Why would China keep on entertaining rude and mischievous countries visiting China or meeting with Chinese leaders to talk ahout Xinjiang, Taiwan, Tibet and human rights? Has China learnt anything from the 100 years of humiliation? Why would Japan dare to invade China? It was all because China was weak, and when a country is weak, it deserves to be attack, to be humiliated, to be insulted, to be ignored and to be messed around.
It was a stupid thing for Xi Jinping to meet up with Sunak when the latter has been talking tough about going against China and even talking about raising the issue of human rights with Xi in the meeting. For goodness sake, China, please wake up from your stupidity. These trouble makers and savages would not respect you if you are weak, appear to be weak. And when they slapped you and you turn the other cheek, they would slap the other cheek as well. Even little countries like Australia, Lithuania, Lavtia, and little England, Canada, (and the many silly European women leaders and American leaders are talking through their assholes to threaten you) are standing in front of you to pee in your face. And you are not doing anything. This will only embolden the little monkeys to continue to pee on you.
Stand up if you want to be respected. There is no point telling the savages to treat you as equals if you are afraid to demand to be treated as equals, afraid to slap them when they misbehaved. The American bullies would keep on bullying you if you are weak. Look at the situation in Taiwan now. It is getting worse and the Americans are marching in openly to violate the One China Policy. And you still allow this to happen and everyday crying to be treated as equals and be respected.
Look at the USA, is there any country that dare to show disrespect, to go to Washington to talk about the rights of the native Americans or the blacks or the coloured people? Look at Israel, a small country of 6 million people, but no Arab or Muslim country dare to whisper a world of disrespect for fear of being whacked. Even India has more respect from its little neighbours and the West. No one dare to say bad things about India. Why? Because they would give a black eye to another trying to be nasty.
Stand up China, and defend your rights and dignity if you want to be respected and want to live in peace. The little monkeys would not show you any respect if you don't even believe in yourself, if you don't respect yourself. Every little monkey is watching how you react to provocations. They would keep coming after you and pee on your head if you are meek and do nothing.
What happen to your Wolf Warrior Diplomacy? Just for two days and got frighten because the bullies said it is bad? So now returning to the Sheep Diplomacy, to be pushed around and kicked around by little monkeys? You will invite the Taiwanese and the Americans to start a war if you are weak and clueless.
I hope the Chinese leaders read this and wake up from their stupidity. This is a harsh world of bullies that only understand toughness when they are whacked when they misbehaved.
Just tell the little monkeys that want to see Xi, '想见习总，没门'.
Xi will only see friendly countries.
PS. After dealing with Australia, it is time China haul up Little Britain and Canada for drying under the sun. These two little monkeys think too highly of themselves and are very mischievous.
>>>>>
ReplyDeleteVirgo49 November 16, 2022 10:07 am
Mr RB
Nowadays these hawkers only know how to slaughter their own fellow men to make an additional buck.
Maybe also cannot blamed them as they themselves are also been slaughtered by the high rentals of
those wealthy property lords who also have to slaughter their tenants or lessess as they also have to pay
so called"markets" rates by another more shrewed owners of by the Papies Govt who now required them
to tender their properties in millions and millions in order to secure their purchases or leashholds. NOT
lease but leashed like dogs.
So what's they called vicious cycles of you slaughter me and I slaughter you cycles.
Now they purposely always gave you an extra egg to top up your mee goreng or mee siam just to have an
extra fivety cents as extras commission for their profits.
All these are pure Capitalisism as practiced by the Imperial West.
So mucjlh for Leo81 intelligent economics.
The more intelligent these economists are the more cruel and scheming they became.
To slaughter the daft Peasants.
Why China even with their low low salaries for most of their blue collared workers, they can still survive?
Because the State made sure that the Essiential Goods and services are controlled.
Their rentals for their hawkers just like in Singapore in the early fifties and sixties are rents controlled.
Hawkers stalls in the NEA premises are priced low and the hawkers no need to slaughter their own.
Now every stall are tender for bidding and everyone kia soo bidded high just like the COEs.
Also coffins oops coffee shops are being sold in the millions.
So dont expect the stall holders to pay one to two hundred for a stall but by thousands by the owners.
So in return they have to price their goods six to seven dollars just for an extra egg to make up their
rentals.
So this vicious cycle will never end.
Unless these slaughter economics are been controlled.
<<<<<
Gd morning Uncle Virgo49,
Not sure whether you are an "undercover economist" masquerading as a layman but if you are a "hammer" (not referring to any logo of any entity btw), you may have been spot on and hit several nails on the heads.
1) Many economists hired and working for BIG CORPORATIONS across many industries and sectors may NOT have understood "CAPITALISM" in the fundamental sense qualitatively as thorough as you have pontificated in your comment attached above.
In your comment attached above, you have used words such as "pure capitalism, slaughter" etc...
Shows your in depth understanding of the "rules of the game or how/ what the whole system is all about"?
2) In a way, you are right that to put in your words:
Delete"The more intelligent these economists are the more cruel and scheming they became. To slaughter the daft Peasants."
BIG CORPORATIONS across many industries and sectors hire economists to advise the board and management. Being well paid (and even handsomely and highly) by all these BIG CORPORATIONS, the fiduciary duty of these economists then surely is to serve the interests of their employers, and likely NOT at liberty to give advice that seems siding with the masses (as that could be conflicting in interests).
Hence the outcome in your own words:
"To slaughter the daft Peasants."
Uncle Virgo49, you are thus spot on and hence the observation that you could be an "undercover economists" masquerading as a lay person.
Many SMEs (small and medium enterprises) may not have the resources to afford a headcount for an economist in their payroll.
But many BIG CORPORATIONS do including in your own words:
"Maybe also cannot blamed them as they themselves are also been slaughtered by the high rentals of
those wealthy property lords ..."
Yes indeed. Many good and services are precisely computed and priced to "MAXIMISE" profits including rent, entry tickets, mortgages, premiums, entertainment subscriptions etc etc. If you dig a bit deeper in the HR of BIG CORPORATIONS, you may be surprised many or even all of the BIG CORPORATIONS have NOT one but multiple economists on board in their teams.
In a legal tussle, if one party hires senior counsels and the other party has no lawyer to represent them, who do you think has the upper hand and likely to win?
Similarly, in the real world, Economics is the study of "human activities" with intricate and complex observations and concepts empirically tested in the past 200 over years or even beyond (for underlying principles etc). Economists are highly trained not unlike surgeons to understand complex econometric models. At times, dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models are deployed not UNLIKE military warfare simulation in determining decision making or policies direction.
Let's take a simple real life example of how basic simple microeconomics concepts are being applied by BIG BUSINESSES.
Uncle Virgo49, am sure you know about this place called RWS as many in MSN over the years are probably apprised of the fact that you are no stranger to GENTING. Now, have you ever noticed or wondered why there are 3 different prices for the entry tickets to USS in RWS? How come USS is able to do that to maximise profits while if a bortakchay chicken rice seller tries to emulate USS pricing model and sell his chicken rice at 3 different prices, he probably would end up losing his pants and go belly up? BIG Business owners may NOT be trained in economics but they have the resources to hire some of the best to sell their services to them. This is probably a reality and fact in the real world.
3) You may lament or swear about capitalism and how exploitative it has become at the service of landowners etc. But in the past 10 millenniums since the Neolithic Revolution 10,000 over years ago, capitalism despite its flaws and tendency for extremes arguably provides the best form of organisation in human societies. Can you fight it? Are you able to resist it? Can you even live without it? (How did you manage to get the World Cup subscription at $100+ and not say $10,000?)
DeleteSo?
Join them, right? Learn some basic Economics (but no need for you lah cos you seem to understand in depth in Economics based on your comment as attached above) and navigate the capitalist system like a fish in water?
For the SMEs, they probably can observe how BIG BUSINESSES do it and emulate some of the practices if their resources permit?
Cheers,
Leo 81
President Xi Jinping Publicly Scolds Canadian PM Trudeau At G20 Over Leaked Talks
ReplyDeleteThe Chinese president express his displeasure over a perceived breach of confidence after bilateral talks
Chinese President Xi Jinping has publicly dressed down Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for allegedly leaking the content of their meeting to the media. The exchange was captured on video during the G20 summit in Bali, Indonesia on Wednesday.
Xi, speaking through a translator, was annoyingly telling Trudeau: “Everything we discussed has been leaked to the papers. That's not appropriate, that’s not the way the conversation was conducted. If there was sincerity on your part… "
Trudeau is heard responding, speaking over the translator still trying to finish relaying Xi’s words, that “In Canada we believe in free and open and frank dialogue, and that is what we’ll continue to have. We’ll continue to look to work constructively together but there will be things we will disagree on,” the Canadian leader added.
“Let’s create the conditions [for that] first,” replied Xi, offering Trudeau a handshake. While the Chinese leader smiled and moved on, the Canadian PM walked away from the camera, by himself.
China is still not strong enough..maybe 60%...need to be 80% strong then those monkeys will be put in their place. Because of pandemic.. Now the main priority is economy.
ReplyDeleteToday China is strong enough to sit and shit on the monkeys. China is even prepared to take on the Americans on Taiwan.
ReplyDeleteChina signed the g20 declaration fell into usa trap
ReplyDeleteMajority of G20 members are white men countries. This is a slight dilution of G7. They wanted to boot Russia out of G20 as well.
ReplyDeleteThe Joint Declaration also added that several member countries did not agree to the Declaration, so not unanimous.
The rest of the world must create their own organisations and walk out of all the western controlled organisations like the UN, WTO, IMF, WHO and this G20.
BRICS, SCO and an alternate UN should be put in place where the voices of the rest of the world be heard loud and clear, not the dictates of the white men.
Xi told the boy PM to behave himself first then come back, and then walk away from him.
ReplyDeleteWhy no G20 joint declaration against the Americans and NATO for invading Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and Libya?
ReplyDeleteBoy Trudeau got the “disappointed Father talk” then went straight to his room
ReplyDeleteXi Jinping's comments in Chinese that Trudeau didn't allow the interpreter to finish talking when he defensively interjected:
ReplyDeleteXi: "(Letting all the content of our discussion) see on the newspapers, is inappropriate." "Besides, we didn't proceed in that way." "If there is sincerity, we could hold an attitude of mutual respect, to have very good communication. Otherwise, the consequences will be hard to say.." "Create conditions, create conditions."
.
There is a reason people arrange private meetings. It is supposed to be private. If he did not want a private meeting he should have said so at the beginning. Very unprofessional of Trudeau.
Trudeau responds to Xi’s initial criticism by saying, “In Canada we believe in free and open and frank dialogue and that is what we will continue to have, we will continue to look to work constructively together, but there will be things we disagree on”.
ReplyDeleteBefore he finished speaking, however, Xi (actually Xi understands English, having spent time in Muscatine, a small farming community in Iowa ), looking slightly exasperated, cuts him off and says in Mandarin, “Create the conditions, create the conditions, OK?” before smiling, shaking Mr Trudeau’s hand and walking off.
ReplyDeleteVirgo49
has said the Most
Commonsensical in term of practical economics.
We have millions of professional economists in the World.
None ever solves the Problem of Wealth
Distributions.
Even reknown economists loke Ma Mohan Singh of lndia,, Tharman Shanmugaretnam of Sin are not able to do any good jobs in dealing with economic problems in their socities comprising a huge and densely-populated and a tiny speck of their countries.
However,
with an enlighten leader in Comrade Xi Jin Ping who rise from rank and file, he leads China to its' Most Glorious Moment in History.
His ecomomy policy is base on commonsensical practicality. And that is; fairly share of wealth to all the People.
With all the People able to speny, the Economy naturally thrives, period.
"Temasek to write down US$275 million in FTX, says belief in Bankman-Fried appears to be ‘misplaced’ ' - ST
ReplyDeleteThey invest US$275 million of the people's money based on faith in a person !!
When the belief is strong, can take poison also would not die. What is US$275m?
ReplyDeleteJust belief, like believing in Covid vaccines.
Hope they don't believe in another gambler. Managing national wealth based on beliefs!
ReplyDeleteOPM, so belief also can try.
Would someone in Temasek take responsibility? Rules that are applied to WP in Hougang must also be seen to be applied in fairness to those who play with public money.
ReplyDeleteJust call it misplaced and sweep it under the carpet? Just like that? How convenient!
OPM? Not when money is in opposition hands. Funny, they only seem to care so much for opposition ward residents. What about money belonging to Singaporeans? Oops sorry, GIC and Temasek's money is their money, not Singaporean's money.
ReplyDeleteInvestment based on faith in an individual is reckless investment, all the more penalizable if huge sums of the nation's money is involved!
ReplyDeleteAnother Trudeau Embarrassment
ReplyDeleteCanadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has deleted a tweet which endorsed a claim that Iranian authorities had issued death sentences to 15,000 Iranian protesters.
The removal comes after a number of journalists and human rights campaigners pointed out that the information in the post was untrue, despite being shared by a slew of celebrities, political commentators and government officials.
The post, which went viral on social media over the past couple of days, shows a woman holding an Iranian flag with the text: “Iran sentences 15,000 protesters to death – as a ‘hard lesson’ for all rebels.”
In the tweet, Trudeau stated that Canada denounces the “Iranian regimes’s barbaric decision” to impose the death penalty on the protesters.
According to Iranian state news outlets, three people (ya 3, ie half of 6) connected to the protests have so far been handed death sentences.
Trudeau forgot to mention about the barbaric genocide of native Americans committed by the white men, his forefathers.
ReplyDeleteSilly ass. His behaviour is so childish.
Let the world not forget the 'cultural genocide' committed by the Canadian Government in the past, in allowing the Church to run those Residential Schools that were used to force minority Natives to be religiously educated. Thousands of children died in those Residential Schools due to the terrible treatment. They think that by trying to bring the Natives, Government and the Church together is the end of their obnoxious and horrible past? Forgive and forget? Cleansed off their sins?
ReplyDeleteCanada, USA and Australia have no moral authority to talk about barbaric treatment by other countries of it's anti-establishment elements and their need to clamp down on social unrest.
What will they realistically do if the Native Indians and Aborigines were to start protesting and burning for the return of their land? Tell me.
Now they are doing damage control over the $275 million loss in FTX, talking about control measures and what have you. What is the point of closing the stable doors after the horses have bolted? Wonder how many people in Red Dot are affected?
ReplyDeletePlaying jackpot is fine when using OPM. When hit a jackpot, collect all the winnings. When lose, never mind, OPM. Got any consequences? Got, GST, higher levy, higher gantry charges, higher this, higher that. No they are not gambling with your money. Then whose money?
ReplyDeleteEureka! Red Dot just discovered crypto investment is a scam. That is after losing $275 million for taking part in the scam.
ReplyDeleteThe Government throws out lots of advice to Singaporeans to avoid scams. Did they do a thorough scrutiny before putting so much money into FTX? I guess not, or they would not have fallen for it. OK, never mind, it is OPM. How ironic!
Forget about misplaced trust. That is just trying to do damage control.
It is US$275 or about $377m!
ReplyDeletehttps://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Tech/Semiconductors/China-tops-U.S.-to-take-research-crown-at-global-chip-conference
ReplyDeleteChina tops U.S. to take research crown at global chip conference
Chinese universities, companies produce 30% of papers accepted by ISSCC
YUKI OKOSHI, Nikkei staff writer
November 18, 2022 01:32 JST
TOKYO -- China has submitted the most research papers accepted at a prestigious international academic conference focused on semiconductors, underscoring the country's growing presence in the field and bumping the U.S. into second place.
This is the first time China has taken the top spot in papers accepted by the International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), which is considered the Olympics of the semiconductor sector. The annual event opens in February in San Francisco.
Universities and companies in China -- including Hong Kong and Macao -- submitted 59 papers, or 29.8% of all 198 research documents accepted by the ISSCC for the 2023 event. At the previous conference held this February, 29 papers from China were accepted, or 14.5% of the total.
The ISSCC accepted 40 papers from the U.S., dropping the country from first place this year to second. The U.S. share of all papers shrank to 20.2% from 35%.
South Korea ranked third and Taiwan fourth, while Japan and the Netherlands tied for fifth.
Universities in greater China are driving research into semiconductors. The University of Macau had 15 papers accepted, while Beijing's Tsinghua University and Peking University produced 13 and six papers, respectively.
But among corporations, Samsung Electronics led the way with eight papers, followed by Intel with six. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., the world's largest contract chipmaker, submitted only two papers accepted by the ISSCC.
Japanese researchers wrote 10 papers selected by the ISSCC, lifting the country's share to 5.1% from 3.5%. The Tokyo Institute of Technology produced four of them.