6/24/2013

Putin, the one man in the way of the Western Mafia


They wanted regime change in Syria. They wanted President Assad out, replaced. They wanted to arm the rebels, send in Nato troops, bomb Syria. The only thing or man standing in the way is Russia’s Putin. He is a one man show, a Rambo in his own way. He told the Evil Empire and its cronies to lay off Syria.

Putin will support Assad and will not have him removed. The fabricated evidence of Assad’s troops using chemical was bluntly brushed off as nonsense. Putin is not going to let the western mafia push him around and intervene, invade Syria and replace Assad. He stood by Assad as the legitimate leader of Syria.

The G8 ie the western mafia plus Russia, held a meeting to push through their agenda, to remove Assad but ended with red faces when Putin alone refused to budge. Assad is safe with Putin. Obama and his Evil Empire just cannot bull doze through this Russian Rambo.

Actually not really true. Though the West could not get the G8 to come up with a position and stand to intervene in the Syrian War at the meeting, they are still going to bull doze their way by training and supplying arms to the rebels.

15 comments:

Ⓜatilah $ingapura⚠️ said...

I like Putin. He's like a Dr Mahathir but has actually killed people, and has been able to defend himself from being killed.

He's a Dr M with special forces training and the mind of a Sicilian capo di tutti capo.

He's out-thugged all the other thugs of geo politics. Even the oligarchs and Russian mafia are scared of him.

The said...

Now, Edward Snowden is in Russia.

"Putin always seems almost eager to stick a finger in the eye of the United States - whether it is Syria, Iran and now of course with Snowden,"

http://news.yahoo.com/schumer-says-putin-likely-approved-snowden-flight-134245547.html

Anonymous said...

STForum 24June

[Need for balance between national security and privacy]

Eric J. Brooks


"I DISAGREE with Professor Simon Chesterman's assertion
that we should get used to a surveillance society
('Getting used to a surveillance society'; last Wednesday).

History contradicts the claim that
'established intelligence agencies have protocols...
that make it difficult to deploy security resources for personal reasons'.

Those who believe in wholesale data-gathering and surveillance
must address some uncomfortable questions... "


http://www.straitstimes.com/premium/forum-letters/story/need-balance-between-national-security-and-privacy-20130624

Anonymous said...

Most important of all, Putin also knows how to deal with his political opposition at home.

That's why the strongest opposition in his country is also not strong.

Sounds familiar?

Anonymous said...

It's not a matter of how strong or good the government is, but rather how weak and bad is the opposition.

It's not a matter of how good you are for the job, but rather are you the best available for the job?

In the kingdom of the blind, the one eye jack will be King, tio bo?



Anonymous said...

Yahoo! Sg

[Thailand 'white mask' protesters rally in Bangkok]


"The demonstration by the 'V for Thailand' movement --
an enigmatic protest group spawned over social media whose supporters wear the masks of comic book hero 'V' --
was the 4th this month outside the CentralWorld complex in the heart of the city.

Little is known about the leaders or political allegiances of V for Thailand,
but the group has swiftly developed a major social media profile railing against the govt and Thaksin.

The group's Facebook page says it represents 'people power'
urging peaceful opposition to 'parliamentary monopoly and corruption'."


http://sg.news.yahoo.com/thailand-white-mask-protesters-rally-bangkok-221742525.html

Anonymous said...

Putin is a man of not many words, and not a man to mince his words. Blunt, no nonsense and deadly serious.

I think he is far more politicaly astute and knowledgeable than any of the leaders of the West, US included, and knows how to play his cards. Let not the West underestimate his resolve. This man plays for keeps. When he says he supports Assad, the West better believe him.

Anonymous said...

G8 will bulldoze their way alright, by training and supplying arms to the rebels. And Putin will also do the same in supporting Assad.

But, Putin's move will be condemned, using the UN as the pawn to do the trick, while the US and G8's move will be hailed as saving Syria.

As our friend, the late Feed Me to the Fish said, I am sick and tired of being sick and tired of the pure hypocrisy of the US and the West and the UN as well. And not forgetting all the poodles who will yelp along with them.

Anonymous said...

One day the US may support and arm a rebel groups to fight the govt.

denk said...

the Criminals In Action strike again, oops, sorry its the pakistan talibans !

http://zeenews.india.com/news/south-asia/taliban-militants-killed-9-foreign-tourists-2-pakistanis_857065.html

p.s.
in case u haved missed this...
http://therearenosunglasses.wordpress.com/2008/09/15/pakistans-taliban-ttp-are-cia-just-like-i-said/

Anonymous said...

BBC

[China media: Edward Snowden]


"Media in mainland China and Hong Kong continue to demand answers and an apology from Washington
on whistleblower Edward Snowden's revelations of US cyber-espionage.

Communist Party newspaper People's Daily repeats calls for the US govt
to end the 'hypocrisy of a thief shouting "stop thief!"'..."


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-23026275

Anonymous said...

Yahoo! Sg

[Mother of Singapore’s civil society]

By P N Balji


"Constance Singam is considered to be the mother of Singapore's civil society."


http://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/singaporescene/mother-singapore-civil-society-081226367.html

Anonymous said...

G8 or not, it is all about money. From the east to the west, when is it really about peace?

Ⓜatilah $ingapura⚠️ said...

@1046:

>> Eric J. Brooks


"I DISAGREE with Professor Simon Chesterman's assertion
that we should get used to a surveillance society


I don't. I absolutely agree that everyone had better wake up and get used to the idea of being tagged and tabbed.

BUT I don't agree that you should just roll over and comply. You do have OPTIONS.

Firstly, no government gives a shit about your privacy. They will violate your privacy when it suits their objectives. Privacy must then, be protected at the INDIVIDUAL level. It is up to YOU to protect your privacy, or as much as you can. You will not achieve 100% privacy, the government is still going to know something about you.

"National security" is going to continue to be the go-to excuse for the government justifying its snooping activities. Forget George Orwell. It's already been happening for decades, and will only become more "efficient".

Big Data mining, deep packet inspection, traffic analysis, data sharing between sovereign governments etc is all part of day to day life, and as computing power increases (Moore's Law) expect it to get bigger, faster and cheaper.

Anonymous said...

Putin has more IQ than the sum of entire US senate.

ross
http://rt.com/op-edge/