Afghanistan - Vlogger Ji Xiang and Yaoyang's adventure: a few heartwarming moments in Afghanistan

Below are 3 short clips of Yaoyang's trip to Afghanistan and doing his little bit to bring a little warmth and physical comfort to the hungry stomachs of Afghans living in trying times. In the first clip he bought and delivered 1,500 packs of naans to a refugee camp. A few days later he hired a chef to cook 300 packs of rice and mutton, to the same refugee camp, for the refugees to enjoy a meal with meat that they did not have for a long time.

In the last clip he delivered rice and chicken prepared by a specially hired cook during the Afghan New Year to 20 families that he met during his trip, to let them have a sumptuous meal with meat on thir New Year.

Cannot believe nor imagine how the Americans could launch a cruel war against these poor tribesmen in a remote corner of the world and accusing them of the 911 attack, as terrorists and a threat to the American Empire. The merciless and lying Americans must pay for their crimes against the poor and hapless Afghans, the women and children that don't even have potable water or electricity in their mud homes.

The clips are all about 20-30 minutes each.

There are several of these Chinese vloggers travelling around Afghanistan and Pakistan doing their little bits to help the poor and refugees in these two countries.  The poor children were out in the streets from early morning to 9 or 10pm either kneeling on the road sides hoping for some kind souls to spare them a piece of naan. Some were trying earn a few cents cleaning the shoes of passer bys. Many are below 10, some as young as 3. 

These beautiful children, yes, the boys and girls are very good looking, green eyes, yellow eyes, blue eyes, brown eyes. They became refugees when their homes were destroyed by the American bombings. They were the victims of pretentious wars inflicted on their countries and their parents by evil and wicked white men from the USA, Europe and Australia. And the UN keeps mum, no war crimes, no genocide, no crimes against humanity, because the invasions were led by the Americans.

The UN is a sham and a shame for not condemning the crimes against these poor tribesmen and farmers. More than 20 years of killings and destruction by the Americans and their equally wicked allies against poor tribesmen that could barely fight back.

Shame on you Americans, Europeans and Americans and everyone participating in the butchering of the hapless Afghans and Pakistanis whom they simply branded as terrorists. The white men are the real terrorists. The atrocities against the Afghans are incomprehensible. These tribesmen are living their lives in the mountains of Afghanistan, oblivious of what was going on around the world, but got butchered by the white men from Europe and across the Atlantic Ocean. How could this happen, for what reason but some white men's lies and hegemonic agenda.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl_EubpMvbQ

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCsE7UeRB_M

 

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alDcUA8QkeE

 

 

Who is the real culprit in creating debt traps?

The IMF has such a bad name nowadays, known by many to be setting real debt traps for countries like Argentina. Argentina is a good study of how the trap works. Argentina had been paying back it's loans over the years, but the amount of debt has not been reduced. The Argentina currency had continually been depreciated, so the loan gets bigger in US$ terms. That is the trap they set and that is how they control countries that went to them for help.

When China started the AIIB, it was widely criticised by the USA and the West, as it was now competing directly with the IMF and World Bank. When China upped the game plan by offering loans to poor countries to develop infrastructure, it was strongly criticised and demonised to no end as a debt trap. But taking loans for infrastructure development and promise of economic progress certainly trumps taking loans to buy destructive weapons with nothing to show. Why would sensible countries opt for destruction rather than progress and a better life for it's citizens? The USA and the West is intent on keeping poor countries perennially poor, so they can be controlled, while China is helping poor countries to rise above poverty. China itself has shown the road to others by lifting people out of poverty, hundreds of millions of their own people, and it does not escape the attention of those poor countries in South Asia, South America and Africa.

Anonymous 

PS. The debt trap that Sri Lanka is owing is mainly to the IMF, after so many years still paying and never ending. The proof is in the pudding as they said. Look at the number of loans that are being taken up by the poorer countries and you will know who they would go to for cheap loans. 

If the IMF is that good, why are they flocking to borrow from AIIB and not IMF? Should not they abandon AIIB and go knocking at the door of IMF? It is exactly because of the fear of debt trap by the IMF.  

And the West and IMF have resorted to bad mouth AIIB because they are losing customers to AIIB.

thesaker: Why pick on China?

'I think that it is fair to say that these are all clear signs that the Empire of Hate and Lies has now declared total war on Russia, just short of overtly actually attacking Russian forces or Russia, of course. In fact, Russia and the Empire of Hate and Lies have been at war since at least 2013, and Russia had to make many concessions to the Empire simply because from 2013-2021 Russia did not have:

A military that could take on NATO and win. She does now.
The kind of advanced strategic deterrence systems (nuclear and conventional) she now has.
A stabilized southern axis (Middle-East, Caucasus, Central Asia) from which no threat can realistically come.
A legal case to justify the decision to openly intervene in the Ukraine
A society that would not crumble under the tremendous pressure of US PSYOPS
A society in which the 5th columnists, the 6th columnists, and the Atlantic Integrationist have been pretty much totally discredited.
An economy that could survive the kind of total economic war unleashed nowadays
A system of alliances Russia could count on (remember Lukashenko’s and Nazarbayev’s “multipolarity” of the mid-20s?)
Large enough stores of advanced weapons for a long campaign
The real and full support of China'

What should we expect?

'Sooner or later, the delusional and ignorant psychopaths which run the Empire of Hate and Lies will come to realize that far from breaking Russia, they committed collective economic, political, social, moral, spiritual, and, of course, military suicide and they will be left with *nothing* else to do that try a desperate military provocation. I hope that I am wrong, but I don’t see how the united West could de-escalate from the corner it painted itself into.

Both the USA and the EU are run not by individuals, but by a class (in the Marxist sense of the word) which we can conceptually call the “1%ers”. One percent seems small, but in the USA 1% is over 3 MILLION people, and in the EU this is almost 4,5 MILLION people. Throw in colonies like Japan, Australia, Taiwan, and others and we can see that it is reasonable to assume that there are about 10’000’000 very rich and very powerful people out there who want to see Russia dead and gone forever.

These people will NEVER be voted out of power. Oh sure, here and there, for a while, some will lose an election and an outsider might be voted in, but that is what economic sanctions are for: to punish those nations which vote for the “wrong” candidate (like Hungary just did).'

'We are 41 days into this horror and the end is nowhere near in sight, and remember that the real objective of Russia and China is not “just” to disarm and denazify the Nazi-occupied Ukraine, it is to completely change the European collective security architecture which, in turn, is the cornerstone of the Empire of Lies worldwide. This will most probably take several years unless the coming economic crisis is even much worse than I expect it to be (in my total ignorance of economic topics).

Conclusion:

The Empire of Lies already understands that it lost Banderastan, so it executed the Bucha massacre to change the narrative and trigger a TOTAL “Cancel Russia” war. The WWII Nazis used the term “final solution” and that is what the Bucha false flag signals: the decision by Uncle Shmuel to achieve a “final solution” to the “Russian problem”.

This is the West’s way to signal that it too is now entering into its own 2nd phase of the war.'

http://thesaker.is/the-true-importance-of-the-bucha-false-flag-a-crucial-change-of-narrative/

Anonymous

Chinese names - Lawrence Lim Heng Tan, what is the standard convention?

 This is the 21st century and generally people are more educated and well informed. The westerners have been exposed to Chinese names for centuries and would have no difficulty in knowing how Chinese names are written, that the first name is the family name followed by his individual name. 

When a Chinese writes his name as Lim Heng Tan, everyone understands that his family name or surname is Lim and Heng Tan is his given individual name. So it is proper to address him as Mr Lim. But no, today, it is very confusing because some Chinese are trying to confuse the westerners in the way they write their names. Lim  Heng Tan could be written as Heng Tan Lim,  so can be Mr Heng and not Mr Lim.  Lawrence Lim Heng Tan would be even more puzzling.

Lee Hsien Loong is Mr Lee, as simple as that. What would happen if the main media were to write his name as Hsien Loong Lee? Xi Jinping is not written as Jinping Xi for good reasons.  The Chinese community and the main media should play its role by not confusing the westerners with the way the Chinese write their names. Chinese name must be written according to how Chinese write them for centuries. There is a standard convention for it. Why start to write their names in funny ways, some this way and some that way? Why become rojak?

Lawrence Lim Heng Tan or Lawrence Heng Tan Lim? What is the intent and purpose of writing Chinese names anyhow and in any way and using it officially? Why is Lawrence Lim Heng Tan written in the birth certificate or IC becomes Lawrence Heng Tan Lim in the media or in the name card?

Are the Chinese people writing their Chinese names in different ways afraid that the westerners would be confused and did not know if they are Mr Lim or Mr Tan? By writing names anyway you like would actually cause more confusion than intended.

Understanding how Chinese names are written in the standard and well known convention is not difficult for any westerner to known and be comfortable with. The govt and main media must be the responsible leader in setting this norm and not be the shit stirrer to confuse instead of making things simple and easier for themselves and for westerners.

The westerners do no need you to make it easier for them, but by doing so confusing them further. Stick to one standard way of writing Chinese name to make life easy for everyone.

Correct or not, Mr Lim or Mr Tan? Lawrence, shall I call you Mr Lim or Mr Tan? How are the westerners going to know which is the correct version?

Twitter - The assassination of the Truth

Twitter bans Scott Ritter for questioning Ukraine narrative

Twitter “permanently suspended” the retired US Marine Corps officer Scott Ritter on Wednesday, accusing him of engaging in prohibited behavior by questioning the claims of Ukrainian authorities that Russian soldiers had massacred civilians in Bucha near Kiev. Ritter is best known as the former UN weapons inspector who doubted US claims about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, invoked by Washington as a pretext for the 2003 invasion.

“So apparently I’ve been suspended from Twitter for the crime of challenging the orthodox narrative of the so-called Bucha massacre,” Ritter said on his Telegram channel, sharing a screenshot of the message he received from the Big Tech platform.

“I’ve appealed, so who knows what the future will bring,” Ritter said, adding that “Freedom of speech in America today is an endangered concept.”

According to the screenshot, Twitter’s censors had decided that Ritter violated their rules against “harassment and abuse” by saying the Ukrainian police had committed crimes against humanity in Bucha, and were trying to shift blame onto Russia with US help.

Ritter’s tweet did not contain calls for abuse or harassment, or wish physical harm on anyone, Shadowproof journalist Kevin Gosztola pointed out, arguing that his ban “shows how Twitter Rules can be twisted to silence US foreign policy critics.”

Ritter is a retired US Marine who had inspected Soviet weapons under the now-defunct INF treaty, worked as the chief UN weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991 to 1998, and served on the staff of General Norman Schwarzkopf during the first Gulf War.

Anonymous

PS. Now you know truth can be fake and fake can be truth depending on what they want you to believe in. This is as good as adults telling lies and demanded that the lies be accepted as truth.