Pacific Islands Summit - No joint statement dictated by the US

 The Emperor of the American Empire ordered the head of states of the Pacific Islands to the White House in the hope of coercing them to sign a joint statement against China and Russia. Surprisingly, the leaders of the Pacific Islands are more enlightened than many countries in the world and had seen through the plot of the Americans and refused to budge. No joint statement to denounce or condemn China and Russia. They came and they went, leaving the Americans in the lurch, still wondering why the Pacific Islanders have unanimously stood together to speak in one voice and act as a group of independent sovereign states, telling the Americans to mind their own business, that they are in charge of their own affairs and will chart the course of their future development.

The Americans tried, Biden and Blinken, to dangle some carrot in front of the islanders, to take the bait, to come under the umbrella and 'protection' of the Empire. The islanders are facing external threats, from who, the Americans alleged. And the Americans would be there to protect them. This was the first insult to the islanders. The islanders are very safe in their own ways and any external threats are likely to come from Australia and the Americans.

The second insult, the Americans wanted to send their warships to patrol the region, in the name of protecting the Pacific Islands. The truth is to control the Pacific Islands militarily with the presence of their warships and eventually military bases. No way would the Pacific Islands be controlled by any big powers. They are absolutely capable of protecting their waters. Where is the threat? The obvious threats are from the AngloSaxon tribes, wanting to send their warships to control the waters around the Pacific Islands. In fact both the Americans and the British sent a warship each without consultation with the Pacific Islands, without their agreement or approval, to want to patrol the waters. This is an act of aggression, a haughty and condescending act, thinking that the islanders are stupid and could not see the sinister ploy of the AngloSaxons. The Solomon Islands had given notice to the Americans and Brits not to send their warships to the region without their approval. Period.

As far as the Pacific Islands are concerned, they do not need the Americans presence after decades of neglect and exploitations. The Marshall Islands still have vivid memories of the American nuclear tests on their islands and treating their people as guinea pigs, exposing them to the harm caused by nuclear explosion and radiation. While the Americans had totally abandoned and ignored the interests of the Pacific Islanders, China was there all the time to trade and to offer assistance, to help in infrastructure development that benefitted the islanders. The Americans are coming back now after seeing what the Chinese have contributed to the well beings of the islanders, and would likely to continue to ignore the islanders if not of Chinese presence. This is something that the islanders could see clearly, that the Americans are opportunistic and only care about America's own interest. If China is not helping and working with them, the Americans would not be bothered with them.

The emptiness of the summit with Biden is the best indication of where the Americans stand in the eyes of the Pacific Islanders. The Pacific Islanders would be their own masters and are fully able to take care of their own interests. The Americans can no longer deceive them or stir trouble in the region. Any attempt to include a security clause in any joint statement would provide an opportunity for the Americans to muscle into the Pacific Islands with their military and warships, to take control over the region, to control the Pacific Islanders  The Pacific Islanders are not stupid and are fully aware of the Americans intention.

PS. Everywhere the Americans go, they hyped about security threats, accusing others as threats and inviting themselves to be the policemen, not just to counter the threat but in reality to control and turn countries into their stooges.

More Studies Confirm the COVID Jab Does More Harm Than Good

 

BY Joseph Mercola

TIME: October 4, 2022

Cardiologist calls for the immediate suspension of all COVID shots as real-world data show they cause more harm than good.


A scientific review in the Journal of Insulin Resistance, written by cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra, calls for the immediate suspension of all COVID shots as real-world data show they cause more harm than good.

Data from Israel shows myocarditis post-jab is occurring at a rate of 1 in 6,000. Hong Kong data from male children and teens found a rate of 1 in 2,700.

Data from the British Yellow Card system shows 1 in 120 people who have received at least one mRNA injection suffer an adverse event “that is beyond mild.”

In Norway, the rate of serious adverse events post-jab is 1 in 1,000 after two doses of Pfizer.

Researchers looking at data from the FDA, Health Canada and the Pfizer and Moderna trials concluded the absolute risk of a serious adverse event from the mRNA shots was 1 in 800, which massively exceeds the risk of COVID-19 hospitalization found in randomized controlled trials.

Leaked audio from a June 2022 meeting between Israeli researchers and the Israeli Ministry of Healthy reveals the Pfizer jab causes long-term adverse effects and is associated with more severe side effects upon rechallenge (i.e., with repeated doses). While the researchers wanted to warn the public, the Ministry altered their final report to say that adverse effects are mild and short-lived. The government then canceled any further research into adverse effects.

The COVID jabs are an absolute disaster, with injuries and deaths piling up by the day. Yet so-called health authorities, doctors, media, drug makers and many of the jabbed themselves claim there’s nothing to see here.

Ever since their release, brave medical professionals have spoken out against them, calling for a more cautious approach.

Now, a peer-reviewed scientific review, published in two parts in the Journal of Insulin Resistance calls for the immediate suspension of all COVID shots as real-world data show they cause more harm than good.

According to this paper, “Curing the Pandemic of Misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Through Real Evidence-Based Medicine,” authored by cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra:

“In the non-elderly population the ‘number needed to treat’ to prevent a single death runs into the thousands. Re-analysis of randomized controlled trials using the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology suggests a greater risk of serious adverse events from the vaccines than being hospitalized from COVID-19.

Pharmacovigilance systems and real-world safety data, coupled with plausible mechanisms of harm, are deeply concerning, especially in relation to cardiovascular safety.

Mirroring a potential signal from the Pfizer Phase 3 trial, a significant rise in cardiac arrest calls to ambulances in England was seen in 2021, with similar data emerging from Israel in the 16–39-year-old age group.

Conclusion:

It cannot be said that the consent to receive these agents was fully informed, as is required ethically and legally. A pause and reappraisal of global vaccination policies for COVID-19 is long overdue.”

SSO 

Rogue Based World Order, a matter of principles

 The Americans are trying to con the world about Rules Based World Order as the panacea for peace and stability. Some scholars have tried to explain this Rules Based World Order as an American World Order, with the rules written by the Americans for the rest of the world to follow but the Americans, being the rule maker, are above the laws. In reality, this American so called Rules Based World Order is more like a Rogue Based World Order.

The Americans and their predecessors, the savages from Europe, practised this Rogue Based World Order from the time they set out to conquer and rule the world by force, by wars and killings and plundering. The savages from Europe ganged up to divide the world among themselves. They cut continents like Asia, Africa and the Americas into pieces and shared among themselves. The rest of the world belonged to them by the use of force. They were very successful in doing that with no opposition as they had the monopoly of modern weapons, the guns and big cannons and warships. As long as the rest of the world became their possessions, the people of the world and their lands and assets belonged to the Europeans, directly or indirectly, it was peace and stability under the European Empire, with the rest of the world serving and prospering the Europeans. The world was their colonies.

The Europeans ruled the world under their Rogue Based World Order. They are the superior beans. They are the top dogs, they deserved the best. The rest of the world would be the smaller dogs and cannot be richer and better than the Europeans. Any country that attempts to be better and richer than the European countries would be taken down. Japan tried but was cut down. 

In the recent decades, things have changed dramatically with many countries of the world getting richer and stronger. And this is unacceptable to the European powers, especially the Americans. According to the Americans, no one is allowed to be better, richer and more powerful than them. They would come down hard to take down any country that tried to do that, even going to wars. They proudly said that China cannot be allowed to be richer and better than them. Is this kind of rogue behaviour acceptable? Why is it that no one is condemning this rogue behaviour of the Americans, that a stronger state can not only bully a weaker state, but can also stop and prevent a weaker state from becoming richer and stronger?

In a smaller way Singapore had experienced what it was like when bigger states decided that Singapore could not be richer and more prosperous than them. To stop Singapore from prospering, to keep Singapore down, Malaysia under Mahathir refused to sell sand to Singapore, threatened to cut off Singapore's water supply, even talking about war. What Mahathir did were exactly what the Americans are doing and saying to China. China cannot be richer and stronger than the US and the Americans think it is right and proper to take down China by all means.

Can the world live with this rogue principle that bigger and more power countries have the right to bring down countries, to keep countries poorer and weaker than them? It may be unpleasant and undesirable for countries when in competition, to not want to trade with another country. But to go all out to cripple another country, to put obstacles against another country, to threaten to go to war, to form gangs, to bring down another country, is a totally different proposition. If this principle of interstate relations is acceptable, then smaller and weaker countries would never have a chance to be richer and better than the big and powerful countries. Accepting this rogue principle would be saying it is ok for our neighbours to put obstacles in our path to economic growth and prosperity, blocking our trade routes, ganging up to put us down, to keep us poor and weak. Can small countries like Singapore live with this rogue principle and think it is ok?

The Rogue Based World Order hyped by the Americans is exactly about using force and unfair and unethical means to put down another country. They are openly saying it, forming alliances with Japan, with India, and with other AngloSaxon countries and European countries to stop China's economic growth, to stop Russia and many countries they declared as enemies, with economic sanctions and threatening wars. And no country is principled enough to stand up and say this rogue principle in international relations is unacceptable. The UN is also very quiet about it and condoning this rogue principle, that the Americans can go about crippling China or any country from becoming richer and stronger, by foul and unethical means.

How many countries think this Rogue Based World Order is acceptable and willing to live with it, to live with the rogue principle that the big and powerful can use might and force to prevent other countries from becoming rich and prosperous through peaceful means and hard work?

The American Rogue Based World Order is based on the principle of rogues and savages, of gangsters and mafias, that they can decide who can be rich and prosperous, and how rich and prosperous to be determined by them, definitely cannot be richer than them.

What do you think?

CECA Effect - What would Singapore be like in the long term, 20, 30 years down the road?

CECA effect:
October 2, 2022 at 9:44 am (Quote)


Upon expiry of the 5-year CECA and resigning, India government will ask for more jobs right?. Initially signed in 2005, the beginning of mass import of them by converting all construction workers from Thai to India nationals, shipbuilding to India nationals, larger import than before of India nationals into IT, Finance/Banking jobs, then gradually you see a lot more of them in hospitals as doctors & nurses, in LTA, IDA, PUB, etc. stat

boards, R&D /academic institutions, restaurants & retails (correct me if I am wrong). There are also job schemes specifically for India nations such as SIA pilot training program aimed for employing SIA Singapore-India bound flight pilots, DBS special talent sponsorships/scholarships for India nationals (in IT right? Somebody can clarify and correct me) and not sure what else more.

In the 2005 CECA, india ask for 127 professional and semi skilled job types for a start right? Wonder how many now.

Are India nationals from India having the world class productivity, worker ethnic? I commonly read articles about them being 5 times slower than China in delivery (perhaps 3 times slower with presence of Singaporean supervisors). Our construction workers from India are renowned for poor productivity why continue to employ them (bcos of CECA?) when you have the very productive Thai workers that can help lower our construction costs thus our HDB prices! Do you think India national professionals and semi skilled fare better?

CECA has become a poor productivity (and perhaps quality) trap for our economy?

CECA effect:
October 2, 2022 at 9:54 am (Quote)

I thought Singapore is advocate for diversity? Why in many departments you see like 90% sometimes like 99% of professionals from one foreign country? What if they all coordinate to steal our data from database? Doing surface/fake work that one day crash our IT systems/infrastructure then you see 0$ in your bank account!

 
The above are two comments in a thread in TRE responding to a Simon Lim's article titled, 'More foreign indian doctors from India - I read it online with disquiet and trepidation that our Ministry of Health is looking to recruit about 240 foreign indian doctors from India.'


The discussions were mainly about the impact on Singapore and Singaporeans with this no holds bar import of CECA Indians in great numbers and across many professions. In this case, if the import of doctors in such numbers and repeated over time, how would it affect the medical profession and medical professionals. And not only doctors are recruited in large numbers from India, nurses are also coming in in great numbers. Would Singapore become more like another beautiful Indian city eventually?


What do you think?

Jokowi - A people's president

 

Indonesian President Jokowi making his rounds in the middle of the night to distribute food and cash to the needy Indonesians. His gestures are very well received by the Indonesian people. 2 minutes clip.