Macron's 8,000 Airbus deal literally kills Boeing for good

Macron has more than ruffled the feathers of the Neocons in the USA, with his calling for Europe not to act like vassal states and follow the USA into a conflict with China over Taiwan, saying Europe should not engage in a crisis that is not of their own making.

Not only has that stance caused hysteria in the USA, it also clearly antagonised the USA's stooges in Europe as well, particulaly the Germans. China already noticed the apparent split in Europe's top echelons of power. When Macron wanted to follow Olaf Scholz to China months ago, he was flatly brushed aside and denied by Olaf Scholz. That was a big slap on Macron's ego and he is clearly paying Olaf Scholz back in his own coin, which the Chinese are helping him by giving him an emperors welcome which Scholz earlier visit could not match. The unity and solidarity propaganda touted in the EU is a mirage that Russia and China could clearly see by putting two and two together.

Now, as I said earlier, Macron did more than ruffled the feathers of the Neocons in the USA. Macron, in the eyes of analyst and onlookers, is actually joining the de-dollarisation movement by closing many deals in Yuan with China and bypassing the US$. Among the big deals made was China buying more Airbus helicopters and planes and the expansion of Airbus plant in China with more investments. That is a significant development, indicating that even the Europeans are not happy with the US$ hegemony.

Of course the Industrial Giants of EU, ie Germany and France, would not be happy with the USA cannibalising Europe's industrial base by offering subsidies to European manufacturers to shift to the USA. Moreover, selling expensive energy to Europe caused much of the problems now besetting Europe, when Europe could instead still be enjoying cheap Russian energy if not for towing the USA line. Blowing up the Nord Stream pipelines was the added pain inflicted on the Europeans.

 Anonymous 

Can a disease or sickness save a person from imprisonment

 

A person suffering from a chronic and debilitating disease may use this as a ground to avoid a prison sentence. This is something that is new to many layperson. There was such a case and the judge had to check with the Prison Services to confirm that the prison can accommodate a person with such a condition eg Parkinson's disease. In this particular case, the Prison confirmed that they could take in the convicted person and the judge went ahead with the jail sentence.

What if the Prison Services said they could not accommodate a person with such a disease? Would the convicted person be exempted from imprisonment? Many criminals had spent time in jail for their crimes. Presumably all are fit to be imprisoned. Has there been cases when a convicted person be spared jail sentence because of a disease? There is a law that prevented older people from caning.

I find this line of defence very ingenious. There are many kinds of queer diseases and sicknesses eg fear of height, fear of small place, fear of darkness, fear of stranger, fear of confinement, or conditions when a person could turn violent easily, prone to kill, prone to rape, molest etc etc. Could such conditions be used as a line of defence in court to avoid a jail sentence? 

This line of defence is really educational and makes the law very interesting. I am thrilled by the submission. Sure, a person with an infectious disease or deranged would have to be imprisoned in a different way, but still imprisoned, not spared from being jailed. It would be a nice argument to claim a guilty person has a fear of the prison or police uniform to keep him out of the prison. How about an aversion of prison food, would die from not wanting to eat prison food?

What do you think?

America is the real threat to China!

 

This 6 minutes clip shows all the American bases surrounding China and not a single Chinese or Russia military base near to the USA. So who is the threat and who is the victim? Only the very dull and very thick would still shout and believe in the American vicious lie that China is the threat.

The whole world has woken up to the real American threat. Only the walking zombies and stupid would still deny this truth and still blindly being led by the warmongering number one terrorist state, ie the Evil American Empire.

US operates more than 336 bioweapon labs around the world

The US Department of Defense acknowledged on June 9, 2022 that it had established “collaborations” with 46 Ukrainian laboratories, obviously for… peaceful purposes.[5] In reality, the Pentagon was not “collaborating” but directly operating biological warfare laboratories in Ukraine since 2014, in violation of the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention. This has been documented since the 2014 Maidan, including, for example, a report by a former agent of the SBU, the Ukrainian intelligence service, revealing that “the deaths of the test subjects were authorized as part of its conduct.”[6] In this case, the “test subjects” are Ukrainians, not lab rats.
It is also discovered that this extremely dangerous research was aimed at improving the pathogenic properties of plague, anthrax, tularemia, cholera and other deadly diseases.[7] Among the priorities identified was the study of bacterial and viral pathogens that can be transmitted from bats to humans, such as the pathogens of plague, leptospirosis, brucellosis, and coronaviruses… Bat coronaviruses? Doesn’t that remind us of something? Let us add that a military program entitled ‘Covid-19’ was financed in November 2019, three months before the WHO gave this name to a global pandemic that has not finished making the headlines.[8] Simple coincidence?

Translation from French: Yannis V. Zbroek
Patrick Pasin, Publisher and author of “War in Ukraine: The Criminal Responsibility of the West – Our Options for Stopping the Crisis” (in French)

The above is quoted from RT. 

 "The US openly admitted that it runs 336 biological laboratories in 30 countries around the world, including 26 in Ukraine. However, the contracts suggest that the US has signed contracts with 49 countries, way more than it had admitted. 1 May 2022" Global Times

The Americans officially admitted that they have 336 biolabs in 30 countries. The real figure could be very much higher as proven by the discovery of 46 biolabs in Ukraine but with the Americans admitting only 26. The discrepancy in the numbers of biolabs is a sign that the Americans are hiding something sinister in this programme. Why are the Americans not telling the truth, why are the Americans not transparent about something that they claimed to be innocent. Also, why is there a need to have so many biolabs all over the world to study the same things?

Were the Americans using this labs to test bioweapons they are developing to target the specific victims in these countries? There were reports that the Americans were collecting DNAs of different races for their studies in bioweapons. The Covid19 virus was claimed to be specially designed to attack Asian stocks, especially Chinese, Japanese, Koreans and the Vietnamese, all of quite similar stock.

If this is true, then countries allowing the Americans to set up such bioweapon labs in their territories and allowing the Americans to collect and test samples with their DNAs are actually facilitating the Americans to design bioweapons to target them specifically when needed. This is inviting disaster to themselves and their people.

Why would countries allow the Americans to do this to their population? Are the leaders of these countries stupid or mad? Are they not compromising the interests of their people and putting the safety of their people at great risks?

There is no good reason for countries to allow the American military to set up bioweapons labs in their countries as the main aim of a military is to engage and conduct wars. The bioweapon labs must also be meant for wars. Every country should wisen up and close down all the American bioweapon labs in their countries immediately to safeguard their national interests and to protect their citizens.

What are they waiting for. Being ignorant and stupid is one thing. When the truth and risk are exposed, they have no reason not to act on it.

Stoltenberg and Ursula von der Leyen are American appointees to rule Europe

Marco Rubio is insinuating that the USA needs to change its policy towards Macron and Europe to put Macron in his place over his stance. A regime change is looming perhaps, leveraging on the chaos in France today? Bear in mind that Europe is now under Ursula von der leyen as EU leader, the de facto stooge of the USA, tasked with the job of steering Europe into the gutters.

Ursula von der leyen is reported to be eyeing the job of chief of Nato, to replace the other stooge, Jens Stoltenberg, and is the best case scenario for the USA agenda, if the USA succeeds in putting another pro USA stooge to replace her as EU leader. That would make the setup most ideal for the USA to control the now economically backsliding Europeans like sheep. At least Angela Merkel provided the pushback against the USA in the past, and Macron is not capitulating at present.

What does Marco Rubio mean by asking whether Macron now speaks for all of Europe? Is the USA the only de facto authority to speak for Europe? Macron has more rights to speak for Europe than the USA. In the past, Angela Merkel had done the same for Europe, going against the USA, and can the USA say Merkel wasn't the head of Europe? Every other European leader looked up to Merkel as leader of Europe. Germany was even propping up the economies of the PIGS for years and they knew who called the shots.

Looking at the big picture, Macron, albeit not a strong French leader in the shoes of De Gaulle or Jacques Chirac, is nevertheless the only EU leader that looks at least credible enough to lead Europe. If Rishi Sunak can lead the UK, why can't Macron lead Europe? And that ignites the fear in the USA that when Ursula von der leyen is no more the leader of the EU, the USA is probably getting nervous should Macron next aspire to replace her as leader of the EU, after leaving as Emperor of France. Of course events can change overnight, with a regime change in France, but the USA is nevertheless nervous and paranoid by taking the big risk.

As in the Middle East, the threat of the USA pulling out its military support for Saudi Arabia, including sale of weapons to them, has not rattled the resolve of Mohammed bin Salman, nor mitigate his disdain and distrust of the USA. After all, the USA can pull out its military support for Saudi Arabia, since the Saudis already are sourcing their military weapons from Russia, buying Russian S400 air defence system instead of relying on USA's patriot system that failed to work. Russia is ready to step in should the USA leaves. That would be good riddance. Moreover, recent events have killed for good the myth of a Saudi conflict with Iran and put paid to the need for huge military expenditure by the Saudis in the face of the hyped up Iranian threat.

Therefore, in Europe, even if the USA were to leave Nato and Europe as threatened by Trump, the Europeans have already started their own EU Security Union Alliance among the EU states, an idea ironically, if I remember correctly, was hatched and started by the French. Just connecting the dots tells us why Macron is not in the good books of the USA and why he is being targeted for a regime change. Moreover, the French had repeatedly been agitating for France to leave Nato.

 Anonymous