China must ban mischievous visitors for life for bragging about raising Taiwan, Tibet and Xinjiang when in China

 Several European delegations led by their Presidents or PMs had visited China or are going to China, Merz just landed and Trump biting his nails if he will really be in Beijing. Their official agenda recently are all about trade, nothing about Taiwan, Tibet or Xinjiang. China would not allow silly and mischievous visitors to raise issues to embarrass or attack China while in China. This used to be the standard practice of western countries in the past, when China was weak and needed to trade with them. Trump may be slapping Xi everyday, but when in China, he also behaves and stays clear of stupid talks.

This silly practice has been stopped hence. But it still did not prevent silly European leaders from claiming that they raised such issues while in China like the rogues led by Von de Leyen and Antonio Costa. They were sent around Beijing in buses instead of the usual Red Flag limousines. After their short trip and meeting on the same morning of arrival, they held a press briefing in Beijing and claimed to have raised issues of human rights to tell the Washington regime that they did what was told. China did the necessary, sent them out on the next flight without even offering lunch. No lunch for silly clowns. In and out of Beijing within hours as unwelcomed visitors.

China was too kind. China must make it a policy that any clowns visiting China and raising such silly issues will be banned for life from entering Greater China. And if they raised it in China, kick them out in the first flight available, to anywhere, and let them sort out their own shit. China must watch out for Merz to do the same silly act and be prepared to kick him out immediately and ban him for life from visiting China.

When visitors come visiting, China always treat them the best. But if they are rude and mischievous, China needs not be gracious. Rogues do not deserve any courtesy treatment. Kick them out no more visit to China. Such a policy will keep the rascals away from China for good. Period.

When  Emperor Trump can learn good manners while in Beijing, why allowed silly little clowns to do otherwise? Trump can be unpredictable anywhere, especially in the White House, but Trump is very predictable when in Beijing. Or else he can kiss all his family business in China goodbye.

Disinformation campaign attacking Singapore and Lawrence Wong

 CNA reported on the disinformation campaign attacking Singapore and Lawrence Wong. The police is investigation and has reported to YouTube to remove all the offending videos but not its entirety. It was reported that the culprits were likely to be state backed operators but it's identity was not disclosed, unlike an earlier incident when it was so quick to point the fingers at China. Maybe this time it is not China, so needed to be more careful about disclosure of the attackers. Such disinformation campaign is quite sophisticated and not easy to be tracked. Often when it could be tracked, very likely it was a red herring, to intentionally allow it to be traced to the wrong source, a false flag incident. The perpetrators are normally experts in this field and kucing kurap investigators are unlikely to be good enough to do the job.

Who is likely behind this attack is still in the dark. The only way is to speculate from whatever facts that are available, their intent and purpose, and circumstantial evidence and who is likely to benefit from it. It was stated that the Chinese text used was the version used in Taiwan, not simplified Chinese. Simpletons may jump the gun to say it must be Taiwan as China was using simplified Chinese. The smarter ones would say it was to mislead, but actually to say the Chinese are so stupid to want to directly implicate Taiwan and easily got caught red handed. Both are likely to be equally wrong.

Another way is to look at the content. The videos were likely to be AI generated and purportedly used Charlie Munger as the cover and with many references to Munger's life experience and expertise in investment strategies. The texts were then translated from English to Chinese using AI or a translation app. The creator is likely to be well versed in the biography of Charlie Munger and with quite an in depth knowledge of investment and the intricacies of stock markets, and thus be able to push out fairly coherent narratives with appropriate investment jargons and stories.

These could be the giveaway clue of the creator or parties behind the videos. Who are the likely people that knew Charlie Munger so well and also about his investment philosophies, policies and strategies?

What about the intent and purpose of the disinformation campaign? In a way, they were selling the story that China was unhappy with Lawrence Wong. In another way, it was to create a rift between China and Singapore/Lawrence Wong, that Lawrence Wong had offended China or China was offended by Lawrence Wong. Who or which party will benefit if China Singapore relations or Lawrence Wong's relation with China were negatively affected? 

Another insinuation is to imply that Hsien Loong was not happy with Lawrence, or agitating Hsien Loong to remove Lawrence as PM...to whose advantage if Lawrence is removed? Someone wanting Lawrence's seat?

There are many ways to read the intention and objective of this disinformation campaign. I think, try to picture who will benefit from it is likely to provide a better lead to the source of the disinformation.

What do you think?

American democracy? Looks like Trump and family owns America

I think the latest Trump tariff announcement is the straw that will break the camel's back. Countries can just stop exporting or reducing their exports to the USA and what can Trump do with his tariff threat? Trump does not realize that the USA relies on the world more than what the world needs from USA.

BRICS and the Global South countries have defanged the bullying of the USA with member countries doing more trade with each other than with the USA. Trump accused them of playing games, while it is he himself that is playing stupid games and hoping to win stupid prizes.

China has already set an example by reducing its exports to the USA, and it is up to the world to wise up and follow and not be bullied by hiding heads in the sand. This latest rhetoric by Trump will never end, so long as he can use such tools to enrich himself, his family and cronies.

How could the world possibly keep making changes to its trading position with the USA when Trump is moving the goalpost all the time. No time in history has world trade been subjected to such chaos, confusion and uncertainty as during Trump's second term. It is the creation of just one man's whims and fancies and should not be allowed to hold the world hostage forever.


Anonymous

Nuclear treaty talk - USA can have 1000 warheads, China can have 100

The USA 'demands' that China must be a party to any arms control setup. The question is what kind of setup that is not under the control of the USA or the West? The Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT) between Russia and USA has been allowed to lapse by the USA itself on February 5th, 2026, so why is the USA now trying to play games by dragging the issue of China not being a party to the negotiations for a new treaty, when China is already a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty. The reason that China is building up its nuclear arsenal is no different from the USA doing the same in secret. The USA cannot be trusted on anything under the sun and certainly not its claim to morality under any treaty.

China's nuclear arsenal is only a fraction of what the USA or Russia now possessed. China will be writing its demise by allowing itself to be dragged into a trap where it cannot increase its deterrence. China may even be told when to and when not to use its nuclear weapons in times of conflict, lol.

China must never be dictated to by any kind of deal prefixed by the word 'demand'. Trump can do what he likes even with agreements in place and can opt out to enable him to increase his arsenal, after which he will again make demands. Why pull out of nuclear deal and then try to force the other party to the table? Just look at the nuclear deal with Iran, which he tore apart after just two years in force. Is this the kind of deal that China will want to go into?


Anonymous

Christian money supporting Jewish ambition in the Middle East!

Americans and Europeans are traditionally anti Jews, anti Semitism. Hitler pushed this anti Semitism to its limits with his holocaust. He did not complete his job and now we have the tragedy in the Middle East, particularly to the Palestinians and the Arabs and Muslims in general. But anti Semitism is still deeply rooted in America as Christians and the Jews are religiously incompatible, thesis and  anti thesis. They are opposing religions, intolerable to each other. 

Jews practise Judaism. Jews are not Christians, but anti Christians. The Jews put Jesus to death for blasphemy, condemning Jesus as a fraud. There is no Christian church in Israel, banned. Anti Semitism among the Americans is natural.

To think that America is using Christian tax money to support the cause of the Jews, to genocide the Palestinians, is utterly shocking. Are the American Christians aware that they are paying for the Jews to kill the Arabs and Muslims, and to ban Christianity in Israel and Israel occupied Palestinian land? Are the American Christians aware that many churches in Palestine, Syria and Lebanon were bombed and destroyed by the Israelis, killing Christians in the churches?

Why are the American Christians not protesting and not stopping their govt from using their tax money to support the Israelis that are anti Christians?