How many eager beavers
or silly allies will be hopping onto the American bandwagon to send troops to
fight the IS which is actually an American red herring, created to destabilize
the Middle East in perpetuity? The Americans have enough military power and
assets to destroy the earth, all the countries, many times over and cannot
fight the IS on its own, needing more commitments from stupid allies? What is
the real intent of the Americans to get more silly allies to fight in the ME
shadow play?
The current American
pretense to want to do more is a result of the success of the Russians who were
there with a real intent to destroy IS, and thus exposing the farce of the
American game plan. There have been many reports that the Americans forces were
attacking the Syrian govt soldiers and positions instead of fighting the IS.
And the complicity of the Americans, the Saudis, the Turks and other allies in
fighting on the side of the IS are getting more ridiculous. The Americans and
its stupid allies are there to remove the Assad govt, not to fight IS.
And this is not the end
of the American game plan. They would demand and coerce their stupid allies to
commit more assets and soldiers should they be successful in provoking a war in
the South China Sea or in the Korean Peninsula. And it will again be you are
with us or against us. The Australians knew exactly what the Americans are
conceiving and wanted out, not wanting to be dragged in further by the
Americans in a war that they did not want and have nothing to do with it. It is a clear signal that the Australians
would not want to engage in more American incited wars, and not in the South China Sea against China .
Who would the
Americans coerce next to send more troops and assets to fight in the ME? The
Europeans, other than the hardcore British and French, are opting out as well. I
think the Americans have several pets in Asean that would be most willing to
say yes to more wars.