Covid19 - Clinical trial on children age 5 -11

 Singapore's Kerdang Kerbau Hospital is conducting a clinical on children age 5-11 using Pfizer/Moderna vaccines in lower dosage. Actually it is recruiting children for this trial and very likely the parents would be making the decision, ie, giving consent for the trial.

So far no one from the animal lovers community is protesting.  They used to protest against the use of animals like guinea pigs, mice, monkeys, dogs and cats for clinical trials. Why are they reticent in this case? My guess, the guinea pigs and other animals did not give their consent and cannot protest on their own. So it is natural and good that they need the assistance of human beans to protest and object for them. Animal lovers also cannot protest as children are not animals, so not within their areas of interest and concern.

In this case if the children were recruited into the programme, they surely would have obtained the consent of their parents. At these tender age, the children would not be able to give their own consent and rightfully the wiser parents would have to consent on their behalf, knowing what is good or bad for them.

So, for those people protesting in the social media, they may be barking up the wrong tree. When the parents of these children are willing to give their consent for the use of this experimental vaccine, why should they be protesting? It is not their children that are undergoing the trial. And as they said, the benefits outweigh the risk. Everything is done legally.

I really cannot think of any good reason to protest when it is like a willing buyer willing seller case., like two consenting adults saying ok. The govt surely knows that this is done for a good cause. The parents too would know the risk and the goodness of this trial. They would surely exercise good judgement on behalf of their dear children.

Wondering why they did not choose to use the Chinese vaccines that are safer, using traditional method to produce and with inactivated virus. Just wondering.

God bless them. This is uniquely Singapore.

PS. With or without this trial, the govt is going to vaccinate all the school going children after the school holiday, in January 2022. Ong Ye Kung said early next year. Please correct me if I am wrong on this vaccination plan for children. Not sure if parental consent would be needed or the parents can opt their children out of it. Or is it compulsory or otherwise. Maybe not compulsory but there will be restrictions for those not vaccinated like the case of the adults. Let's wait for the official announcement.

Latest in the news, the children would be under observation for 15 months. Does this mean no compulsory vaccination until the trial is over? Also, the reporter said the vaccine is 96% effective in preventing infection. I hope I heard this clearly on CNA. 

And good news, the silly boy PM of Canada approved the vaccination of children using mRNA vaccines. Now we can quote this silly boy PM and go ahead with the vaccination of children. If clever white men said ok, then must be ok. When they said 96% efficacy, then must be so.

Covid19 - American mischievous transparency on refusing to reveal the truth about mRNA vaccines

Freedom Of Information Act on vaccines delayed by ... 55 years? 

Sounds suspiciously like something to hide...is Pfizer waiting for vaccinated to all die off? Wait what? FDA wants 55 years to process FOIA request over vaccine data.

Freedom of Information Act requests are rarely speedy, but when a group of scientists asked the federal government to share the data it relied upon in licensing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, the response went beyond typical bureaucratic foot-dragging. As in 55 years beyond. That’s how long the Food & Drug Administration in court papers this week proposes it should be given to review and release the trove of vaccine-related documents responsive to the request. 

If a federal judge in Texas agrees, plaintiffs Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency can expect to see the full record in 2076. Register now for FREE unlimited access to reuters.com The 1967 FOIA law requires federal agencies to respond to information requests within 20 business days. However, the time it takes to actually get the documents “will vary depending on the complexity of the request and any backlog of requests already pending at the agency,” according to the government’s central FOIA website. 

Justice Department lawyers representing the FDA note in court papers that the plaintiffs are seeking a huge amount of vaccine-related material – about 329,000 pages. The plaintiffs, a group of more than 30 professors and scientists from universities including Yale, Harvard, UCLA and Brown, filed suit in September in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, seeking expedited access to the records. They say that releasing the information could help reassure vaccine skeptics that the shot is indeed “safe and effective and, thus, increase confidence in the Pfizer vaccine.” But the FDA can’t simply turn the documents over wholesale. 

The records must be reviewed to redact “confidential business and trade secret information of Pfizer or BioNTech and personal privacy information of patients who participated in clinical trials,” wrote DOJ lawyers in a joint status report filed Monday. The FDA proposes releasing 500 pages per month on a rolling basis, noting that the branch that would handle the review has only 10 employees and is currently processing about 400 other FOIA requests. “By processing and making interim responses based on 500-page increments, FDA will be able to provide more pages to more requesters, thus avoiding a system where a few large requests monopolize finite processing resources and where fewer requesters’ requests are being fulfilled,” DOJ lawyers wrote, pointing to other court decisions where the 500-page-per-month schedule was upheld. 

Civil division trial lawyer Courtney Enlow referred my request for further comment to the DOJ public affairs office, which did not respond. Plaintiffs' lawyers argue that their request should be top priority, and that the FDA should release all the material no later than March 3, 2022. “This 108-day period is the same amount of time it took the FDA to review the responsive documents for the far more intricate task of licensing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine,” wrote Aaron Siri of Siri & Glimstad in New York and John Howie of Howie Law in Dallas in court papers. 

“The entire purpose of the FOIA is to assure government transparency,” they continued. “It is difficult to imagine a greater need for transparency than immediate disclosure of the documents relied upon by the FDA to license a product that is now being mandated to over 100 million Americans under penalty of losing their careers, their income, their military service status, and far worse.”

PS. Why are they so afraid to release the data to the public? What are they hiding if the vaccine is so good, so safe? Something is dreadfully wrong and frightening about this vaccine. Be warned! 

Why they have to hide, it means it is NO GOOD. It means it is harmful, maybe deadly. When they refuse to tell the truth, you better be very very careful and ask more questions.

USS Connecticut - China confirms hitting it with an unmanned submarine

 China has had enough of the American lies about the USS Connecticut hitting an undersea mountain. China also has had enough of waiting for the Americans to come clean and admit what really happened to the Connecticut. And since the Americans chose not to come clean, not to tell the truth, China would tell it all to expose the mischievous activities of the Americans and how the Connecticut was hunted down and eventually forced to surface and limped to Guam.

The Chinese were in the thick of things. A hostile nuclear armed attack submarine of China's number enemy, the evil American Empire, cannot be so naive to think that they could sneak around Chinese territorial waters undetected and even tried to get close to China's main submarine base in Hainan.

The story began when the Connecticut came in as the path finder and protector of the American aircraft carriers.  All American carriers are fronted by submarines wherever they go. And when an American aircraft carrier is in an area, when it sailed into the South China Sea, the Chinese would be in full alert to track down the submarine escorts. The Chinese went all out to hunt for the Connecticut with air, sea and space resources, including super computers and anti submarine satellites. They dropped many sonar detectors and charges into the path of the Connecticut and finally got it cornered. But the foolish American submarine commanders thought they were one up on the Chinese. But it refused to surrender and refused to surface. China delivered the final blow by hitting the Connecticut at its nose with an unmanned submarine, the HSU001. The Connecticut's nose was where it housed the sophisticated navigation equipment, the eyes and ears of the submarine. This was almost totally destroyed when the China sub slammed it. The rest is history. The damage forced it to surface and embarrassingly crawled back to Guam, and pretending that the Chinese did not know and was not watching. 

This was like a repeat of the 1979 incident when a PLA fighter pilot slammed his aircraft against the American recce plane, damaging it and forced to land in Hainan to be torn apart by the Chinese and its crew virtually ended as POWs. This time the Americans were a bit luckier, not having to send out SOS message and seek help in Hainan.

The Chinese did a splendid job hunting down the hunter, the Sea Wolf, the most advanced American nuclear attack submarine. How's that for poking its nose in the wrong places and getting its nose cut? The Chinese were inferior in submarine warfare? The Americans were superior and have more sophisticated submarines and could run circus in the South China Sea freely, undetected? 

Would the Americans dare to own up and tell the truth, that the Connecticut could have been sunk or crippled by the Chinese in a real hostile situation? Would the Commanders of the Connecticut sheepishly report what had happened to the Pentagon? Would the world hear the truth from the Americans finally? A sophisticated submarine like the Connecticut could not be wandering around the South China Sea like a drunkard man and collided with a stationary undersea mountain. Such a silly explanation was a joke. If this is the quality of American subs, they would be crashing against the port walls before getting out to sea.

China would likely be telling the Americans, see you again next time cowboys, if you dare. Would the American submarines end their adventurism like the U2 spy planes, never to fly over China again, in this case never to enter the South China Sea again?

Covid-19 Germany: A Big Lesson And Warning To Singapore

Germany is hit with 65,000 new COVID-19 infected cases and at least 260 to 300 deaths daily. This is the official report. But the unofficial report is that the real figures are at least two to three times of the official figures.

With only 65% of the population vaccinated with the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, which are waning in efficacy, efficiency and effectiveness very fast, it is not only the unvaccinated who gets infected. The vaccinated ones who have their immunity waned, are also getting infected fast. This is the signal for the Fourth Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

This proves once again that those who have allowed their bodies to be poisoned by the Pfizer and Moderna pseudo vaccines have been taken for a wild long ride through the Valley of Darkness led by the Blinds and the Fraudsters.

There is no light and there is no tunnel. This Covid War is still a long way to go.

85% of Singaporeans have been screwed good and proper. By you know who?


SSO - 18 November 2021.

Is honesty a good thing? Not in Singapore any more

Survey: Singaporean students more honest than those from US, UK, Australia

Above survey is posted in theindependent.sg. Is this supposed to be a praise or a dig against Singaporeans? Though I agree with the finding, I shiver at the thought of it, at the silliness of Singaporeans for trying to be honest, for being brought up to be honest and throw into the deep blue sea to compete against the dishonest sharks and hyenas. 

Honesty was a good thing in the past. The govt under the first generation of leaders made it a point that all civil servants and politicians must be honest. This is the first judge of a person to be enlisted in the premier service and to become politicians, to become super talented politicians. If one is dishonest, out you go.

And it was easy then to find out if a Singaporean is honest or dishonest. Check with the teachers and the schools. Check with the people he mixed around, his neighbours and the neighbourhood. Singapore is such a small place and everyone knows everyone. There is no where to hide, not even your grandfather's past. all can be dug out when needed.

And the system worked then. Honesty is a must and nearly all Singaporeans are honest. And after many years of living inside a tiny bubble of honesty, the daft, oops, honest Singaporeans also think everyone in the whole world is like them, all honest Abel. They can never imagine that other people can be so dishonest. They cannot believe that foreigners coming to Singapore looking for jobs can present fake academic records, claiming certificates and degrees from fake universities. 

And because Singaporeans are so honest, all the fakes with their fake certificates and fake universities are happily hired, as their fake certificates and degrees are printed in genuine high quality paper, like gold, and all of these fake foreigners are hired to be the bosses of Singaporeans.

And the rest is history. Singaporeans are now mostly unemployed or underemployed, sacked by the fakes to protect themselves, so that no one is around to question them or to check on their fake certificates and degrees.  Today, many qualified Singaporeans with their real degrees from world best Singapore universities are jobless and have to drive taxis or deliver food to be gainfully employed.  Some of them now have to learn to fake, to be dishonest, to tell their employers that they did not have degrees or diplomas or they would be over qualified and would not get the jobs as drivers or security guards.

Honesty, honest people, competing with the fakes, the cheats, stand no chance. They would be outsmarted by the cheats. And the saddest part of it, when the cheats are caught, they simply got a smack on the wrist. Some could still be employed by the imbeciles even after being caught for cheating.

Maybe honesty is no longer value in Singapore. Only the daft Singaporeans continue to be honest and stupidly believing in honesty. Come on, go ahead and cheat in your exams and change the grades to all As. Or simply buy from degree mills printed in good quality paper. The employers love it. The employers would say this is smart, not dumb. If you can't cheat and ended up unemployed, blame yourself. The foreigners are so talented. Everyone armed with the best degrees from the best universities and with excellent grades and experience, from little villages from God knows where.

Honest Singaporeans would not stand a chance with their degrees that cannot be eaten.  Serve them right. Being honest is equal to being daft and being unemployed or becoming drivers and delivering food or checking people at entrance of buildings, food centres or shopping malls. If there is no Covid19, dunno what these daft Singaporeans would be doing.

What do you think?