-
One more death likely due to the effects of the vaccines that cause blood clots and resultant heart attacks:
1. The Ministry of Health said on Saturday said a 72-year-old woman who died a day after getting her first Covid-19 vaccine dose had suffered a heart attack.
2. An autopsy found that “there were no indications of an allergic reaction to the vaccines”, said MOH.
3. The woman’s son had taken to Facebook this week and asked if the vaccine could be behind her death.
4. He told TODAY that the family hopes to apply for compensation under the vaccine injury financial assistance programme
"SINGAPORE — There was no indication that a woman who died earlier this month a day after she had taken her first dose of the Covid-19 vaccine had any allergic reaction to the jab, said the Ministry of Health (MOH) on Saturday (June 19), adding that the 72-year-old had died of a heart attack.
MOH was responding to media queries about a Facebook post by Mr Andrew Tan, who questioned if the vaccine had caused the death of his mother, Doreen Chan.
In its statement, MOH said that it was alerted to the death of the woman at Sengkang General Hospital on June 4, and that she had been vaccinated with the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine the day before.
“She had been assessed by trained healthcare personnel to be suitable for Covid-19 vaccination prior to vaccination,” said MOH, which did not name her.
“In line with our protocols, she was also observed on-site for about 30 minutes post-vaccination and was well.”
MOH added that the coroner had determined the cause of the woman’s death to be ischaemic heart disease, after an autopsy was conducted.
“The autopsy showed long-standing blockage of the blood vessels supplying blood to the heart muscles, and no indications of an allergic reaction to the vaccines,” the ministry said."
Read more at:
https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/moh-says-72-year-old-womans-death-unrelated-covid-19-vaccination-family-seeking-moreAnonymous
MOH's Denial Opens Up A Can Of Worms That Warrants Further Investigations
ReplyDeleteLooking for the victim's allergy to the vaccines when it has been determined that there was "long-standing blockage in the blood vessels supplying blood to the heart muscles" is like trying to find out whether the victim was allergic to the murderer when it has been ascertained that death was caused by strangulation, depriving the victim of oxygen and blood supply, a distinct indication that the victim could have been murdered.
A professional like Sherlock Holmes would have been looking at what has caused the death instead of quickly ruling out the mRNA vaccines, which has already been established that the vaccines can cause blood clots, which can cause blockages to the blood vessels.
Moreover, if the victim has a "long-standing blockage to the vessels supplying blood to the heart muscles", but she did not suffer any heart attack before, and did not die as a result of the longest-standing blockage, then something must have triggered, aggrevated or enhanced the pre-existing blockage to the extent that death became imminent, occuring within 24 hours of having been injected with the Experimental mRNA vaccines.
The fact that MOH is quick to divorce the Vaccines from contributing to the cause of death is itself very telling. It speaks volumes.
And the reason given is very filmsy and unacceptable.
Therefore, I strongly agree that this is a case of someone trying to cover up the deadly effects of the Experimental mRNA Vaccines.
A neutral third party should investigate further this case thoroughly, on an urgent basis, leaving no stones unturned.
This is of national interest - to the Government, the Vaccines providers, the professionals, as well as to the people!
Queen of Hearts.
Will put this up as a main article on Tuesday.
ReplyDeleteStill got a piece by SSO to put up tomorrow.
Thanks.
I am sure more and more deaths will occur in the near future. But very sad. There are cunning people at play.
ReplyDeleteIn order to take care of your rice bowl, just like in politics, honestly is not always the best policy.
ReplyDeleteTo keep your easy, comfy and powerful $millions Job, saying what your Big Boss wants you to say is the best policy.
Covering up for the foreign vaccines producers is stupid and traitorous.
ReplyDeleteNo government in the world would side with a foreign money-making, profit-oriented business entity against its own citizens, unless some very powerful persons have betrayed the country, of course.
A very clever and extremely convenient way of claiming that the "Death is not caused by the vaccines is: "Pre-existing long-standing medical conditions".
ReplyDeleteThere could have been many more deaths caused by the vaccines but could have been cleverly or stupidly dismissed as due to other causes, most notoriously of which is due to "pre-existing medical conditions."
Everyone of us have pre-existing long-standing medical conditions, especially if you are over 30 years of age. The most common one being blockages in your blood vessels. Our blood vessels are like the water pipes in our homes. After prolonged usage, impurities and deposits accumulate along the passage-ways.
When I was 35 years old, my good doctor said my blood vessels had 25% blockage by cholesterol but he also said it was not dangerous and I did not need to do anything except not to add up more cholesterol by avoiding fatty foods. That means, whether the pre-existing long-standing blockage is life-threatening or not depends on the percentage of blockage. Anything below 50% of blockage is not risky. 50% to 75% is risky, and 75% to 90% is dangerous or life-threatening.
Therefore, the key question to ask the person who performed the autopsy is:
How many percentage of blockage was found in the deceased woman's blood vessels?
If the unfortunate 71 years old deceased woman had a long-standing blockage of her blood vessels, why did the trained healthcare personnel assessed her to be fit for the COVID-19 vaccination in the first place? Isn't that a big blunder?
ReplyDeleteWe all also know that a trained healthcare personnel had also blundered by injecting an overdose of 5 times of vaccines into a nurse.
We also know that another trained healthcare personnel has blundered by injecting the vaccine into a 16 year old boy, who is not allowed yet to be vaccinated. The vaccination was meant for 18 years old and above. The healthcare personnel had failed to verify the boy's age before jnjecting him with the vaccine.
Trained healthcare personnel, so what? They are only human. They can make mistakes and blunders like anyone else.
Yes, even well-trained doctors have made blunders and committed crimes.
ReplyDeleteEven honourable politicians and revered leaders lied and deceive their country folks as well as deceiving the world.
So the word "trained" cannot absolve wrong-doings, cannot prevent mistakes and blunders.
As long as one is a human being, he or she, or shim, is capable of making mistakes and blunders.
Community infections have grown and expanded from about 7 per day to 108 per day, over the last one week. This is the result of the stupidity and stubbornness of certain idiots running this country. These idiots must be kicked out in the next GE.
ReplyDeleteBukit Merah View Cluster has increased to 73, the largest group in the last one month so far.
There must be many more hidden, undetected and unreported cases.
Due to the open-legs policy of courting dangers from the Highly Contagious and Deadly Type D (D stands for Deadly) Covid-19 virus, coming from India through Singapore Travellers to and fro India, Singaporeans have to suffer again and again.
When are the idiots going to wake up?
Sinkies have very retarded takes. Which doctor will dare to stand out now and say its a vaccine death? Israel has 100 doctors agaibst child vaccines. We have a balless 12 who ran like with theirtails between their legs. They would rather kids die than stand up. Also, there are at least 20 cases of deaths. No compensations, insult to injury, dead bodies are opened up to rummage for any excuse on the coroner report!
ReplyDeleteIrrefutable Facts About The mRNA Vaccines
ReplyDeleteThese are some of the established irrefutable facts about the mRNA vaccines:
1) mRNA vaccines skipped the important animal clinical trials. In previous other mRna vaccines (SARS) animal trials, ADE was established.
2) Pfizer submitted a set of Organ Biodistribution data which has confirmed that the vaccines breach the safety defense in which the vaccine went into bloodstream and spread to other organs instead of staying at injection sites.
3) According to the biodistribution data provided by Pfizer, which was made Confidential and not disclosed to public, there is high concentration of vaccine at ovaries and bone marrow, together with heart and brain.
4) This is a cause for great concern, especially for women. Nobody knows what are the implications of such concentration at different organs for short and long term.
5) In particular, blood related diseases is of great concern since there is increasing concentration in bone marrow. Would it cause leukemia in the long term?
6) There is no long term data to establish the safety aspects on the vaccines.
7) The great scope and depth seen in all the Adverse Events Reports in the US, UK and EU seem to support the hypothesis that the spread of vaccine to all other organs via the blood stream might have createed grave impact on the body of many people.
8) Even rare illnesses were invoked in many of the vaccinated.
9) Rare heart problems have been established as the adverse side effects on youngsters.
10) There are still many things we don’t know about these vaccines but the government is rushing in to get mass inoculation of these experimental vaccines.
11) It is quite an established fact no matter how we get vaccinated, we will not get herd immunity but going into endemic.
12) The efficacy of these vaccines in preventing infections are put into great doubt and according to data statistical analysis, is almost zero in Singapore’s context.
13) Vaccination will not prevent infection nor transmission.
14) It may help to reduce serious illness from infection but the rate of serious illness for unvaccinated is actually at 10% in SG. Cutting down to 5% by vaccination doesn’t seem to justify the risk of vaccination itself.
By Goh Meng Seng, at TRE.
From TRE, by Foong Swee Fong:
ReplyDeleteThe ST headline boldly reads, “Study of 29,000 people quarantined in Singapore shows Covid-19 vaccines can prevent infection and severe illness”.
However, the report does not tally with what is happening on the ground.
I have been tabulating the daily cases of infection as published on MOH’s website since 1 May 2021, breaking down each case into age, sex, unvaccinated and vaccinated. With the data, I have calculated the infection or attack rates of the virus in the unvaccinated and vaccinated populations of Singapore, and thereby the efficacy of the vaccine.
The average efficacy has been zero to negative.
The efficacy of a vaccine is calculated by comparing the infection rates in the unvaccinated and vaccinated populations. If the infection in the former is 10% while the latter is free from infection, then the vaccine is 100% effective. Conversely, if the infection rate is 10% in both populations, then there is no difference whether one is vaccinated or not, ie, the efficacy of the vaccine is zero. If the infection rate is 10% in the unvaccinated population and 5% in the vaccinated, then the efficacy is 50%.
It is common to confuse infection rate with efficacy. The former depends on the transmissibility of the virus, the number of community cases, effective implementation of preventive measures like safe distancing, mask wearing, early contact tracing and isolation as well as vaccination. Currently, the infection rate in Malaysia is much higher than in Singapore due to higher community cases and perhaps less effective implementation of preventive measures. So, even if the vaccine used and vaccination rate were the same in both countries, the infection rate can be different. However, the efficacy of the vaccine should be the same. Although the infection rate may be higher in Malaysia, it rises proportionately in both the unvaccinated and vaccinated populations, so that the ratio, which essentially is the efficacy rate, remains the same.
It is important to note that efficacy cannot be taken in isolation. There have been 222 breakthrough cases, which are infections despite vaccination, between 1st May 2021 and 18 June 2021. It is a grave mistake to dismiss these as the unlucky 5% given that the efficacy is 95% as claimed by Pfizer. One has to ask, 222 infections compared to what? Ideally, a similarly profiled population which is not vaccinated. Without comparison, one is just taking for granted that the vaccine is effective. That is why politicians and experts who say that the higher the vaccination rate, the lower will be the infections are assuming that the vaccine is effective; they should check that the vaccine is indeed effective in real life before making such statements. If the vaccines are 0% effective, vaccination will not help.
Dr Gabriel Oon, retired oncologist who is a pioneer in liver cancer research here and who played a key role in Singapore’s hepatitis B vaccination program, said recently that Pfizer is useless against the new variants. His observation has been borne out by real life data supplied by MOH. In total, there have been 751 infections between 1 May 2020 and 18 June 2021, which is way more than the 150 or so in the Pfizer trial. The efficacy rate has become more consistent with more data from each passing day, which has been stuck at zero to negative.
The ST article says a local study of 29,000 people who are quarantined shows that effectiveness of the vaccine is 79.1%. However, real life data points to zero to negative. I invite everyone who is reading this post to send me a note on Messenger for an Excel copy of my data and calculations to verify. If indeed the efficacy of the vaccine is zero to negative, we should stop it immediately.