US Terrorism And Its Militant Doctrine Of Permanent Warfare To Dominate the World.
USA evil plans for world domination ( PART ONE )
After
the Second World War the world thought that at last there would be
lasting peace led by the Americans. From the first day of German and
Japanese defeat and even before the eventual German and Japanese
surrender the Americans laid broad plans for world domination and
conquests.Their strategy was to use the bogey of fighting communism to
preserve freedom and democracy. It has been seven decades and more, does
American concept of freedom and democracy achieve any positive result
and peace for the world. No, American focus on peace , freedom and
democracy means only one thing and that is every country big and small
should be brought under the aegis of American rule and control. And
American control means not only complete and total military domination
of land and space but also domination and control in the political,
economic, scientific and financial lives and activities of all countries
in the world. In its attempt for world domination US uses all kinds of
evil stratagem to bear on its design and this can be seen in its most
wanton terrorism in every corner of the globe using its military might
to bomb countries via drones into fear and submission. This evil
American terrorism has brought great and countless deaths and endless
suffering all over the world.
In Europe the Evil Empire - USA, almost succeeded in bringing every
European country under its control via NATO which is under direct US
control and manipulation. Under NATO US has the final say in all
military, political, economic and financial affairs. However, when
comes to Russia, the Evil Empire meets more than its equal and was
checkmated by Russia.
US tries to bring down Russia by establishing a string of military
bases all over Europe. The CIA and Pentagon the two most vicious and
destructive arms of the Evil Empire would infiltrate into many small
neutral or pro Russia countries and stirred up internal problems and
strive to create choas and uncertainty. The Evil Empire would then step
in to break up these countries and establish ultimate control by setting
up pro American stooges in power. The Evil Empire has broken up
Yugoslavia into three or four separate countries and Albania into two
smaller states.
US then focus its strategy on establishing a strangle hold on the
Middle -East Arab countries. Here it adopts a three prone strategy.
Almost all Arab countries are under just as evil theodocracy
dictatorial regimes. These Arab theodocratic dictators treat their
subjects especially women like slaves and rule them in a servile manner.
The Evil Empire is able to see that the Arab dictators do not feel safe
from its own people and so it signs alliances with the numbskull Arab
dictators to help them preserve their dictatorships. Having eased into
the favours of the Arab kings or rulers the Evil Empire took no time in
establishing an economic strangle hold on all the rich oil producing
Arab countries thus controlling practically hundred per cent of their
oil resources. The unsuspecting Arabs were then asked to sign a trade
treaty based on the use of US dollars as a standard unit of monetary
transaction. It must be pointed out that US had earlier scrapped the
international Bretton Wood's agreement on using gold as a standard
support and back up for all international trade transactions. In trying
to impose the American dollar as a standard unit of international
exchange the US has an evil intention to manipulate the US dollar with
impunity to cheat and swindle every trading nation that the Evil Empire
conducts business with. Thus with the effective control of the US
dollar the Evil Empire had for many decades were able to peg the price
of Middle East oil at only $US5.00 per barrel. Under the same agreement
even if the Arabs sell the oil to other countries they must only accept
payment strictly in US dollars.
Just imagine how much US squeezed the Arabs and the world when it
imports thousands of billions of barrels of oil almost for free when it
then in turn sells these barrels of oil to other countries or
international markets at many multiple times its original cost of
$US5.00 per barrel. For years and decades US has been shipping billions
of tons of cheap Arab oil to dump into disused old underground salt
wells as reseerves for future use. However the game was up when Saddam
Hussein of Iraq and Gadaffi of Libya refused to continue with the
unfair spurious treaty which binds the Arab hands . Saddam would accept
payments for Iraqi oil not only in US dollar but also in other major
countries currencies. Gaddafi did the same thing and also try to
establish a pan African gold standard for trading purpose and in payment
for Libya or Arab oil. It was the last straw for the Evil Empire which
saw Saddam and Gaddafi as a threat to American control not only of the
Middle East but also the whole world. The result was that the two
countries were attacked and destroyed and Saddam Hussein and Gadaffi
were killed and murdered for trying to do the right thing for their
countries and for the Arabs in general. The main enemies of the Arabs
are the theocratic rulers of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait , Jordan and Tunisia
who for their own selfish ends connive with the evil Americans to thumb
down on their own people.These evil Arab theocratic rulers must
eventually be destroyed for the good of the Arabs and for the world.
The next strategy US used to have a strangle hold on the Middle East
is to make use of its deputy sheriff, Israel. US and the West have been
helping Israel to build up a strong and mighty military state so that
it can act as a deputy sheriff to help US and the West to control the
Arabs. Israel military power is second to none in the Middle East and it
has been able to constantly carry out wars of aggression against the
helpless Arabs with impunity. With a strong and powerful Israel US and
the West feel safe of its continuing dominance and control of the Middle
East.
What does control of the Middle East mean to the world and to China ?
It implies that US and the West can block or cut off supplies of oil to
countries which they wish to sanction or contain. China view this
American control of the Middle East very seriously and will endeavour to
make every effort to help Africa and the Middle East countries to break
off these evil and insidious American dominance.
Southernglory1
Tuesday,4th March,2014
3/03/2014
Kunming, 29 killed and 143 wounded
10 Xinjiang separatists dressed in black with faced hooded, went on a
killing rampage in Kunming Railway Station. They went killing anyone in
the station. The Police managed to shoot and kill 4 of the terrorists,
wounded 1 and hunting for the rest. It was reported that the terrorists
were Uighurs from the Xinjiang region demanding for self rule.
Xinjiang has been part of China since time immemorial and the Uighurs minority group is getting more violent in demanding to break away from China.
In many countries around the world, the minorities are challenging the central govt and wanting to form their own govt. Some of these minorities have been there for centuries. Some minorities are new to the land, especially those in Europe and the Americas. As the minorities grow in number and strength, there is a natural tendency to want to be their own masters. The fragile states of Central Asia, China and Russia, even Myanmar, Thailand, Philippines and Malaysia, are countries plagued by the presence of a more vocal and demanding minorities. Violent protest and violence as a means to achieving their political goal, often with external support, will only embolden the separatist movements.
Would Europe and countries that practiced free immigration laws end up with a substantial minority population that would make demands for their existence, for territorial and sovereign rights or political representation from the adopted countries? When their populations are small, they are like benign cancerous cells. When they grow in size, many would turn malignant and become a social and political problem of their host countries.
When would the pressure from the substantial presence of foreigners as new citizens in Sin City become a real problem and to challenge the original citizens for a bigger say, representation and the economic pie of the state. When would these apparently very nice people turned to become not so nice or even violence when they feel their interests are not satisfied or their expectations not met?
Are we planting the seed of communal violence for the future by bringing in so many foreigners into our midst? We have managed to keep the lid on for the last 40 plus years with the 3 major racial groups and a smaller Eurasian community living in relative harmony and co existence. With the new intakes, this delicate balance is going to be challenged and we can’t be so naïve not to foresee what the future has installed for us by our reckless immigration policy.
In the Kunming incident, it looks like China will no longer be acting nice to the terrorists and separatist movement. A dragnet is likely to be cast over Xinjiang and the strong arm of the law will inflict pain on the reign of terror of the separatists. Historically China is like an ocean of people and even the larger minority groups like the Mongols and Manchus ended up as Chinese after their conquest of China. The minority Uighurs would hardly stand a chance to think they could separate themselves from China. They are asking to be whacked real hard on their butts for their violent and wanton killing of the innocents. There should be no pity should the perpetrators and their supporters be dealt with in the same way they killed the innocents in Kunming.
Xinjiang has been part of China since time immemorial and the Uighurs minority group is getting more violent in demanding to break away from China.
In many countries around the world, the minorities are challenging the central govt and wanting to form their own govt. Some of these minorities have been there for centuries. Some minorities are new to the land, especially those in Europe and the Americas. As the minorities grow in number and strength, there is a natural tendency to want to be their own masters. The fragile states of Central Asia, China and Russia, even Myanmar, Thailand, Philippines and Malaysia, are countries plagued by the presence of a more vocal and demanding minorities. Violent protest and violence as a means to achieving their political goal, often with external support, will only embolden the separatist movements.
Would Europe and countries that practiced free immigration laws end up with a substantial minority population that would make demands for their existence, for territorial and sovereign rights or political representation from the adopted countries? When their populations are small, they are like benign cancerous cells. When they grow in size, many would turn malignant and become a social and political problem of their host countries.
When would the pressure from the substantial presence of foreigners as new citizens in Sin City become a real problem and to challenge the original citizens for a bigger say, representation and the economic pie of the state. When would these apparently very nice people turned to become not so nice or even violence when they feel their interests are not satisfied or their expectations not met?
Are we planting the seed of communal violence for the future by bringing in so many foreigners into our midst? We have managed to keep the lid on for the last 40 plus years with the 3 major racial groups and a smaller Eurasian community living in relative harmony and co existence. With the new intakes, this delicate balance is going to be challenged and we can’t be so naïve not to foresee what the future has installed for us by our reckless immigration policy.
In the Kunming incident, it looks like China will no longer be acting nice to the terrorists and separatist movement. A dragnet is likely to be cast over Xinjiang and the strong arm of the law will inflict pain on the reign of terror of the separatists. Historically China is like an ocean of people and even the larger minority groups like the Mongols and Manchus ended up as Chinese after their conquest of China. The minority Uighurs would hardly stand a chance to think they could separate themselves from China. They are asking to be whacked real hard on their butts for their violent and wanton killing of the innocents. There should be no pity should the perpetrators and their supporters be dealt with in the same way they killed the innocents in Kunming.
Sinkies need foreign recruitment agencies to get jobs here
The proliferation of recruitment agencies owned by foreigners is not
something to be trifled with. We have crazily, under the notion of free
market forces, to issue all kinds of licences to foreigners to compete
against our own citizens. Insurance agencies, student recruitment
agencies, housing agents, and recruitment agencies, all that can be run
without much talent is given freely to foreigners. In the case of
recruitment agencies, there appears to be an unwritten modus operandi,
where the employers choose to work with these foreign owned agencies, or
new citizen owned agencies, and the target group of employees is
foreigners, has led to a situation where jobs are given to foreigners
instead of citizens.
Not only the citizens are losing out on jobs, the citizen owned agencies are having a tough time getting a share of the recruitment pie as their local data base with mainly local applicant CVs are not in demand by employers, local and foreign. The talk is that if one is thinking of getting a job, the chances of success are better with a foreign recruitment agency. The catch is that it is very rare that a foreign recruitment agency would want to job match a citizen. There seems to be a lot of under table practices that made it so lucrative to place foreigners than to place citizens and that made the latter not a worthwhile effort.
A free market system, a ‘meritocrazy’ policy that only naïve little boys and girls think will work, are working against the citizens in all areas and making them look like fools, hapless, unwanted, and with no one to turn to except to look for a taxi licence when all things failed. The failure of the govt to ignore the plight of its citizens for good jobs will be translated into negative votes for sure. The citizens may be daft but not daft to the extent that they did not know who they should vote to Parliament to look after their interests.
The nearly cooked citizens will feel the pain soon, other than those that are already cooked. When they start to jump out of the boiling water, things can be ugly. The lethargy, the lack of will to change the nature of things to their own advantage, the stupidity to believe that it is all their fault, that the foreigners are smarter and more deserving than them, have kept the daft Sinkies in a state of resignation and despair.
Either they wake up their ideas or they will be the new beggars in this super rich island of super opportunities that are going to the foreigners. Is there a conspiracy that jobs should go to foreigners, that employers rather work with foreign recruiters than the citizens to recruit foreigners? Or is it how the system has been designed and allowed to do the citizens in?
What price to pay for being daft and to be treated as daft even by foreigners? No one knows what is going on, really?
Not only the citizens are losing out on jobs, the citizen owned agencies are having a tough time getting a share of the recruitment pie as their local data base with mainly local applicant CVs are not in demand by employers, local and foreign. The talk is that if one is thinking of getting a job, the chances of success are better with a foreign recruitment agency. The catch is that it is very rare that a foreign recruitment agency would want to job match a citizen. There seems to be a lot of under table practices that made it so lucrative to place foreigners than to place citizens and that made the latter not a worthwhile effort.
A free market system, a ‘meritocrazy’ policy that only naïve little boys and girls think will work, are working against the citizens in all areas and making them look like fools, hapless, unwanted, and with no one to turn to except to look for a taxi licence when all things failed. The failure of the govt to ignore the plight of its citizens for good jobs will be translated into negative votes for sure. The citizens may be daft but not daft to the extent that they did not know who they should vote to Parliament to look after their interests.
The nearly cooked citizens will feel the pain soon, other than those that are already cooked. When they start to jump out of the boiling water, things can be ugly. The lethargy, the lack of will to change the nature of things to their own advantage, the stupidity to believe that it is all their fault, that the foreigners are smarter and more deserving than them, have kept the daft Sinkies in a state of resignation and despair.
Either they wake up their ideas or they will be the new beggars in this super rich island of super opportunities that are going to the foreigners. Is there a conspiracy that jobs should go to foreigners, that employers rather work with foreign recruiters than the citizens to recruit foreigners? Or is it how the system has been designed and allowed to do the citizens in?
What price to pay for being daft and to be treated as daft even by foreigners? No one knows what is going on, really?
American war plan against China is called ‘JOAC’, pronounced joke
While China is making plans to deny the access of American warships
patrolling its coastal seas, the Americans are countering this plan by a
war plan called ‘JOAC’ for Joint Operational Access Concept. Obviously
the Americans do not meant it to be a joke. The Chinese area access
denial plan is a defensive strategy to keep the enemies away from its
shores and for doing this, they are being accused to being provocative,
if not, aggressive.
The Americans have been strutting their military hardware along the Yellow Sea, East China Seas, right at the door step of China and telling China, what can you do about it. And when China declared its first ADIZ in East China Sea, another defensive act, the Americans aggressively flew 2 B 52 nuclear bombers heading straight into China. Such a hostile act could easily trigger a nuclear war as the nuclear capability of the bombers cannot be ignored. China could have shot them down if they came a bit closer to the firing range of their nuclear weapons.
The arrogance and hostility of the Americans and their intent for war have been taken for granted by the West who spoke about it as if it is their right to attack anyone they like. And China’s acts to defend itself with ADIZ and area access denial missiles are read as aggressive and war mongering.
So the Americans are serious about this joke, oops, I mean JOAC. What is this plan all about? According to Geoff Dyer in an article published yesterday in the ST on his book, The Contest Of The Century: The New Era Of Competition With China, this plan is being devised to counter China’s area access denial plan to keep American warships away from Chinese soil to prevent them from launching strikes at China mainland. How it works? The plan calls for a massive strike against all the missile targets in China to disarm Chinese missiles from hitting American warships. And they made a few assumptions, 1, the Chinese would not doing anything and allow the Americans to launch the strikes without hitting back, like the cruise missile strike against China’s embassy in Belgrade. 2, it assume that the strike can be a limited war and China would not dare to launch its nuclear arsenal against the US mainland.
The probability of a massive counter attack by China and an all out nuclear war cannot be ruled out. Which country would allow another country to strike at its heartland and resist from retaliation if it can do so and has the weapons to do so? The war crazy Americans cannot be so mad to think that a massive strike against China could be done without the Chinese hitting back with all they got. They could not be more right to call their plan a joke.
While they are planning to counter the Chinese defensive strategy with a hostile and aggressive war plan, do they believe that the Chinese would stop at their defensive plan and would not be planning to counter strike should the Americans carry out their joke? This is very similar to some countries that think they would have a big advantage to have a first strike strategy without thinking that the enemy too could have the same first strike strategy against them.
Just pray the Americans are joking and continue to have more jokes up their sleeves. The idiots still think war is an option between nuclear capable super powers and are risking for war. And they are claiming that the Chinese may flirt with adventurism when they are most guilty of this act. The Americans could be adventurous against smaller and military weaker countries. They should plan to have peace with other nuclear powers if they are sane in their heads.
Kopi Level - Yellow
The Americans have been strutting their military hardware along the Yellow Sea, East China Seas, right at the door step of China and telling China, what can you do about it. And when China declared its first ADIZ in East China Sea, another defensive act, the Americans aggressively flew 2 B 52 nuclear bombers heading straight into China. Such a hostile act could easily trigger a nuclear war as the nuclear capability of the bombers cannot be ignored. China could have shot them down if they came a bit closer to the firing range of their nuclear weapons.
The arrogance and hostility of the Americans and their intent for war have been taken for granted by the West who spoke about it as if it is their right to attack anyone they like. And China’s acts to defend itself with ADIZ and area access denial missiles are read as aggressive and war mongering.
So the Americans are serious about this joke, oops, I mean JOAC. What is this plan all about? According to Geoff Dyer in an article published yesterday in the ST on his book, The Contest Of The Century: The New Era Of Competition With China, this plan is being devised to counter China’s area access denial plan to keep American warships away from Chinese soil to prevent them from launching strikes at China mainland. How it works? The plan calls for a massive strike against all the missile targets in China to disarm Chinese missiles from hitting American warships. And they made a few assumptions, 1, the Chinese would not doing anything and allow the Americans to launch the strikes without hitting back, like the cruise missile strike against China’s embassy in Belgrade. 2, it assume that the strike can be a limited war and China would not dare to launch its nuclear arsenal against the US mainland.
The probability of a massive counter attack by China and an all out nuclear war cannot be ruled out. Which country would allow another country to strike at its heartland and resist from retaliation if it can do so and has the weapons to do so? The war crazy Americans cannot be so mad to think that a massive strike against China could be done without the Chinese hitting back with all they got. They could not be more right to call their plan a joke.
While they are planning to counter the Chinese defensive strategy with a hostile and aggressive war plan, do they believe that the Chinese would stop at their defensive plan and would not be planning to counter strike should the Americans carry out their joke? This is very similar to some countries that think they would have a big advantage to have a first strike strategy without thinking that the enemy too could have the same first strike strategy against them.
Just pray the Americans are joking and continue to have more jokes up their sleeves. The idiots still think war is an option between nuclear capable super powers and are risking for war. And they are claiming that the Chinese may flirt with adventurism when they are most guilty of this act. The Americans could be adventurous against smaller and military weaker countries. They should plan to have peace with other nuclear powers if they are sane in their heads.
Kopi Level - Yellow
3/02/2014
Four Horsemen – The Age of Decadence
A blogger in TRE recommended the Four Horsemen as a good
documentary to watch. The producer Ross Ashcroft gave an analysis on the rise
of civilisation and the falls of empires. It is the last stage in the decline
of empires, the Age of Decadence, particularly in the USA
that is most relevant to what is happening here. Why not when we are just a
small replica of the American system, borrowing and copying everything American
to the T? And if America
is failing, the symptoms appearing there will also be here in a graduated
scale.
The rise of an empire coincidentally dealt with a familiar
subject called pioneers. It all began with the pioneers digging the road and
paving the way for a brighter future for those that came after them. It then
went through the ages of conquest, commerce, affluence, intellectual pursuit
and, just before it came to an end, the age of decadence described as bread and
circus.
The prominent features of the onset of decadence are as
follows:
- An undisciplined over size military that is over extending itself. This is self explanatory in what we are doing today and how cocky we have become.
- Conspicuous display of wealth. We have seen many Ferraris and Lamborghinis and French mansions around us like the Antons and the Michaels.
- Disparity in wealth or a big income gap. No need to elaborate when the wealth of the nation concentrates in the hands of a few families and the high incomes of top people in number of times over the low level workers are there for all to see. The people benefiting from it will tell the daft workers it is the hard truth, can’t be helped.
- A bloated govt or over size govt. No need to explain on this, big in numbers and big in salary.
- An obsession with sex. Funny that we have so many court cases about sex recently.
- Debasement of currency. We used to be able to buy a semi D for $40k but now it needs $3m to $4m to get one. We could get a 5 rm HDB flat for less than $30k but we need $500k or more to get one today. The value of our money has gone bananas.
There are many other features of a decadent state like
apathy, amoralism, no one cares a damn. Think
Hong Lim Park
when several very important issues were raised but hardly anyone bothered to
attend. And housing prices kept spiralling and people said it is good. Ashcroft
described it as the squandering of a generation of its inheritance. I wonder
what he meant and how relevant it is in the City of Sin.
One interesting comment by Ashcroft that I feel very strange and astonishing,
is the glorifications of chefs in the society. Are we also glorifying our chefs
too?
The Americans got rid of the Glass Steagall Act to allow the
banks to do as they liked, creating money and gambling in a way that put the
casinos to shame. And this is facilitated by the call for deregulations and
they did, leading to the financial disaster of 2008 and the massive bailout of
the banks that were too big to fall to the tune of U$8.5 trillion. This was
several times the amount used to reconstruct Europe
after WW2.
The decadence continues unabated after the bailout and the
banking and finance bandits dug in even deeper and waiting for the big bang to
come. The banks continue to gamble and cheat their clients while the stock
exchange was designed for the computer traders to cheat the innocent and
hapless investors. Crimes of such nature that are blatantly flouted like in a
state of lawlessness by the bankers and the crooks in the financial system
without anyone thinking that they were wrong, crimes sanctioned by the states
and with the regulators assisting the criminals to become more efficient and
bold in the plundering. They don’t even know that these acts were criminal,
they did not want to know.
Ashcroft said, ‘When plunder becomes a way of life for a
group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the
course of time a legal system that authorises it and a moral code that
glorifies it’.
How far or how deep are we in this state of decadence? All
the features of a state of decadence described by Ashcroft are apparent and
here with us.
What is next after the state of decadence?
Here is the link to the Four Horsemen - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fbvquHSPJU&feature=youtu.be. A good 90 minute documentary.
Kopi Level - Green
3/01/2014
How much an average Sinkie needs to live in Sin?
This
is just a broad brush estimate on how much it would cost an average Sinkie to
live here from birth to death, or the sum of money he needs to earn and to pay
for the privilege of living in Sin City. It will only consider a few basic
factors without going into nitty gritties of living.
For
the first 25 years, it could range from $500k to a million to grow a child to
an adult. The same amount would be needed from 65 to 80 or more during the
golden years. These two phases of life will cost between $1m to $2m for each
person.
For
the duration of 25 years to 65, the working life, it will need something like
$2.5m to $4.5m. At $1k pm for personal expenses, this will work out to about
$500k for 40 years. Add in two children will be an additional $1m to $2m. The
flat will cost between $500k to $1.5m. A car, at $100k per car for 10 years, it
will cost $400k for 40 years.
Just
using these simplified numbers, an average Sinkie will need $3.5m to $6.5m to
survive in Sin for a period of 85 years. And assuming that the cost for the
first 25 years is paid by the parents, it is still between $3m to $6m to get
by. And where is the money coming from?
A
Sinkie must make this sum in his 40 years of economically active life. This
works out to be about $5k to $10k pm, using the minimum and maximum estimates.
Any Sinkie earning less than $5k pm is likely to struggle all the way to
survive, ceteris paribus.
Can
you afford to live in Sin?
Kopi Level - Green
The revelations of the Little India riot
We have heard of brave policemen and of policemen running away from the
mob. We have heard of praises and medals for bravery and brickbats for
not holding the ground, and worse, policemen fleeing for safety. And the
dominant view, the policemen are the law enforcers and must make a
stand, face the mobsters and deal with them with force and authority.
The alternative view is that the police on the ground were outnumbered
and there was no need to risk life and injuries, no need to attack the
mob to escalate the tension and create a nasty situation.
At the moment all the comments are academic as the commentators are detached from a reality, from the tense situation where personal security were at risk. And from the comfort of sitting behind a computer and punching the keyboard I thought it would be easy for Arnold Schwarzeneggar or Robocop to deal with the mob single handed. It would be a piece of cake even if the mob were illiterate villagers that were used to violence, to pelting policemen with stones and anything they could lay their hands on, to overturning and burning police cars. One thing for sure, they were not the nice school children that could be shouted down by a school teacher. It was a violent and incensed mob.
What would happen if the orders were not given to pull back but instead for the handful of policemen to charge at the mob before the arrival of the SOC officers is moot. There could be a few serious casualties among the men and women in blue. Did anyone suggest to the police women to charge at the mob? This sounds like the soldiers in Kota Tinggi during Confrontation who thought it was a picnic and they could take a break bathing in the river unguarded.
It is quite fun really to make all kinds of postulations and even gungho ideas in the comfort of an aircon room with tea and cakes to munch. The riot could throw up a few heroes like Arnold or a few policemen in black plastic bags. Who is wiser?
What do you think? Of course it looked quite ridiculous and malu for policemen and women running away from a mob. It would be nice if they would strut out from the ambushed ambulance with guns blazing in both hands, taking down the mobsters in their way. This would be great stuff for Hollywood or even Mediacorp. Really great for adrenalin pumping and story telling and a great opportunity missed.
I am still having a lot of wild imaginations on what it could have been. If only I had a machine gun crew. But these kinds of wet dreams are best for the early hours in bed. One can only 'how lian' after the event and not being there.
At the moment all the comments are academic as the commentators are detached from a reality, from the tense situation where personal security were at risk. And from the comfort of sitting behind a computer and punching the keyboard I thought it would be easy for Arnold Schwarzeneggar or Robocop to deal with the mob single handed. It would be a piece of cake even if the mob were illiterate villagers that were used to violence, to pelting policemen with stones and anything they could lay their hands on, to overturning and burning police cars. One thing for sure, they were not the nice school children that could be shouted down by a school teacher. It was a violent and incensed mob.
What would happen if the orders were not given to pull back but instead for the handful of policemen to charge at the mob before the arrival of the SOC officers is moot. There could be a few serious casualties among the men and women in blue. Did anyone suggest to the police women to charge at the mob? This sounds like the soldiers in Kota Tinggi during Confrontation who thought it was a picnic and they could take a break bathing in the river unguarded.
It is quite fun really to make all kinds of postulations and even gungho ideas in the comfort of an aircon room with tea and cakes to munch. The riot could throw up a few heroes like Arnold or a few policemen in black plastic bags. Who is wiser?
What do you think? Of course it looked quite ridiculous and malu for policemen and women running away from a mob. It would be nice if they would strut out from the ambushed ambulance with guns blazing in both hands, taking down the mobsters in their way. This would be great stuff for Hollywood or even Mediacorp. Really great for adrenalin pumping and story telling and a great opportunity missed.
I am still having a lot of wild imaginations on what it could have been. If only I had a machine gun crew. But these kinds of wet dreams are best for the early hours in bed. One can only 'how lian' after the event and not being there.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)