OpenAI is accusing DeepSeek of stealing its 'proprietary operation output' model. Why output model and not talking about its input model, which is realistically stealing all the information from the internet, books and research papers in order to work effectively? Now I am beginning to understand that it is their' input' model of stealing information that it really does not want to divulge to elicit lawsuits, when such stolen information is discovered.
OpenAI is now facing a lawsuit in India filed by Indian and international book publishers over copyright infringements, in other words 'stealing of information' to put it more starkly. India is a big market for OpenAI and Sam Altman has thought it necessary to fly to India to sort this out. Any legal tussle emerging from this episode in India is bound to open up a 'Pandora's Box' of litigation if exposed globally.
In other words, OpenAI is stealing all the information needed to run its system and that applies to every AI running entity. All AI outfits are stealing information from others to be up to date. It really is a thief calling a thief, if one were to consider all the information gathering that AI is doing to be able to work effectively.
So, by accusing DeepSeek of theft, isn't that what they are all doing in order for their AI system to work?
Anonymous
PS. Latest, OpenAI given up suing DeepSeek.
5 comments:
DeepSeek is just the tip of the iceberg that is already posing big problems for OpenAI, Amazon and Google/Microsoft among others. The USA is having a nightmare of sorts trying to justify its spending of an enormous amount of money, attempting to monopolize control of the AI sector, only to be marginalized by upstarts like DeepSeek. All that narrative about high-end chips monopolization is losing its purpose.
According to Kevin Walmsley, Alibaba is coming into the picture with its own AI model Qwen 2,5, which is even claimed to beat DeepSeek and OpenAI in various parameters. And Alibaba is not the only other Chinese technology company undertaking development of AI. They are all competing against each other to innovate and improve AI workings. All these developments by Chinese AI developers are making AI developments in China about to sweep aside the USA AI developers, outside of the USA of course, that needs hundreds of billions to achieve what Chinese companies can achieve with only pittance to do it.
The USA Government and its AI developers are touted to be spending another US$500 billion trying to monopolize the AI industry, after already having invested US$250 billion into the sector collectively. Perhaps it now still does not realize that such a venture may just be throwing good money after bad.
But Chinese companies in the same industry must not try to correct the mistake of the enemy. Let them destroy themselves is the best strategy.
But NO money to uplift the lives of their citizens. Time for an uprising.
Wonder if the USA citizens have freedom to revolt. Democracy should allow all that and if not, what kind of democracy and freedom is the USA gloating about?
The USA is giving more money to Israel to rearm, taking advantage of the so-called truce. In the meantime, more homeless people are living on the streets as living costs, job cuts and business closures add to the problem. We have not even talked about falling infrastructures like bridges needing replacement, tens of thousands of them built long ago and structurally unsafe.
OpenAI suing DeepSeek does not solve its problem. OpenAI has no chance of suing Alibaba's Qwen 2.5 which works on a totally different architecture. I am not a tech geek, but I believe this revelation is making OpenAI suing DeepSeek just throwing good money after bad. OpenAI may succeed in crippling DeepSeek, but not others like Alibaba.
Post a Comment