Little boy Justine and little girl Freeland are now lost for words as
what to do next with the arrest of a third Canadian by China. The only
thing they could do is to regurgitate the phrase ‘rule of law’ to hide
their lawless arrest of an innocent Chinese citizen. But this would not
work anymore and after repeating it over and over again it becomes so
lame, sounding to hollow and hypocritical.
Oh yes, they can still go crying to bid daddy the USA. Try to threaten
China with the military might of the Americans. The Chinese would
tremble when threaten by the American aircraft carriers. No? It won’t do
either. China today would take on the Americans if needed to. The
temperature and tension are rising and China is not going to back down
and be bullied by this little USA. China is going to teach the little
boys and girls a lesson in politeness and not to be rude to people
carrying a bigger stick.
I think there is one possible way to get out of this tricky situation
and come up on top for Canada. Try to get help from Singapore. Singapore
had a great experience handling a similar situation like the Canadians
when its armoured vehicles were detained in Hong Kong. How did Singapore
do it and successfully got its armoured vehicles back? The details are
classified of course. The only thing that could be gathered was from
the information available in the media.
One thing, the Canadian ministers must talk tough. Apply the rule of law
on China and demand the return of the Canadians arrested or else face
consequences, like real. Next Canada can hire our retired diplomats who
are very experience in handling China to assist them. Yes, Canada can
learn from these diplomats to punch above its weight and give China a
few black eyes with their loud mouth undiplomatic diplomacy. China would
definitely cower where hearing the loud voices and rhetoric against
them.
To add more pressure, hire some of the anti China journalists or expurts
to write articles to smear China, calling China a bully, not following
the rule of law. Keep publishing such articles in the main media to
embarrass China. And there are many hostile Americans, Jewish and Indian
writers that can reinforce the message, to attack China repeatedly.
When all these forces are working in unison, China would capitulate and
release all the Canadians arrested. And Canada can continue to play with
its ‘rule of law’ to detain Meng and even extradite her to the USA for
30 years of imprisonment. And China would not be able to do a thing.
QED.
Retired diplomats can still be very useful in handling international
disputes and can be paid handsomely for their experience and expertise
in managing China. In this world today, only Singapore has diplomats of
such standing, reputation and stature that would make China tremble when
they opened their mouths. Just their looks would send shivers down the
spines of Chinese leaders.
12/20/2018
Huawei – The Americans spreading fake news and white lie
Was Saddam Hussein’s WMD fake news or American white lie? Some western
idiots and bananas would still say not sure, still in a state of denial
that their godly white Americans cannot lie and would not lie, that
Saddam still could have hidden his WMD somewhere but not found.
The latest fake news and white lie is that Huawei’s 5G technology is a national security risk to America and the 5 eyes countries. Raising national security and security threat is the American’s escapee, an excuse it is using everywhere and every time when they deem fit, when all other reasons failed to make sense. China’s buiding islands in the South China Sea is a threat to American interests and security, Huawei’s supremacy in 5G technology is a threat to American national security etc etc. Everything is a threat to American interest and security, read American dominance as the Number One super power.
The sicko John Bolton started another white lie. China’s investments and aids in Africa is another form of colonialism. This white colonialist is accusing China of colonizing Africa? Who colonized Africa and robbed the Africans of their wealth? Who hunted down Africans and turned them into slaves to work in the cotton fields? Who practiced apartheid in Africa? Oh Africa has its own ‘bananas’ that believed the whites are the gods sent to help them even after centuries of deprivation and inflicting poverty and war in all the African countries.
By making such allegations, particularly in the case of Huawei, when no American company could come near to Huawei in 5G technology, the Americans hope to shut Huawei out of the American market. They also put pressure on their allies to ban Huawei from their respective markets. Some like Australia and Japan would be most willing to do so for their own reasons. Britain is hesitating as they know that without 5G they would lack behind when competing with China and other European countries. The British are too smart to miss this boat just like when they jumped into the AIIB as founding member.
Germany, France, Italy, Portugal and several other European countries would go ahead to welcome Huawei into their market. What the Americans have done by spreading this white lie and restraining their allies to use Huawei is to keep them in the dark ages of communication technology. They would be left behind because of the American pressure. Would the Brits want to be left behind while France and Germany ran ahead with 5G? This is exactly how and why the ‘has been’ American Empire would degenerate further and lack behind other nations by their backward and selfish policy to shun the latest 5G technology.
I bet the British would turn against the Americans again in this as they fear being left behind in this technology race to the future. The British has been declining since they lost the empire and cannot afford to fall further behind to other European countries like Germany and France for not embracing Huawei’s 5G technologies. It is suicidal for the British and those that abided by the American pressure and lie not to use 5G. This is how the Empire will fall and fade into oblivion for not wanting to face the new reality repeating what happened to the Qing Empire in its dying days.
Huawei has the technology that is most relevant and wanted by all the countries wanting to move forward, not backward to Stone Age. It is not only a super technology, it is a technology that would change the world. The Americans are gripped with fear of Huawei’s 5G. A good product is a good product by any names. The American allegation is just a red herring to stop Huawei but did not come up with any evidence to support their allegation except casting doubts. Huawei is not guilty unless proven and does not need to prove it is innocent. But the white men are now expecting Huawei to prove its innocence just because of the American allegation and lie.
PS. When a country uses Huawei’s 5G and equipment, the equipment would be installed in the respective country and would have its native people managing the system. In other words they are in control of the system and equipment and could manage and prevent any mischief using the equipment, protecting their national security. So what is this American white lie about Huawei’s security threat? Huawei’s staff would not be in control or in charge of the equipment and system. Once they have accepted the system, they could ban Huawei’s staff from the system.
The main objective of the American white lie is to kill Huawei and its 5G technology. Period. And it is the Americans that are violating a UN Resolution on trading with Iran, not Huawei, China. The US is the only country imposing this sanction against Iran when Europe and the rest of the world are abiding by the UN Resolution and permitted to trade with Iran. This American sanction is not UN approved but a unilateral American sanction. Why no Europeans were arrested for trading with Iran?
PS. China arrested a third Canadian.
The latest fake news and white lie is that Huawei’s 5G technology is a national security risk to America and the 5 eyes countries. Raising national security and security threat is the American’s escapee, an excuse it is using everywhere and every time when they deem fit, when all other reasons failed to make sense. China’s buiding islands in the South China Sea is a threat to American interests and security, Huawei’s supremacy in 5G technology is a threat to American national security etc etc. Everything is a threat to American interest and security, read American dominance as the Number One super power.
The sicko John Bolton started another white lie. China’s investments and aids in Africa is another form of colonialism. This white colonialist is accusing China of colonizing Africa? Who colonized Africa and robbed the Africans of their wealth? Who hunted down Africans and turned them into slaves to work in the cotton fields? Who practiced apartheid in Africa? Oh Africa has its own ‘bananas’ that believed the whites are the gods sent to help them even after centuries of deprivation and inflicting poverty and war in all the African countries.
By making such allegations, particularly in the case of Huawei, when no American company could come near to Huawei in 5G technology, the Americans hope to shut Huawei out of the American market. They also put pressure on their allies to ban Huawei from their respective markets. Some like Australia and Japan would be most willing to do so for their own reasons. Britain is hesitating as they know that without 5G they would lack behind when competing with China and other European countries. The British are too smart to miss this boat just like when they jumped into the AIIB as founding member.
Germany, France, Italy, Portugal and several other European countries would go ahead to welcome Huawei into their market. What the Americans have done by spreading this white lie and restraining their allies to use Huawei is to keep them in the dark ages of communication technology. They would be left behind because of the American pressure. Would the Brits want to be left behind while France and Germany ran ahead with 5G? This is exactly how and why the ‘has been’ American Empire would degenerate further and lack behind other nations by their backward and selfish policy to shun the latest 5G technology.
I bet the British would turn against the Americans again in this as they fear being left behind in this technology race to the future. The British has been declining since they lost the empire and cannot afford to fall further behind to other European countries like Germany and France for not embracing Huawei’s 5G technologies. It is suicidal for the British and those that abided by the American pressure and lie not to use 5G. This is how the Empire will fall and fade into oblivion for not wanting to face the new reality repeating what happened to the Qing Empire in its dying days.
Huawei has the technology that is most relevant and wanted by all the countries wanting to move forward, not backward to Stone Age. It is not only a super technology, it is a technology that would change the world. The Americans are gripped with fear of Huawei’s 5G. A good product is a good product by any names. The American allegation is just a red herring to stop Huawei but did not come up with any evidence to support their allegation except casting doubts. Huawei is not guilty unless proven and does not need to prove it is innocent. But the white men are now expecting Huawei to prove its innocence just because of the American allegation and lie.
PS. When a country uses Huawei’s 5G and equipment, the equipment would be installed in the respective country and would have its native people managing the system. In other words they are in control of the system and equipment and could manage and prevent any mischief using the equipment, protecting their national security. So what is this American white lie about Huawei’s security threat? Huawei’s staff would not be in control or in charge of the equipment and system. Once they have accepted the system, they could ban Huawei’s staff from the system.
The main objective of the American white lie is to kill Huawei and its 5G technology. Period. And it is the Americans that are violating a UN Resolution on trading with Iran, not Huawei, China. The US is the only country imposing this sanction against Iran when Europe and the rest of the world are abiding by the UN Resolution and permitted to trade with Iran. This American sanction is not UN approved but a unilateral American sanction. Why no Europeans were arrested for trading with Iran?
PS. China arrested a third Canadian.
12/19/2018
The Kidnapping of Huawei's CFO, Meng Wanzhou May Lead to War of Unknown consequences
Is the US trying to exercise extra-territoriality over the kidnapping of Huawei's CFO, Meng Wanzhou. If so it is just foolish and wishful thinking. The kidnapping of Meng Wanzhou is an act of banditry which must be strongly denounced and condemned by the whole civilize world.
The kidnapping of Meng Wanzhou is a criminal banditry act which will have far reaching and far ranging worldwide disastrous consequences and implications not only for China and the Chinese people but also for all countries which value freedom, independence and full sovereignty of their countries.
Meng Wanzhou should be freed without conditions. failing which China is obliged to complement the precedent set by USA and all Americans and its western allies will face similar predicaments not only from China but also from other countries which have been bullied by US and have been the target of US illogical illateral sanctions.
USA, a rogue and thuggery country must seriously take note, China and the Chinese people will not be humiliated again to be subjected to US practise of extraterritorial legality.
From the Opium Wars of 1830s to 1940s , a dark age in Chinese history. China was attacked, invaded and occupied by many European countries viz England, France, Russia, Germany, America and Japan. Each of the invading country subjected China to great shameful intolerable humiliations. They each and every one imposed on China a punishing war indemnity where China was forced to pay to each of the occupying powers hundreds of millions of silver dollars . ( In today's value it is worth a few thousand billions of dollars ). This served to impoverish China and the Chinese people for over a hundred years until 1049 when the Peoples Republic of China stopped the payment.
The British, France, Russia, Germany, America, Italy, Holland and Japan occupied large areas of Chinese lands in the coastal ports of Shanghai, Ning Po, Dairen ( Port Arthur ), Canton , Amoy and others. In these ports and other occupied areas they exercised extra territorial rights . They collected all the revenues, taxes, duties, port dues and deprived the Chinese government of any revenues at all.This further impoverish China in conjunction to the war indemnities.
In the occupied areas the Westerners were not subjected to Chinese laws. Also Chinese people in occupied areas were subjected to foreign laws and not Chinese laws. Thus when westerners or Chinese commit crimes they could just escape to foreign occupied areas and escaped punishment from Chinese jurisdiction.
The most humiliating part was when they carved up China and divided China among themselves as their sphere of influence and insultingly called it "the cutting of the Chinese water melon." They detached large swathes of Chinese lands and incorporated or annexed them to British India ( now the cause of border trouble between China and India )and Burma, to France Indo-China and to Russia's Far East ( mostly taken from China ), and to Japan which occupied Liu Chiu Dow ( which the Japs renamed Okinawa ) and Taiwan.
Now, in the case of Huawei and Meng Wanzhou US thinks it can exercise extraterritoriality over a Chinese citizen and thereby over China. US must stop thinking foolishly that China will allows its citizen who has not committed any crime or breach any US laws to be kidnapped to be tried in USA. It is wishful thinking if it thinks it can fix Huawei or Meng Wanzhou and thereby exercise extraterritoriality against China.
USA has run foul of the rules of international laws. It has defied United Nations ruling under United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 which calls on all countries to drop sanctions on Iran as part of the 2015 Nuclear Agreements. Yet the recalcitrant USA is alone in defiance of the resolution and rejects the Security Council's role in such matters.
The kidnapping of Meng Wanzhou is illegal, unlawful and extremely provocative. Here I quote Professor D. Sachs of Columbia University
"When global trade rules obstruct USA gangster tactics, then the rules have to go according to Trump."
"The unprecedented arrest of Meng is even more provocative because it is based on US extraterritorial sanctions, that is the claim by US that it can order other countries to stop trading with third parties such as Cuba or Iran. US would certainly not tolerate China or any other country telling US companies with whom they can or cannot trade."
"US has no right to unilaterally sanction Huawei base only on US rules. It should be based on agreements according to United Nations Security Council if there is a case."
"The Trump administration, not Huawei or China is today's greatest threat to international rule of law and therfore to global peace."
The implications of Huawei-Meng Wanzhou's case is that if US is allowed to kidnap a Chinese citizen and hold a China's top company to ransom and get away with it , that would mean US rules and laws can be applied on any Chinese or any Chinese firms be it whether they are domiciled in China or outside China. That would be acceding to US extraterritoriality . It would mean US rules and laws supercede Chinese rules and laws even in China. Ultimately that means China will lose its independence as a sovereign nation and come under US rule and dominance.
In this 21st century if US still thinks it can exercise extraterritoriality on China or any other country it is foolish and wishful thinking for it would be tantamount to declaration of war.
China should not take chances but must be fully prepared for all out war against a desperate rogue evil empire
Let other countries big or small be aware if the rogue evil empire dares to commit travesty with a powerful China now, what chances have they if one day US turns against them and exercise extraterritoriality against them base on flimsy fabricated reasons as in the case of Huawei-Meng Wanzhou as well as bullies under illateral US sanctions on many other countries like, Iran, Cuba, Venezuella, Turkey, Cambodia and many more others.
It is time for all other countries on earth to wake up to the evil intent of the rogue US which intends to bring the whole world of all countries under its abominable dominance and total hegemony. People of the world and of all countries must unite to defend and uphold their independence and sovereignty and destroy the Evil Empire before it can destroy the beautiful world on earth.
Southernglory1
Wednesday, 19th December, 2018
The kidnapping of Meng Wanzhou is a criminal banditry act which will have far reaching and far ranging worldwide disastrous consequences and implications not only for China and the Chinese people but also for all countries which value freedom, independence and full sovereignty of their countries.
Meng Wanzhou should be freed without conditions. failing which China is obliged to complement the precedent set by USA and all Americans and its western allies will face similar predicaments not only from China but also from other countries which have been bullied by US and have been the target of US illogical illateral sanctions.
USA, a rogue and thuggery country must seriously take note, China and the Chinese people will not be humiliated again to be subjected to US practise of extraterritorial legality.
From the Opium Wars of 1830s to 1940s , a dark age in Chinese history. China was attacked, invaded and occupied by many European countries viz England, France, Russia, Germany, America and Japan. Each of the invading country subjected China to great shameful intolerable humiliations. They each and every one imposed on China a punishing war indemnity where China was forced to pay to each of the occupying powers hundreds of millions of silver dollars . ( In today's value it is worth a few thousand billions of dollars ). This served to impoverish China and the Chinese people for over a hundred years until 1049 when the Peoples Republic of China stopped the payment.
The British, France, Russia, Germany, America, Italy, Holland and Japan occupied large areas of Chinese lands in the coastal ports of Shanghai, Ning Po, Dairen ( Port Arthur ), Canton , Amoy and others. In these ports and other occupied areas they exercised extra territorial rights . They collected all the revenues, taxes, duties, port dues and deprived the Chinese government of any revenues at all.This further impoverish China in conjunction to the war indemnities.
In the occupied areas the Westerners were not subjected to Chinese laws. Also Chinese people in occupied areas were subjected to foreign laws and not Chinese laws. Thus when westerners or Chinese commit crimes they could just escape to foreign occupied areas and escaped punishment from Chinese jurisdiction.
The most humiliating part was when they carved up China and divided China among themselves as their sphere of influence and insultingly called it "the cutting of the Chinese water melon." They detached large swathes of Chinese lands and incorporated or annexed them to British India ( now the cause of border trouble between China and India )and Burma, to France Indo-China and to Russia's Far East ( mostly taken from China ), and to Japan which occupied Liu Chiu Dow ( which the Japs renamed Okinawa ) and Taiwan.
Now, in the case of Huawei and Meng Wanzhou US thinks it can exercise extraterritoriality over a Chinese citizen and thereby over China. US must stop thinking foolishly that China will allows its citizen who has not committed any crime or breach any US laws to be kidnapped to be tried in USA. It is wishful thinking if it thinks it can fix Huawei or Meng Wanzhou and thereby exercise extraterritoriality against China.
USA has run foul of the rules of international laws. It has defied United Nations ruling under United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 which calls on all countries to drop sanctions on Iran as part of the 2015 Nuclear Agreements. Yet the recalcitrant USA is alone in defiance of the resolution and rejects the Security Council's role in such matters.
The kidnapping of Meng Wanzhou is illegal, unlawful and extremely provocative. Here I quote Professor D. Sachs of Columbia University
"When global trade rules obstruct USA gangster tactics, then the rules have to go according to Trump."
"The unprecedented arrest of Meng is even more provocative because it is based on US extraterritorial sanctions, that is the claim by US that it can order other countries to stop trading with third parties such as Cuba or Iran. US would certainly not tolerate China or any other country telling US companies with whom they can or cannot trade."
"US has no right to unilaterally sanction Huawei base only on US rules. It should be based on agreements according to United Nations Security Council if there is a case."
"The Trump administration, not Huawei or China is today's greatest threat to international rule of law and therfore to global peace."
The implications of Huawei-Meng Wanzhou's case is that if US is allowed to kidnap a Chinese citizen and hold a China's top company to ransom and get away with it , that would mean US rules and laws can be applied on any Chinese or any Chinese firms be it whether they are domiciled in China or outside China. That would be acceding to US extraterritoriality . It would mean US rules and laws supercede Chinese rules and laws even in China. Ultimately that means China will lose its independence as a sovereign nation and come under US rule and dominance.
In this 21st century if US still thinks it can exercise extraterritoriality on China or any other country it is foolish and wishful thinking for it would be tantamount to declaration of war.
China should not take chances but must be fully prepared for all out war against a desperate rogue evil empire
Let other countries big or small be aware if the rogue evil empire dares to commit travesty with a powerful China now, what chances have they if one day US turns against them and exercise extraterritoriality against them base on flimsy fabricated reasons as in the case of Huawei-Meng Wanzhou as well as bullies under illateral US sanctions on many other countries like, Iran, Cuba, Venezuella, Turkey, Cambodia and many more others.
It is time for all other countries on earth to wake up to the evil intent of the rogue US which intends to bring the whole world of all countries under its abominable dominance and total hegemony. People of the world and of all countries must unite to defend and uphold their independence and sovereignty and destroy the Evil Empire before it can destroy the beautiful world on earth.
Southernglory1
Wednesday, 19th December, 2018
Why sugar tax? What's next, salt tax?
Does sugar cause diabetes?
There are two main types of diabetes – Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.In Type 1 diabetes, the insulin producing cells in your pancreas are destroyed by your immune system. No amount of sugar in your diet – or anything in your lifestyle – has caused or can cause you to get Type 1 diabetes.
With Type 2 diabetes, though we know sugar doesn’t directly cause Type 2 diabetes, you are more likely to get it if you are overweight. You gain weight when you take in more calories than your body needs, and sugary foods and drinks contain a lot of calories.
And it's important to add that fatty foods and drinks are playing a part in our nation's expanding waistline.
So you can see if too much sugar is making you put on weight, then you are increasing your risk of getting Type 2 diabetes. But Type 2 diabetes is complex, and sugar is unlikely to be the only reason the condition develops. Diabetes UK.
The above statements by Diabetes UK said it clearly. For Type 1 diabetes, sugar is not a cause of diabetes. Period. In the case of Type 2, sugar is only one of the indirect cause of diabetes. Fatty food, carbohydrates all add to the sugar level in the blood. Fat people are more likely or have a higher chance of getting diabetes. So don't blame sugar as the main culprit. Incidentally Type 1 is the more serious of the two types of diabetes as in this case the pancreas is not producing enough insulin.
The idea of a sugar tax was politely shot down by an Australian professor from Monash, saying that it was ineffective and at best with a small impact. There are many other factors that would lead to diabetes eg lack of exercise, genetics and stress. So if sugar should be taxed because it is one of the indirect causes of diabetes, what's next? Tax on carbohydrates, tax on people not exercising, tax on fatty food?
Why is sugar been identified as a factor to be taxed, and why is tax a solution? Funny reasons and funny solution? Is it all about money, about squeezing more money from the people? Is this another desperate move to raise tax because the govt needs money? And the govt needs your view on whether to tax you or not to tax you and the people are to commit themselves to being taxed?
What about people that need to take sugar, especially children that have an active life and need more sugar while they are growing and playing? Normal and healthy children would easily take care of their sugar intake without fearing diabetes. Personally I need a bit more sugar than usual to keep me buzzing. A lack of sugar will make me drowsy and slow. Sugar is important for people leading an active lifestyle. Sugar is energy. Why should people be penalised and taxed just for living actively? I also have to add salt to my drinks after active physical training. I get cramps when my salt level is low. Would salt be the next thing to be slated for higher taxes? High water tax not enough, sugar, salt also want to tax when these are the basic life necessities, basic building blocks for a healthy lifestyle?
No one is encouraging people to take excessive sugar. A simple solution would be to regulate the sugar content in drinks. Even this does not ensure people consume less sugar as one can drink more packs or bottles instead. But the effect will be there to the casual drinkers. A sugar tax does not directly lead to lower consumption of sugar nor lowering of diabetic cases but lead to more money to the govt coffer.
How many silly buggers would want to tell the govt, please tax me more for consuming more sugar to stop them from taking more sugar?
Once tax is levied on sugar, many many food items would end up being taxed as sugar is a component of the food and leading to higher cost of living.
12/18/2018
Canadian govt - A bunch of innocent boys and girls in govt
Reading the western media, especially from their political commentators and even govt officials, one cannot get away from the notion that the Canadians are so angelic, so innocent, just like little boys and girls, in the arrest and harsh treatment of an innocent Chinese lady while transiting Vancouver airport. She was arrested not because she committed a crime. The Canadians knew that she was innocent. But they have to arrest her and subjected her to treatments befitting a hard core criminal, under the pretext of rule of law. The Canadians lived by the rule of law. And they are having a great time enjoying the arrest of Meng.
So, under what rule of law did they arrest Meng Wanzhou? Oh, they have an extradition treaty with the Americans. So when the Americans told them to arrest Meng Wanzhou, a Chinese national who did not commit any crimes, they did so, because that was the rule of law, arresting an innocent citizen of another country also can. There is no other condition attached to such extradition treaty? Of course there are. The person being arrested must have committed a crime, and the request must not be politically motivated or for any other reasons than committing a crime.
Did the boys and girls in the Canada govt know that the arrest of Meng Wanzhou was politically motivated, a kidnapping of another country's citizen to be used as a bargaining chip, to shut Huawei out of the western market? No they did not know. Really, the children did not know. And that is true. How could a little girl made Foreign Minister, and a little boy PM know the difference between a crime and rule of law and a political and commercial plot schemed by the thugs in Washington? They could not have known. They only know how to play with their toys, and if the thugs in Washington told them to arrest an innocent citizen from another country, little innocent and ignorant boys and girls have to believe the Americans were doing it because of a crime committed, and because of the rule of law.
So everyday they uttered about the rule of law and nothing else, like all innocent boys and girls trained to do, it is the rule of law, it is the rule of law, Canada is a rule of law country. China has no rule of law, so China arrested the two intelligence operators is lawless, did not obey any rule of law. The two Canadians arrested in China are also innocent boys that did nothing wrong and China is behaving like thugs to arrest them without observing the rule of law. They could not see anything wrong with what the two Canadians were doing in China, sooooo innocent.
What if there were evidence that the Americans were lying to them, that the arrest of Meng was a politically motivated ploy, that she was a bargaining chip in the China trade war and trade negotiation? No, cannot be, the arrest was a rule of law thing. What about the American President saying that he would intervene to set her free if this could end up making a trade deal with China in the interest of the Americans? Is this not clear enough that there is nothing about a crime or about the rule of law? Now that Trump had said it in front of the media and shown to the whole world, what did the little girl do? She pleaded with Trump not to politicise it. She used the word 'politicise' because she knew. But if Trump would to listen to her and keep quiet henceforth, she and other little boys and girls could continue with their lie that it is not politics but the rule of law. And these children can live happily with that like nothing happened at all.
What the American President said was just what he said, nothing to affect 'the rule of law' arrest of Meng. The little boys and girls in Canada only want to believe that they were playing a game of rule of law and anything else they would not hear, could not understand. This is what you will get when a govt is run by a bunch of innocent and ignorant little brats. They believed that they were doing all the right things and China was doing all the wrong things.
They are so innocent, so cute and so naive, they could not have done anything wrong about wrongful arrest of an innocent citizen of another country or ill treating her and violating her human rights. When would these vicious little brats wake up from the world of childish make beliefs? It is the American's fault, not the Canadians. They just arrest Meng because the Americans asked them, nothing to do with them. Oh, so cute!
So, under what rule of law did they arrest Meng Wanzhou? Oh, they have an extradition treaty with the Americans. So when the Americans told them to arrest Meng Wanzhou, a Chinese national who did not commit any crimes, they did so, because that was the rule of law, arresting an innocent citizen of another country also can. There is no other condition attached to such extradition treaty? Of course there are. The person being arrested must have committed a crime, and the request must not be politically motivated or for any other reasons than committing a crime.
Did the boys and girls in the Canada govt know that the arrest of Meng Wanzhou was politically motivated, a kidnapping of another country's citizen to be used as a bargaining chip, to shut Huawei out of the western market? No they did not know. Really, the children did not know. And that is true. How could a little girl made Foreign Minister, and a little boy PM know the difference between a crime and rule of law and a political and commercial plot schemed by the thugs in Washington? They could not have known. They only know how to play with their toys, and if the thugs in Washington told them to arrest an innocent citizen from another country, little innocent and ignorant boys and girls have to believe the Americans were doing it because of a crime committed, and because of the rule of law.
So everyday they uttered about the rule of law and nothing else, like all innocent boys and girls trained to do, it is the rule of law, it is the rule of law, Canada is a rule of law country. China has no rule of law, so China arrested the two intelligence operators is lawless, did not obey any rule of law. The two Canadians arrested in China are also innocent boys that did nothing wrong and China is behaving like thugs to arrest them without observing the rule of law. They could not see anything wrong with what the two Canadians were doing in China, sooooo innocent.
What if there were evidence that the Americans were lying to them, that the arrest of Meng was a politically motivated ploy, that she was a bargaining chip in the China trade war and trade negotiation? No, cannot be, the arrest was a rule of law thing. What about the American President saying that he would intervene to set her free if this could end up making a trade deal with China in the interest of the Americans? Is this not clear enough that there is nothing about a crime or about the rule of law? Now that Trump had said it in front of the media and shown to the whole world, what did the little girl do? She pleaded with Trump not to politicise it. She used the word 'politicise' because she knew. But if Trump would to listen to her and keep quiet henceforth, she and other little boys and girls could continue with their lie that it is not politics but the rule of law. And these children can live happily with that like nothing happened at all.
What the American President said was just what he said, nothing to affect 'the rule of law' arrest of Meng. The little boys and girls in Canada only want to believe that they were playing a game of rule of law and anything else they would not hear, could not understand. This is what you will get when a govt is run by a bunch of innocent and ignorant little brats. They believed that they were doing all the right things and China was doing all the wrong things.
They are so innocent, so cute and so naive, they could not have done anything wrong about wrongful arrest of an innocent citizen of another country or ill treating her and violating her human rights. When would these vicious little brats wake up from the world of childish make beliefs? It is the American's fault, not the Canadians. They just arrest Meng because the Americans asked them, nothing to do with them. Oh, so cute!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)