Yushui Village in Lijiang, Yunnan, with snow mountain backdrop and cascading waterfalls.
7/25/2013
High frequency trader fined more than $3m by regulators
BBC 22 July 2013-07-23
Financial regulators in the UK and US have fined a high frequency trader and his firm more than $3m (£1.95m) for manipulating commodities markets.
The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) fined Michael Coscia $903,176, while two US regulators levied the rest on him and his company, Panther Energy….
It is the first time the FCA has taken action against a high frequency trader.
Between 6 September 2011 and 18 October 2011, US-based Mr Coscia used algorithmic programs that he developed to create false orders for oil and gas on trading exchanges in the US and UK.
He made about $1.4m during the period using a computer program which placed and quickly cancelled trades to manipulate the price of commodities, an illegal process known as "layering" and "spoofing".
Tracey McDermott, the FCA's director of enforcement and financial crime, said: "Mr Coscia was cheating the market and other participants.
"High frequency trading and the use of algorithms are an important and commonplace part of the markets nowadays but in this case these techniques were deliberately designed to abuse the market, undermining its integrity.
"This is unacceptable, which is why we have taken tough action to punish Coscia and deprive him of any benefit he acquired."…
High frequency trading is coming under increasing scrutiny by regulators. Automated trading was blamed for exacerbating the "flash crash" on Wall Street in May 2010, when blue chips went briefly into freefall, and then recovered almost as quickly.
There have been many reports and complaints about this fraudulent trading methods and how dangerous it is other than cheating other innocent investors. The only reason that they are allowed to practise in stock markets in US and UK is because the lawmakers and regulators have been bought and paid to shut up.
Would HFT be allowed in the Singapore Stock Exchange? Are the Singapore Govt and the regulators fully briefed and understand that this kind of trading is basically cheating the ignorant and innocent investors and would not only cause them to lose their pants, it would eventually destroy the confidence of the stock market for fair play and providing a level playing field.
Would the authority and regulators approve this unfair system that could cause more damage than the Lehman Bonds and toxic notes? The risks and dangers of this trading method are all there to see. Anyone who chooses to ignore them must ultimately be responsible for the damages and fallout when big damages are inflicted on the investors and the stock market. The people who authorise and approve HFT cannot plead ignorance and must be fully held accountable and responsible for full consequences of this decision. The Govt would have to share a big part of the blame.
Everyone has been warned and there is all the time to stop HFT from entering the trading system. Would there be anyone responsible enough to pull the plug and put a stop to this self inflicted impending carnage?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
16 comments:
RB, not so sure about HFT as the products listed on the SGX may not be worth the effort, but algo trading is already in existence in SGX. The launching of an expensive matching engine 2 years back, and the securing of an area for the co-location of servers from interested parties indicate that they would encourage HFT, just that the products and the volume does not justify its developement
In 2008, a lot of Sinkies lose their money, some a lot of it, in structured products from local banks what.
I remember former Presidential candidate TKL even helped them publicise their grievances by organising many rallies at Hong Lim Park just for this matter!
But what happened? PAP still won 93% seats in GE 2011 and TKL even lost his deposit in the 2011 Presidential Election!
And what's the big deal about HFT? Will it cause PAP to lose to WP in GE 2016?
Let's see the carnage and wait for someone in the govt to set up a committee to find out why and pretend to be ignorant.
Even casinos are no big deal, so what is HFT?
CPIB (under PMO) asst director gambled at casino and committed fraud! So is this a big deal?
I think PAP will still win in GE 2016 and remain as govt. And that will be a big deal.
What do you think?
Why you people worry worry? Just set up a review panel and all problems will be taken care of.
HFT is here to stay. Algorithms are being used in virtually every facet of modern industrialised life.
Financial markets have always been the place for the most elaborate scams -- because of the potential for "fast, big money" -- which resonates well with the human default of "highest gain for the least cost, realisable in the short term".
So in the past, and still in the present there've been scams (some legal) like bucket shops, Ponzi schemes, pump and dumps, insider trading, dark pools, industrial espionage, sovereign debt defaults (govts "fuck you in your face" to their borrowers), large unreported loss positions (e.g. LTCM) leading to catastrophic failure...and stuff not even invented yet.
Placing fake orders to manipulate price is not a new thing. Somehow, some way, people are going to figure out how to cheat, and cheat they will.
Singapore is well positioned to become the region's leading HFT centre. Think of it as the Third Casino ;-)
The stock exchange should be place under the gaming and casino acts and be regulated in the same way. It is not investment as we know before and all the retail investors must be warned.
Hey Matilah, where have you been these couple of weeks?
Any paper trade is prone to felony.
Bring back Barter Trade.
@1134 redbean:
Singapore, Indonesia and KL.
Without you around some of the bloggers have been asking for you man.
Good to have you back, in one piece.
Thank you. Great to be back here in Oz. What a trip -- this one was very fruitful. I even got a blowjob at Alkaff Mansion..I mean in the wonderful, manicured gardens.
The supply exchange should be location under the gaming and casino actions and be regulated in the identical way. It is not buying into as we understand before and all the retail investors should be warned.
Regards,
Kopi Luwak
Hi Glan Deas, welcome to the blog. Where are you from?
Post a Comment