Who is the world’s Number One Menace?

The Americans have voted North Korea as the most serious nuclear threat with testimonies from their respectable intelligence services that provided the evidence that Saddam Hussein possessed WMD. These agencies are now giving strong evidence to support their assertion that North Korea is the most dangerous country.

In a NYT report this is what the director of National Intelligence Agency, James Clapper, said to put North Korea at the top of his list of nuclear proliferation related threats…North Korea has expanded its uranium enrichment facility at its main nuclear complex in Yongbyon and restarted a plutonium production reactor and could begin to recover plutonium from the reactor’s spent fuel within a matter of weeks or months.

Isn’t this the same as what Japan has done, in restarting the Fukushima plant? The possession of plutonium is ground to justify proliferation threat? How much plutonium have the Americans had in their possession?

The other result is trust. Clapper said, "we in the intelligence community are very much in the ‘distrust, and verify’ mode". Ah, the same agency that lied to the world about WMD is saying the North Koreans cannot be trusted but they can be trusted. Excuse me, what did you say about the evidence of WMD in Iraq? Can you be trusted? Did you verify your insidious condemnation report of Iraq that was used as an excuse to invade that country and to murder President Saddam Hussein whom you accused of possessing WMD and now proven to be a white lie?

Who is less trustworthy? Who is more menacing? Who is more dangerous, the liar or the once accused by the liar?

Why are the Americans patrolling the South China Sea? Why is it that the littoral states now must leave the islands alone, no construction, no military bases, because the Americans said so? The countries with construction and military bases in the South China Sea islands are China, Vietnam, Taiwan, the Philippines and Malaysia. Are the Americans taking over the South China Sea as part of the Empire? In the guise of getting other countries, the Philippines and now the Japs and Indians to conduct joint patrols, the Americans are the real mccoy patrolling the South China Sea for the Empire and all the countries in the region better back off. The Empire is here and taking over.
The Americans said they are in the South China Sea to lower tension. There was no tension after they were defeated in Vietnam and left until they returned with their pivot to Asia policy.


Anonymous said...

When N Korea farts, they shout 'provocation'.

When the US and it's poodles invade Iraq and Vietnam and dropped millions of tons of bombs, used chemical weapons in Vietnam, destroyed the country and killed millions nobody shouted or talked about provocation, human rights, war crimes and bullying.

Those fuckers are talking cock through their CB hole.

Ⓜatilah $ingapura⚠️ said...

If Bernie Sanders wins the US Presidential Erection, all of a sudden there could be a withdrawal from/ a sharp decline in US global adventurism....what would happen then?

All the ball-lickers of Uncle Sam will suddenly all balls-drop (chuak) together when they realise that USA won't be using military might to "keep the peace"...

Bernie Sanders
on Google Dec 30, 2015

The test of a great and powerful nation is not how many wars it can engage in, but how it can resolve international conflicts in a peaceful manner. I will move away from a policy of unilateral military action and regime change, and toward a policy of emphasizing diplomacy, and ensuring the decision to go to war is a last resort.

Can you imagine the fear and shock in the Philippines, S Korea and Japan...possibly even Singapore when the amount of US forces in their respective cuntries and in the region decreases?!?

US presence in Asia: trillions

Asian benefits of US presence in Asia : hundreds of billions

The look on the faces of US-friendly Asian LEEders when US military pulls back under President Bernie...


Anonymous said...

Top US economists have played down fears of China's economic slowdown and warned some Americans who wish to contain China economically.

Larry Summers, director of the White House National Economic Council in 2009 and 2010, said China is facing an enormous, complex set of challenges but he does not believe this will be as disruptive as some think.

Stephen Roach, a senior fellow atYale University's Jackson Institute of Global Aff airs and former chief economist at Morgan Stanley Asia, said he has always been skeptical of those who take the turmoil in China's fi nancial markets to negatively interpret what it means for the real economy.

"I think the Chinese economy is performing much, much better than your average market participant would want to conclude right now," he said on Wednesday at the Brookings Institution in Washington.

Anonymous said...

While Washington is beating the war drums against China, the people to people relations are good across the world. New York Empire State Building was dressed in red and gold to celebrate the Chinese New Year, the Sydney Opera House was also lit in red, London held the biggest Chinese New Year Celebration outside Asia. Southeast Asian countries also celebrated Chinese New Year and making the day a public holiday.

Anonymous said...

The Americans said they are in the South China Sea to lower tension. There was no tension after they were defeated in Vietnam and left until they returned with their pivot to Asia policy.


Vietnam go after Cambodia. China have to step in after they refuse to listen as China help vietnam during US invasion. SE Asia was scared of Vietnam who could march its army south. Even China have to retreat, casualties were high. Same case now like NK who dun want to listen.