Embassy of Russia in Singapore on ST column by Ang Moh 
On
 October 12, 2024, we read in the Straits Times another opus entitled 
"Putin likely to boost efforts to confuse European public as Ukraine war
 rages” by its international affairs correspondent Jonathan Eyal.
The feeling is mixed – bewilderment, misunderstanding, and indignation.
It
 seems that not being able to understand the true causes of Europe’s 
problems and its political and economic difficulties, rooted in the 
complete loss of sovereignty and its growing dependence on the US, the 
author, driven by a vicious logic, seeks to find the source of his fears
 in others.
The stereotypical anti-Russian logic, which has been 
implanted into the mass consciousness of Europeans at the instigation of
 Washington since the start of the hybrid war against Russia in Ukraine,
 suggests to Mr Eyal, as we understand, a convenient solution.
Indeed,
 how simple is that… All problems with ensuring the security of weapons 
arsenals, man-made disasters, fires, explosions at military-industrial 
complex enterprises, fraud using ICT, failures in the operation of 
transport networks, disruption of GPS signals, etc., are attributed to 
the machinations of Moscow and the Russian special services. Of course, 
without any evidence, but only to please their own philistine ideas.
Wake
 up, Mr Eyal! Stop being afraid of yourself, delve into your anxieties, 
get rid of the American-dependency complex, and try to look at things 
from an unbiased perspective...
Then, we are sure, you will see 
the things differently. It will become clear, that it was Russia that 
sought to create a system of equal and indivisible security in Europe, 
and it was Moscow that called for a reliable legal basis for it. It was 
we who warned about the challenges created by eastward NATO expansion, 
its expansion into the Asia-Pacific region; it was we who demanded an 
end to the genocide of everything Russian in Ukraine, which Western 
strategists have chosen as a battleground for unleashing a hybrid war 
against Russia. It is we who remain open to dialogue on a peaceful 
resolution of the conflict, but on the basis of equality and in line 
with our interests and changed realities.
We are convinced that once you get to the heart of the matter, you will feel better and calmer.
And
 stop denigrating and involving in your dishonest reasoning the name of 
the recognized leader of the Russian people, President Vladimir V. 
Putin. His authority is well deserved, recognized throughout the world 
and stands above any slander.
Anonymous 
 
1 comment:
Who wants to read that propaganda rag? Fit only for picking up dog poo!
Post a Comment