Chinatown hawker centre. Hawker Centres are a national heritage, selling a wide variety of food at very reasonable prices. They are spread across the whole island and is part of the Singapore way of life.
11/04/2014
Aljunied GRC – Who will be sacrificed?
Aljunied is going to be the most feared GRC in the next GE. Who would PAP send to do battle against the WP? Whoever they are going to send would be most revealing of what is in the PAP’s mind. For instance, if they think it is a goner, they may send in a kucing kurap team of newbies and those that can be sacrificed like what the opposition commando squad sent to Teck Ghee with little chances of success. Not sending a team is not acceptable.
If they are very confident of taking back Aljunied, they would definitely put in a very strong team to mean business provided the biggies would not be risked in a losing battle.
The problem is that they are not sure. Then how? Would any minister be gungho enough to volunteer to take Aljunied? Or shall I rephrase that, would any minister be stupid enough to want to go to Aljunied? Or if there is no volunteer, who is going to decide the team to go to Aljunied, and how many ministers or ministers of state would be put in jeopardy?
Whoever is being asked to go to Aljunied is not going to be happy. Maybe they would draw lots to see who would be fielded, after taking out the few that should not be risked. I think this is going to be a very difficult task for Hsien Loong or whoever is tasked to be the strategist and to do the allocation. Then there will also be the two single wards to face the same problem. But in the case of single wards the PAP could be dealing with smaller fries or newcomers, so not too stressful.
It is when a minister or a few ministers of state would be arrowed to do battle in Aljunied that it would become a problem. Would any of them decline to go? Would any minister threaten to resign if directed to go to Aljunied?
Never has PAP faced with such a difficult position and dilemma. Tough. Why must there be an Aljunied? What if after the next GE there were more Aljunieds?
PS. The last team that contested Aljunied had two ministers, a parliamentary secretary and a minister in waiting. Watch out for Redbean’s choice for PAP’s Dream Team in Aljunied.
Kopi Level - Green
11/03/2014
Singapore joining coalition against Islamic State
Just reported in Parliament, ‘To combat the militant group, Singapore will contribute assets that were previously deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen says. CNA.
The unavoidable happens. There is no way Singapore can avoid joining the coalition once it is in bed with the Americans. The Americans would make sure that it will happen or Singapore would be accused of taking a free ride. But Eng Hen assured the House that it would be a contribution in assets, with the assets now in Iraq and Afghanistan redeployed to the new theatre. No ground troops would be In Iraq or Syria. All precautions and necessary training would be provided to our soldiers to keep them from harms way. How effective would this be is yet to tell when the war zone could expand and contract and cover anywhere.
What is more dangerous is back home or Singaporeans happily travelling all over the world on business or as tourists. This war against the IS transcends all national boundaries. We need to warn Singaporeans everywhere, including stepping up vigilance back home. This is no ordinary war and violence can pop up anywhere. Australia and Canada have a taste of it in the heart of their homeland. It is a war without borders.
This is Red Alert.
Kopi Level - Green
GE – Freak or no freak?
Tham Yuen C picked up the discussion on the freak election revisited by
Ho Kwon Ping in his article in the Sunday Times yesterday. Many people
thought Ho Kwon Ping was being polite and saying the right thing. Tham
Yuen C spoke to several academics to feel the pulse once again. Tan Ern
Ser, Viswa Sadasivan, Pauline Straughan and Bilveer Singh were all
consulted on their views on this freak issue. Wondering if they were as
polite as Ho Kwon Ping, but all agreed that a freak is unlikely. But
they qualified themselves by saying that under certain conditions,
though a freak is very unlikely, could still not be ruled out.
Tan Ern Ser said PAP would do everything possible and would adopt policies that are sustainable to stay in power. He even suggested that PAP would win by default as the ageing population would not want change. Sadasivan read that the ground was a lot sweeter than before but cautioned whether the changes in PAP policies were due to seeing the light or a matter of survival. Pauline Straughan was more hopeful that the PAP would continue on its momentum to talk to the people and to keep talking to the people, then the next election would not be shocking, like a freak election. The PAP would still win unless it does something spectacularly unpopular. The idea of PAP doing some, thing silly to lose its legitimacy, like rampant corruption, is unlikely. Bilveer Singh added that the electorates were sensible people and would not allow a freak to happen. All in, they agreed that PAP would still win but at most losing some popularity vote.
Based on the comments of these experts, all things are normal and PAP would be in power for the next 10 to 15 years as forecasted by Ho Kwon Ping. But would PAP do something spectacularly unpopular to do itself in, like not holding to the one goal lead but went for an all out and reckless persecution of opposing views? They are now tweaking many policies and the CPF sacred cow is not being spared. The only danger is that the above comments become positive feedback and give the PAP a false sense of confidence to continue with what it has been doing, more tough or hard headed policies, and the same tactics of fixing the opposition and dissenting voices.
There are signs of panic and strange behaviours from the PAP and its apparachiks. The most obvious is the relentless effort in charging of Roy and Hui Hui. Would the PAP read the kpkbs in social media and kopitiams as noises from the lunatic fringe or would they take it seriously as feedbacks from the ground up? Would PAP continue to deal with oppositions and opposing views like in the past and think it can get away with it? Or would the PAP take heed from these feedbacks that the old way of tackling dissent cannot work anymore and if pushed through in a high handed manner may lead to the freak election result being prematurely brought forward instead of another 10 or 15 years?
There is now a confluence of factors and events emerging in the political theatre that could make the freak come true. Smaller and less spectacular events, but cumulated, could be that something that is spectacularly unpopular. Maybe the PAP is so confident that nothing has changed and the next GE is already in the bag for another 2 or 3 terms, and it can do as it has always done before and swing the sledgehammer freely at anyone in its path. Can the PAP continue to do unpopular things? Would a few careless straws, added together, break the camel’s back?
What do you think?
Kopi Level - Yellow
Tan Ern Ser said PAP would do everything possible and would adopt policies that are sustainable to stay in power. He even suggested that PAP would win by default as the ageing population would not want change. Sadasivan read that the ground was a lot sweeter than before but cautioned whether the changes in PAP policies were due to seeing the light or a matter of survival. Pauline Straughan was more hopeful that the PAP would continue on its momentum to talk to the people and to keep talking to the people, then the next election would not be shocking, like a freak election. The PAP would still win unless it does something spectacularly unpopular. The idea of PAP doing some, thing silly to lose its legitimacy, like rampant corruption, is unlikely. Bilveer Singh added that the electorates were sensible people and would not allow a freak to happen. All in, they agreed that PAP would still win but at most losing some popularity vote.
Based on the comments of these experts, all things are normal and PAP would be in power for the next 10 to 15 years as forecasted by Ho Kwon Ping. But would PAP do something spectacularly unpopular to do itself in, like not holding to the one goal lead but went for an all out and reckless persecution of opposing views? They are now tweaking many policies and the CPF sacred cow is not being spared. The only danger is that the above comments become positive feedback and give the PAP a false sense of confidence to continue with what it has been doing, more tough or hard headed policies, and the same tactics of fixing the opposition and dissenting voices.
There are signs of panic and strange behaviours from the PAP and its apparachiks. The most obvious is the relentless effort in charging of Roy and Hui Hui. Would the PAP read the kpkbs in social media and kopitiams as noises from the lunatic fringe or would they take it seriously as feedbacks from the ground up? Would PAP continue to deal with oppositions and opposing views like in the past and think it can get away with it? Or would the PAP take heed from these feedbacks that the old way of tackling dissent cannot work anymore and if pushed through in a high handed manner may lead to the freak election result being prematurely brought forward instead of another 10 or 15 years?
There is now a confluence of factors and events emerging in the political theatre that could make the freak come true. Smaller and less spectacular events, but cumulated, could be that something that is spectacularly unpopular. Maybe the PAP is so confident that nothing has changed and the next GE is already in the bag for another 2 or 3 terms, and it can do as it has always done before and swing the sledgehammer freely at anyone in its path. Can the PAP continue to do unpopular things? Would a few careless straws, added together, break the camel’s back?
What do you think?
Kopi Level - Yellow
Democracy 2014 – Hong Kong Chapter.
By MIKOspace
What Hong
Kong Protests Taught Hong Kong, China and The World.
Democracy
is Not Easy.
It is
learnt only through failures and errors. The Lessons are perpetual with endless
emergence of newer Lessons.
After
nearly 5 weeks of “pro”-Democracy sit-downs, disruptions and infringements of
the natural “democratic” rights of other Hong Kongers, the protesting crowd
simply fizzled and dissolved as it depleted itself of non-existent political sustenance,
as well as the folding goodwill shelter of Democracy’s Umbrella.
It became blatantly
clear that in spite of increasing thousands of nightly cheering spectators and
bystanders, the
HK student protestors were UNABLE to establish a connection with the larger HK
Community to develop a critical collective identity for sustainable political action
to obtain the greatest good for the largest number.
In the end, the HK
Students and their political and financial supporters were exposed to be just
another noisy and mischievous rabble that were merely opinionated with deep
prejudices but no convictions; and that while they had energetic determination,
they did not possess any credible political will because they, albeit a tiny
group, had only wanted for themselves instead of incorporating the greater good
that the vast majority of other Hong Kongers may prefer.
Democracy is for the Whole and not just
for a few persons in Society, no matter how vocal and destructive the few may
demonstrate.
The Absence of a Collective Hong Kong Identity
further explained
the failure of HK student protestors to establish a connection through their
protests with the vast majority of other Hong Kongers. They occupied, stood and
sat ALONE on major public roads, property and space, becoming increasingly an
unnecessary nuisance to fellow Hong Kongers who rightfully demanded the
legitimate return of their shared “public space” so rudely expropriated weeks
earlier by the students for purposes which were never articulated in the
language and terms of the public good.
The
Protestors’ insensitivity to the growing economic plight of their fellow Hong
Kongers betrayed the fragile absence of the perequisite social norms of trust
and reciprocity necessary to promote civic co-operation in a Democracy. There were no shared bonds of affiliation and
trust between the Protestors and other members of Hong Kong society.
Hong Kong politics is
NOT about Beijing vs Democracy.
Hong Kongers, have to choose between its future as a prosperous Chinese city vs
being an unstable anti-China bastion.
Kopi Level - Yellow
Read the Full
Article:
11/02/2014
55 – The age of Insanity
A research paper from the trash bin came to me for my
reading on a Sunday morning. Its title, ’55 – The age of Insanity’, is quite
mysterious and provocative. It has a list of professors and doctors attached as
co contributors to the article. The main author apparently is a young genius
but his name, like the rest, has been erased from the paper and I could only
briefly make up the initial Dr AS.
Even the institution has been struck out from this mysterious paper from the
trash bin.
The theme of this paper is about a defective gene PME55
found in true blue Singaporeans born after the war, ie the post war babies or
baby boomers. This gene is practically non existent among the generations
before the war. The effect of this gene is that it will be activated at the
biological age of 55 and anyone with such a defective gene would be morphed
into a new person minus all the skills, knowledge and experience of life. It is
like a Trojan Horse virus that wiped out the memory and turned the brain into a
clean brain or ‘unprogrammed’ brain with no user software inside.
At the critical age of 55, whole generation of true blue
Singaporeans would suddenly turned into walking zombies. They could not perform
the jobs they were doing yesterday, become completely useless. Regardless of
their professions, they will be immediately terminated for the good of the
organisations and quickly bungled out of their jobs. And these people, mostly
PMEs, because of their blank brains, did not know what is happening to them due
to their reduced mental ability. So they left their jobs as a matter of fact
and retired from life, neither happy or unhappy and not knowing why.
Some may find jobs that are more suitable to their lower
mental ability. According to the paper, the best jobs that are suitable for
people affected by PME55 are security guards and taxi drivers. Some may not
even be suitable for such jobs and will be retired permanently. No employer
would want them. Those who could still find some brain cells tickling could be
retrained, put on courses to re-educate them with simple knowledge for some low
level jobs. This is about the best that can be done to people affected by this
disease.
There are also changes to the characters of these sick
people. There will be personality changes. From being highly respected
individuals in positions of authority, responsibility, ability and
trustworthiness, some would become philanderers, some amorous, some gamblers
and some will simply not be able to manage their money and their lives.
The govt knew about this disease. The employers too knew
about this. Anyone who knows about this defective gene and its effect will be
able to understand what is going on in this city state. Govt policies like
retirement age, CPF minimum sums, training programmes, not wasting resources to
provide tertiary education to these people, influx of foreign talents, reversed
mortgage, annuities etc etc begin to make sense. They are answers and solutions
to PME55. Even employment policies are adjusted to take care of PME55.
Fortunately or unfortunately not many people knew about this
defective gene and could not understand why certain policies and things are
happening in the way they are happening. The defective gene is a state secret.
Perhaps that is the reason why the paper was not published and ended up in a
thrash bin.
The good thing, the govt is coming out with a slew of
policies to take care of the true blue generations of Singaporeans with this
gene. Their life savings are protected. There are strict rules against them
going to the casinos. There is the Pioneer Generation Package to take care of
them too. New manual jobs that are less demanding and taxing on their blank
brain cells are created for them so that they can continue to work if they want
to enjoy their dignity. Their retirements have been carefully planned to ensure
that all their financial needs are well taken care of. They have nothing to
worry about even if they lose their jobs at 55. The country will continue to
prosper with their replacement from overseas to support them.
In the research papers, the pages on recommendations were
all blanks. But now the picture is clearer. Though the recommendations may be
missing, the knowledge of the existence of this defective gene clears all the
doubts about why things are happening the way it is. There is a new urgency to
replace the population with new migrants that don’t have this defective gene
that will self destruct true blue Singaporeans at 55.
I am going throw this piece of paper back into the trash
bin. No one should be reading it. It is a national secret of this unique city
state. Time for kopi.
Kopi Level - Yellow
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)