WASHINGTON: US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Friday (Jun 16) that his coming visit to China aims to open up better communications "by addressing misperceptions and avoiding miscalculations".
"Intense competition requires sustained diplomacy to ensure that competition does not veer into confrontation or conflict," Blinken said. CNA
The Americans are trying to deceive the world and China that they are trying to avoid conflict and war by visiting China to talk about avoiding miscalculations. Blinken is just the typical white men that went to talk peace with the Red Indians but harbouring plans to massacre them and steal their land, with a bible in hand and a gun behind his back.
To understand where he is coming from, one must understand where and what were the causes of instability, threats and crisis in East and the South China Sea region. The main provocateur of instability, crisis and war is the Americans. In the north, they have been provoking and threatening North Korea with their military bases, flying nuclear bombers and conducting military exercises to simulate an invasion of North Korea on the waters of North Korea. Further south, they have been agitating and encouraging Taiwan to break away from China. In the South China Sea, they have been inciting and goading the Asean states to claim Chinese islands with promises of military support and intervention.
These are the causes and roots of instability and war making potentials. Without the Americans pulling all the strings, sending their war planes and warships into the region, there is no crisis, no tension and no crisis.
This trip by Blinken for talks with China is nothing different from talks about Code of Conduct in the sea and airspace around China. In this talk the Americans would also be talking about Taiwan, a domestic issue of China. What the Americans are going to tell China is very simple. They are going to do this and that, and China must not do this and not do that. In other words, the Americans are saying, we are going to mess with China and it is best that China stay out of the way of the Americans, to avoid any miscalculation that would lead to a war.
In the case of Taiwan, the Americans are going to tell the Chinese, China cannot reunite with Taiwan, they are going to sell weapons to Taiwan, they are going to station troops in Taiwan, they are going to send their politicians to Taiwan to instigate the Taiwan independence movement, they are going to defend Taiwan militarily. And China must not stop the Americans from what they are doing and going to do to keep Taiwan independent from China. And to avoid miscalculations, China must stay away from Taiwan and American forces. This is outright and blatant interference in China's internal affairs, and outright confrontation with China coaxed in American deceptive words and language of talks. They are telling China that they are the Empire and Taiwan is under their protection. Would China be duped by Blinken to talk about its internal affairs, of reuniting with Taiwan and be told to accept the Americans' conditions...to avoid a crisis and miscalculations?
Also, the Americans are going to tell the Chinese that they are going to sail their warships through the Strait of Taiwan and their aircraft carriers in the East China Sea. And China must stay away from the American warships to avoid miscalculation. Would China show the Americans the middle finger and tell the Americans that these are hostile and unwelcome military presence and China would deal with them accordingly as China deems fit, not as desired or told by the Americans.
In the case of North Korea, the Americans would want to keep their military bases, weapons, including nuclear weapons in South Korea and would continue with their provocative military threats against North Korea with their allies South Korea, Japan and now the Philippines. They would increase their war machine and soldiers in South Korea. And China must stay away in a war with North Korea. Would China accept that?
In the seas and airspace around China, including the South China Sea, the Americans would want to continue to send their warplanes and warships to conduct espionage and spying missions in these area, including the provocative 'freedom of navigation' missions, and China must keep away from the American warplanes and warships, and to keep them safe, not to interfere with their provocative behaviours. Would China accept these demands, now coaxed as terms of negotiation to avoid miscalculations, so that the Americans can do what they want around China?
The latest, the Americans and the Japanese are sending their coast guard ships to patrol the South China Sea. Coast guards are the equivalent of the police force used to patrol a country's territorial seas. The Americans and the Japanese are claiming the South China Sea as their territorial waters. For them to send their coast guards to patrol the seas, this is a de facto ownership of the waters in the South China Sea. The American crony Asean states would not see this expansionist act of the Americans and the Japanese to claim the South China Sea. Eventually their coast guards would make it a permanent presence in the region, like it belongs to them. And Blinken is going to set the rules for China not to intercept or chase away these coast guard ships. Would China allow this to happen and accept it as a fait accompli?
Forget about sleeping Asean. Some are in cahoot with the Americans to control the South China Sea militarily. This is Expansionism and provocation by the Americans, acts of hostility to challenge China's control in the South China Sea. These are dangerous rogue behaviours that would lead to a crisis. With so many foreign warships messing around in Chinese waters, miscalculations would happen that could lead to confrontation.
Avoiding miscalculation is not to tell China that it cannot do this and that to confront the foreign forces. Avoiding miscalculation is for the hostile foreign forces to stay away from the region and not to provoke China with their hostile and aggressive warplanes and warships.
If the Americans and hostile foreign powers stay away from the region, there will be peace and no crisis, and no need to worry about miscalculations. There will be no need for Blinken to fly to Beijing to threaten and tell the Chinese about such risks. Just stay away from Chinese airspace and territorial waters. Just stay out of Taiwan and stop all the mischievous and gangster behaviours on Taiwan. Period.
PS. This is standard gangster tactic. They create troubles and then come and talk terms to prevent trouble, as if they are the good guys. And if you ignore them, they would blame you for not wanting to talk to avoid trouble.
7 comments:
Singapore is neutral? Red dot's actions doesn't match its words, just like the US
FM Balakrishnan noted that Singapore is a critical security partner of the US, “hosting American ships and aircraft, sending pilots to train in the skies above Arizona and Idaho”.
He said: “For six decades now, the strategic partnership between the United States and Singapore, rooted in respect for the rules-based international order, has helped strengthen peace and stability in the region and around the world.”
Good morning All
Blinking Idiot Blinken Blink here Blink There are now too afraid that their Rickety Whacked Old Grandpa Send to Scrapyards Sampan Warships will be taken down by the PLA Navies
That's why he said needed Communications with the PRCs and avoid any miscalculations.
NATO and the UAssA feared the Kamikaze Styles of Putin's ways of their provacations by confronting the face to face.
Now China seemed to be now following Putin's style of doing the same.
Enough is Enough.
As Scott Ritter said UAss could never ever win a war with China and would be sucicidal.
The Americunts could do some damage to China but they be defeated soundly with their Navies sunk to their watery deep of South China Seas.
Chinese General had said "We dont want troubles but are NOT afraid of troubles"
So just come and meet us in the Skies and Seas with all your Gang of Doggies Jepun, the Philippines and South Korea and ASEAN if you dafts wanted to join in and see what's we present you.
See how both Eunches smiled and grabbed each other.
Both Scoundrols of the same stock and genes.
Think the Chinese don't know Red Dot's smelly odours.
Yesterday's ST front page Sinking Land heading towards a Recession.
Many young Sinkies still have NOT the notions of Cantonese version of "May See Kor" and Hokkien One of "Ai Beh Si Kay" with their free styles of living in imaginary good times are forever myths.
Have NOT undergone starvations in their lifes.
Same breath announced due to China's so called slower economy.
Sinkies just wanted to capitalise on the benefits of trading with China but at the same time biting the ones that are on friendly terms with them.
Bloody hypocrites.
The geopolitical leanings of elites who live in colonial bungalows are not congruent with the views of many who live in HDB flats.
China cannot continue to appease this rogue American Empire anymore. When China was weak, it has to accept the bullying and bashing by the rogue Americans. China is now strong enough to kick asses. If China does not stand up to stare eye to eye with the rogue Americans, it would encourage and embolden silly little countries in the West and also silly little Asean countries to misbehave, thinking they could get away standing on the shoulders of the evil American Empire.
China should simply tell Blinken all bets are off. All codes of conduct are off. China will deal with all provocations and interference in its internal affairs as it deems fit, using force if necessary. Force is the only language the rogue Americans and silly little countries understand. All provocative and hostile acts in Chinese airspace and waters would not be safe anymore. China would act and would not ensure the safety of provocateurs and their equipment.
China must not be duped by Blinken about good behaviour and conduct when the rogue American behaviours are all about attacking and suppressing China. After so many years of bullying and lying, China by now must know that white men only tell lies. Not a word is to be believed.
Xi should not give an audience to Blinken. Let Qin Kang to deal with this sneaky snake oil salesman. He is unfit to meet with Xi.
Mr RB
Conmen Americunts thought that they can con Putin like that Drunken Gorbachev Grabachop.chop.
They wanted to negotiate with Putin the control and downsize the number of Atoms Arsenals.
Putin now had Belarus armed with Nuclear and any other country that wanted to defence themselves as detergent with the Atoms can have them.
The UASSA thought that they can con and hoodwink Putin to agree to their proposal of reducing their A-Bombs.
They were just afraid that Putin might put all these into use and had more A-Bombs than all NATO combined.
Thunk Putin is stupid? He told them to go to HELL and shown his middle finger to them.
The West and NATO knew that Putin is not joking and if Russia is threatened he will unleash all his A-Bombs.
If A-Bombs are no more, then the Full Force of all their Mafia Gangs will slaughter Russia.
Putin is NOT GabraChev.
I believe Xi meeting Blinken is not on the cards on the Chinese side. The protocol does not cover this.
But Xi's meeting with Bill Gates has touched a raw nerve with the USA and its media doggies. Bill Gates is even giving US$50 million to China, said to fight Malaria and Tuberculosis. That is even more unacceptable for the USA. What is the agenda of Bill Gates is left to be seen.
That Xi goes out of his way to meet bill Gates, and if he and even senior state officials avoid meeting Blinken, this will in fact send a strong signal that China is annoyed and going all out to put Blinken to shame.
Ursula von de Leyen went back to Brussels boiling with rage, after being slighted by the Chinese leadership that treated her like an invisible woman, after she insisted on tagging along with Macron who visited China in April.
Hope China gives Blinken just a blink of a treatment like Ursula von de Leyen. Just the bare minimum in protocol is sufficient to deal with unruly people.
Post a Comment