We had a
freak election in 2015. Yes , it was a freak election. Of course what is a
freak election is a matter of opinion. Today some people are very busy worrying
about this thing called rogue president. Again, what is a rogue president is
also a matter of opinion. Why waste so much expensive manpower, time and
resources on a peeved thing called a ‘rogue’ president? The Workers Party
rightly refused to participate in this farce. Yes, to me it is a farce. Some
may disagree and think or regard it as a very serious affair, a life and death
thing involving an island state called Singapore. When one sees a bull, it is a
bull.
Let’s get
back to the first principle, what is this farce all about? It all started
because someone said in case there is a freak election, in case the people
voted in a new govt and the new govt is made up of crooks whose only interest
is to run down the country and spend all the money in the reserves, and run the
country to the ground. Are these valid and real reasons? Reasonable, sensible?
When these
fears were first mooted, no one raise the any question. Or no one dared to
raise any question. Fear was omnipresence then. Now that fear is dead, shall
the people take some time to question what all these fears were about?
In the first
place, what is a freak election, according to who is an election a freak
election? Oh, is it because the people voted a new group of people, a new party
to form the govt. Is that freakish? Or is that just a normal process of a democracy
when the people so decided to choose another party to form the govt because
they have given up hope on the incumbent govt as has been?
There are 2
million people out there, all very well educated. Are the voters stupid, mad or
being drugged, or being bribed and so foolish to vote in unison, a new party to
form the govt made up of rogues and cheats? And why should the political
leaders in the newly elected govt be rogues, thugs, robbers, cheats, out to
destroy the country and rob its reserves? Is this a reasonable assumption or a
foolish assumption?
Is it right
to say that only good, honest, clever and responsible politicians are found in
the ruling party and the rest are all bad people? Children, I am speaking to
you. Do you understand what I am saying? Have you grown up and know what is
right and wrong, what is good for you and what is bad for you, what is reasonable
and what is freakish?
Are these
assumptions sound and real? Or are they just wild imaginations to frighten the
voters, to create irrational fear? All democratic countries went through the
electoral processes to elect new govts. This is what a democratic process is
all about, a change of govt is the norm.
Is there a
need for an Elected President to check on a popularly elected govt? How
effective is such an Elected President to check on a ‘rogue’ govt? A one man
machine against a parliament of political leaders?
And after
creating an Elected President to check on a ‘rogue’ elected govt, now another
new fear is raised. What happened if the Elected President to check on a
‘rogue’ govt becomes a ‘rogue’ President? So now we need to devise another
funny scheme to double check to make sure the Elected President will not become
a ‘rogue’ president?
Do we then
need to triple check on whatever rules and regulations and criteria so that
these would not become ‘rogue’ system of checks and checks?
What the
fish? What is going on? A popularly elected govt to be checked by a single man
called Elected President, and now to check on this Elected President that is
supposed to check on the elected govt?
Does it make
sense? Does it make any sense at all? So far, the only thing that makes sense
is what the WP has suggested, there is no need for this Elected President. No
need to waste public money and resources, in the hundreds of millions for
something that needs to be checked and checked and checked.
What do you
think?
The moral of
the story…. I need a safe. But the safe is not safe enough. So I buy a bigger
safe to put the safe inside. But I don’t trust the bigger safe. So I buy a
biggerer safe to put the bigger safe with the smaller safe inside into this
biggerer safe. If I don’t feel good about this biggerer safe, I may want to
build a fortress around it. And so the
story goes.