names of people who donates back their progress package

This thread is reserved for honourable and generous people who, for their own reasons, donate the progress package money back to the public coffer. I would like to post the names of such people here. Please let me know if you come across any. The first name is David Gan

how stupid can singaporeans be?

I am angry on a Sunday morning. Shit, why should I be angry on a Sunday morning on a topic like stupid Singaporeans? I just read in the papers that David Gan, the famous hair stylist, also received the progress package. And this generous man, with a big heart, is going to donate whatever he gets back to the public coffer. Now, that is a very nice gesture. No, I am not angry with David or his receiving the package. I am angry with stupid Singaporeans who decided to give him the progress package. Andy is a new citizen. He is probably a new citizen for less than 3 years. I welcome him, and many Singaporeans welcome this talented man as one of us. He is a genuine talent in his field, among the best of the best. Not some cheap half baked foreign talents. Now what is my problem? Many foreigners were given the citizenship, and without having to serve national service. And now, just because they are citizens, they are entitled to a share of the nation's wealth immediately, because they are citizens. The national wealth was built over many years by generations of Singaporeans. And if they are to be given to new citizens, at least make sure that they serve national service as well, or be qualified for it after a certain time criteria, to be fair to the rest of the stupid Singaporeans who have to serve national service for 30 years of their lives. This is another way to degrade the meaning of national service and the value of citizenship to a born Singaporeans.

badawi can't take the heat

Actually I wanted to start a new topic on what I am going to say below but find them all inter related. Let me start off by referring to an article in the Straits Times today reporting that Badawi wanted his critics on the Ninth Malaysia Plan 'to hold their tongues and to stop spreading negative stories about the plan.' Basically Badawi is experiencing the heat and cannot take the heat. In this new century of internet and virtual reporting, politicians cannot afford to talk rubbish and propose craps and think they can get away with it. Not that in the past there were no criticisms about those silly policies they dished out. They were articulated but not heard. The people have no means to be heard. Today everything is heard and immediately heard. There is no way the politcians can pretend to be an ostrich and refuse to see or hear the feedback. And the internet, the blogs and forums, are the real feedback which they can only refuse to hear. They chose to set up a fictitious feedback unit and only consider those things there as feedback. Anything comments outside of the feedback unit is considered destructive criticism and not to be taken seriously. And they are going to behave like Badawi, when the criticisms are strong and they do not want to hear, gag them. Don't let people speak or air their views, so they can feel good and believe that everything is good, the ground is sweet. And their 'yak' proposals can then be pushed through happily because they did not hear any criticism. Is that what intelligent people want to do? Get only the feedback they want to hear and the rest must not be allowed to say anything? If there is no immediate feedback, the PAP will be happily singing the song of no upgrading to opposition wards and go into Potong Pasir and Hougang with their legs wide open. Now they can reword their positions and hopefully can undo the damage caused. Would they say a big thank you to internet, to the bloggers and forumers for exposing how badly that position was received?

Singaporeans are stupid. Says Li Ao

This is what the fame Li Ao of Taiwan, or of China, depending on which side of the bed he woke up from said. And the report in the Straits Times also said that the law abiding Singaporeans have always been seen as gullible in Greater China. Now, how come Singaporeans got this kind of image? Let me think seriously about this. Li Ao also said so. He recommends all Singaporeans to think also. Now he is asking too much, asking Singaporeans to think. Li Ao said, 'If even a clever man like Li Ao has this impression - and he has no enemies in Singapore - think : Why doe he have this impression?' For those Singaporeans who find thinking a tedious process, take a break. I will try to think a little. For once, Singaporeans think or do not think, that the money in their CPF account is their money. And the Government rightly believe so and so decided to take good care of the money for the stupid Singaporeans. Ah, good reason. Another reason, Singaporeans sincerely believe that all the half baked foreigners are talents or more talented than them. And this is a fact. Oh my God. But how did the Chinese know this? Obviously they did not know what is happening inside Singapore. They must have dealings with Singaporeans to know that the gullible Singaporeans are all law abiding even in China when no one obeys the law, or very few do. They must have met many law abiding Singaporeans in Suzhou. But Li Ao is in Taiwan. How could he have such an impression that Singaporeans are stupid? Now what did Singaporeans do in Taiwan? Now Singaporeans, before you behave stupidly again, please huh, this is meant to be a joke. Seriously. Now I must emphasise this again to make sure Singaporeans get the message, that this is really a joke.

democracy = people crazy

Thailand has seen the worst of democracy with the dethronement of Thaksin. It is mob rule, peoplecracy, when a small group of activists pushed their way against the people who voted for Thaksin to be their PM. Is this democracy? It is tyranny of a minority. If Thaksin in Singapore, he would have the law on his side. Technically and legally he was within the law. Here is a case where the law may be right. But if the people were against it, the law can be set aside.