For
those who are unfamiliar with this Ah Q character in Lu Xun’s political satire,
Ah Q is the epitome of poverty but in a state of denial and trying to justify
every failure and misfortune in his life as something good, to comfort himself
and to minimize the pain. What is happening today in Sin City is that more and more Ah
Qs are appearing and trying to make the best out of a bad situation by
comforting themselves that it is good, or it will be good in the long run.
The
media have been making many complementary statements about how good life is and
how good cycling is. ‘Bold moves for car lite Singapore in the offing’ wow great
stuff! ‘Cycling as a viable commuting
choice lauded’, another great stuff as if the people really love cycling and
are throwing the burden of their cursed cars away. Everyone is so happy about
having more cycling lanes to make cycling more convenient and to throw away
their dreams of car ownership. Car lite cities make for a better quality of
life. Boon Wan was quoted saying, ‘There is a growing consensus among developed
cities that few cars mean less traffic, congestion, less air and noise
pollution and more land for public spaces and amenities.’ Or more land to build
more flats to bring in more migrants?
Let
me recall a statement by a Chinese missile scientist, Qian Xueshen when he
tried to convince his good friend, a nuclear scientist, to help to detonate the
first nuclear bomb in China . The latter did not want
to as nuclear bombs are weapons of mass destruction. Qian told him that having
the bomb and not using it was different from not having the bomb altogether.
This, in the current context, is like having a car and not wanting to use
against not able to own a car and has no choice but to cycle. For the cycling
enthusiasts, cycling is a choice and their bicycles can cost several thousands.
They cycle for fun, not because they must, not because they could not afford a
car. Many would be having a big car in their garages.
While
the rich car owners are trying their best to con the daft to abandon their
cars, the daft are behaving like Ah Qs, swallowing the lie totally. And now the
Ah Qs are even convincing themselves that cycling is a better quality of life.
In Lu Xun’s Ah Q, he was a victim of circumstances, and had no choice. Poverty
was his life and he had to try to live his dastardly poor life the best he
could. He had to convince himself that life was not so miserable to carry on
living.
The
Singapore Ah Qs could not think and allowed the rich to con them that no car is
good. And stupidly they believe so, giving up the dreams and aspirations to
want a better life with the comfort of car ownership and cycling for fun on
weekends. They could not see the difference between having a car and not using
it and not able to own a car and have to cycle everywhere.
Which
Ah Q is dafter? In the 60s and 70s, the poor commie country called China was filled with bicycles
on the roads. We used to sneer at their
poverty, car less society due to being poor. Today they are all craving to own
cars, for a better quality of life. The Singaporean Ah Qs will soon be shouting
cars are bad, bicycles are good. Rich commies are bad, poor capitalists are
good. Or cars are good, bicycles are betterer.
What
about those who need a car for the old, the sick, the young and for the barang
barang they must bring along in the course of doing their little businesses?
How are they to get by without a car or a car that cost more than a hundred
thousand of big Singapore dollars?