RESEARCHER : 'WE MADE A BIG MISTAKE' on COVID-19 VACCINE - MERCOLA June 14 2021
A simplified and modified version of an important article posted by Dr Mercola on June 14
In a recent interview with Canadian Broadcaster, Alex Pierson, Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., dropped a shocking truth bomb that immediately went viral, despite being CENSORED by GOOGLE.
Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., has gained access to a sensitive Pfzer’s paper ( BIODISTRIBUTION STUDY)
from the Japanese regulatory agency.
This paper was hidden from the public and Byram Bridle and his team of international scientists has to use the FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT FOIA to get this paper from the Japanese Regulatory agency.
This paper revealed "a HUGE problem with ALL COVID-19 VACCINES."
Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine contains mRNA vaccine packaged in nanosized plastic PEG packages and injected into people during vaccination.
All this while, the ASSUMPTION that vaccine developers have been working with is that the mRNA in the vaccines would primarily REMAIN in and around the vaccination site.
This Pfzer’s paper, however, show the mRNA vaccine and the subsequent spike protein produced are WIDELY DISTRIBUTED in the body WITHIN HOURS.
Now, why is this distribution in the body serious?
It is SERIOUS because that SPIKE PROTEIN created in the body due to the mRNA vaccine injection is toxic as per below statement from Dr Byram Bridle
“We have known for a LONG TIME that the spike protein is a PATHOGENIC ( ie TOXIC ) protein. It is a toxin. It can cause DAMAGE in our body if it gets into circulation. ~ Dr. Byram Bridle”
"The mRNA enters your bloodstream and ACCUMULATES in a variety of organs, primarily your SPLEEN, BONE MARROW, LIVER, ADRENAL GLANDS and, in women, the OVARIES. The spike protein also travel to your HEART, BRAIN and LUNGS, where BLEEDING and or BLOOD CLOTS can occur as a result, and is expelled in BREAST MILK."
"This is a serious problem, as the spike protein is a toxin shown to cause cardiovascular and neurological damage. It also has REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY, and Pfzer’s biodistribution data show it ACCUMULATES in WOMEN ’s OVARIES"
Bridle also cites recent research showing the spike protein remained in the bloodstream of humans for 29 days.
Any reader can get the full details of the above extract from Dr. Mercola website from his article published on June 14 2021.
The above only raises issues on that spike protein. The other problematic issues caused by the nanosized PEG envelope is not covered in the above article but in a different message.
PS. Why is this not reported or discuss in our media?
Why did the Straits Times failed to get such vital information and facts to keep Singaporeans informed?
ReplyDeleteOr, is it a deliberate black out of negative facts, information and data regarding the Pfizer and Modena vaccines?
Why is the Multi-Ministry Task Force and the Experts Committee keeping silent on this vital and significant fact?
Or are they so ignorant that they have yet to find out such important and critical information? If so, then they have to wake up now.
And they have to stop the Vaccination Program until more data are available, or until our scientists can run some tests, researches, experiments to ascertain and determine the truth, to get to the bottom of this significant and dangerous problem that affects everyone of us.
Selective hearing. Hear only what you are supposed to hear.
ReplyDeleteSheeples are only allowed to hear the good stuff. If bad stuff, such as these, were circulated, how would the public react? They would definitely shun being vaccinated with the mRNA vaccines and big Pharmas would lose out big time. Big Pharmas contributed big money for big campaigns and must be rewarded handsomely. And there are those experts, all ready, and being paid to tout the good stuff. Make hay while the sun shines is the motto of most of those experts.
ReplyDeleteTherefore, without the bade stuff being revealed and widely circulated, Governments everywhere can easily convince their people about the benefits of mRNA jabs, and it can freely just shaft the stuff into the bodies of the public. There is always the 'no liability clause' to give them all the protection.
In the worse case scenario and effects start manifesting years down the road, who to look for accountability? The people who allowed this to happen would probably be gone for good. The big Pharmas already made their pile and their bank accounts fattened to no end. You die is your own business!
Still very in this game. Remember the earlier days when there were so many confusing advises and recommendations and all proven wrong?
ReplyDeleteWe shall wait and see how things eventually work out and see who has the last laugh.
No one is cock sure that he or she is right at this point in the game.
It is so sad that because of a stupid political decision, many experts were made to tell lies and destroy their name and reputation as professionals.
ReplyDeleteMany would have no face to face their families and friends.
It is so sad that because of a bad political decision Singapore is wasting all its money in India, allowing Indian's deadly variant to easily enter Singapore and turning Singapore into a third world country.
ReplyDeleteMisinformation? When lying and fabrication has become a habit and is taken as the norm, how to be convinced even if it is the truth?
ReplyDeleteEven experts have to take sides - either with them or against them. Freedom of expression?
ReplyDeleteMost medical and scientific researchers are funded by big corporations such as the big pharmaceuticals and Bill Gates Foundation.
ReplyDeleteSo, all these medical and scientific researchers' livelihood and expenses are dependent on their terms and conditions for funding laid down by their funds providers.
Therefore, they have no choice but to tow the line and follow the cues of their fund-masters.
My exact convictions all along, SSO. He who pays the piper calls the tune. In the world of today, there is no such thing as morality, only greed. And so much greed that the truth has been distorted beyond belief such that not many opinions can be taken at face value, least of all from the experts.
ReplyDeleteThe irony is that in days gone by, expert opinions were confidently taken as certainty that they are the truth. That is the reason why expert opinions were then sought so as to better convince the ground. Not so today. Those expert opinions, more often than not are, so to speak, weapons of deceit.
That is why so much money is invested in such avenues of deceit. Now, US$300 million a year is not a small sum to sniff at. The experts will sing their way to the bank.
Unpublished Facts About Experts
ReplyDelete1. Very few subject experts are really experts in the true sense. Almost all of them are mere specialists and theorists specializing in a tiny aspect of medical or scientific endeavors. In fact, they study more and more about less and less. Their knowledge becomes very narrow but focused. And, over a prolonged period, in the course of their works, many of them lost their common sense and natural intuition/instinct. They become like "robots", so to speak.
2. As "robots", they do not care about ethics and morals. They can't feel. They lost their feelings for human relationships and compassion. They only try to follow their professional codes of conduct and the laws, because they have no choice. Even the codes of conduct and laws, they will try to circumvent or misinterpret them to suit their purpose.
3. For their personal survival, they know where their loyalty lies. It lies with where their research funds come from - big corporations, government, (political parties, non-governmental organisations and private financial foundations, such as Bill Gates & Ex-Wife Foundation, Clintons Foundation, Lee Foundation, Temasek Foundation, etc. So, in a way they become political animals too.
4. Etc ....
Covering The Ass To Circumvent The Need To Pay Compensations And The Bad Publicity On Negative And Deadly Aspects Of The Vaccines?
ReplyDeleteOne more death likely due to the effects of the vaccines that cause blood clots and resultant heart attacks:
1. The Ministry of Health said on Saturday said a 72-year-old woman who died a day after getting her first Covid-19 vaccine dose had suffered a heart attack.
2. An autopsy found that “there were no indications of an allergic reaction to the vaccines”, said MOH.
3. The woman’s son had taken to Facebook this week and asked if the vaccine could be behind her death.
4. He told TODAY that the family hopes to apply for compensation under the vaccine injury financial assistance programme
"SINGAPORE — There was no indication that a woman who died earlier this month a day after she had taken her first dose of the Covid-19 vaccine had any allergic reaction to the jab, said the Ministry of Health (MOH) on Saturday (June 19), adding that the 72-year-old had died of a heart attack.
MOH was responding to media queries about a Facebook post by Mr Andrew Tan, who questioned if the vaccine had caused the death of his mother, Doreen Chan.
In its statement, MOH said that it was alerted to the death of the woman at Sengkang General Hospital on June 4, and that she had been vaccinated with the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine the day before.
“She had been assessed by trained healthcare personnel to be suitable for Covid-19 vaccination prior to vaccination,” said MOH, which did not name her.
“In line with our protocols, she was also observed on-site for about 30 minutes post-vaccination and was well.”
MOH added that the coroner had determined the cause of the woman’s death to be ischaemic heart disease, after an autopsy was conducted.
“The autopsy showed long-standing blockage of the blood vessels supplying blood to the heart muscles, and no indications of an allergic reaction to the vaccines,” the ministry said."
Read more at:
https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/moh-says-72-year-old-womans-death-unrelated-covid-19-vaccination-family-seeking-more
Shouldn't the cause of death be determined after a Corona Inquiry?
ReplyDeleteBy taking an official public position like this, isn't it obvious that the MOH is attempting to very strongly influence the decision of the Corona's Inquiry?
This one-sided declaration by MOH is definitely highly unacceptable and unethical.
Even legally questionable?
What is the use of the Vaccines Inquiry Financial Assistance Program if the cause of death can be so easily determined by a stroke of the pen held in the hand of a Minister? For show?
ReplyDeleteAt least there should be a benefit of doubt given to the deceased (victim), isn't it?
Where is fairness and justice?
If I have to die, I had rather die due to COVID-19 than to die by the toxic of the vaccines that cause blood clots that lead to stroke or heart attack, and then be my children be told that my death was not due to the vaccines. That will be tragic.
ReplyDeleteCOVID-19 Vaccines: Guidelines For Determining Cause Of Death Due Or Not Due To Vaccines
ReplyDelete1. Any death that occurs within 28 days of having injected with the mRNA vaccines must be diligently, seriously and thoroughly investigated (leaving no stones unturned) and considered, before brushing aside as death not due to the vaccines. Corona and postmodern cannot be 100% sure that the vaccines have got nothing to do with the death.
2. It is very highly probable that the after-effects of the vaccines could have triggered the heart attack, stroke, organ failure, whatsoever.
3. Even if death is said to be caused by a pre-existing heart condition or disease (or any other organs), the benefit of doubt must be given to the deceased in that the vaccines could have partially, if not wholly, attributed to and be inclusive as part of the cause of death, especially so when death occurs within one to three days after injecting the experimental mRNA vaccines into the body.
4. If there is a doubt or dispute regarding the actual and true cause of death, a third party, not coming from any government or government-link or government directed agency, must be formed and directed to determine the actual and true cause of death. Members of this third party must be neutral people who have no link whatsoever to the government, organs of state, government-linked organisations, statutory boards, Temasek Holdings, GIC, or the ruling political party.
5. The government must not be the sole determinant to decide on the cause of death in such a situation because the government is also a interested party, not a neutral party. There is clearly a serious conflict of interest here.
6. The Court of Appeal should be the ultimate arbiter of cause of death if any member of the deceased family is not convinced or satisfied that the deceased's death was not caused by the vaccines.
SSO - 19 June 2021.
There have been suggestions that in the USA people who died of COVID19 in late 2019 were diagnosed as death from the common flu, a very convenient way of covering up. Post mortem and further investigations were all shot down. Why? The bag is there, but they refused to let out the cat.
ReplyDeleteAs we go along, more comedy of errors will surface. The more they stir the shit, the more unpleasant will be the odour.
ReplyDeleteTo cover a lie, they need to invent another lie. The experts are having a field day reaping in the dough.
ReplyDelete