SGX proposes to make it easier to become remisiers

With an industry that is dying, and they still did not know why or refused to know why it is dying, SGX is trying very hard to want to prevent the industry from having to fold up. Unfortunately it is only a matter of when before the final nail is slammed into the coffin to seal its fate if they refused to see what is wrong with the stock market.
 
Good companies are delisting, trading volumes hitting record low, the gloating of increasing volumes in derivative trades would not help to tell a different story. It is so pathetic that a healthy industry, the envy of many, has reached such a state of despair, all because of a stupid decision to allow computers to trade against everyone and redesigning the whole system to facilitate the computers to make the killing.
So, what is there to attract more new remisiers into the industry? What is there to prevent good companies from delisting when listing in the exchange is meaningless, cannot raise fund and share prices being shagged to penny stocks?
 
The reality, the income in the stock market is worst than the income of fishmongers and vegetable sellers in the wet market. So, who would want to be a remisier in the stock market? If the income is less than $1,000 or in a good month, $2,000 net, without CPF, with no staff benefits, no paid leave, no paid holidays etc etc, I would think such jobs would only be good enough for people with 3 O levels. It just does not make sense for people who have better qualifications and could earn more to want to join the industry.
 
OK, for the investment specialists that could be earning $3,000 a month, maybe the qualifications and entry level could be a little bit higher. But how high before putting off the potential workers who could get more in any other jobs? With so many stringent requirements and examinations to take, just to earn $1,000 to $3,000, would it be more ‘senang’ to be a Grab or Uber driver, and earning much more, and could own a car some more?
 
Only the daft would still be thinking that smart Singaporeans would be crawling on their knees to come begging to become remisiers. Only the daft would think that the stock market would somehow come to live again without having to remove the cancer.
 
If one does not know the cause of an illness, or refuses to want to know the cause of an illness, how could the illness be cured? What is the point of prescribing medicine for flu when the patient is dying from AIDs? More cosmetics would not do much to stop a dying patient from dying.