APEC 2024 Peru. Biden shafted to a corner in the back row. Xi in front row next to Peru's President
12/17/2008
Fair to who?
HDB has replied to See Leong Kit and again said that market pricing is the fairest way to go, but fair to who? Would the new buyers buying the same batch of flats and paying another $180k or $200k think that it is fair? There are many questions to be asked. What is the mission of HDB? Where are the statistics to show that there is a big market subsidy? What are the comparable flats that HDB is using to compute these new prices? Are the pricing static or forward looking? Or are they pegged in a similar model as electricity prices? With the property markets coming down rapidly, would the current pricing be fair to the new buyers?
Actually these questions are unlikely to get a reply. The HDB has replied and case is closed. Those new buyers in the second batch should blame it on the market prices and accept the fact that they have to buy the flats from HDB at the new inflated prices. They must pay the higher prices to be fair to other buyers of other HDB flats.
I don't buy the logic. But what is fair to one may not be fair to another. Who is to decide what is fair? Equal pain or equal gain?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
The way the HDB replied gives the impression that slapping the new buyers with $180k is nothing to bother about. Maybe to the policy makers $180k is chicken feed.
Just about one third of a peanut only mah!
should have thought of that.
Post a Comment