11/26/2012

PG for court hearings



What is the case all about between Ng Boon Gay and Cecilia Sue? Is it a case about promiscuity or about corruption? So far the case is more about detailed sexual acts, explicit, implicit, lewd, perversion, and nearly everything there is to make an X rated movie sell. The corruption part seems to be less important and superficially treated. It is like a violent movie with all the gore and blood with little care to the plot.

I think the censorship board should be called in to snip some of the scenes from being published in the main media or people may think that it is an evening paper or some wanbao.

Should the media also be rated for certain news like PG, under 18, under 16 like in the cinemas or on TV?

My view is that this episode should receive a PG rating at least if reported in the media.

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sex sells
and
it is also
a great distraction.

Veritas said...

I think public reserve the right to know the truth, the whole truth. If censorship could be applied in this case, it would be make use by the powerful to cover their acts of corruptions or even murder.

GIC and Temasek use exactly their lofty goals of protecting national interest to prevent us from peeking into their books.

In the case of Cecilia, we just have to bear with the side effect of pornography.

Veritas said...

People must know truth never mind how ugly they are. Today, people are being so brainwash that even the most prudish Bible writer are more open in the topic of sexuality.

In Bible, there are often graphic sexual description of perversity. We know Lots' 2 daughter screwed their own father. We know king David sleep with young virgin Abishag when he is about to die.

We know the father of today Jew, is Judah spwan the "Judah line". He sleep with his daughter in law, which bored him Perez. This incestuos line later give birth to King David, King Solomon and even Jesus.

If Bible write hide all these porn, we will not know the truth. And today, many people still regard that we must censor the truth in favor of other lofty ideas.

Even Vatican wants to hash up their pedophile incidents.

This can only bring forth further disaster. Truth is the highest priority.

Chua Chin Leng aka redbean said...

The corruption part, if there is, must be laid bare on the table. There is no necessity for the nitty details of the sexual acts to be so elaborate. It is either they have a relationship and whether that leads to corruption or a compromise on the award of contracts.

Oh, PG is only for parental guidance, and not totally censored.

Veritas said...

Below is from wikipedia about Islam that most religious scholars do not want to talk about.


According to Muslim scholars, most of the hadith about Aisha is fabricated. According to the traditional sources, Aisha was six or seven years old when she was betrothed to Muhammad(sallallaho alayhi wasallam) and nine when the marriage was consummated. Aisha stayed in her parents' home for several years until she joined Muhammad(sallallaho alayhi wasallam) and the marriage was consummated when she was nine. However, al-Tabari records that she was ten. The sources do not offer much more information about Aisha's childhood years, but mention that after the wedding, she continued to play with her toys, and that Muhammad(sallallaho alayhi wasallam) entered into the spirit of these games.
The issue of Aisha's age at the time she was married to Muhammad(sallallaho alayhi wasallam) has been of interest since the earliest days of Islam, and references to her age by early historians are frequent.


During my days in Church, no one ever mentioned that "according" to Bible, Jesus is the descendent of "incest couple Judah and Tammar", "King David and his adultery wife Bersheba", "whore, traitor, non-Jews" Rahab....etc. Not to forget, Abraham screwed his half sister Sarah which begets Issac.

Today any mentioning of Aisha referring to Hadith, u immediately get suspicious look from many Muslim scholars(assumming he is aware).

The problem of religion is there are many deviant people who interpret it to the masses. Most people do not have the intellectual capacity or diligent to dig the truth.

I think it is necessary that public get informed as much as possible. That will prevent us from being fooled.

Anonymous said...

So let's be prudish and say "Did Ng Boon Gay know Cecilia Sue in the biblical sense?"

oldhorse42 said...

The case could have been heard in camera not so much for public morality concern but to better protect the image of public service.
The conduct and behavior of this highly paid civil servant really tarnish the image of public service. And it is just one woman!If all the women he is involved with while in service are disclosed, one will wonder whether he has time to do an honest day's work?

oldhorse42 said...

The case could have been heard in camera not so much for public morality concern but to better protect the image of public service.
The conduct and behavior of this highly paid civil servant really tarnish the image of public service. And it is just one woman!If all the women he is involved with while in service are disclosed, one will wonder whether he has time to do an honest day's work?

Veritas said...

The more porn reported by SPH regarding civil service, the better. Today, there are still many people who believe the integrity of our civil service. But actually insiders already knew its a can of worms.

We need to report it in a way like Bill Clinton and Lewinsky. Better to get public disilusioned fast. This is the only way to reform.

Anonymous said...

If civil servants don't have sex;
then how to increase fertility rate?
Cannot outsource sex with spouse to Foreign talents right?

Anonymous said...

Matilah, this should be your favorite subject so what do you think? Please post responsibly

Anonymous said...

Anon2.09 pm what ask that moron? It's a waste of time!

Matilah_Singapura said...

Sure put a rating on it.

Putting on a rating IS NOT "censorship" -- it is merely a forewarning that the ensuing content might not be suitable to minors, and it is THE PARENTS who apply discretion as far as their children is concerned, not the motherfucking government.

"Censorship" is the actual redaction, deletion, deliberate non disclosure of content.

I am a great supporter of "parents rights". So yeah, inform the parents properly and allow them to FREELY judge what is suitable or not for their kids.

And in that way mothers can teach their daughters properly, how to use their pussies, and perhaps their mouths and asses to obtain ANYTHING and EVERYTHING they'll need in life.

In Singapore, you have to be realistic: it is a materialistic society, and girls have to look out for themselves ;-)

Anonymous said...

Censorship Board sleeping huh?

Anonymous said...

Hell no censorship please. What we now have is 'National Porn' that is of greater interest than 'National Con'.

Anonymous said...

Matilah, I don't you were going to post responsibly when I was reading your first few paragraphs before it get degenerated again. Alamak knn you don't have better thing to do is it? Does your mother teaches your sister all those things and does your grandma taught your mother also?

Anonymous said...

Matilah, give us a break! I understand from earlier post that u even practice incest. This is against the order of nature, please confess your sin and refrain from continuing to do so. God bless your lost soul