American military bases in Syria and Iraq under waves of attacks and suffering heavy casualties

 Such news would not be reported in the western media. Just like the daily barrages of missiles and rockets raining down in Israel, there will be no casualties, no buildings being destroyed, nothing happened. The missiles and rockets were just like firecrackers or duds, would not hit anything of value, would not hit any Israelis as it they could recognise an Israelis and would turn away.

American and Israeli propaganda warfare are now very predictable. They are winning the war in the Middle East and also in Ukraine. The American military bases in Syria and Iraq are very safe, would not be attacked. And if they are attacked, it would not hurt anyone, no casualties, maybe a hole in a open space. A Sky News twit was heard saying the latest Iranian missiles were all taken down by the Israeli defence, when the whole world could see hundreds of them hitting their targets in live coverage by social media. He looked so stupid saying that, and he knew it. It showed in his stupid face.

How often have the American occupation forces and their military bases in Syria and Iraq been attacked and how many American boys and girls have been sent home in plastic bags? As far as American and western media are concerned, none. They are very safe. The Syrian and Iraqi forces would not dare to attack the Americans. Really?

The Syrian and Iraqi, as well as the Houthis, Hamas and Hezbollahs are unable to provide many video coverage of their attacks and the damages and deaths inflicted for lack of such facilities. This does not mean that the Americans and Israelis are safe and not killed. Several hundreds of thousands of rockets and missiles have landed in Israel, American bases in Syria and Iraq. A ten percent hit rate would have killed thousands of them, definitely not just 10 or 20 or like the bloated Israeli numbers in the thousands in Lebanon.

There is a blackout on news of American and Israeli casualties in the conflict. No western journalists would dare to spill the beans.

US's help is to build military bases to threaten the security of the countries it is 'supposed to help'

 US is strongly against China because China is the only country in the world that can compete successfully against the US in economics , industries, trade and commerce, science and technology, cyber space, space technology, semiconductors, politics and last and most important militarily. 

US and its Western allies do not want to see China helping countries of the South in Africa and South America arise because they feel they are robbed of the opportunity to continuously rape and exploit the countries of the two continents which they have been exploiting for the last few hundred years. 

US and the West help for other countries is basically hogwash thin air and the only tangible thing can be seen of their help are the military bases which they use them to threaten the security and sovereignty of the victimised countries. On the contrary China's aid is selfless and respectful on a mutual win-win basis.

Anonymous

Without wars, ... Without selling weapons, how can the USA benefit?

 Without chaos, without instigation, without hyping up threats, how to have wars.

Without wars, how can the USA war economy sell weapons. Without selling weapons how can the USA benefit?

As the world wise up, infrastructure development becomes more important than weapons for fighting against each other causing destruction. As de-dollarization picks up steam, and countries no longer feel safe with investing in US Treasuries, global production likewise no longer need the US$ for all trading activities. The USA needs to go back to basics to survive, which is by in shoring manufacturing. But they already do not have the logistics to do that and have to start from scratch. How can they compete knowing their industrial endeavor is already behind most others?

One alternative is pulling others down, so that they can go top again. Hence their campaign against anything Chinese to put China down to the stone age. It will not work.

Anonymous

Demand for oil outside the SWIFT system is skyrocketing

 There is much propaganda being used to fool the world that the demand for oil is slipping because China's economy is deteriorating or even collapsing. How true is that is analyzed by Kevin Walmsley on his site 'Inside China Business'. This is one site I would recommend to all having an interest in Global economic matters, with information culled from all over the world to support its writeup. Very informative, to the point, clearly narrated and no nonsense on issues.

China's demand for oil is not slipping as alleged by the West and its manufacturing is not contracting. China's import of oil is now largely outside the monitoring of the USA and the West. Thus, with their own fertile imagination they are now assuming that the world demand for oil is moving downwards, taking into account only what they can monitor. The other part of the equation which China is dealing with within BRICS is outside the eyeballs of the USA due to the oil trading being done outside the US$. As an example, China is importing more oil than ever from Iran and the trade being done in Yuan, or even through barter. Therefore, for the West to assume that oil demand worldwide is faltering because of China is disinformation to carry an agenda.

This is the situation evolving today within BRICS, where countries doing trade in commodities, not just oil, do not have to go through Western Banks using the US$ and is therefore beyond the control of the West to monitor. Juvenile Trump, despite his spoilt brat tantrum, probably has a little bit of sense to fear the result of a de-dollarization tsunami if he is elected. The Chinese have the saying -'Smart in a moment, but stupid for life'. That is why he is threatening those countries joining de-dollarization, which means joining BRICS. He will not succeed.

Anonymous

The biggest blunder by the USA is pushing Russia into the arms of China

 The biggest blunder by the USA must be pushing Russia into the arms of China. Russia was in G8 and expelled to create G7, which was the straw that broke the bear's back. Now Russia is in BRICS and helping the group increase membership to overtake the G7 in terms of GDP. The G7 no longer is a grouping of the rich nations, with countries in the EU being crippled by the loss of cheap Russian energy. Germany suffered the brunt of the miscalculation, but to Olaf Scholz it probably is worth the price to pay. Japan, a member of the G7 is also paying the price with its economy stagnating and even worsening over the decades.

One pertinent comment by India's Foreign Minister, Subrahmanyam Jaishankar hits a raw nerve of the G7. He said that the G7 closed its doors to us, so we formed our own grouping, meaning BRICS. India had been invited to sit in at the G7 meeting to observe, like a dog observing what is going on when its masters talk to each other. This is more a humiliation than an ego boosting move. India was so eager to join the G7 to create another G8.

China and Russia were once ideological foes, but over the decades been demonized by the USA pertaining to issues over NATO expansion towards the Russian border, inviting Ukraine to join NATO so that the USA can place nukes to threaten Russia, sabotaging Russian expansion of the energy supply to the EU through the Nord Stream pipelines which the USA and NATO subsequently destroyed. Forget about who destroyed the pipelines, as the real culprit behind the scenes is none other than the USA, that had been eyeing the energy market in the EU.

Russia and China coming together is a match made in heaven, thanks to the USA. God must be watching.

Of course, the West is trying to split the alliance between Russia and China, claiming the alliance will not last. Whether it last or not is not that important as nothing is permanent. The most important objective is coming together to get rid of the US$ hegemony by forming BRICS, which will free the world from the tyranny of sanctions, blackmailing and threats by the USA using the US$ hegemony. It also will remove the unfair privilege of the USA being able to print toilet papers at will to flood the world and export its inflation globally. 

Annymous