In Singapore ,
everything works. So the people working in the industries, in the ministries,
etc etc would naturally learn less as there are lesser breakdowns and problems
for them to overcome and to learn from. Ok, I know you people will be shouting
SMRT! Ok, there are exceptions. After the breakdowns are taken care of, our
SMRT staff would be very experienced and they can market their skills to the
world, for having gone through all the problems and knowing how to deal with
them. I think this is the only industry and profession where we can tell the
world we have the most experienced and trained people.
The industries like
water and sewerage system, power and electrical system, all working so
smoothly, sure got no talent. Just like in the business, banking and finance,
our banks were rock solid, no problem for so many decades. Where got talent? They got no opportunity to learn anything, so
now we have to start all over again, go overseas to find the talents we need. Maybe
when there is a financial crisis and out banks are at the brink of collapse we
will have new talents after they survived the crisis.
The moral of the
story, when you want people with talents in flood control and drainage, go to
countries that are flood prone. They sure have very experienced people who
would know everything about flooding and drainage. If you want experienced
train operators, go to countries where trains always breakdown and you will
find all the seasoned engineers and managers who have gone through all the
problems. Very well trained and experience.
And if Singapore wants
to go nuclear, better go and recruit the engineers and scientists from Fukushima when they are
still alive. Not many would be left around for long. They have the experienced
on how to deal with a breakdown. And if you want banking and finance experts,
go to countries where there are many banking frauds and problems, you will find
all the experienced people to hire.
Did someone say when a
system is working fine, with no problems, it means you have very able people
running it, proactively planning and preventing problems from happening? These people would not have the experience of
solving all the massive breakdown problems but they are so efficient to prevent
problems from happening, seeing to it that everything works at the push of the
button. Unfortunately if they have to apply for jobs, they would not have a
string of problem solving skills to boot and some may think they have no
talent, or no experience at solving problems.
What do you think? Who
is the better person to employ? Those that ensure systems work with no or
little failures, or those who cannot manage a proper system that runs smoothly
and every day fighting fires but with a lot of experience to tell? Do you want
people to work diligently until everything works so fine that people may think
they are useless, nothing to do, or people who run around everywhere trying to
solve problems when problems is the norm, and looking like very hardworking,
very involved, because they could not ensure that the system works smoothly?
If no one was there to
screw up the housing policy and programmes, Boon Wan would not have the chance
to solve the problems and now can put it in his resume as the hero that solved
the housing problem. Some may say the problem is still there. That is another
opinion.