The warmongering American terrorists have been gloating about all the war experience they have and their advantages over the PLA that has not fight a war since 1979. In terms of killings civilians, fighting against tribesmen, the Americans are very well decorated. They know everything about fighting wars with inferior enemies with little or no weapons. So, they are very confident about a war with China and wanting to start a war with China, with experience on their side against inexperienced PLA soldiers.
This is the logic and narrative they are spreading. And the unthinking Anglophiles are swallowing them hook, line and sinkers, including all the semen, and repeating every word the Americans said. Come on, use your head and have a bit of originality, to show a little intelligence, if there is any to think out of the box. Parroting semen is like pasting them on your eyes. Any schoolboys also know how to repeat what the Americans are saying, no need any thinking.
Theoretically it sounds logical. Unfortunately, after many years and hundreds of wargames simulating a war in the western Pacific Ocean tell a different story. The Americans always lose against China because of local condition, proximity to Chinese mainland and the ability to deploy the full force of the PLA, despite all the war experience. The Americans still assume that the Chinese are fighting with inferior weapons like in the Korean War.
America will win in a war against China? This is what the clowns in Washington believe. Clowns are clowns and their thinking ability, if they can think, instead of clowning, is something to depend on. Ever recall why the Americans cannot win wars even against the goat herders in Afghanistan and the Houthis with all their war experience as an advantage? Do these ring a bell?
Experience in warfare is an advantage for sure. But what if the experience is obsolete? Outdated doctrines, military tactics and warfare can be very dangerous and the cause of losing a war. The Indians found this out too late. They wanted to fight a war with the Pakistan using old WW2 concept and doctrine, without knowing that modern warfare is entirely a different kettle of fish. Dogfights belong to WW2. The kill range of modern weapons and missiles is over the horizon, beyond visual range, hundreds of kilometres away. Today, the Indians would not dare to fly their aircraft within 150 km from the border of Pakistan.
Gloating and bragging about experience in outdated warfare tactics and strategies, and weapons systems, would be the Americans downfall. It is a handicap, not an asset, better not to have. Ask the Indians for advice. Chinese warfare in an age of AI, 6G, drones and hypersonic missiles will be something the Americans are alien to. Experience in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Ukraine or Africa is Middle Age, ancient.
Modern warfare is completely different from WW2 or the invasion of Iraq or Afghanistan. Oops, I am leaking a secret and teaching the clowns in Washington to start thinking. No need to elaborate more on what modern warfare is all about. Let the hillbillies and clowns in Washington go figure. Savage experience in how to slit the throats of little Afghan boys would not help the Americans to win a modern war. Brawns and muscles are not an advantage anymore. No need to paint faces like Rambos. The enemies would be over the horizon, never come face to face, not seen. Save the paint and effort. Good for Hollywood movies only.
2 comments:
https://youtube.com/shorts/tbJsElE-fGo?si=wECFSKU7fb6qs9Y-
Fight between the UAssA and 🇨🇳 China
Enjoy!
The USA military may have the best experience, but what happened in Vietnam? Half a million USA soldiers in Vietnam plus South Koreans and South Vietnamese and yet unable to carve out a victory over rag-tag Vietcong fighters. The USA also had massive aerial advantage and support together with weapons galore. A war is won not on experience alone but on strategy, tenacity and knowing the enemy - its size, shape and weakness. If experience determines the outcome of a war, Hitler would have defeated the Soviet Union and so did Napolean.
The USA military also had the same massive advantage in weapons and aerial superiority in Afghanistan, but twenty years later had to flee with tails between its legs. What the USA had been fighting in Afghanistan were merely against farmers bearing small arms. There was not even a proper unit to be called an army within the ranks of the Taliban. Today, the Taliban have the semblance of an army with weapons seized from the USA when it fled - supposedly destroyed but mostly reconditioned and still a force to be reckoned with in battle. Nothing to gloat about actually for the USA even if it had won the fight.
The USA may have the bragging rights, but not necessarily the clout to come out and proclaim victory even before facing a really formidable foe - one that is on par with it. The French had massive bragging rights regarding their Rafale jet, but what happened recently when the Rafales failed even against cheap Chinese J10C. The Rafales had all the experience, but when it comes to the crunch, it failed.
Post a Comment