Alice Huang barred from re-entering Singapore; insufficient evidence she committed offences in Megaspeed probe: MHA
An independent investigation into several companies, including Megaspeed and their key officers, began in February 2025. "Singapore is committed to upholding our reputation as a trusted and reliable business hub," the Ministry of Home Affairs said.In February 2026, after consulting the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC), police concluded that there was insufficient evidence to establish that Huang had committed any offences relating to the possible inaccurate declarations for which Megaspeed was being investigated. CNA
Oh, her crime is not providing ' inaccurate information to downplay her role in the company during investigations'. Guilty until proven innocent? Why not allow her to defend her case?
'In a press conference on Mar 3, 2025, Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs K Shanmugam said that the investigations were not based on any request from any country or sovereign entity.' CNA. Why need to explain this?
Was it a crime for buying Nvidia chips in Malaysia? The chips were found in Malaysia and have not been reexported. Trump had lifted the ban for China to buy the chips. China can buy the chips officially but refusing to import them. Billions of dollars of H200 chips are stuck in Hong Kong, not allowed to enter China. So, what is the problem? Having affairs a crime?
PS. Alice Huang was questioned and had her passport seized in June 2025. By February 2026, however, investigators found insufficient evidence that she had committed the suspected offenses. She received a warning for knowingly providing inaccurate information about her role at Megaspeed and was barred from re-entering Singapore.
Notably, Singapore stressed that she had never been investigated for espionage....
According to CNN, US intelligence officials remain divided over whether the evidence establishes that Alice Huang worked for Beijing. Attorney General Todd Blanche said that the Justice Department had reached “no conclusions” about her alleged intelligence ties.
The assessments leave a fundamental question unanswered: how did an unproven espionage allegation gain such traction despite the lack of conclusive evidence? RT
2 comments:
Just to make the master happy.
Correct, if this lady is a juice, do you think the G dare to investigate her?
Post a Comment