The American gangsters still treating the rest of the world as fools

This is a report in Channel News Asia coming out of Washington. China is using "coercive tactics" and fostering regional tensions as it expands its maritime presence in the South China Sea and elsewhere, but is avoiding triggering an armed conflict, the Pentagon said on Friday (May 13).’ Now should not this be read as The USA is using coercive tactics instead?  They have just lifted all arms embargo to Vietnam with China in mind, ie to sell more arms to Vietnam to counter China militarily.

The Chinese are reclaiming land from the ocean within their territorial sovereignty and turning the islands into usable land. And it is only natural for them to send in their military to secure the islands for their own safety. Compare this to what the Americans are doing in this part of the world, tens of thousands of miles from the American coast, sending their warships and warplanes to violate the Chinese territorial waters and airspace? Who is the rascal using coercive tactics but avoiding triggering an armed conflict? What right and business have the Americans in the South China Sea and provocatively sailing their warships into the 12nm territorial limits of Chinese islands? This is a perfect example of a rogue, a gangster come knocking and challenging the owner and telling the world it is the owner that is aggressive.

Why is it alright for the Americans to militarise Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean and Guam in the Pacific Ocean, turning them in military fortresses with nuclear weapons for offensive missions?

But that is not all.  The Americans are building military bases all over the world, thousands of them, more than a hundred in Japan alone. Now in the Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand and Singapore, more American bases are set up. And they are crying out loud that China has a military base or access to military facilities in Djibouti, in Africa where China has a lot of investments and the need to protect them, their nationals and their ships against piracy in the region. To the Americans, having a military base in Djibouti is unacceptable. One small military base with no nuclear weapons is not allowed in the view of the Americans. Only the Americans can have military bases all over the world.

The Americans are still thinking that the people of the world are stupid and must accept the rule of the Americans, that they are the Empire and owner of this planet. Oh, they are still wondering why they are hated, the most hated people in the whole world.  Other than the Arabs killed by the Americans, the Americans themselves are the next most killed people and soldiers in the world, for dabbling in mischiefs and starting wars all over the world….in the name of American peace.

Beware of the wrath of God. God has sent his chosen one, in Donald Trump, to get rid of the evil regime in America. Repent before it is too late. The Americans shall pay a very heavy price for the killings and destructions they are causing to the rest of the world. Wherever there is war, the Americans are involved, overtly or covertly. No need to look for proof. You know the Americans are the instigators, provocateurs and combatants in all the wars on this planet.


Anonymous said...

No need to worry, the rise of the New Age Spartans (aka Chinese PLA) together with allies like the Puddings ( Russia ) & Naughty Boys (aka North Koreans) will keep those Greed Monsters ( the Americans) in check & give them more headaches. A change of Americans head can't do anything ad they r too greedy. The rise of these New Age Spartans is the new world order ...nothing can stop them..not even Greed..

Chua Chin Leng aka redbean said...

The mad Americans are building up their forces in Europe and poised for a war with Russia. We are so close to the 3rd World War.

Anonymous said...

No worries, if the Americans troops were to posed a war to the Russians, the Chinese PLA will come & help the Russians out covertly..the Chinese & Russins will come our war weapons & war tactics unthinkable of this New Warring States & make sure the Americans will learn a great lesson ( akin to the Vietnam war). RUSSIANS & Chinese Warlords will come together as a repeat of the 唇亡齿寒. In Chinese history of the 3kingdom saw how Liu Bei Zhuge Liang's strategies defeated Tsao Tsao MIGHTY army thru' careful planning & strategies..it's akun to a repeat episode of tat..

Anonymous said...

Irregardless of who becomes president of usa, there will be trade war for sure simply coz of trade deficit issues and own debt issues.

If the trade war dont work out, then it will be for war. At the end of the day, it is still about money.

Anonymous said...

Can you imagine what is war like when fought among the super powers with nuclear weapons?

Anonymous said...

US presi in Vietnam was doing sales. Vietnam used to buy from Russia. Reports said Viets are interested in US radar. Question is how much can Vietcon pay for US weapons? Taiwan paid for old models at far above market prices.

China is not threaten because china produces weapons themselves. Subs, jets, radar, tanks, assault boats, all kinds. I see this is the most important part of going to war. As long as the factories in various parts of china have the tech to do the assembly and testing, there is no way US navy can do a threat to china. Why?

US navy can sail. But the assault jet planes may not fly. I saw reports that US strips parts from those parking jets to repair flying jets for practice. The jets parking there therefore may not be usable at war time. US factories may not be there because US Defense budget is cut.
Got the point?

Further look: US dare not to put troops in middle east. Will Obama put troops to fight PLA? That s impossible. Hillary may not want it and Trump may charge Vietnam if US is to involve with the latter in war.
There is no war in S China sea.

But PLA may have to take over Taiwan. Taiwan is going close with Japan, offering cb to please. China PLA may not allow Taiwan to go beyond 100 years without being rule directly by mainland. Its now 67 years. So PLA may wait for Xi to go and the next taking over may have to be the one to decide on Taiwan. By then Taiwan independent movement president will be in her second term. The economy will be very bad. The independent movement will turn public attention on Taiwan Independence. That will be after 2020. Sg also will have good show in 2020GE. According to estimate, Taiwan can hold on to taiwan only 48 hours.
If that is true, how long can Sg hold on to sg will be a big question. The new govt in 2020GE will have to decide if it wants to improve cohesiveness by sacking foreigners PR who lie low with their sons keeping in India and Malaysia. If not, NS men s salary will have to improve to raise morale, when the new 2020GE continue to mass increase foreigners to this island.
Taiwan war is a dangerous moment to sg s own security. That one i am scared.

Anonymous said...

@ Anon 10:38am

According to what estimate that suggest taiwan can hold out 48 hrs ? Can you share with us?

Anonymous said...

Anon 11:41am
U should form your own opinion or read somewhere.
Share with readers some broad scope facts: China defense budget is tw s 15 times. China s economy is tw s 20 times. There are 2000+ missiles aiming at tw run ways, institutions.

Tw own internal survey last month: 14.?% will run off when PLA attack, 30% will not resist, others i forgot liao.

China s likely approach:
lock the straits, mine the sea to stop for US carrier from approaching whatever, rain missiles on taiwan, air attack and parachutes to take over, subs, and assault boats amphibious landing with china tanks. All these are currently in their live exercises. U can see the real tanks, and boats in landing. I think without US carrier firing missiles to disturb, 48 hrs is very close because PLA has the number.

Will US defend tw? On papers. In real assaults, hard to expect because Tw is recognized as china s territory under one china policy.

48hrs is based on judgement. U cannot accept as true. Can take it as 480 weeks or months. Its hard to confirm til it goes live.

Ⓜatilah $ingapura⚠️ said...

If you are a fool, be prepared to be treated as one.

Putin is painted as a "very bad guy", as he does have inclinations of "expansion". So the fuckheads in the EU balls drop. No problem, just suck some US dick...problem solved.

The biggest nightmare scenario is if Trump becomes president. He doesn't like to fight. He likes to "make deals". He likes Putin. He claims to like China, although he doesn't like China's trade policies.

And so, motivated by pure ego and self-interest, he will do deals with Russia and China...and the world could see a super-duper power alliance of US-Russia-China.

What better way to carve up the world? You want them to be "friends"? If that happens, everyone who is not in the "alliance" will be royally screwed. That means the rest of the world.

Frankly, I prefer them to remain adversaries. The push-pull dynamic is a much safer bet.
Let's face it, all 3 cuntries are GANGSTERS lah. Better for them to stay enemies than to become friends.

Anonymous said...

@ anon 12:27pm

Thanks for clarifying on the 48hrs or 480 weeks (FYI.. 52 weeks is 1 yr liao) whichever it is.

Since it is your own personal judgement or estimate. I wont say too much.

Anonymous said...

Vietnam was attacked by US, her people and country NAPALM-seared for its ideology . Todate the country is still a communist state one- party state, YET it is lifting its arms ban. Why then attacked Vietnam back then?

Comments like it is nothing to do with China really insult people intelligent.


Napalm is a flammable liquid used in warfare. It is a mixture of a gelling agent, and either petroleum or a similar fuel. It was initially used as an incendiary device against buildings and later primarily as an anti-personnel weapon, as it sticks to skin and causes severe burns when on fire.

From 1965 to 1969, the Dow Chemical Company manufactured napalm B for the American armed forces.[8] After news reports of napalm B's deadly and disfiguring effects were published, Dow Chemical experienced boycotts of its products, and its recruiters for new chemists, chemical engineers, etc., graduating from college were subject to campus boycotts. The management of the company decided that its "first obligation was the government." Meanwhile, napalm B became a symbol for the Vietnam War

The first recorded strategic use of napalm incendiary bombs occurred in an attack by the US Army Air Force on Berlin on 6 March 1944, using American AN-M76 incendiary bombs with PT-1 (Pyrogel) filler.

[Napalm B was also widely used by the United Nations military forces during the Korean War

Napalm B became an intrinsic element of U.S. military action during the Vietnam War as forces increasingly employed its widespread tactical as well as psychological effects.

[citation needed] Reportedly about 388,000 tons of U.S. napalm bombs were dropped in the region between 1963 and 1973, compared to 32,357 tons used over three years in the Korean War, and 16,500 tons dropped on Japan in 1945.[1]

"Napalm is the most terrible pain you can imagine," said Kim Phúc, a napalm bombing survivor known from a famous Vietnam War photograph. "Water boils at 100 degrees Celsius (212°F). Napalm generates temperatures of 800 to 1,200 degrees Celsius (1,500–2,200°F)."[

International law[edit]

International law does not specifically prohibit the use of napalm or other incendiaries against military targets,[20] but use against civilian populations was banned by the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) in 1980.[22] Protocol III of the CCW restricts the use of all incendiary weapons, but a number of countries have not acceded to all of the protocols of the CCW. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), countries are considered a party to the convention, which entered into force as international law in December 1983, as long as they ratify at least two of the five protocols. The United States signed it approximately 25 years after the General Assembly adopted it, on 21 Jan 2009: President Barack Obama's first full day in office. Their ratification, however, is subject to a reservation that says it can disregard the treaty at its discretion if doing so would save civilian lives.

Anonymous said...

Effects of U.S. chemical defoliation

U.S. helicopter spraying chemical defoliants in the Mekong Delta, South Vietnam
One of the most controversial aspects of the U.S. military effort in Southeast Asia was the widespread use of chemical defoliants between 1961 and 1971. They were used to defoliate large parts of the countryside to prevent the Viet Cong from being able to hide their weapons and encampments under the foliage. These chemicals continue to change the landscape, cause diseases and birth defects, and poison the food chain.[

The defoliants, which were distributed in drums marked with color-coded bands, included the "Rainbow Herbicides"—Agent Pink, Agent Green, Agent Purple, Agent Blue, Agent White, and, most famously, Agent Orange, which included dioxin as a by-product of its manufacture. About 12 million gallons (45,000,000 L) of Agent Orange were sprayed over Southeast Asia during the American involvement.[citation needed]

A prime area of Ranch Hand operations was in the Mekong Delta, where the U.S. Navy patrol boats were vulnerable to attack from the undergrowth at the water's edge.

In 1961 and 1962, the Kennedy administration authorized the use of chemicals to destroy rice crops. Between 1961 and 1967, the U.S. Air Force sprayed 20 million U.S. gallons (75,700,000 L) of concentrated herbicides over 6 million acres (24,000 km2) of crops and trees, affecting an estimated 13% of South Vietnam's land. In 1965, 42% of all herbicide was sprayed over food crops. Another purpose of herbicide use was to drive civilian populations into RVN-controlled areas.

Vietnamese victims affected by Agent Orange attempted a class action lawsuit against Dow Chemical and other US chemical manufacturers, but District Court Judge Jack B. Weinstein dismissed their case.[523] They appealed, but the dismissal was cemented in February 2008 by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.[524] As of 2006, the Vietnamese government estimates that there are over 4,000,000 victims of dioxin poisoning in Vietnam, although the United States government denies any conclusive scientific links between Agent Orange and the Vietnamese victims of dioxin poisoning. In some areas of southern Vietnam, dioxin levels remain at over 100 times the accepted international standard.[525]

The U.S. Veterans Administration has listed prostate cancer, respiratory cancers, multiple myeloma, Diabetes mellitus type 2, B-cell lymphomas, soft-tissue sarcoma, chloracne, porphyria cutanea tarda, peripheral neuropathy, and spina bifida in children of veterans exposed to Agent Orange.wiki

Anonymous said...

Are there any rice productions now from those locations/countries bombed by US ?

b said...

Chinese rulers can be even more ruthless than american ones. Its the lesser of two rotten bananas.