Wah seh, the Wen Jia Bao Way

China’s Premier Wen Jia Bao is accused of corruption by the New York Times and threatens to sue the paper. But before he does that, he did the needful. He voluntarily called for an investigation into his family wealth. Can anyone beat that? Either he is clean or he is an idiot. No one in the democratic world or free world would dare to affront an accusation of corruption and to open his own house for a shake out. Many would hide, run or erase all records or regulations that could reveal their corrupt ways.

Wen Jia Bao is setting a new standard for ethical govt for the world to follow. This is the new communist and a new world standard for a clean govt. Hello America, anyone there would dare to take up such a challenge? Check my family wealth!

Am I disappointed with SDP’s NOM?

The main thrust in SDP’s housing proposal is the Non Open Market Scheme, ie buying flats from HDB and must sell back to HDB. I think this is like reinventing the wheel and trying to look clever. No need to.

Look, the problems and unhappiness are caused by the current housing policies. 1. Not building enough to meet the demands of Singaporeans. 2. Selling HDB flats to PRs, in the resale market. This is a very dangerous thing to do if the PR population is not curtailed. In the future, many public flats would end up being owned by PRs. 3. Selling HDB flats at ‘airy fairy’ market subsidy price. Stop this scam and go back to cost plus pricing.

Just address these problems. There is no need to reinvent the wheel to come up with more ‘airy fairy’ schemes if the fundamentals of public housing are put right, ie building flats to ensure all Singaporeans can buy them at cost plus and shit away with all the market forces and market subsidy nonsense. Just build more HDB flats for the people and keep it for Singaporeans only, even in the resale market. The prices will stabilize and be lowered progressively. Owners of public housing must not aspire to see their flat prices shooting to the roof like private properties. But the good news is that all Singaporeans will have a roof over their heads and not having to pay through their noses and emptying their CPF and savings. There will be money left for retirement and some finer things of living. The flat would still have real value and no need to sell back to the HDB and creating more unseen problems in the future.

The Housing Minister has made public housing so complicated and confusing. That does not mean that the solution must be complicated and confusing. Do not create new schemes that would make the situation more complex and hazy. Just work with the current system, get rid of some of the nonsense.

The solution must be straight and simple. Build more flats for Singaporeans at cost plus, not that the govt must make a loss, but with the aim of providing the citizens, not PRs, with decent and genuinely affordable housing. Not the kind of flexible affordable housing that can be stretched like rubber bands. Is this so difficult to do? Think simple. No need to think clever. When a house is infested by termites, there is no need to build another house. Just treat the termite problem. And often the problems in a country are due to too clever people in charge. What a country needs is good men and not very clever men. With good men and good intention, many unnecessary problems will not arise, like the housing woes today.

How far has PAP deviated from its original goals?

‘This was the plan which we had from the very beginning, to give everybody a home at cost or below cost and as development takes place, everybody gets a lift, all boats rise as the tide rises. "We are investing to bring it up to date and you pay a token sum, the government carries the rest and HDB has been doing a fine job to give you an environment that you have today," Mr Lee shared.’ This is part of his speech during a Tree Planting session at Havelock Road last Sunday.

In his latest speech LKY recalled the original plan to give every Singaporean a home that would appreciate its value over time. This the PAP has done very well. In his speech he also touched on the pricing policies of HDB flats. ‘…you pay a token sum, the govt carries the rest…’ Is this still the case?

We must give full credit to his generation of leaders for doing what they preached and delivering them, cheap housing at a token price and appreciating home values. They have been there and done it. I think all the older Sinkies who have bought their flats during the early years will confirm this truth.

What is the new social contract?

The issue or trouble today is the mission of the new leaders. Are they still practicing the old policies of giving every Sinkie a home at cost of below cost? Are there Sinkies being deprived or disqualified from owning a home? Are Sinkies being made to pay sky high market driven prices?

The support for the old leaders for their good policies for the good of the people was genuine. Are the new leaders and their pro people policies gaining the same kind of support for the older leaders?

What do you think?

How to save the Stock Exchange

How many people believe that the Stock Exchange is in the pink of health? I think no one knows, or no one believes that it is dying, that it can go on a standstill the moment the computer traders decided to call it a day. But no, the truth is that the Stock Exchange is doing fine, doing roaring business, volume increasing, especially derivatives, and will be the biggest stock exchange soon, over taking Hongkong and Tokyo. The daily trading volume is in the billions and expanding, I think. I also agree that it will be a very big success. All the talks about retrenchment and remisiers going out of job or earning less than $2000 a month is bullshit. How can remisiers be earning less than a clerk or a taxi driver? Cannot be lah.



I think, despite the Stock Exchange doing so well, there are some things that can be tweaked to make it even better, with real trading and more retail participation instead of computer trading among themselves with no change of ownership. This boils down to a return to the basics. A stock exchange must not be turned into a casino for the thugs to do what they like. A stock exchange is for investment, long term, medium term and short term, and not for gambling or day trading only. A stock exchange must provide a level playing field for all players big and small. A stock exchange must operate a system that is fair to all players and no one must have any special advantage against others, to plug their computers into the system, to corner the market, ram shares up and down. I think these are all stated in the Rules and Regulations and by laws, no unfair competition, no insider trading, etc etc.



I cannot imagine any stock exchange would allow such violations to go on, or design its trading system to violate its own regulations and by laws. If it does, everyone will know unless the market players are all like the proverbial 4 monkeys, see nothing, hear nothing, do nothing and say nothing. If such is the case, then one can commit murder and rape in broad daylight.



There is a genocide going on in the New York Stock Exchange at the moment. But the regulators’ hands are tied as the big bankers and funds are preventing any laws to be passed to make their looting, rape, murder and arson a crime. So what they are doing at the moment is all legal, no crime.



Our Stock Exchange has adopted all the latest technology and practices of the industry and is the finest in the world, with the fastest computers that can service all the algos and computer tradings with or without retail participation. This is progress. Soon it would not need any retail participation at all. And this is what I think need to change. Retail participation may be bad for a world class super speed stock exchange that can handle millions of trades per second. The slowness of the retail and their small trades are really an irritant. So is the existence of things like remisiers, or key board operators, with little value add to the advanced and leading edge system that cost hundreds of millions.



I say if someone woke up one day on the wrong side of the bed and decided that remisiers and retail traders are needed even in a sophisticated world class stock exchange, and commission is really necessary to feed the backroom staff in the brokerage, below are a few suggestions that I think may help.



1. Separate the trading of ordinary stocks and warrants from the covered warrants and derivatives. The ordinary stocks and warrants should be traded in a closed system like before, for the small time retail traders and remisiers that are too slow and unsophisticated. The covered warrants and derivatives can continue in the present system and can be further expended to cater to the big funds and their high speed computers and algos on their own without the retail as a hindrance. They will be very happy trading among themselves instead of wasting time with small retail traders and the irritating remisiers. It is also a kind of levelling the playing field and the big funds will be most happy to take on competitive players of the same size. The volumes will shoot to the sky definitely.



2. Scrip lending must be stopped. Short selling is ok as long as traders are able to cover their own trades. But it is just not nice to ask someone who owns 1 million DBS shares to lend his scrips to a short seller for $2000 and see his share value sold down by $1m. Can investors be that stupid?





3. Variable commission rate must be normalised to prevent anyone from taking advantage of paying minimal or no commission to beat other players. Can such thing really be in practice, that big funds or proprietary traders been taking advantage of negligible commission rate to make profits against small traders that have to pay higher commissions? Cannot be right ya?. Level playing field and the regulations would not allow any party to have special advantage. If not, insider trading should also not be an offence.





4. Commission needs to be standardised and raised as this is the blood line that pays the salary of the all the remisiers and administrative and support staff, including the CEOs and operations managers of the brokerages. Without commission or little commission, who is going to pay for their salary and the overheads? See, commission is very important to keep the industry going.





5. The teeny weeny bit size is good for the machines to churn their trades. Is churning an offence? This, couple with negligible or no commission means that the computers can trade in the millions and to make profits by one single bit either way. On the other hand, the greedy little traders need several bids before they can make a little profit. The system should be modified to increase the bid size to the previous levels for the big funds and their machines to make bigger profits in a separate system detached from normal stocks. It is good for them and the small traders as well. Who does not want to make bigger profits unless, unless, the small bid size is specially designed to favour the big computer traders. This definitely cannot be. The system is definitely designed to be fair to all. Let’s make it fairer for the big computer traders by increasing the bid size, let them make more money from the small retail traders who are expert enough to trade derivatives with them without the aid of high speed computers plugged into the system. I am so thoughtful for the big computer traders.





6. Oh, no lunch break and continuous trading. I think the remisiers would not mind having a lunch break when the stocks and derivatives are traded under two different systems. Before I forget, the ordinary stock and warrant trading system must be a closed system and no one is allowed to plug in their computers to gain an advantage over the less sophisticated and cheapskate small traders that cannot afford to invest in high speed computers and software. When this system is back in place, the remisiers can afford to make less with lesser trading volumes and be quite contented. The computers and their algos can continue to trade in a separate derivative system without lunch breaks and churn as much as they like. Who cares? Anyway computers need not have to eat or to pee. In fact the Exchange should provide a non stop 24 hours trading system to please the algo and computer traders, but just spare the remisiers as they are human beings and need a break every now and then.





These are just some minor changes that I think could make the stock exchange even better and healthier. This is free advice, no need to pay big consultation fee unless a comprehensive and detailed proposal is needed.

The Art of RAR

The most compelling story of a new photopainting technique developed by a Singaporean is waiting to get some notice from the local art scene and the critics. I am still promoting this new art form/technique locally and if I fail to get any support or notice, then I would have to go out of this little island to seek the attention of the world. While our local critics and reporters are busily covering the works of foreign talents, incidentally my work was first featured by a Malaysian lifestyle magazine, the Essenze, a couple of months ago.

The most remarkable feature of this technique is that I could create many pieces of artwork, on paper or canvas, just by pointing my camera to a pond of the water. With proper set up, I could create many never seen before paintings and concepts that no human artiste could think of.

My work is a collaboration with Mother Nature with the latter doing the conceptualisation and the main features of a painting and I doing the finishing touches. These unique and revolutionary paintings are now on show at NUSS Guild House at Kent Ridge till 21 Dec 12. More than 30 pieces of my work are being exhibited and all are welcome.

Admission is Free.