Prominent experts are increasingly urging caution
regarding COVID vaccination, especially for individuals under 50 years
of age. Notably, Dr. Kári Stefánsson, a Gold Medalist from the European
Society of Cardiology, has recently suggested that those under 40 or 50
should refrain from vaccination due to potential heart inflammation
linked to COVID vaccines.
Furthermore, I've compiled a
comprehensive list of experts who initially supported mass vaccination
but have since raised concerns, which I've dubbed the "U-Turn Tracker."
It's
crucial to question whether these decision-makers are fully aware of
the emerging issues surrounding experimental mRNA vaccines or if they're
heavily invested in these products and thus doubling down despite
mounting evidence of harm.
Additionally, there's growing concern
about DNA Plasmid contaminations in Pfizer mRNA vaccines, exceeding the
guidance set by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). This issue,
initially identified by Kervin McKernan and subsequently confirmed by
independent scientists, most notably Phillip Buckhaults, demands serious
attention.
Where did the figure of 60% originate, and how did
these appointed officials calculate the recommended vaccination rate for
each country? What are they going to do to incentivize 60% to
vaccinate? Will they offer more donuts or resort to “no-jab no-job
policies?”
Singapore’s vaccination drive in 2021 when Tharman Shamugaratnam was the Deputy Prime Minister.
Is
there an acknowledgment that the African continent, which has one of
the lowest vaccination rates, experienced comparatively fewer severe
impacts from the pandemic?
Here’s the current share of population
receiving at least one dose of the vaccines. As you can see the African
continent has the lowest share vaccinated population.
And there
are the cases of COVID. I know these are not normalized numbers but
Africa has a population 1.2 billion, you don’t need to normalize the
numbers to see the obvious pattern.
What I'm stressing is that
giving a universal guideline in this highly intricate situation appears
irrational and neglects the precautionary principle, which suggests that
when safety is uncertain, it's wiser to exercise caution and wait for
more evidence before making a decision.
I also hope that people
worldwide will become more aware and reconsider granting authority to
unelected "global" figures like Tharman Shanmugaratnam.
Signing off for now
A17
P.S.
I just watched some YouTube videos featuring Tharman Shanmugaratnam.
While I'm not familiar with him, he comes across as a well-intentioned
bloke who aspires to make the world a better place. Let me just say that
its worth remembering the old adage: "the road to hell is paved with
good intentions."
P.S.: My Singaporean friend just informed me
that Tharman Shamugaratnam is highly likely to be elected as the next
President of Singapore on September 1st 2023. This reminds me of a video
clip in which Klaus Schwab openly admits to infiltrating governments
around the world: "What we are very proud of now [is] that we penetrate
the cabinets. [More than half of the Canadian cabinet ministers] are
actually Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum... It's true
in Argentina, and it's true in France now, with the president [being] a
Young Global Leader."
You can watch the clip here.
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1003573450553693
Anonymous