The bivalent vaccines will thus offer broad protection against Covid-19 and better protection against the Omicron variant, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Bringing in bivalent vaccines to Singapore
Speaking in Parliament, Ong shared that the bivalent vaccines are provided for in Singapore's agreements with pharmaceutical companies.
As vaccine formulations improve, the government will continue to update its National Vaccination Programme. CNA
I am sure everyone must still have vivid memories of the 96% efficacy claim of mRNA vaccines and felt cheated and stupid for taking the claim for at face value without asking what this 96% efficacy meant. Superficially it must have been taken as 96% effectiveness in preventing infection. But apparently this is not true and no one is wiser what it really meant. And knowing how pervasive and widespread are the infection in the USA and countries using mRNA vaccines, it can simply be ruled out that the vaccines are anything but effective in preventing infection. So, its seems that the narrative is now about preventing severe illness and death or something like that ah. Even this is not clear. What did the vaccines really prevent or protect? How effective against severe illness and death? Anyone got any idea other than hearing some wild claims and motherhood statements that it is effective and must be jabbed and boostered many times, the more the merrier, oops, the more the better?
What about complications, what about brain damages and other illnesses that are being reported in alternative media but not a whisper in the main media? Why are main media so quiet to the point of not wanting to report anything about adverse effects of the infection and the vaccines? There are now so many questions that needed to be answer, so many suspicious things happening that are causing alarm to those infected and those vaccinated by mRNA vaccines.
The above report has one assumption, everything is fine with mRNA vaccines and the new derivatives, including the bivalent vaccines, and children would also be fine when boostered by the new bivalent vaccines. There is nothing to worry about. Ok, the experts said so. Who are the experts? Politicians or medical professionals or pharmaceutical operators? Who is deciding that the bivalent vaccines are safe even for children and children must be boostered?
Also, look at the above two phrases that I have highlighted in bold, 1, offer broad protection against Covid-19 and better protection against the Omicron variant, 2, Singapore's agreements with pharmaceutical companies.
Anyone understand what is the meaning of broad protection against
Covid19 and better protection against Omicron variant? It sounds like
motherhood statement without any details. You want to know what this
really meant? The 96% efficacy is as good as what the koyote man said.
Also, what agreements did govts signed with the pharmaceutical companies?
Is the idea of
boosting the children part of the agreement with the pharmaceutical companies? Hope it is not and the decision would be made independently by medical experts and not by pharmaceutical companies.
The agreements are secret? If it is secret, what is it that the public ought to known but unable to know because it is secret? The vaccine trial results were supposed be locked up for 75 years. When would these secret agreements be made public? Would the American public also pursue this, to make the secret agreements no longer secret? Oh, not sure if the American govt signed such secret agreements with the pharmaceutical companies.
What do you think?
7 comments:
Good morning Mr RB and All
Aiyyo! Very simple lah! They will simply tell you that there are new strains that kept elvoving lah !
Anyone wanted to counter their revelations?
Ponzi and pyramid professionals anyone dared to prove them wrong.
Especially with that WHO WHO names dropping and that all powerful UAssA FarkChee's sermons like their White God who dared defile them
COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters for Young Adults: A Risk-Benefit Assessment and Five Ethical Arguments against Mandates at Universities
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4206070
50 Pages Posted: 12 Sep 2022
Kevin Bardosh
University of Washington; University of Edinburgh - Edinburgh Medical School
Allison Krug
Artemis Biomedical Communications LLC
Euzebiusz Jamrozik
University of Oxford
Trudo Lemmens
University of Toronto - Faculty of Law
Salmaan Keshavjee
Harvard University - Harvard Medical School
Vinay Prasad
University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)
Martin A. Makary
Johns Hopkins University - Department of Surgery
Stefan Baral
John Hopkins University
Tracy Beth Høeg
Florida Department of Health; Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital
Abstract
Students at North American universities risk disenrollment due to third dose COVID-19 vaccine mandates. We present a risk-benefit assessment of boosters in this age group and provide five ethical arguments against mandates. We estimate that 22,000 - 30,000 previously uninfected adults aged 18-29 must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent one COVID-19 hospitalisation.
Using CDC and sponsor-reported adverse event data, we find that booster mandates may cause a net expected harm:
per COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented in previously uninfected young adults, we anticipate 18 to 98 serious adverse events, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities. Given the high prevalence of post-infection immunity, this risk-benefit profile is even less favourable.
University booster mandates are unethicalbecause:
1) no formal risk-benefit assessment exists for this age group;
2) vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people;
3) mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission;
4) US mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes; and
5) mandates create wider social harms.
We consider counter-arguments such as a desire for socialisation and safety and show that such arguments lack scientific and/or ethical support. Finally, we discuss the relevance of our analysis for current 2-dose COVIDovid-19 vaccine mandates in North America.
https://rumble.com/v1iz7yh-dr.-peter-mccullough-finally-the-truth-about-covid-3919.html
Not surprisingly, it seems like Remdesivir and Paxlovid are being promoted here in Sinkieland for covid cases while cheap and proven drugs like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine are banned as directed by the US masters.
https://rumble.com/v1j5p5l-fda-approve-ba.5-vaccine-no-human-trials.html
https://rumble.com/vwpi0x-ivermectin-more-evidence-dr.-john-campbell.html
Whatever is adopted in the US, it will be repeated here hook, line and sinker.
Just like CNN, CNBA, and of course CNA
Beginning to sound like the medical version of F35...Mega fail inspite of billions pumped in to fix defects!
🤣🤣🤣
The way the Minister puts it really make me very scared. Scare of what?
Scare of anything signed with the pharmaceutical companies. Who is the representative who signed the documents? On what basis did he/she signed the documents? What proof does he/she has to say that the "vaccines" works?
And about the Minister who said the things he said. He seems to have no confidence in what he has said. Why? Because, if he has the confidence, he would have told us what made the vaccine safe. Sad to say, he never. He left it for us to guess. My guess is as good as yours. What is it?
Just imagine, one high flyer at Temasick signed the CONtract with the Big Pharmaceutical Company, without proof or validity of successful experiments being done by our own people, blindly signed the CONtract with the Big Buoya Pharmaceutical Company and now expect the whole country to buy it?
What the hell is going on?
End of Covid-19 pandemic ‘in sight’, says World Health Organisation
Full article at:
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/other/end-of-covid-19-pandemic-in-sight-says-world-health-organisation/ar-AA11PpRG?ocid=winp1taskbar&cvid=1524df68e674470982b369a4878db9d5
Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
“We have never been in a better position to end the pandemic – we are not there yet, but the end is in sight.
So why the need to sign contract with pharmeceutical companies??
Post a Comment