massacre had used unfounded claims of Apache depredations to justify murder. Although 104 men were charged with murder, all were acquitted at trial.
8 1860 Wiyot Massacre
In an act of genocide on a small tribe, the Wiyot Massacre took place on February 26, 1860. (Smaller attacks on the Wiyot tribe took place later that week.)
For at least 1,000 years, the tribe had lived off the northern coast of California on what is now called Indian Island. The peaceful Wiyot had just completed their annual world renewal ceremony, marking the start of their new year.
The men were out gathering supplies when a small group of white men crossed Humboldt Bay and slaughtered women, children, and the elderly. From 60 to 200 people died.
The local sheriff lied, citing revenge for cattle rustling as the reason. In reality, a local militia wished to be federally recognized as a state militia to receive money from the government. The militia leader believed that massacring local tribes would accomplish that goal, but it didn’t work.
7 Bridge Gulch Massacre
The Bridge Gulch Massacre against the Wintu tribe of northern California took place on April 23, 1852. Shortly before the attack, a man named John Anderson was killed, with his riderless mule returning to a nearby corral. Nearly 70 men set out after the perpetrators, who were reportedly members of the Wintu tribe, though they were of a different band than the ones who were brutally murdered.
Surrounding a part of the small valley known as Bridge Gulch, the men attacked early in the morning, shooting nearly every man, woman, and child they saw. Over 150 Native Americans were killed, and only two small girls survived. They were taken back to the town and “adopted” by white parents.
6 Cypress Hills Massacre
One of the driving forces behind the creation of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Cypress Hills Massacre took place in 1873 in what is now Saskatchewan. People of the First Nations had occupied the territory for thousands of years. Meanwhile, Montana fur traders had recently set up trading posts in the area, with tensions rising as the traders’ stocks began to dwindle.
Eventually, some disgruntled wolf hunters arrived, tired from tracking another Native American tribe who were supposedly horse thieves. When another horse went missing, the Assiniboine tribe was blamed.
The drunken Americans went to take one of the tribe’s horses as payment, but a handful of the Assiniboine, drunk as well, challenged them to a fight. The Americans slaughtered the Assiniboine, killing at least 20 of them.
Canadian officials tried in vain to prosecute those responsible, managing to capture three of them while they were still in Canada. But they were acquitted due to a lack of evidence.
5 Three Knolls Massacre
By 1865, the Yana tribe’s population had dwindled to fewer than 100 in northern California around Lassen Peak. After the murders of several nearby white people during a raid, hunters tracked the culprits to Three Knolls, where the Native Americans slept.
Determined to rid the area of any remaining natives, the settlers attacked, killing dozens of Native Americans. Only a handful escaped.
A Yana tribesman named Ishi was present at the massacre as a small child, and he and his family eventually hid in some nearby mountains for almost 40 years. 1n 1911, he emerged as a frail, elderly man—the last of his people—to tell his fantastical story.
4 Marias Massacre
The deadliest massacre of Native Americans in Montana’s history was a mistake. Colonel Eugene Baker had been sent by the government to “pacify” a rebellious band of the Blackfeet tribe.
Eventually, Baker’s men tracked the tribe to a village along the Marias River. On January 23, 1870, the men surrounded the village and prepared to attack.
But a scout recognized some of the painted designs on the lodges and reported to Baker that this was the wrong band. Baker replied, “That makes no difference, one band or another of them; they are all [Blackfeet] and we will attack them.”
Most of the Native American men were out hunting, so the majority of the 173 massacred were women, children, and the elderly. When Baker discovered that the survivors had smallpox, he abandoned them in the wilderness without food or shelter, increasing the death toll by 140.
3 Yontocket Massacre
The Tolowa people laid claim to territories in northwestern California and southern Oregon that were continuously encroached upon by white settlers. By 1853, a “war of extermination” had been going on for a while, with settlers forming makeshift militias and slaughtering any Native Americans they encountered.
In the fall of that year, the Tolowa and other tribes came together to pray at Yontocket, the spiritual center of their universe, and to perform the world renewal dance. Unknown to them, a group of white people, led by J.M. Peters, was slowly creeping upon the camp.
Surrounding the Tolowa, the men began firing, indiscriminately slaughtering everyone in sight. Peters, who lost no men during the massacre, reportedly said that “scarcely an Indian was left alive.” By the end of the violence, hundreds of people had been killed.
2 Clear Lake Massacre
An island in Clear Lake, California, was renamed Bloody Island after the massacre of the indigenous Pomo tribe there in 1850. Thanks to severe mistreatment, including rape and murder, at the hands of white men who had taken various members of the tribe as slaves, the Pomo people attacked, killing two men and escaping to a nearby lake.
Captain Nathaniel Lyon, a soldier in the US Cavalry, and other men set off into the woods to find the offending tribe. The men discovered the hidden camp a short time later.
After failing to successfully reach the tribe, which had taken refuge on an island in the lake, the soldiers built a handful of boats, loaded them with cannons, and attacked. From 100 to 400 Native Americans were killed.
A local newspaper originally declared the massacre to be tantamount to state-sponsored genocide but reversed course four days later, calling it a “greatly exaggerated” story.
1 Bear River Massacre
Perhaps the deadliest massacre of Native Americans in US history, the Bear River Massacre has remained in obscurity largely because it occurred during the Civil War. The Northern Shoshone called present-day southeastern Idaho home, and it was there that they were attacked.
Mormon settlers had been progressively taking more land from the Native Americans, appropriating nearly all of the arable territory. Striking back at those stealing their land, the Shoshone soon saw themselves in the crosshairs of Colonel Patrick Connor and 200 California Volunteers, who vowed to take no prisoners.
At daybreak on January 29, 1863, the soldiers attacked, brutally killing nearly 250 Native Americans. They raped any women who hadn’t been killed, used axes to crush the skulls of the wounded, and set fire to all the lodges.
The above 10 horrific massacres were lies, white lies. Not that they did not happen. These events were peanuts in the Singapore expression if you know what and how they massacred the Red Indians. Oh, they raised it to the highest level, called genocide. See part II
First test of fake news in the news
A diplomatic faux pas between Singapore on one side and Vietnam and Cambodia on the other side seems to be brewing with both sides saying different things on the Vietnamese presence in Cambodia. Hsien Loong said it was an invasion of Cambodia by Vietnam. The Vietnamese said they were there to liberate the Cambodians from the Khmer Rouges. The Cambodians chipped in to say they appreciated the Vietnamese presence and to prevent the massacre of the Cambodians by the Khmer Rouges. The Vietnamese and Cambodians are asking Hsien Loong to apologise for saying something they don't see as their truth.
Some quarters in the opposition parties have raised this issue and calling for Hsien Loong to apologise for making a false statement or a fake news or alternative truth. Who is telling the truth and who is spreading false or fake news? The Vietnamese and cambodians are sticking to their version of the truth. Hsien Loong is sticking to his Singaporean truth.
Can both sides be telling the truth or one side is telling truth and one side is telling fake news? How would this stand under our POFMA? I am very sure if this case appears in our courts it would definitely be in Hsien Loong's favour and the other side be judged as making false news and vice versa. What would Shanmugam said, Hsien Loong spreading fake news or the Cambodians and Vietnamese spreading fake news?
Is fake news so easy to judge? And in this case if one party is wrong for spreading fake news, it would mean that govt or national leaders can be spreading fake news. Actually the answer is so obvious. It all depends on who is saying it and in which country and what they would want to believe. Hmmm, does it mean that the truth is subjective or fake news is subjective? Remember that every country is writing their own history, and Singapore's history is British Empire history?
What do you think? While so many that are here, with Matilah the cheer leader, are in agreement with what was said in Parliament, that CPF is not our money, many, including me, would say CPF is our money. Am I spreading fake news, or what transpired or uttered in Parliament was fake news?
Now that POFMA is law, the party that is making false or fake news can be charged. Can those who shared my view that CPF is our money be charged for spreading fake news? The answer is no, parliamentary privilege, can say anything in parliament and cannot be charged, unless...
Some quarters in the opposition parties have raised this issue and calling for Hsien Loong to apologise for making a false statement or a fake news or alternative truth. Who is telling the truth and who is spreading false or fake news? The Vietnamese and cambodians are sticking to their version of the truth. Hsien Loong is sticking to his Singaporean truth.
Can both sides be telling the truth or one side is telling truth and one side is telling fake news? How would this stand under our POFMA? I am very sure if this case appears in our courts it would definitely be in Hsien Loong's favour and the other side be judged as making false news and vice versa. What would Shanmugam said, Hsien Loong spreading fake news or the Cambodians and Vietnamese spreading fake news?
Is fake news so easy to judge? And in this case if one party is wrong for spreading fake news, it would mean that govt or national leaders can be spreading fake news. Actually the answer is so obvious. It all depends on who is saying it and in which country and what they would want to believe. Hmmm, does it mean that the truth is subjective or fake news is subjective? Remember that every country is writing their own history, and Singapore's history is British Empire history?
What do you think? While so many that are here, with Matilah the cheer leader, are in agreement with what was said in Parliament, that CPF is not our money, many, including me, would say CPF is our money. Am I spreading fake news, or what transpired or uttered in Parliament was fake news?
Now that POFMA is law, the party that is making false or fake news can be charged. Can those who shared my view that CPF is our money be charged for spreading fake news? The answer is no, parliamentary privilege, can say anything in parliament and cannot be charged, unless...
6/09/2019
Yamato - Live by the sword, die by the sword
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKROConWAHE
A very well produced sinking of Yamato at the end of WW2, depicting the last few minutes of the lives of Japanese soldiers and the pain, suffering and agony they went through, exactly like the American soldiers in Hawaii when attacked by them. Just retribution.
The attack scene is a good reminder for the crews of American carriers today, when they are attacked by waves and waves of fighter bombers, and missiles, and all they could do was to be sitting ducks.
The war demons in their aircraft carriers only think of attacking others with immunity, hitting others when others could not hit back, until the day they, the predators, become the victims and suffer the equally savage attacks and be bashed to pieces. The fate of all aircraft carrier soldiers would be the same as in this short 15 minute clips, live by the sword, die by the sword. Three Japanese aircraft carriers were sunk in the battle of Midway with all on board blown to pieces.
It is very enjoyable and satisfying to see the hunters became the hunted, the predators became the hapless prey, to be devoured like they devoured their victims. The Japanese butchers were butchered by the Americans.
RIP American boys and girls of Pearl Harbour, Hawaii.
This is the clip on the attack of Pearl Harbour by the Japanese, the devastating destruction of the American fleet with the Americans half asleep. 7 minutes of sheer agony under the merciless Japanese fighter bombers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZJ3T7PBO6Q
A very well produced sinking of Yamato at the end of WW2, depicting the last few minutes of the lives of Japanese soldiers and the pain, suffering and agony they went through, exactly like the American soldiers in Hawaii when attacked by them. Just retribution.
The attack scene is a good reminder for the crews of American carriers today, when they are attacked by waves and waves of fighter bombers, and missiles, and all they could do was to be sitting ducks.
The war demons in their aircraft carriers only think of attacking others with immunity, hitting others when others could not hit back, until the day they, the predators, become the victims and suffer the equally savage attacks and be bashed to pieces. The fate of all aircraft carrier soldiers would be the same as in this short 15 minute clips, live by the sword, die by the sword. Three Japanese aircraft carriers were sunk in the battle of Midway with all on board blown to pieces.
It is very enjoyable and satisfying to see the hunters became the hunted, the predators became the hapless prey, to be devoured like they devoured their victims. The Japanese butchers were butchered by the Americans.
RIP American boys and girls of Pearl Harbour, Hawaii.
This is the clip on the attack of Pearl Harbour by the Japanese, the devastating destruction of the American fleet with the Americans half asleep. 7 minutes of sheer agony under the merciless Japanese fighter bombers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZJ3T7PBO6Q
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)