No one owes you a living

It is so easy to utter such a comment when one has millions in the bank account, oops I mean many millions and many bank accounts, and many multi million dollar landed properties. Might as well say ‘you die your business’, who cares? KNN, if I have so many millions I might also say such darn things to the losers in life. It is only natural when one is rich and comfortable to shit on the losers. Human nature is like that. Only when they are in the same shit hole then they will say ‘let’s stand together as one and fight together as one’.

Tony Tan in his Parliamentary Speech talked about the threats from the Islamic State and terrorism. And several ministers came out to say Singaporeans must unite and stand together to fight against terrorism. The slight problem here is that the people are so divided by how much they earned and how much they have that they have become water and oil. There are people living in $50m or $100m bungalows and people living in 2rm and 3rm flats that they could not afford to pay and only hope that they could pay up in 30 years if they continue to have a job. Would the rich and the poor think the same, to fight together against terrorism regardless of how many millions they had in their bank accounts or how many dollars left inside their pockets, not enough for the next meal? Or would the losers turn around and say, ‘no one owes you a living’.  You so rich you go and fight and defend your millions and your multi million dollar properties?

What about the millions of foreigners that are here taking the good jobs from the citizens and beating up citizens when they are unhappy? Are they going to help out in defending the citizens against terrorism? Or are the citizens supposed to defend, fight and die for these foreigners?

We have a fractured and fragmented society to the extent that to each his own, you die your business are the new normal. No one owes you a living is the mantra of the day. It applies both ways, not just one way.

What terrorism? What have the losers got to defend for, what have they got to lose? ‘Everyone has a part to play to keep Singapore and Singaporean safe’. What is that? And Vivian said, ‘The rise of nationalism, protectionism and the polarization of society in many regional countries have further exacerbated the challenges faced by Singapore.’ But these are other people’s problems. Singapore does not believe in nationalism, in protectionism, we believe in a borderless country, everyone can come here to live and work and to live in harmony. Singaporeans will protect them, their wealth and safety, even if these foreigners feel free to bash up Singaporeans for fun or for whatever reasons.

Singapore is a united people, foreigners and citizens will be protected from harm, from terrorism. Singaporeans will unite and stand together to fight terrorism. Not sure if the foreigners here think the same way.

How many people will be shouting, ‘You die your business’? How many people will be shouting,‘No one owes you a living’? How many people will be shouting, ‘Let’s stand together and fight together’?

Would the electorate vote for a politician to tell them he does not owe you a living? Why would the voters vote for someone to be paid in the millions only to hear him say, ‘No one owes you a living’?

AIIB starts new era for Asia
By Chua Chin Leng (chinadaily.com.cn)Updated: 2016-01-16 11:27

After three years in the making, the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) officially opens for business on Jan 16, 2016. The AIIB is a milestone for Asia; it’s for Asian countries to take charge of their futures going forward. Asian countries now have an Asian bank financed mainly by Asian countries providing funds for infrastructure development in Asia. 

The positive contribution of an Asian bank to finance infrastructure development, energy, and transportation in Asia is clear and obvious. The encouraging international membership is a vindication of the need and the niche role that AIIB could play for its Asian members. 

The participation of many western economic powers gives credence and affirmation that the AIIB is on the right path and would be an essential organization in the same league as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the Asian Development Bank (ADB). On a positive note, the AIIB would play a complimentary role to these existing institutions, to provide financing and fill the gaps that the existing structure and organizations could not do. The needs of Asian countries to develop their coal, thermal, and hydro power infrastructure excluded by the Bretton Woods Agreements would now be served by the AIIB. 

The challenges faced by the AIIB are more political than economics. The opposition from the American and Japanese corner arises from their perception that the AIIB is a challenge to their dominance and monopoly in the existing world order. 

No one can deny the great economic benefits that the AIIB would bring to Asian countries. The political rhetoric is just that and economic considerations would rule the day as was seen by the last minute entry of the Philippines becoming a founding member. No Asian country would want to be left out from benefiting from an Asian Bank with a primary role of supporting the infrastructure development of Asian countries.

Obstacles, real and imaginary, would be placed by beneficiaries of the old world order into the path of the AIIB. It is important that Asian countries like China, India, and Russia would put their priorities right, to see to it that an Asian bank could succeed under their leadership to serve Asian interests and the ascendance of Asian powers, to free Asian countries from the dominance of western powers.

The Asian countries would also work closely with the western members in the AIIB to ensure that AIIB is run professionally and abiding by all the good practices of the World Bank, IMF, and ADB, and to be a credible and sustainable Asian bank. 

The AIIB is a showpiece of Asia, an announcement that Asia has arrived and Asian countries are able and capable of managing the economic development of Asia with Asian expertise, funds and professional management. The primacy of economic considerations should be the guiding principle of the AIIB and not politics. AIIB should not become a political organization and be bogged down with political squabbling if it is to survive the challenges that would fall in its path.
It cannot avoid or totally be detached from the political implications and conflicts in geopolitics. As long as the AIIB can put the economic interests of its member countries above politics, with transparent and good governance, it would be unshakable to the negative political rhetoric and criticisms of its critics and naysayers. 

All Asian countries have a vested interest to see to it that the AIIB is a success and benefits all members. This responsibility rests squarely on the shoulders of the emerging Asian economic power houses, in China, India, South Korea, in Russia and in the central and south East Asian countries.
The author is a political observer from Singapore.

Fate of racial harmony in Singapore

“Peace in Republic is result of the ‘deliberate choice’ made by the country’s forefathers.” This is quoted from yesterday’s Today paper in an article by Amanda Lee. I think most Singaporeans would agree with this statement wholeheartedly. It is a historical fact. Our forefathers were brought here by the colonial masters to serve the interests of Empire for cheap and compliant labour. And when we were given independence, this mix bag of people was there and our forefathers had to make the best out of it. They had to live with whatever that was here. They did not create the problem of a population of so many races. They had no choice.

Chee Hean made a speech saying that the fate of racial harmony lies with the Singaporeans. How many of you agree with him? Our forefathers did their best and we were hammered, coerced and coaxed into becoming a people called Singaporeans. They succeeded to bring a people different in race, religion and history together to live as one people. That was their achievements.

Today, the people did have a choice, oops, not really, when the govt imported more than two million foreigners from all over the world and shafted them down the throat of the people. The govt had a choice, the people did not. The govt consciously and deliberately chose to do this, to bring another mix bag of people of different races, religions and historical background into a Singapore that had four major ethnic groups of people living peacefully together in harmony. The govt decided this for the people.

Now Chee Hean is saying that racial harmony is now the responsibility of Singaporeans to make it work again? Why is this not the responsibility of those people who decided to bring these foreigners here against the wishes of the Singaporeans, without the consent of the Singaporeans? How many of you agree with what Chee Hean said, that it is now the Singaporeans’ responsibility?

Peace and racial harmony were a deliberate choice of our forefathers. Is the influx of more than two million foreigners in so short a span of time a deliberate choice of the Singaporeans of today? If it is, then it must be the responsibility of the Singaporeans to make it work. If not, then who should be responsible to make it work? Who should be held responsible if it did not work and the problems became national problems?

Chee Hean lauded the peace and harmony we have so far and attributed this to ‘Each community did not insist on the primacy of its race, language or practices. Instead, each of our communities is prepared to practice its own culture and religion in the context of making adaptations to accommodate others where necessary.’  Can this be taken for granted, that it would always be like that? There are already signs of intolerance by the new immigrants and new citizens that they would like to be different and demanding more recognition of who they are and what they are.

By the way, why is it not the responsibility of the new immigrants to make racial harmony works? Why are foreigners easily let off when they bashed up Singaporeans for the smallest excuse?

The hungry Singaporeans of yesteryears were hungry enough to want to get on with their lives, to be left in peace, just to work for a better life. The new Singaporeans are not hungry, not that easy to please, very demanding and would not be easily persuaded to accommodate, integrate and accept the way of lives of other ethnic and religious groups. We are not dealing with the same inputs, the same environment and the same realities. Do not take our good fortune of racial harmony for granted and think everything will be the same, so easily done, so simple. Just because someone said integrate and the new and old citizens will integrate. Just throw a free makan and all is well, we will have a happy integrated society with racial harmony. So simple!

2 men changed the balance of power in the 21st Century

Today we are seeing the world increasingly turning into a bi polar world with an ascending China challenging the dominance of a crumbling American hegemony. To the Americans and their sympathizers, particularly the bananas that did not know who they are and still trying very hard to believe their forefathers came from the West and were really descendants of some John Smith or George Washington, they must all be bewildered by the changing balance and wondering what had gone wrong. How did the world become what it is today when the great USA becomes a nation of debtors and the poorest and unassuming country, Communist China, is their biggest creditor?

To make matters worse, this creditor is not going to go away and will come knocking at the door to collect the debt from the debtor. And no matter what the debtor is trying to do, the debt keeps piling up and sitting on the debtor like a mountain. There is no escape from the weight of the debt.

And everyday, the superiority and advantage of the debtor in every field of endeavour is shifting to favour the creditor, from manufacturing to farming, from consumer goods to weapons, from ships to aircraft, commercial planes to war planes, war ships, transportation, telecommunication, satellites, rocketry, computer and cyber technology, green technology, the creditor is catching up and already better in many fields.

How can it be? In only a short span of one generation, the seemingly unsurpassed superiority of the Americans has been surpassed. Everything the Americans are doing, or have done, the Chinese have bettered or in the process of catching up.

The Americans must be shaking in disbelief, pinching themselves silly asking themselves this is not true. The sad thing is that this is true. The poor illiterate, backward peasants of a poor communist country, plagued by poverty and famine, inefficiency, low education, lack of financial resources and money, lack of talents, scientists, engineers, architects, medical professionals, academics, thinkers and planners, military experts, now they have plenty of them, and damn bloody good ones. There was not a single millionaire in 1980 in China. Today the millionaires are crawling everywhere, with equally many billionaires and some to the riches in the world.

The Americans did not see this coming. It is now history. It is too late to think of containing China and keeping it as a developing nation for another century by all kinds of sanctions, blockages and obstacles placed in its way. The new China is here. Who did it?

Two men, one an American, another a Chinese but not of Chinese nationality did it. The American and the non Chinese Chinese convinced the Americans that it was a good thing to engage China and bring China into the world community, to integrate China with the world instead of making China an enemy. Of course that was real and a good thing, but may not necessarily be good to the American hegemony. The one billion people will rise one day to be the equals of the world. It would be better to work with them and cultivate and build a healthy relationship with this one billion people, to be friends than enemies.

It sounded logical. The Americans also thought so. What harm could it bring to help another nation of people to live better and to live in peace? It would take maybe a century for them to get the act together to rise out of poverty. It was a tough and long process and maybe they might not be able to do it.  These are the same people that were good enough to be coolies, cooks and laundrymen, without very little talent.

Many countries were still struggling to reach the level of wealth of developed countries and many hardly made any real changes, just managing to stand above the poverty level, to join the ranks of developing countries since the end of WW2. A  huge moribund country like China, with one billion hungry and illiterate people would take much more time to sort themselves out of poverty. How to feed a billion people is not a joke.

Who in his right mind could perceive that a poor China that was short of everything except poor people could turn around in 30 years and in 40 years, vying for world dominance with the Americans for world supremacy?  Who would believe the richest nation could owe the poorest nation a ton of debt in a short span of 40 years?

The Americans are in shock and in awe today. Now, how to reverse the trend? The losing trend is just too fast and too hard to swallow. All the defences are up, all the obstacles are raised again, to contain China, to keep it poor or not allowed to get richer, to overtake the richest and most powerful country in the world.

Alas, it is a bit too late. The momentum is so strong that within the next 5 years, China will be Number One in financial terms, the Number One economy in the world.

Two men did it, to change the balance of power of the 21^st Century.

Australia rejects US plea to fight IS

It was reported that the Australians had rejected the American’s plea for more help to commit more troops and equipment to fight IS. Australians have said they had done enough. The Americans are coercing their allies for greater commitments.  The Australians said they had no more appetite for more it.

How many eager beavers or silly allies will be hopping onto the American bandwagon to send troops to fight the IS which is actually an American red herring, created to destabilize the Middle East in perpetuity? The Americans have enough military power and assets to destroy the earth, all the countries, many times over and cannot fight the IS on its own, needing more commitments from stupid allies? What is the real intent of the Americans to get more silly allies to fight in the ME shadow play?

The current American pretense to want to do more is a result of the success of the Russians who were there with a real intent to destroy IS, and thus exposing the farce of the American game plan. There have been many reports that the Americans forces were attacking the Syrian govt soldiers and positions instead of fighting the IS. And the complicity of the Americans, the Saudis, the Turks and other allies in fighting on the side of the IS are getting more ridiculous. The Americans and its stupid allies are there to remove the Assad govt, not to fight IS.

And this is not the end of the American game plan. They would demand and coerce their stupid allies to commit more assets and soldiers should they be successful in provoking a war in the South China Sea or in the Korean Peninsula. And it will again be you are with us or against us. The Australians knew exactly what the Americans are conceiving and wanted out, not wanting to be dragged in further by the Americans in a war that they did not want and have nothing to do with it.  It is a clear signal that the Australians would not want to engage in more American incited wars, and not in the South China Sea against China.

Who would the Americans coerce next to send more troops and assets to fight in the ME? The Europeans, other than the hardcore British and French, are opting out as well. I think the Americans have several pets in Asean that would be most willing to say yes to more wars.