How many eager beavers or silly allies will be hopping onto the American bandwagon to send troops to fight the IS which is actually an American red herring, created to destabilize the Middle East in perpetuity? The Americans have enough military power and assets to destroy the earth, all the countries, many times over and cannot fight the IS on its own, needing more commitments from stupid allies? What is the real intent of the Americans to get more silly allies to fight in the ME shadow play?
The current American pretense to want to do more is a result of the success of the Russians who were there with a real intent to destroy IS, and thus exposing the farce of the American game plan. There have been many reports that the Americans forces were attacking the Syrian govt soldiers and positions instead of fighting the IS. And the complicity of the Americans, the Saudis, the Turks and other allies in fighting on the side of the IS are getting more ridiculous. The Americans and its stupid allies are there to remove the Assad govt, not to fight IS.
And this is not the end of the American game plan. They would demand and coerce their stupid allies to commit more assets and soldiers should they be successful in provoking a war in the South China Sea or in the Korean Peninsula. And it will again be you are with us or against us. The Australians knew exactly what the Americans are conceiving and wanted out, not wanting to be dragged in further by the Americans in a war that they did not want and have nothing to do with it. It is a clear signal that the Australians would not want to engage in more American incited wars, and not in the
South China Sea against . China
Who would the Americans coerce next to send more troops and assets to fight in the ME? The Europeans, other than the hardcore British and French, are opting out as well. I think the Americans have several pets in Asean that would be most willing to say yes to more wars.