The suspected adverse reactions of mRNA vaccines were 0.13 percent. The same data for inactivated vaccines was 0.053 percent.
What did the data say of the effectiveness of the two types of vaccines
in preventing adverse cases? The data is from the most authoritative
main media in Singapore, data verified after due diligence by the best
reporters, must be real and difficult to dispute.
Which
is more effective? Sinovac-Coronavac of course. Then why are these
vaccines excluded from the national emergency scheme and people
vaccinated with these vaccines are discriminated? Why are these vaccines
not preferred? Why were there so many reports claiming that mRNA
vaccines are more effective when the data said otherwise?
Would someone be coming out to dispute the ST data?
3 comments:
You cannot argue with people eating poo in their mouths and claim it is sugar, so says a Chinese (Teochew) saying.
They have the MSM, the authority in charge, the Western propaganda machine behind them. Who can win them in arguments.
Joker Joe Biden has an official annual budget of US$300 Million, excluding the secret budget used by the CIA and NSA, to demonize China and everything Chinese. This budget must have its tentacles stretching all the way into the holes of someone in the Expurts Committee or the Clownish Duo in the Multi-Millionaire Tasked And Forced.
The new narrative now says that if you are fully vaccinated, good for you, but please stay home and do not go out.
The hope that by fully vaccinating the whole country we can open up is maybe just wishful thinking. A few good examples of doubtfulness are now on display, waiting to be studied.
How many times have Red Dot been attempting to open up and retracted. Even with more than 80% fully vaccinated citizens, we are still playing hide and seek with the virus.
Living with the virus? The virus wants to live with us, but can we live with the virus is the question.
Post a Comment