10/11/2022

Ukraine - Only mindless white savages dare to talk about preemptive strikes and nuclear war

 Zelenskyy insists that a pre-emptive nuclear strike against Russia was needed if Russia decades to launch a nuclear strike on Ukraine. They later walked back on his warp idea and twisted around to say that he was refering to sanctions. This guy is a liar and a con-man, all proven beyond any doubt.


If Biden does do a pre-emptive nuclear strike on Russia, Europe is finished. Europe will bear the full brunt of Russian retaliation first. The whole of Europe will be nuclearised to ashes. Even if not so, Europe will be unhabitable, with the fallout enough to kill whatever is left, and nothing can grow for ages.

And USA is not going to enjoy the same undamaged situation as WW1 and 2, where they were isolated from the carnage. This nuclear war will be affecting their homeland, clear and simple. Oh, yes they have their mountain holes to hide, but for how long before the nuclear fallout fades? And who gets the privilege of living as cavemen in those holes? Not the ordinary citizens, you can be sure.

Biden is dangerous in his state of mind. He may not be aware of what he is saying or realise the consequences. He may push the nuclear button in one of his sleep walking moments. Pray this does not happen.

Anonymous 

20 comments:

  1. With the USA mid-term November election closing in, there will be more rhetorics coming out from Washington, Brussels and Ukraine. Every day, we hear of the USA providing more help to Ukraine and carrying out more terrorist attacks as well. What help is Sleepy Joe doing for the homeless and downtrodden in the USA?

    After the Nord Stream 1 and 2 and Crimea Bridge sabotage failures, more desperate attempts will be made to shore up Biden's hopes in November. And that begs the question, what else he will do? The USA and EU have completely exhausted their sanctions capablities on Russia and are scrapping the bottom of the sanctions barrel. Most of their thousands of sanctions are irrelevant hubris to fool the world that Russia had been sanctioned to oblivion. They sanctioned dogs, cats, trees, music, and families of people they do not like. Does that rattle Putin? They sanctioned Kim and his predecessors for decades, and yet he is still able to fire missiles like fire crackers to scare the shit out of the Japs and South Koreans.

    Some of the sanctions on Russia are ironically backfiring. Energy for one is causing undue hardship for the EU countries, but shhh...do not talk about the protest erupting in Germany. You may land in jail for talking about that. So much for freedom of expression and democratic principles.

    ReplyDelete
  2. USA are the no1 financial power and data center of the world. USA are now also the no1 seapower. However, these advantages have archilles's heel which depend on electricity, water, air spaces . The attacks on the Russian gas pipelines and bridges look frightening to those peoples who are still thinking of World war2. The repair techniques of pipelines and bridges structure then are backward. Fast forward to the present, temporary bypasses can be make to connect and restore them quickly within days. Permanent repairs can be done later.
    Currently, USA undersea cables and over head satellites are venerable, there are lack of knowledge of how to repair and restore them quickly when they are severed. For every hours of operation stoppages of transmission of data, billions dollars may be loss. This would dealed a death blow.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It looks like Putin's originally objective was to secure the eastern provinces to protect the massacres of Russian speaking Ukrainians. The war was starting to slow down with the annexation of the eastern provinces.

    Then the blow up of the Nord Stream pipelines and followed by the blowing up of the Crimean Bridge. Both incidents were clearly to enlarge the war by attacking where it hurts the Russians most.

    Why or who would want to flare up the war, to keep the flames burning bright? Is it Zelensky or the Americans? Zelensky must be a complete idiot or reckless bum to think that he could conduct such sneak attacks and get away with it. Russia has so overwhelming fire power but has been restraining from attacking Kiev and the rest of Ukraine, leaving the rest of Ukraine fairly safe and in peace. These attacks only provoke and raise anger on the Russian sides and are like inviting the Russians to hit back with more ferocity. Who would be the loser and suffer the most?

    Why the escalation? Who would benefit from the escalation? Who wants to escalate the war?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The answers to your many questions is very simple - The Evi USA. This is the only country that has been making all the moves to escalate the war.

      Because the war is being fought in Ukraine, not in USA.

      Ukrainians are now being used as Canon Folders. But the corrupted Zelenskyy pretends that he does not know and he has been calling all the shots so far. He is the worst animal in Ukraine. He needs to be removed or ousted. Someone more sensible must replace him.

      On the other hand, the war has already reached a stage of no return. And therefore nobody wants to replace him. Because after the war, there is going to be a huge debt that the Ukrainians will have to pay and pay. Endless. This is the big problem!



      Delete
  4. Countries of World are divided into 2 camps: Nuclear weaponry countries and non. There would be silent mutual agreements among the nuclear nations not to bomb each other. They would rarely go to war with each others. Non nuclear countries can only be proxies to be taken advantage of. Iraq, Libya, Yugoslavia , Ukraine had fallen into the proxies traps. Taiwan maybe next. Japan and S Korea are also good candidates yo be exploited.

    ReplyDelete

  5. Russia should annex Ukraine and rename it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes, you are right. Russia should just annex the whole of Ukraine. That will wake up the US.

    I don't see any problem there. Just consider Ukraine as one of its own territory, and rename it into many parts - into different names.

    That should solve the problem, by and large.





    ReplyDelete
  7. Months ago, the West was already talking about rebuilding in Ukraine. Who is going to do that or finance that, when the war is not even over. Talking about rebuilding when the war is over is not too late.

    When that time comes, the West will probably let the Japs and Indians grab the rebuilding crumbs, and trying to lure the Chinese in as well, while they will stand by and watch. But, ya, they will take all the goodies, like minerals and essential materials for their own industrial use. Like stealing the oil in Iraq and Syria and letting the country fester amid the destruction.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You can Di-Nazify Ukraine, unless you take the whole Ukraine.

    The Nazis are now spread all over Ukraine and they are growing stronger and stronger.

    They, in fact, form the main bulk of the Special Forces. They are also the Ukrainian Commandos.

    Therefore, in order to flush out the Nazis in Ukraine, one has to take the whole of Ukraine. Once that is done, one has to go house to house, to search for them. They are very cunning and shrewd. The job of searching for them won't be easy. However, it has to be done.





    ReplyDelete
  9. Not a bad idea for Russia to take Ukraine. It will increase the Russian mainland by thousands of square miles, with all the rich resources to harvest. With Belarus on friendly ties, it will boost Russia's border distance from NATO expansionist agenda. With Ukraine and Belarus providing the buffer zone, Moscow is safer from NATO's threat.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The Nazis will then disperse to other European countries. What will they do? Certainly not sight seeing or shopping, but they will do a re-Nazification of Europe. Then the fun will begin. And Crazy Pelosi will be clapping with joy watching the 'sight to behold' moment recreated.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The Nazis are now all over the World, as far as Argentina and Chile. What Russia can do is to eliminate one section of the Nazi Gang only.

    All those who have been hunting down the Nazis in the past, many of them have already died.

    Hope this new wave of hunting down the Nazis will reignite a new wave of fire to bring down all the Nazis.

    Hope against Hope...


    ReplyDelete
  12. The worst case scenario is for a Nazi becoming the leader of a country. Zelenskyy, although a Jew, a bitter enemy of the Nazis, choose to align with the neo-Nazi militants and even used them to fight the Russians.

    Hunting down the Nazis had been more often said than done. What is even more ironic is leaders like Zelenskyy and his handlers protecting them and recognising them. So, how can they be hunted down? Almost an impossibility, with all the sympathisers upending the work of the Nazi hunters.

    ReplyDelete
  13. It is thought that Hitler was not assassinated but escaped to Argentina. True or not is unverifiable.

    ReplyDelete
  14. https://youtu.be/wJj9typ7SbA
    Supporters of Russia in USA

    ReplyDelete
  15. A huge protest is now on in France involving tens of thousands of French people against inflation and high cost of living and chanting for France to get out of NATO. Live on Youtube.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Not only in France, the whole of Europe is up in "arms" protesting in their respective cities and elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Their mass media are not reporting.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Off Topic.

    One of the Justice Department's arguments to reject Trump's submissions of documents for the special master:

    "The justice department added that if Trump truly believed the case was about a dispute under the Presidential Records Act, then he filed his original request for a special master in Washington, instead of with a judge he appointed in Florida."

    This kind of argument is not only rude, but also an insult to the face of the presiding judge. Does it matter where he filed the request for a special master? The presiding judge should take this as an insult.

    It is obvious that DOJ is trying to say that "the judge whom he appointed" has given him leniency that any judge at Washington would not. This is the point DOJ is trying to drive at, isn't it? You are belittling the Presiding Judge!

    In this sense, Whoever at DOJ must be disciplined!







    ReplyDelete