Racist Singapore?

Singapore—Wake Up, Singapore, a political website run by a “community of young activists” asked on its Facebook page on June 18 why the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) “doesn’t allow” Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam to be the Prime Minister.

Why doesn't the PAP allow Tharman to be PM?
Posted by Wake Up, Singapore on Wednesday, June 17, 2020

Mr Tharman, the Senior Minister and Coordinating Minister for Social Policies, also served as the country’s Deputy Prime Minister from 2011 to 2019, until he was replaced by Heng Swee Keat. He’s a well-beloved and highly respected political leader.

In a 2019 poll on social media which had nearly 20,000 respondents, an overwhelming 92 percent of voters said they would choose Mr Tharman over Mr Heng to succeed Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and become the nation’s next head of Government. A survey from this publication, as well as a Blackbox survey commissioned by Yahoo Singapore, had similar results.

Abdullah hightailed about the popularity of Mr Tharman and asked Mr Heng, “Is it Singapore who is not ready for a non-Chinese prime minister, or is it the PAP (the ruling People’s Action Party) who is not ready for a non-Chinese prime minister?”

Mr Heng said that Singapore might not be ready yet for a non-Chinese Prime Minister, especially those from older generations. He said that from his “own experience in walking the ground, in working with different people from all walks of life, is that the views — if you go by age and by life experience — would be very different,” but added, “I do think that at the right time when enough people think that we may have a minority leader, a minority who becomes the leader of the country, that is something that we can all hope for.”

The above is posted in www.theindependent.sg.

The questions raised in the above comments, Is Singapore ready for a non Chinese PM or Is the PAP ready for a non Chinese PM? Which question is more relevant?

Similarly I would like to ask the following two questions. Is Singapore ready to flood the country with Indians from India? Or is the PAP ready to flood the island with Indians from India? 

What is the population of Singapore, I mean Singaporeans? 3.5m? What is the size of Indians and Bangladeshis in Singapore, excluding Singaporean Indians? 500,000 or 1m?

Why is the PAP so comfortable with so many Indians in Singapore but not comfortable with an Indian PM? Or why are Singaporeans so comfortable in having so many Indians in Singapore but not an Indian PM? Which is the more relevant question?

What is the real issue? What is more problematical or treacherous to Singaporeans or to the PAP? 

What do you think?

And here are some comments from www.theindependent.sg

This was reflected in the answers given by netizens to the question posed by Wake Up, Singapore.

Fazlena Kaswadi wrote, “According to their bubble survey, they say sporean not ready for non-chinese pm. Only in Singapore is this kind of discrimination legal and accepted.”

Mohan Tamilmaran commented, “Cos the PAP wants us to think that Spore, being Chinese majority, is not ready for a non-Chinese PM. Yet the govt deems it so important that the a President should be Malay, never mind whether or not Spore is ready.”

Another netizen, going by the name of YA AO As, answered, “They are afraid of letting go of a family business.”

One comment zeroed in on how intelligent Mr Tharman is. Lalli Maniam wrote, “Tharman is very smart, not like the ones who are sitting there and saying one can have Cotton from the  sheep ”

Another netizen seems to believe so highly in Mr Tharman that he said if the Senior Minister ever formed a “team” on his own, he would win.

Thng Felix commented, “Tharman shd form a team by himself and contest in the Election for the betterment of all Singsporeans…he will win . I will vote for him 100%”

Others also wrote of him in glowing terms.

Adrian Ng wrote, “very obvious tharman is much more pm calibre than any of the 4G.The way he express n carry himself is PM material.”

PS. If I were to recommend an immigration policy to the govt, my position, not more than 50,000 nationals from any particular country would be allowed to work here at any particular time. This is not about racism but about national security. 

Having too big a foreign population is an existential threat to the country and a threat to the social security and harmony of the people.  Can't imagine having hundreds of thousands of them from any particular country working here at one time. 

This is truly Stupidity has no Cure Disease in action.

The world's Number One Terrorist Nation - The stupids believe they are peace loving people

The Americans and the western media have been publishing misinformation and fake news about China, branding China as an aggressive and expanding power. We cannot trust the Chinese. What if they...  This is all the Americans and the western media are accusing China of, What if? And China has been seen and believed by all those that were fed on American and western diet of misinformation that China is a hostile and dangerous country.  And many silly Asian and SE Asian leaders believe so especially from the American lackey and crony countries in SE Asia. Singapore is number One in believing this disinformation of hate against China.

Now who is the dangerous Number One Terrorist Nation in the world in terms of wars and bombing of other countries? Below is the America's bombing list. These are the countries that the Americans have attacked and bombed in recent years. And all the silly country leaders still believe that the Americans are peace loving people, inviting the Americans to be policemen, to keep peace.

Korea and China 1950-53
Guatemala 1954
Indonesia 1958
Cuba 1959-61
Guatemala 1960
Congo 1964
Laos 1964-73
Vietnam 1961-73
Cambodia 1969-70
Guatemala 1967-69
Grenada 1983
Lebanon 1983-84
Libya 1986
El Salvador 1980s
Nicaragua 1980s
Iran 1987
Panama 1989
Iraq 1991 Invasion
Somalia 1993
Bosnia 1984-85
Sudan 1998
Yugoslavia 1999
Yemen 2002
Iraq 1991-2003
Iraq 2003-2015
Afghanistan 2001-2015
Pakistan 2007-2015
Somalia 2007-8, 2011
Yeman 2009, 2011
Libya 2011,2015
Syria 2014-15

Now ask, what wars have China fought, invaded and countries bombed during the same period? China was only involved in 4 defensive border wars with Russia, India, Vietnam and the Korean War. China has not set foot on any foreign country and neither did China bomb any country.

Why is China untrustworthy, dangerous when the Americans were and are doing all the invasions, wars and bombings and killings? Think, look at the facts.  Who is the dangerous one, who is the warmonger, who is the world's Number One Terrorist Nation?  China cannot be trusted because the evil Americans said so. China is so dangerous, if....if, not that China has invaded any country or bomb any country but based on if, and the Americans said so.

Who is unreliable? Who cannot be trusted? Still want to believe in the American lies, in white lies?

Pleading for the PAP to understand the high cost of living

'"The PAP government has to understand that as living costs have increased, the burden on ordinary Singaporeans has become crushing."

People’s Voice Party (PVP) chief Lim Tean took to his Facebook on Monday (15 June) sharing a video of a pre-school teacher voicing out against Singapore’s high cost of living and low wages that are crushing the young families in the country.

Vig Ramachandran, a pre-school teacher for 12 years, said in the video that many young Singaporean families are struggling with the high cost of living as they need to support their while coping to the high financial commitment of household expenses, childcare and education fees, HDB mortgage, as well as the rising GST and elderly parents’ hospital bills.'

The above is from TOC in an article by S Ling on the high cost of living and how the low wage families are struggling to keep up with.

To me and to many Singaporeans, this is understandable as the average Singaporeans are all affected by the high cost of living, not just about school fees. Many Singaporeans are living from pay check to pay check and with 60 per cent having enough just to tie over 6 months if they lose their income.  Any time longer they will be in deep trouble.

Is this so difficult to understand? It is very difficult to understand if you are a millionaire or earning millions annually. With such income, what is a few thousand dollars or a few hundred dollars? People living in this ethereal level of existence enjoy a very different kind of lifestyle.  Pardon me, you mean got poor people in Singapore? Don't ever bother them with a few dollar type of problems. It is very irritating to think that people can call it a problem over a few dollars, a few hundred dollars or a few thousand dollars when a meal could be a few hundred or a few thousand dollars.

Excuse me, what was the question again? Oh, 'The PAP government has to understand that as living costs have increased, the burden on ordinary Singaporeans has become crushing'. What living cost? Heard of Swiss standard of living? Peasants and their problems are their problems.  A cooking class in Paris cost how much? $70,000 only mah. I got so much money dunno what to do so go Paris look see look see. can or not?

Hey hoi polloi, buck up and work harder if you want to live better, and don't bother me with such minuscule problems. We have bigger problems to understand, problems that involved millions and millions of dollars, not mundane a few dollar type of problems.

Understand? You want multi millionaires to understand your cost of living problem? They are more concern about getting less than a million and affecting their lifestyle.

Covid19 - A damning article about American conspiracy to wipe its debt owing to China

This is a damning and enlightening article about this Covid19 pandemic and about who is the actual owner of the Wuhan Lab, George Soros. This part needs to be verified. It also touched on how Bill Gates and Dr Fauci were using this lab to conduct their experiment on coronavirus that was prohibited in the US.  The picture gets clearer and dirtier with all the fingers pointing to you know who as the culprit behind this pandemic. 

Saturday, April 18, 2020

War "Talk" Against China is Crazy --- and Unjustified

By Anna Von Reitz

We have heard sabers rattling and all sorts of bombast against China coming from all sorts of sources and it needs to stop. 

Number One Reason? 

The Wuhan Bio-Tech Lab where all this started is owned by George Soros, a citizen of the United States.  Not a Chinese lab at all, even though Chinese scientists were working there. 

Number Two Reason? 

The "feedstock" for the development of the chimera strain corona virus also came from the US, and was most likely donated or sold into the development project by Dr. Anthony Fauci. The virus has HIV splices of genetic coding allowing it to produce Glycoprotein 120, which has been Fauci's "baby" since the 1980's.  

Number Three Reason? 

In 2014, the US stopped development of chimera viruses.  In 2015, Fauci diverted almost $4 million in NIH research funding to George Soros's Wuhan facility so the Chinese could continue development --- Fauci evaded US Law and misappropriated funds to do it.. 

Number Four Reason? 

Dr. Charles Lieber, a leading biological nanotech researcher and head of one of Harvard University's science programs was also deeply involved along with Chinese Grad Students.  If anything, it looks like the Chinese were  being manipulated by these schmucks who were finagling to keep on researching and developing bioweapons that they stood to profit from. When they could no longer do it here, they moved to China. This was a US Project that got moved to China, not a Chinese Project. 

Number Five Reason? 

The first person to develop symptoms of  "Covid 19" was a non-Com from Fort Detrick.  

Number Six Reason? 

This was obviously a set up with Bill Gates, WHO, the World Bank, and other investors and vaccine manufacturers.  Gates has heavily invested in virus development and vaccine factories, both.  He and Fauci are pals.  Both stand to make huge fortunes and gain immense political power if they can pull this scam off.  WHO is obviously complicit.  What kind of scientific or medical organization declares a pandemic based on 150 cases, and on top of it, fails to initiate any clinical process to identify the specific pathogen?  The World Bank is also obviously complicit -- inviting investors to put their money into  "Pandemic Bonds" just in time to collect on a staged pandemic.  

Number Seven Reason? 

This whole thing was hardly hitting the news before "the US, Inc." was in court, finagling and accusing China of being liable for all the economic damages caused by this phony pandemic, and that amount being sought just happened to be almost exactly the same as the US-China Trade Deficit.   Read that, the pikers caused this problem, blamed it on China, and have been trying to force China to pay them "reparations" for the damage they caused to everyone concerned.  

Number Eight Reason? 

Almost simultaneously, the new British 20 Pound Note was issued by the Government of Westminster, showing a cheesey photograph of the Queen and --- wonder of wonders ---- a holograph of a 5G tower,and right above it, the laboratory symbol for the corona virus.  The perky bastards fully admitted that they were the cause of the problem and the 5G connection, too, right there in front of God and everyone, in language nobody could miss or misunderstand.  They took credit for it.  So why on Earth is anyone looking elsewhere?  

Number Nine Reason? 

What did the Chinese gain?  Nothing.  They lost lives.  They lost trade.  They lost support from their own people.    What did "the US" gain?  A fleeting excuse to back-charge China for a well-earned Trade Deficit.  China is THEIR creditor, not ours. And we've made it clear that we are not paying their debts for them. Now we have to make it clear that we aren't going to war for them, either. 

Number Ten Reason? 

The Americans and the Chinese, both, are owed a whopping large amount of credit back from "the United States"---- which owes us somewhere around $25 trillion as unpaid "National Credit" and owes China nearly that much as an unpaid Trade Deficit. 

The Pikers cannot or will not pay their debts or deal honestly about the circumstance, so they planned first to attack and kill us via a civil war.  That plan was exposed and defeated, so now the weasels want to find an excuse to kill their other Creditors, the Chinese, ---- and get us to do it for them.

This is all about the US, Inc. and the USA, Inc. not paying their debts, and then plotting to strong-arm racketeer or murder their creditors ---and both the American People and the Chinese People have been in the cross-hairs for this malarky. 

Summation: 

The Chinese have, with 99% certainty, been targeted both as: (1) potential collaborators, and (2) victims of a giant con scheme designed to--- one way or another--- erase "the US" Trade Deficit with China. 

China had nothing to gain from dirtying itself by unleashing a bioweapon attack on the rest of the world.  That would be shooting its customers in the foot.  No, China had nothing to gain --- but the US and its British Siphons in Westminster stood to gain, and so did WHO and the World Bank and Dr. Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates and Bayer, Inc., and CDC (which is a private vaccine manufacturer), and George Soros and all the Dem Deep Staters could hope to blame all this on Donald Trump.  

Simple enough. 

We know who did this.  We know why.  There is no big mystery here.  There's just a failure to own up and face facts. It's easier to blame people who are innocent but different from us, than to face down the monster we have allowed to inhabit our own shores, walk down our streets, and sleep in our beds. 

If Americans go to war over any of this, we aren't going to march on Shanghai. Oh, no.  And we won't be tricked into bombing Berlin, either. 

The above article is reproduced from http://www.paulstramer.net/2020/04/war-talk-against-china-is-crazy-and.html

Sino Indian border brawl or ambush - A piece of rubbish reporting

Brutal details emerge of India soldier 'ambush' on contested border with China as Modi tries to calm tension.  Joe Wallen, The Telegraph.

As the sun began to set over the Himalayan peaks, Colonel Santosh Babu and his unarmed platoon of 50 Indian soldiers on Monday set off on a patrol across the strategically crucial Galwan Valley in Ladakh.

Their mission was probably the most important in recent Indian history - to ascertain whether Chinese troops had withdrawn, as per an agreement between senior army officers from the two nations, from territory which had previously been administered by India for decades.

Instead, to their surprise, what Colonel Babu's men found were temporary Chinese all-weather tents and roughly enemy 100 soldiers waiting at a location called Patrolling Point 14.

Despite being outnumbered, the Indian soldiers confronted the Chinese troops.  Some started to remove the tents, sparking a long and brutal man-to-man brawl that has brought the two superpowers to the brink of war. ...

“Just when the Indian soldiers, who were on patrol started removing Chinese tents and material, it evoked a violent response from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA)”.

As the fight continued, both sides called for reinforcements but Chinese troops again significantly outnumbered those on the Indian side, allegedly 500 to 100....

Indian Army sources told the Telegraph that 23 troops are now confirmed to have died but casualties will significantly rise, with 110 soldiers injured and  more troops still missing....

The Indian sources say China suffered 35 casualties during the clash, quoting U.S intelligence material, a development Beijing said it wasn’t aware of.


The above is the most unprofessional piece of reporting with hazy and garbled facts and fuzzy numbers. How did the reporter gathered these facts? From slippery tongue witnesses of course. Now wonder all the facts were so funny and illogical and the numbers as good as guess work.

Read this, the 50 Indian soldiers were on a survey mission. But they ended up removing the tents of Chinese soldiers while being outnumbered. How arrogant to start such an aggressive act, to walk into Chinese camp to remove the tents of soldiers of another country. Who did these Indian soldiers think they were? Such hostile acts would definitely invite retaliation from the Chinese side. And the Indian news all over are still claiming that they were provoked by Chinese soldiers. Isn't it clear who were the aggressors?  In this report the heading was 'ambush'. What utter rubbish!  Does the reporter know the meaning of ambush?

And look at the numbers, 50 Indian soldiers provoking 100 Chinese soldiers.  Though both called for reinforcement, with claims that there were 500 Chinese soldiers to 100 Indian soldiers, and only 23 Indian casualties against 35 Chinese casualties.  The numbers gets more confusing with the Indians claiming 110 soldiers injured and more are missing. How many more? It seems that this brawl would have involved at least a few hundred soldiers from the Indian side and 5 times more from the Chinese side. That would be around a 1000 men involved in the fight from an initial 50 Indians against 100 Chinese.

And the funny thing, the Indians did not know how many casualties were from the Chinese side but the Americans that were not there were able to provide the number of Chinese casualties. The Americans must be Gods, omniprescience, all knowing. And the Indians damn were bloody good fighters, outnumbered 500 to 100 but able to inflict more casualties on the Chinese side, and they were ambushed!

Slippery tongues indeed. Talk like real. What is real? Who started the fight or provocation? How come all the great fighting Indians landed up in the river but not the Chinese? Is the reporter saying that the Indian soldiers were all pushed into the river by the Chinese soldiers?