The Australians have been conned into buying nuclear submarines, paying US$385b, to protect the American Empire. These submarines would be used to fight China or Russia in the name of defending Australia. In reality, the submarines are meant to defend the American Empire.
This con job is applicable to Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines and many countries in Europe, and used to be in the Middle East, all buying American weapons to defend the American Empire.
Don't expect much intelligence from descendants of convicts.
Paul Keating said such submarines are least suitable to defend Australia, an island as such, all surrounded by water. Australians have been conned into paying an amount almost a quarter of its GDP, to basically help the USA to maintain its hegemony in Asia.
ReplyDeleteAnd do not be also believe in the lies that no nuclear weapons will be on board those submarines in time to come. They will hype up the China threat and you will see nuclear weapons being introduced into this part of the world. This is the way they work around, first denying then going forward with their plan.
Nothing more, nothing less. Never forget that the USA lies, cheat and steal all the time.
Once Australia has acquired nuclear weapons, it would behave like Israel to bully Indonesia and the Pacific Islanders. And no one would dare to fight back as the Aussies could use nuclear weapons to threaten them.
ReplyDeleteThese white robbers must be evicted out of Australia before they do too much harm to the region.
What about Sinkieland buying very expensive F-35s only to have the jets parked on American soil?
ReplyDeleteAlso protecting its master US empire
DeleteAh Q bought a Rolls Royce and parks it in London and gives instruction for his driver to warm up the engine every morning.
ReplyDeleteThe USA and Australia can dream about using deep water submarines to come close to the Chinese shoreline in times of confrontation. As Paul Keating said, the whole length of the Chinese shoreline is shallow, lined with sensors and any submarine attempting to sneak closer to the Chinese mainland will immediately be discovered, monitored and taken care of.
ReplyDeleteRemember the USA submarine that was sneaking around the South China Sea and got hit by an unknown object, and had to slither away for repairs some time ago? The USA said then that they did not know what the object that their submarine hit was, but they said it was not another submarine. Do you understand what they are saying? Not knowing what the object was and yet claiming it was 'not' another submarine.
That was just a sneak preview of what lies in the South China Sea area and even further South, with a Chinese underwater submarine base hidden under Hainan Island. Now it is even better with Chinese deterrents sited further offshore from China's shoreline.
And that is providing USA with further narratives and ammunition to rally their doggies to raise objections against China's extention of its military reach, labelling it a threat. Do you think the USA really cares about those islands in the South China Sea area, some of which are basically so tiny, just the size of a park according to Paul Keating.
But the USA, as usual, working with its blood thirsty mind and its dirty hands, are using the issue to instigate and create bad blood between China and other claimants. Territorial claims should be settled by those around the region, not someone having no business poking its nose and pouring more fuel into fire.
Just like the India/China border dispute over the Himalayas, India declined to take up the USA's offer to mediate, as they know the USA will instead create a bigger problem for the two countries to reconcile. I also wonder whether China was willing to take up the offer as well.
To understand the USA's agenda, look no further than the Iran/Saudi Arabia stand off, with the USA unable, or should I say unwilling, to bring about a peace deal after almost a decade. They want to keep the stand off between Iran and Saudi Arabia in perpetual suspension and reap all the benefits, selling arms to Saudi Arabia to fight the Yemenis supported by Iran. And China managed to broker the peace deal after keeping the USA out of the room in Beijing. If countries want to succeed in making deals, keep the USA out of the room is the lesson to be learnt.
That brings me to my favourite Native American saying - 'If you see two fish fighting in a pool of water, look around and you will see a White man standing nearby'. How true!
USA co-operating with ASEAN on Myanmar issue means the issue can never be resolved. This is one thing that is as sure as the sun rises.
ReplyDeleteThe USA is going for a regime change in Myanmar, clear and simple. It wants to control Myanmar, which shares a wide common border with China and you know what is in the USA's mind. It is the same mindset about helping Nato to include Ukraine in its fold to move closer to target Russia.
And that means having to remove the strong military leadership in Myanmar that is proving a hindrance to its intention. They instigated that intention for a long time, and when Aung San Syu Kyi got a foothold in Government, they were rubbing their hands in glee. But the military knows more than that about installing democracy, and took over control.
This one cannot blame the Americans. Silly Asean leaders will flip to be screwed by the Americans when the Americans come and say nice things to them. Now the Americans are going to screw Myanmar. Which Asean state would be next?
ReplyDeleteAfter being screwed so many times by the Americans, the Asean states did not learn anything.
At least the Africans and Middle Eastern states have abandoned the Americans and the West for good. They are all going to join BRICS. BRICS would eventually be the organisation for Asia, Africa and Latin America, probably minus some Asean states. Cambodia, Thailand, Indonesia are joining first.
OZ got 2 good companies in sinkies & taiwanese.. sinkies paid billion for f35 then parked in american to pay more rent..while taiwan paid billion & have it equipment delivered to Ukrain..haha
ReplyDeleteHere's proof that US making Ukrainian soldiers dying for US
ReplyDelete"The U.S. can stifle China’s ambitions now by helping Ukraine, and we can do it without sending a blank check or risking American troops. Victory for Kyiv would make the U.S. safer without putting a single American soldier in harm’s way." - Nikki Haley, WSJ March 20
That was a good one, making a sucker out of Australia by asking them to pay US$368 billion for the nuclear powered submarines, whose main objective for acquiring them was to protect USA's interest in this region.
ReplyDeleteMyanmar citizens better wake up and look at what happened to the Iraqis after basically asking the USA to help overthrow Saddam Hussein and bring them democracy. Now they have democracy, but lost the country instead, while the oil revenue is controlled by the USA. Iraq is still in chaos and the USA would not leave and wants to exploit the country's oil.
ReplyDeleteOf what use is democracy when the country is left to be exploited by someone else?
The Americans not only steal the Iraqi oil, but confiscated their hundreds of billions in American banks.
ReplyDeleteThe American robbers are robbing everyone they could, Afghanistan, Russian, Venezuela and many others. Daylight robbery.
When the West visits Africa, they talk about China.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jw2BOG57_2M
In short, even Africans are smarter than Ozzies..
Ozzies? Who are their ancestors? 160,000 convicts, 80% males and 20% females were deported from Little Britain to Australia between 1788 and 1868. The result is what you see today.
ReplyDeleteEven Biden looked down on them. That guy from down under? What's his name?
Morrison? The Biggest Convict Clown?
DeleteDetection tech could render submarines useless by 2050
ReplyDelete'New details of the AUKUS defense and security pact have revealed Australia will buy three second-hand US Virginia-class submarines early next decade (and potentially two more), subject to approval by US Congress.
Australia will also build a fleet of eight nuclear-powered SSN-AUKUS boats at Adelaide’s Osborne Naval Shipyard. The first will be delivered by 2042, with five completed by the 2050s, and construction of the remaining three going into the 2060s.
Both the greatest strength and greatest weakness of subs is their stealth.
But if subs can be detected, they become easy targets: large, slow-moving and vulnerable to attack from the surface.
Subs in the ocean are large, metallic anomalies that move in the upper portion of the water column. They produce more than sound. As they pass through the water, they disturb it and change its physical, chemical and biological signatures. They even disturb Earth’s magnetic field – and nuclear subs unavoidably emit radiation.
Our key result was that the oceans are, in most circumstances, at least likely (probability 75%) – and from some perspectives very likely (probability 90%) – to become transparent by the 2050s. Our certainty of these estimates, which the software evaluated independently, was high (above 70%).
This suggests that, regardless of progress in stealth technologies, submarines – including nuclear-powered submarines – will be able to be detected in the world’s oceans as a result of progress in science and technology.
Our assessment suggests there will only be a brief window of time between the deployment of the first SSN-AUKUS boats and the onset of transparent oceans.
We argue there is evidence submarines could dramatically reduce in effectiveness in the coming decades. In other words, Australia risks investing in a nuclear ecosystem whose use-by date may be much earlier than we’d like.
Link to article:
https://asiatimes.com/2023/03/detection-tech-could-render-submarines-useless-by-2050/