Covid19 - New York Times vaccine safety rankings

 

 
New York Times vaccine safety rankings

1. Sinopharm 

2. Sinovac

3. Kexing 

4. CanSino

5. Astrazeneca 

6. Pfizer

7. Moderna

8. John and Johnson 

9. Novavax 

10. Satellite 5(Russian) 

This is a very interesting and revealing data from New York Times. What is more revealing are things that were not said or written and readers would have to figure out what New York Times did not say or did not want to tell.

In the first place we need to take it that New York Times did not come up with the rankings by guessing but with statistics to support it or they would be sued or accused to spreading misinformation. Pfizer, Moderna, John and Johnson, Novavax would be very unhappy with their low rankings and be ranked lower than Astrazeneca.

Let me elaborate on this point first. Astrazeneca has very bad safety records and most European countries have banned its use. The Americans have a hoard of Astrazeneca vaccines and are giving it away for fear of adverse side effects. Japan too refused to use it and dumped what they had to Taiwan.

So, how dangerous is Astrazeneca? When the Americans, Europeans and Japanese think it is not fit and unsafe to be used, trust them and stop using them as the risk is too high, unacceptable risk. Some Asean countries are still using it out of no choice as they did not have enough supplies of other vaccines. It is a case of between the devil and the deep blue sea. 

Given the fact that Astrazeneca is unsafe, bad enough to use, why should any country be using vaccines that are more unsafe than Astrazeneca?  Pfizer and Moderna are both ranked lower than Astrazeneca. Logically they should be more unsafe and should not be used. Oh, the new slogan, the benefits outweigh the risk! 

How serious is the risk compares to Astrazeneca? Now one is talking about it or reporting it. They only reported the adverse effects of Astrazeneca. Imagine how much adverse data have been covered up, not to be reported. Imagine why so many silly leaders are still singing about how good Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are and encouraging their people to use them...when it is more unsafe than the already banned in many countries Astrazeneca?  Would or should Pfizer and Moderna be banned too? Why not?

The other important point to note is NY Times is anti China and always out to smear China and of course Chinese vaccines. For them to rank four Chinese vaccines at the top, safer than their darlings Pfizer and Moderna, must be something that they had no choice but to do so. There must be overwhelming evidence that proved that the Chinese vaccines are far safer than the American vaccines. Some stupid politicians are still trying to investigate if Chinese vaccines are safe and claiming ignorance and not enough data. Surely the NY Times rankings did not mean much to them, probably unreliable.

NY Times must have all the data of the vaccines on the table for comparison. And they had the gumption to rank Pfizer and Moderna lower than even a dangerous and banned Astrazeneca said it all. They could not do otherwise. The data must have all the adverse effects of Pfizer and Moderna that the public would not be privy to, not allowed to know. But NY Times know and has to admit the facts and thus cannot say they are safer than Astrazenca or safer than the Chinese vaccines, something that they were dying to do so. And Pfizer and Moderna would not dare to sue NYT to clear their names.

Now, what do you think? Why would countries be pushing for a much unsafe vaccine to their people instead of safer vaccines? Are they mad or irresponsible or there is something else that we don't know?

I am written sometimes back that this is a rare and unusual occasion when the white people deliberately chose to inject their people with poison, an act of God, to terminate themselves. Now the proof is here. They have safer vaccines but did not want to use but insisting on using less safe vaccines. How not the white men destroy themselves willingly when they chose to act based on political exigency?

The full impact of injecting poison into their bodies would only blossom in the near future, maybe 5 years or more. By then it would be too late for those injected with these unsafe vaccines. By then there is no way to rewind the clock. The rice would be cooked.

Good riddance for the evil crimes against humanity committed over a few centuries. The debt must be repaid.

With the finding that the mRNA vaccines did not or cannot prevent the infection, many are still stubbornly sticking to the belief that mRNA vaccines are still the panacea, the must have vaccines, the must jab to be safe. But this narrative is changing and the new narrative is that it would prevent an infection from getting worse with statistics selected to substantiate the belief. How real is this? Is it too much to admit that the narrative of the best thing to have is falling apart, not as what was bragged and believed? Only time will tell.

PS. You have been warned by NYT that Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are less safe than Astrazeneca. In another word, poison, as some scientists have called them.