Today,
arising from the landing of Terrex armoured vehicles in Hong Kong and now
impounded for not having the proper papers, the issue has escalated. China is
now making an official protest to Singapore’s relationship with Taiwan on the
ground that those countries recognizing one China should not have official govt
to govt relations with Taiwan. Now what?
This is the
first time that China has rebuked Singapore openly demanding that Singapore
observed the rule of law in its relations with China under the One China
Policy. Before this, Singapore enjoyed a very special relationship with China,
carefully crafted and nurtured under the skilful hands of Lee Kuan Yew. This
special relationship allowed Singapore to have very close ties with the
Americans, the arch enemy of China and persistently trying to contain China and
creating trouble for China, and also Singapore’s nebulous military training in
Taiwan. All was good when relationship was kept at an even keel.
Things
started to change when the Americans took an aggressive stand towards China in
the South China Sea. Working hands in gloves with Japan and instigating the
Aquino govt to take China to The Hague Tribunal and to make matter worst,
turning the permanent arbitration court into a kangaroo court against China. All this got nothing to do with Singapore
until Singapore started to take the side of the Americans demanding that China
accept the dubious rulings of the court, that China must abide by its rulings,
and kept repeating that China must obey the rule of law, abide by international
law as if China was not. Many other sordid events followed suit culminating in
some unnecessary remarks at the Peru APEC Summit.
Why would a
little Red Dot think it is its duty and right to keep telling China what to do
and think that China is hapless and would have to tolerate its demands? Though the Chinese govt did not say anything
officially, the social media and other semi official media were rife in their
attacks against Singapore for being on the side of the Americans and being anti
China.
The writing
was on the wall. Singapore did not see it coming? With its top diplomats making
unfriendly comments, claiming to be speaking in their personal capacity as
‘ordinary citizens’ and brushed aside as non events in Parliament unchastised,
did not go unnoticed.
Now the
climax of this saga, 9 or is it 12 Singapore made Terrex armoured vehicles
landed in Hong Kong port, carried by American President Line. Why did the
vehicles landed in Hong Kong when they were not supposed to be there, on
transit from Taiwan to Singapore? There is absolutely no reason for the
armoured vehicles to be unloaded on to Hong Kong port. How did it happen, who
did it and on what purpose? What is the agenda, or is there an agenda?
The APL or
its employees cannot be so stupid to do such a thing. Armoured vehicles are
weapons of war, prohibited unless proper documentations are done, often with
diplomatic clearance. But why, why were the armoured vehicles in Hong Kong when
they were bound for Singapore? Did someone intentionally unloaded them and then
tipped off the Chinese authorities to create a tiff between the two countries?
Another big
question, these are military weapons. Were they secured, were there guards to
protect them from mischief? Were security protocol in place to keep terrorists
or trouble makers away from the armoured vehicles? It is unbelieveable and
shocking that such weapons are left to commercial shippers without being
accompanied by military guards and treated like scrap cars, leave them wherever
also can.
What’s next?
How would this strange episode be resolved now that Lee Kuan Yew is not around
and Hsien Loong has not been too friendly with his comments on China? Could Singapore punch above its weight
against China? Or would the Americans and its cronies be egging the Singapore
govt to stand up to China just like the Aquino govt? Would there be another
Hague Tribunal, backed by the UN to rule against China and the rulings be legal
and binding?
With the
Philippines not wanting to be the barking dog for the Americans, are the
Americans looking for a replacement in Singapore to provoke China and raise
tension again in the region? If so, would Singapore willingly accept this and
play the role? Looks like Vivian Balakrishnan has a job cut out for him to
excel. And he would pass with flying colours with his team of super talents in
the MFA.
When leaders
received bad counsels and cannot tell the difference, the only way to go is
down.