Can China push the US out of the Palestine-Israel peace process?
Following successful forays into settling other Middle Eastern disputes, Beijing is inserting itself into the region’s most challenging conflictChinese President Xi Jingping and his Palestinian Authority (PA) counterpart, Mahmoud Abbas, announced that the two had signed a strategic partnership, with Beijing offering to mediate between the PA and Israel in addition to facilitating unity between rival Palestinian political parties. China’s recent push towards further involvement in the Middle East’s central conflict will invite the ire of Washington, whose power is waning regionally....
Is China a neutral broker and can it achieve peace?
Although it could be argued that China is biased due to its investments in Israeli infrastructure or its rhetoric towards the cause of Palestinian statehood, it is clear that there is somewhat of a more balanced approach to this issue than what is coming from Washington. The US has viewed Israel as its Western outpost in the Middle East since 1967, and the American’s are so incredibly committed to Tel Aviv that US President Joe Biden has repeatedly stated that he subscribes to the nationalist ideology behind Israel’s creation – Zionism. RT
The article by Robert Inlakesh, a political analyst, journalist and documentary filmmaker currently based in London, UK, is posted in RT. Though the article correctly explained the biased treatment of the Palestinians and the pro Israeli stand of the Americans against a more neutral position of China's relations with the two parties, a casual reader could easily be misled by the two headings that I have embolden above.
Can China push the US out of the Palestine-Israel peace process? gives a hint that China is unlikely to succeed to replace the US as the peace maker. Oops, it assumed that the US is really a peace maker, while meddling in suppressing the Palestinians and siding and approving the Israelis genocide of the Palestinians and stealing their land for several decades...with no end of peace in sight, but the gradually taking over of the Palestinian land and massacring the Palestinians using the same Europe formula against the Red Indians in North America.
The second headline, Is China a neutral broker and can it achieve peace? implies and questioning, that China is not a neutral broker. To a casual reader that just flip through the pages, or glancing the headlines, the impression would be quite negative against China, that the Americans are the sincere peace maker that China is trying to displace and China is biased, not neutral to the Palestinians.
What is the purpose and intent of the author? I must say that the author is a very experienced and crafty analyst. I have not read his previous writings so not able to judge his intent and where he is coming from.
6 comments:
This is the way Journalist, with a biased mentality, work their way around unsuspecting readers, by first planting the doubt in the minds of those reading or watching their interviews with a negative question, then pretend they are neutral.
This is the tactic with the behavior of the USA, weakening the other side first with snide attacks before meeting them. Before setting up a meeting with the Chinese, they often try to create the impression that they are going to the talks or negotiation in a position of strength, by making comments to unsettle the other side. That has now been found to have negative effects and failed.
So, what is the new modus operandi they are adopting? They desperately needed a chance to meet, talk nicely first to say what they want, then turn around to denigrate the Chinese. Lessons have been learnt and China no longer invites them for talks and they are worried about what the Chinese are thinking. Now they are inviting themselves to visit China, which the Chinese will not decline according to protocol. But China will not extend the kind of welcome that it accords to friendly countries and their leaders. That is China's method of dealing with unfriendly countries and leaders, and the world is not blind to such treatment by the Chinese. A gentlemen snub it is, to give the other side something to think about.
On a seperate slate, it is amazing that the MSM is still planting the narrative that Putin is now getting more isolated, and that Zelenskyy is still capable of conducting a counteroffensive and most of all, take back all occupied lands. The fact that they expect people to believe in their lies is really flabbergasting. I think they are starting to believe in their own lies. Oh yes, lest I forget, Yoon of South Korea is sending help and Zelenskyy is celebrating. Russia must be taking careful note and will deal with this Chiwawa.
Now that Wagner has moved to Belarus, basically opening up a new front for Putin, while the Chechens and Russians are holding Eastern Ukraine, Zelenskyy faces the prospect of fighting on two fronts. That makes fighting to the last Ukrainian becoming a real prospect, with Zelenskyy the only one left standing. That will be fun to watch. But he is a Jew, not Ukrainian.
There is also the news that the USA is now reluctant to send F16s to Ukraine. According to a top official from the USA Defence Department, the ground conditions, eg the runways prevailing in Ukraine right now are not conducive to operate the F16s, a view already espoused by many. Moreover, the USA is wary of existing Russian air defence capabilities in Ukraine and fear that those planes may not be of much use, meaning they are easy targets for the Russians.
Now, what is next in the USA's 'game changer plan' in Ukraine? Putin is waiting for USA troops on the ground, and body bags returning to the USA as in Vietnam. The former Soviet Union is famous for fighting grinding wars of attrition, which the USA is least capable of doing. They fled Vietnam and Afghanistan, just like Hitler and Napolean being given a taste of the meat grinder feeling in their war against the former Soviet Union. Russia is even more capable than the Soviet Union in those times.
Most anti-China are also anti-Muslims, but they just pretend to care about Uyghurs. Thus, they love atrocity propaganda -- absurd and sensational stories.
They fake to love Uyghur Muslims that were having a good life but lied about discrimination in Xinjiang.
The real discrimination and massacres of Muslims in Palestine, Kashmir and India they pretend not to see.
Disciples of Jesus, went to the northern parts of Europe and Asia. This were where Russia located. Therefore, Jesus teaching can be said to be the least diluted there. Compared to others nearer to Jerusalem, Jesus teaching was diluted into many forms. The Jews in Israel maybe tracking back to the original of the teaching. Ukraine may be targeted for Israel to reside in. With similarlity traits, getting along with Russia will be amicable.
The Jews are acknowledged as one of the smartest people in the world. They don't believe in Jesus or Christianity. They have their own God called Yahweh and their religion is Judaism.
Do not mislead the people that the Jews believe in Christianity and Jesus. They DON'T! They killed Jesus.
Thanks Anon 9.17pm, for clearing up some misconceptions of historical facts. This blog is really educational. Thanks redbean.
Post a Comment