The Doctrine of Discovery – Not knowing history, not knowing you are a fool

Professor Robert J Miller wrote the following paragraphs in the Seattle Post –the Intelligencer with the title ‘Lewis & Clark, The Doctrine of Discovery and American Indians’. 

‘Meriwether Lewis and William Clark sit high in the pantheon of American folk heroes. Even today, Lewis and Clark are viewed as brave adventurers who went where no one had gone before, exploring and conquering the wilderness for the betterment of America.

There is another way to view Lewis and Clark, however, which is nearer to the truth. Lewis and Clark were military officers serving American empire and manifest destiny and they were the vanguard of American policies that ultimately robbed the indigenous peoples of nearly everything they possessed.’

Many of the celebrated American pioneers like Davy Crockett and many more, were transformed in American legends as heroes but were in fact Indian killers and Indian land grabbers.  The brutal and systematic execution and termination of the American Indians were stories that western media did not like to brag about or did not have the stomach to write about.

I will just quote a few paragraphs from The Doctrine of Discovery and US Expansion to enlighten those who think they are enlightened on early American history and European conquest of the world.

The Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution in 1787,

‘The utmost good faith shall always be observed towards the Indians, their land and property shall never be taken without their consent, and, in their property, rights, and liberty, they shall never be invaded or disturbed.’

In 1794, ‘the US government sent a regiment led by General “Mad” Anthony Wayne to conquer a confederation of American Indian tribes attempting to keep hold of their lands. At the Battle of Fallen Timbers, a band of 800 Native Americans was slaughtered and 5,000 acres of crops were destroyed. ‘

In 1830, the Indian Removal Act was passed, ‘which authorized the President to remove the remaining Eastern Indians to lands west of the Mississippi. Between 1938 and 1939, under President Andrew Jackson, 15,000 Cherokee Indians were forcibly taken from their land, herded into makeshift forts, and made to march some in chains – a thousand miles to present day Oklahoma. Over 4,000 Cherokee died from hunger, disease and exhaustion on what they called Nunna dual Tsuny or the Trail of Tears.’

The rape of the Native Indians and their lands started in 1095 when ‘Pope Urban II issued an edict – the Papal Bull Terra Nullius (meaning empty land). It gave the kings and princes of Europe the right to “discover” or claim land in non Christian areas….These edicts treated non Christians as uncivilized and subhuman, and therefore without rights to any land or nation. Christian leaders claimed a God-given right to take control of all lands and used this idea to justify war, colonization, and even slavery…. In 1823, the Doctrine of Discovery was written into US law as a way to deny land right to the Native Americans in the Supreme Court… ‘

And in 1845, John O’Sullivan gave the Doctrine of Discovery another twist, calling it Manifest Destiny …’the right of our manifest destiny to over spread and to possess the whole of the continent which Providence has given us for the development of the great experiment of liberty…’

The Doctrine of Discovery, sounding so innocent, was the seed of European conquest of the world and the colonization of non Christian people, including butchery and massacres of natives and the robbing of their land. Liberty and freedom were only for the European Christians, not for the non Christians, not for the American Natives, not for the Blacks and not for Africans and Asians.

Know your history and absolve yourself from being made a fool of by the western powers and media.

GE2015 – A contest for nobilities and aristocrats or for the average Singaporeans

This GE is getting more interesting by the days. There are many ways to stack the cards for the contest. There is the very serious challenge concerning many issues and policies that would divide the people and many would affect them personally, especially their pockets and the future of their children. The contest could also be featured as a contest between the nobilities and aristocrats wanting to rule the country and people and the ordinary people wanting to rule the country themselves.

To the nobles and aristocrats, they have virtually everything material, and the money to live a very good life they are born with. They are natural in living a life of plenty. Why would they want to waste their time meddling with so many complex problems of the people and risk the wrath of the people for doing things wrongly? I think they are doing all these for altruistic reasons, not for money or self interest. You may disagree. It is not easy to find selfless people in this pragmatic society.  Thank God there are so many living among us. They want to work for the people, to serve the people, to make life good for the people. It simply says that these are good people with hearts of gold, or pure hearts. As Chan Chun Sing commented, anyone wanting to stand for election must have pure hearts and the nobles and aristocrats have pure hearts, hearts of gold for sure.

The peasants, the ordinary Singaporeans, by extrapolations, must have questionable hearts, very likely not pure. So before they stand up to want to be elected, they would need to have their hearts examined to confirm their hearts are pure. Pure means pure or whatever that means. One thing is for sure, no bad hearts or dirty hearts. How did the PAP come up with so many natural nobles and aristocrats with pure hearts, or how did they know? I dunno, but they do know. That is why they are telling people not to contest the election if their hearts are not pure. Would this be a prerequisite in the election, candidates must satisfy the election committee that their hearts are pure?

So, would the ordinary people vote for nobles and aristocrats with pure hearts to serve them, or would they vote for ordinary people with ordinary hearts, maybe not so pure, to serve them?  I will definitely vote for anyone if I know that his heart is pure. My problem is that I cannot tell and did not know how to tell if someone’s heart is pure or not.

Can anyone help me on this? Then I can blog about it to tell the ordinary Singaporeans how to determine what is a pure heart and who has a pure heart. Maybe it is a given, nobles and aristocrats have pure hearts to want to serve the people. Never mind that if their lifestyle needs millions to be satisfied. If the hearts are pure, it is worth every cent paid to them. Paying the ordinary Singaporeans could be cheaper as they don’t need to eat XO ‘chai tau kuay’ or fine cuisine. But their hearts not sure pure or not. That is a given.

Natural nobilities and aristocracy have natural pure hearts. They came from Pure Land, resided in churches, temples, monasteries and holy grounds up in the clouds. The average and ordinary Singaporeans are likely to come from the heartlands, a bit smelly to some, and take trains. Not being pure is quite natural. The best they could offer is a good heart with cheaper taste and cheaperer desires.

Professor Paul Tambyah – An endorsement for SDP

SDP has for years been the party associated with Chee Soon Juan, or Chee Soon Juan has always been the face of SDP.  The appearance of Paul Tambyah as another face for the SDP comes at an opportune time. Paul Tambyah is likely to be a key member of SDP leadership and his face is likely to give SDP a refreshing new image.

From the responses and comments in TRE, Paul Tambyah is most welcomed and has brought along with him a lot of goodwill and promises for SDP. Just to be able to attract such a strong candidate to the party speaks a lot about the potential of SDP. For professionals like Paul Tambyah and his likes, they would be big catches even for the PAP and would be touted as ministerial material. For him to pick a controversial party like SDP and Chee Soon Juan as comrades in arms must not be an easy decision and many things must have gone through his mind to make this bold move. Paul Tambyah and other professionals joining the SDP is a sign that SDP is not a whimsical and notorious party but a credible and respectable one. They must have seen goodness in the party to move out of their comfort zone to endorse SDP and Chee Soon Juan. The thinking are thinking and showing the light to the unthinking.

As the GE draws closer, if SDP is able to unveil more professionals and credible candidates, and so would be the expectations for other parties like the WP and SingFirst, the opposition camp will be very much strengthened and be seen as a formidable force to reckon with. If each of these parties could parade a few big guns, you can imagine what a coalition govt would look like and place their faces in the shadow cabinet.

The voters would love more of such surprises from the opposition camp especially SDP and WP and other more substantive parties. The voters would now not only think of Chee Soon Juan as SDP. There is Paul Tambyah, and hopefully a few more in the next few weeks to come.

The good men and women are standing up and coming forward to be counted. It is about time.

MH370 – Is there any mystery?

The bits and pieces of MH370 appearing at the Reunion Island are quite expected if the conspiracy theory holds true. It fits into the theory that everyone had been talking about since its disappearance. Diego Garcia anyone? Where is Diego Garcia and who are there operating this secretive military base?  MH370 was never in the Southern Indian Ocean as the Australians would like everyone to believe and trying to mislead, wasting precious time and effort searching in that area. It was just a diversion to take all the attention away from the real location of the aircraft, Diego Garcia. For the moment the theory is still fiction until there is confirmation one day in the future.

How could an aircraft lost in the South China Sea ended with some parts found in the eastern sea of Africa, in the Indian Ocean? Alright, no one has any proof but many are quite sure that their theory of what happened was exactly what happened. Just like the bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade, there is a message to say I can do whatever I want to you and you can’t do anything about it.

The circus should end soon. But the non mystery would remain a mystery and waiting to see the light and scores to be settled. What you sowed you shall reap. The Japanese sowed the murder of American seamen in Pearl Harbour and was repaid by two Atomic bombs. The invasion of Asia and South East Asia was paid for by being semi colonised by the Americans and the death of its citizens and soldiers in the last stage of WW2 culminating in an unconditional surrender to the Allies.

So far only one nation has reaped its evil and continued to prosper, from the killings of the native Indians in North America, black slavery, the Korean War, Vietnam War, invasion of several African and Middle Eastern states, murders, assassinations, regime change, Belgrade and this MH370, ...the score sheet is very long and would be settled one day. The debt owed and to be repaid is huge. Unless God is American, white American, the glee and celebration for committing evil must come to an end.

Who did it? Who took away MH370 and all the lives in it?

Hsien Loong and Heng Chee – An uncomfortable conversation

I took time to listen to what I thought would be a conversation that was best forgotten given the fact that Chan Heng Chee has been the establishment’s top diplomat for over 3 decades. I was just curious to see how much Heng Chee has changed in her thinking and would the conversation turn out to be a farce. My conclusion is that it was a conversation best forgotten for several reasons, not that Heng Chee did not try her best. She did ask very uncomfortable questions and Hsien Loong was very uncomfortable with the kind of questions posed.

Heng Chee raised pertinent issues that have contributed to the angst in the internet, issues that Singaporeans are very agitated and emotionally upset about though some in the establishment chose not to know or chose to appear surprise that they existed. And yes, she was most uncomfortable and obviously frustrated at the replies but had to remain polite without lashing out in exasperation. You could see it in her face.

The main concerns were about the future of Singapore, the influx of ‘foreign talents’ and the fate of PMETs. While Heng Chee was probing for answers on the welfare of the PMETs and how the Govt were responding to improve their lot, Hsien Loong as usual was talking about foreign workers. Who cares about foreign workers? That is not the issue, they are acceptable to provide the cheap labour. It is the host of problems faced by the PMETs and the lost of good jobs to ‘foreign talents’ that put these PMETs in a very precarious and financially disadvantaged position that needed to be addressed. You could see the tense expression in Heng Chee’s face when the answers were deflected by talking around foreign workers.

Some general statements were volunteered like the Govt was working very hard, honestly wanting to improve the lot of the displaced PMETs, but how, when they lost their jobs and could not find similar jobs, to accept lower paying jobs in their 40s and 50s? Is that helping them, solving their problems, or let NTUC suggest sending them overseas, to earn even lesser incomes?

Heng Chee reminded Hsien Loong that his concern about the next 50 years is one thing, but was Hsien Loong concern about the present, yes the problems the PMETs are facing today. Some vague answers came forth towards what the govt is doing to alleviate the plight of the PMETs today and his Govt is doing all they could, honestly, to help the PMETs.  Hsien Loong appeared to be very comfortable with the situation at the moment, balanced and about right, everything is fine now. He was only worried about 50 years in the future. He seemed so out of touch from the realities on the ground. And when Heng Chee persisted by talking about now and the next 25 years,, Hsien Loong responded that it was a tough question. 25 years difficult to deal with, what is the point of talking about 50 years? To him, there is no problem today, but in 25 years time, very difficult but not to worry. Let’s worry about whether there is still a Singapore and a Singapore identity in 50 years time.

It was a most awkward conversation and you could see it all over Hsien Loong and Heng Chee’s body language. Thank God she did not come across as someone trying to carry on a conversation for the sake of a conversation. She posed pressing and tough questions that the Govt has no answers. And thank God the agony lasted only 30 minutes for both of them.

Now you understand why the conversation is best forgotten, not for the lack of effort and seriousness on the part of Heng Chee trying to get Hsien Loong to focus on the immediate problems faced by the PMETs and the people and not about some airy fairy futures 50 years from now. I am not disappointed with Heng Chee for her attempt to strike up a serious conversion on the future of Singapore and the pathetic fate of the PMETs. Unfortunately the conversation led to nowhere and both were so relieved when it was over.